If you're planning on undertaking a massive Nordic friction and studded winter tyre test, having the right facilities to conduct the test in is key. Fortunately for Test World, they own one of the best independent arctic testing facilities in the world which is why we're super excited to see this 21 tyre test, covering all the key friction studless and studded winter tyres on the market.
All tyres are in the popular 205/55 R16, and were tested using a VW Golf. There were some interesting new tyres in the test, including the first test of the studless Michelin X-Ice Snow.
Many of the premium brands included have both studless friction and studded winter tyres in the test, which is why you'll see them twice in the data, so as you're going through the results looking at your favourite tyre make sure you're looking at the right version of it.
Overall, the usual contenders in the winter segment came out top. Continental, who dominate the European winter tyre tests, joint won the test alongside Michelin.
The studded Continental IceContact 3 proved to have an excellent all round ability, with no huge weakness for a studded tyre, and the new studded Michelin X-Ice North 4 dominated on ice, and performed well in nearly all other criteria, showing only a slight weakness during wet handling testing.
Winter specialists Nokian aren't having the best time in the European winter segment at the moment, but they'll be happy with third place for their studded Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 tyre, and even happier as the winning studless friction tyre on test being awarded to the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3.
One other interesting point for European readers, you'll notice some of the best tyres in the dry and wet are rated as some of the worst tyres overall in this test. This serves as a nice reminder that friction and studded tyres are tyres designed for climates that see extreme winters, which mean snow and ice on the ground for many months constantly. None of these tyres are suitable for a central European winter, where dry and wet is the dominant weather, so don't try fitting them in climates like the UK.
Dry
In the dry the budget Petlas Glacier W661 narrowly beat the Michelin X-Ice North 4. Sadly there was no objective dry handling data, the subjective data can be found in the overall results below.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 29.5 m | Best | |
| 29.9 m | +0.40 m | |
| 30 m | +0.50 m |
Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 29 m | Best | |
| 29.4 m | +0.40 m | |
| 29.8 m | +0.80 m | |
| 30 m | +1.00 m | |
| 30.2 m | +1.20 m | |
| 30.3 m | +1.30 m | |
| 30.3 m | +1.30 m | |
| 30.7 m | +1.70 m | |
| 31.2 m | +2.20 m | |
| 31.3 m | +2.30 m | |
| 31.7 m | +2.70 m | |
| 32.1 m | +3.10 m |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 29.3 m | Best | |
| 29.9 m | +0.60 m | |
| 30 m | +0.70 m | |
| 30.6 m | +1.30 m | |
| 31.5 m | +2.20 m |
The difference between best and worst was 10.7% (3.1 m ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths).
Wet
The Petlas also proved best during wet testing, winning wet braking and wet handling.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 32.5 m | Best | |
| 37.3 m | +4.80 m | |
| 40.4 m | +7.90 m |
Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 29.7 m | Best | |
| 36.5 m | +6.80 m | |
| 36.6 m | +6.90 m | |
| 37.1 m | +7.40 m | |
| 38.2 m | +8.50 m | |
| 38.5 m | +8.80 m | |
| 38.5 m | +8.80 m | |
| 38.6 m | +8.90 m | |
| 38.6 m | +8.90 m | |
| 38.7 m | +9.00 m | |
| 39.1 m | +9.40 m | |
| 39.3 m | +9.60 m |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 33.4 m | Best | |
| 34.8 m | +1.40 m | |
| 35.9 m | +2.50 m | |
| 36.6 m | +3.20 m | |
| 37.4 m | +4.00 m |
The difference between best and worst was 36% (10.7 m ≈ 2.4 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 34.9 s | Best | |
| 35.2 s | +0.30 s | |
| 35.3 s | +0.40 s |
Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 33.7 s | Best | |
| 34.1 s | +0.40 s | |
| 34.5 s | +0.80 s | |
| 34.5 s | +0.80 s | |
| 34.6 s | +0.90 s | |
| 34.7 s | +1.00 s | |
| 34.7 s | +1.00 s | |
| 34.8 s | +1.10 s | |
| 34.8 s | +1.10 s | |
| 35 s | +1.30 s | |
| 35 s | +1.30 s | |
| 35.2 s | +1.50 s |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 34.8 s | Best | |
| 34.9 s | +0.10 s | |
| 35.1 s | +0.30 s | |
| 35.2 s | +0.40 s | |
| 35.4 s | +0.60 s |
The difference between best and worst was 5% (1.7 s).
Snow
Colder testing reversed the fortunes of the Petlas tyre, finishing at the back of the pack in all the snow and ice testing.
