Hankook Ventus S1 evo - Test Results

Test Statistics

15

Tests Completed

4^th

Average Position

1^st

Best Result

10^th

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Across 15 tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo delivers consistently strong overall performance (avg. 4.1), frequently contending for wins in UHP-focused comparisons. It shows balanced capability with notable highlights in dry handling and wet performance in several demanding tests, translating to multiple overall victories and podiums. However, results vary by size and test emphasis: while dynamic grip and braking can be excellent, aquaplaning resistance and occasional wet consistency gaps prevent universal dominance.

The tyre's best showings cluster in premium-brand and UHP tests (2011-2012) where it scores wins or top-three finishes, backed by strong subjective handling. Later large-diameter tests reveal weaknesses in straight-line aquaplaning and some wet metrics, indicating sensitivity to size and test conditions. Overall, it's a high-performing, well-rounded UHP tyre with standout dry and wet handling, tempered by aquaplaning variability.

Performance Strengths

Dry Performance Strong Details
• Joint 1st in dry (subjective) and 3rd fastest dry lap in 2012 EVO Max Performance (2/10 overall)
• Overall win with strong dry results in 2011 Autobild Max Performance (1/10)
• Competitive dry handling: 2nd place dry handling (+0.4% from best) in 2018 Auto Bild 20"
• Praised for very good dry handling/braking in 2010 AMS Premium Brand Test (1/10)
Wet Performance (Handling/Braking) Strong Details
• Won wet performance tests in 2010 Sport Auto UHP (3/11 overall)
• Traded top places in wet handling/braking in 2015 Auto Bild Performance (1/7 overall)
• Very good wet handling/braking noted in 2010 AMS Premium Brand Test (1/10)
Overall Competitiveness/Awards Strong Details
• Overall wins in 2011 Autobild Max Performance (1/10) and 2010 AMS Premium Brand (1/10)
• Multiple podiums: 2012 EVO Max Performance (2/10), 2011 Autoreview (3/9), 2010 Sport Auto (3/11), 2010 Auto Bild UHP (3/6)
Value vs. Performance Moderate Details
• Strong overall performance despite being second cheapest in 2010 Auto Bild UHP (3/6)
• Consistently competitive finishes across diverse tests and sizes
Rolling Resistance/Noise (Secondary) Minor Details
• 2018 Auto Bild 20": Rolling resistance 3/8 (+2.5% from best), Noise mid-pack (5/8, +1.2% from best)
• 2010 AMS notes low road noise

Performance Weaknesses

Aquaplaning Resistance Strong Details
• Straight aquaplaning 8/8 (+10.2% from best) in 2018 Auto Bild 20"
• 2010 Auto Express: beat P Zero overall due to Pirelli's poor aquaplaning, implying Hankook was not class-leading
Wet Consistency Across Sizes Moderate Details
• 2010 ADAC/TCS/AMTC: "Strong in dry, slightly weak wet" (8/16 overall)
• 2018 Auto Bild 20": Wet handling 5/8 (+2% from best) and wet braking 3/8 (+4.6% from best) show mid-pack variability
Result Variability/Test Sensitivity Moderate Details
• Bottom result 10/10 in 2011 Auto Express UHP
• Lower-tier finishes in 2010 EVO FWD (8/9) and 2012 Auto Bild 20" (5/8)
Dry Braking (Large Sizes) Minor Details
• 2