Continental dominated snow braking, taking first place with the studless VikingContact and second place with the studded IceContact 3
Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 50.9 m | Best | |
| 51.4 m | +0.50 m | |
| 53.6 m | +2.70 m |
Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 50.2 m | Best | |
| 50.4 m | +0.20 m | |
| 50.6 m | +0.40 m | |
| 50.9 m | +0.70 m | |
| 51 m | +0.80 m | |
| 51.2 m | +1.00 m | |
| 51.2 m | +1.00 m | |
| 51.8 m | +1.60 m | |
| 51.9 m | +1.70 m | |
| 52 m | +1.80 m | |
| 52 m | +1.80 m | |
| 53.2 m | +3.00 m |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 50.4 m | Best | |
| 50.6 m | +0.20 m | |
| 50.7 m | +0.30 m | |
| 50.7 m | +0.30 m | |
| 51.5 m | +1.10 m |
The difference between best and worst was 6.8% (3.4 m ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths).
Continental again took the top two spots during snow traction testing, this time with the studded tyre ahead of the studless.
Snow Traction
Snow acceleration time
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 s | Best | |
| 6.2 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6.5 s | +0.40 s |
Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 s | Best | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6.1 s | +0.20 s | |
| 6.1 s | +0.20 s | |
| 6.1 s | +0.20 s | |
| 6.1 s | +0.20 s | |
| 6.2 s | +0.30 s | |
| 6.2 s | +0.30 s | |
| 6.2 s | +0.30 s |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 s | Best | |
| 5.9 s | Best | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6.1 s | +0.20 s |
The difference between best and worst was 10.2% (0.6 s).
Snow handling testing brought a little advantage to the studless tyres, with the VikingContact again proving best, and the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 finishing second.
Snow Handling
Snow handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48.7 s | Best | |
| 49.5 s | +0.80 s | |
| 53.2 s | +4.50 s |
Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48.3 s | Best | |
| 48.4 s | +0.10 s | |
| 48.7 s | +0.40 s | |
| 48.8 s | +0.50 s | |
| 49.1 s | +0.80 s | |
| 49.3 s | +1.00 s | |
| 49.4 s | +1.10 s | |
| 49.6 s | +1.30 s | |
| 49.8 s | +1.50 s | |
| 50 s | +1.70 s | |
| 50.8 s | +2.50 s | |
| 50.9 s | +2.60 s |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48.8 s | Best | |
| 48.8 s | Best | |
| 49 s | +0.20 s | |
| 49 s | +0.20 s | |
| 49.3 s | +0.50 s |
The difference between best and worst was 10.1% (4.9 s).
Ice
Ice testing naturally brings the advantage back to studded tyres, with the Michelin X-Ice North 4 matching the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 as the best during ice braking.
Ice Braking
Ice braking in meters
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 39.7 m | Best | |
| 45 m | +5.30 m | |
| 54.6 m | +14.90 m |
Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 42.5 m | Best | |
| 42.7 m | +0.20 m | |
| 43.2 m | +0.70 m | |
| 43.2 m | +0.70 m | |
| 43.4 m | +0.90 m | |
| 43.5 m | +1.00 m | |
| 44 m | +1.50 m | |
| 45.9 m | +3.40 m | |
| 47.3 m | +4.80 m | |
| 47.5 m | +5.00 m | |
| 48.1 m | +5.60 m | |
| 50.5 m | +8.00 m |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 37.8 m | Best | |
| 37.8 m | Best | |
| 38.9 m | +1.10 m | |
| 39.7 m | +1.90 m | |
| 41.7 m | +3.90 m |
The difference between best and worst was 44.4% (16.8 m ≈ 3.7 Car Lengths).
Michelin, Continental and Nokian also took the top three sports during ice traction.
Ice Traction
Ice acceleration time
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 s | Best | |
| 5.6 s | +1.70 s | |
| 5.7 s | +1.80 s |
Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 s | Best | |
| 5.4 s | +0.10 s | |
| 5.5 s | +0.20 s | |
| 5.5 s | +0.20 s | |
| 5.6 s | +0.30 s | |
| 5.7 s | +0.40 s | |
| 5.9 s | +0.60 s | |
| 5.9 s | +0.60 s | |
| 6.2 s | +0.90 s | |
| 6.5 s | +1.20 s | |
| 6.6 s | +1.30 s | |
| 6.9 s | +1.60 s |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7 s | Best | |
| 3.8 s | +0.10 s | |
| 3.8 s | +0.10 s | |
| 3.9 s | +0.20 s | |
| 4 s | +0.30 s |
The difference between best and worst was 86.5% (3.2 s).
Michelin rounded out the ice testing with anoher win for the X Ice North 4.
Ice Handling
Ice handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 61.8 s | Best | |
| 62 s | +0.20 s | |
| 72 s | +10.20 s |
Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 60.7 s | Best | |
| 60.8 s | +0.10 s | |
| 61 s | +0.30 s | |
| 61 s | +0.30 s | |
| 61.2 s | +0.50 s | |
| 61.5 s | +0.80 s | |
| 61.7 s | +1.00 s | |
| 63.3 s | +2.60 s | |
| 64 s | +3.30 s | |
| 65.1 s | +4.40 s | |
| 67.3 s | +6.60 s | |
| 70.8 s | +10.10 s |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 57.3 s | Best | |
| 58.6 s | +1.30 s | |
| 58.8 s | +1.50 s | |
| 60.2 s | +2.90 s | |
| 61.6 s | +4.30 s |
The difference between best and worst was 25.7% (14.7 s).
Environment
The tyres were rated subjectively for noise, with seven of the tyres on test finishing joint top.
Subj. Noise
Subjective in car noise levels
Higher is better ↑Central European Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points |
Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points |
Studded Winter Tyres
| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 33.3% (3 Points).
Rolling resistance scores were based on the best tyre (Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3) being set at zero, then other the tyres ratings being how much more fuel they would use represented as a percentage.
Results
Central European Winter Tyres
Linglong Green Max Winter Grip 2
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 29.5 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 37.3 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.9 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 50.9 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.2 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.5 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 39.7 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 3.9 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61.8 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 7 Points |
Linglong Winter Unicorn
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 29.9 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 40.4 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35.3 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 51.4 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.1 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.7 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 45 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.7 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 62 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Sunny SN3860
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 30 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 32.5 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35.2 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 53.6 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.5 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 53.2 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 5 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 54.6 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.6 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 72 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 5 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 7 Points |
Nordic Friction Winter Tyres
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 29.4 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 37.1 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.5 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 51.2 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.1 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.4 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 42.5 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.4 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 60.8 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Continental VikingContact 7
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 30.3 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 38.5 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.7 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 50.2 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 5.9 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.3 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 43.2 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.5 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Michelin X Ice Snow
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 31.2 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 38.6 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 50.4 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.7 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 42.7 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.3 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 8 Points |
Pirelli Ice Zero FR
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 30 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 39.3 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.8 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 51 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.4 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 44 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.6 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 60.7 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 30.7 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 36.5 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.1 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 50.6 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.1 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.8 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 43.2 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.5 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 63.3 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 8 Points |
Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 30.3 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 38.5 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.5 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 51.2 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.1 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.1 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 43.5 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.9 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 64 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 8 Points |
Sava Eskimo Ice
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 32.1 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 38.6 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.6 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 52 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.6 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 43.4 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.7 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61.7 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Bridgestone Blizzak Ice
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 30.2 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 38.7 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 52 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.2 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 50.8 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 45.9 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.9 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61.2 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Nankang Ice Activa 2
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 31.7 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 38.2 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.7 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 51.9 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.8 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 47.5 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 6.2 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61.5 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Nexen Winguard Ice+ WH43
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 31.3 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 39.1 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35.2 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 51.8 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.1 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 50 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 47.3 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 6.9 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 65.1 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 8 Points |
Petlas Glacier W661
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 29 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 10 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 29.7 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 33.7 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 53.2 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.2 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 50.9 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 50.5 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 6.6 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 70.8 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 4 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 8 Points |
Toyo OBSERVE GSI 6 HP
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 29.8 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 36.6 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.8 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 50.9 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.2 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.3 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 48.1 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 6.5 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 67.3 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 5 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 8 Points |
Studded Winter Tyres
Michelin X Ice North 4
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 29.3 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 35.9 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35.4 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 50.6 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 37.8 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 3.7 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 57.3 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 10 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 6 Points |
Continental IceContact 3
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 29.9 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 33.4 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.9 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 50.4 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 5.9 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.8 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 38.9 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 3.8 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 60.2 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 7 Points |
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 30 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 36.6 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35.1 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 50.7 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 37.8 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 3.8 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 58.8 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 6 Points |
Bridgestone Noranza 001
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 31.5 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 37.4 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35.2 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 51.5 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 5.9 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.8 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 39.7 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 3.9 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 58.6 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 6 Points |
Hankook Winter i pike RS2
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 30.6 m |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 34.8 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.8 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 50.7 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.1 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.3 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 41.7 m |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 4 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61.6 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 6 Points |

Thank you for adding this to your impressive data library. But there is no mention, or link, as to who commissioned this test, only that it was conducted at the Test World facility in Finland?
I believe it was a test run by test world themselves
Thanks for the prompt response.
Would love to see the Michelin CrossClimate Plus and the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 tested on ice against these since, year round, ice always comes first, during and after the snow. I consider that ice performance on an All Season or Winter tyre is the most important safety item because, unlike the snow, you can't really see the ice most of the times, either day or night. You can only feel it, which can be, sometimes, too late, depending on the tyres you have...
All season tyres don't usually get put through extreme winter testing, as the climates they're suitable for don't really see that kind of weather. When you get to lots of ice on the road, it's a winter market.
That said, Auto Bild sometimes include ice testing in their tests which an be found here
So far, I noticed that ADAC is the only tester that tests ice performance on All Season tyres. On Winter tyres, and on the past 3 years, I just found ice testing at ADAC (studless tyres), Auto Center (2017 and 2019 - studded tyres), Vi Bilagare (2018 and 2019 - studded tyres), Auto Centrum - AC (2017 - studless), and you (Tyre Reviews in 2019 - with a fantastic cross range of tyres and videos - congratulations!). We could extrapolate the results for the Crossclimate Plus and the Bridgestone WC A005 but it would be better to have them both properly ice tested against winter and studded tyres just to have an idea of how much can they replace a winter tyre in a not so harsh winter climate.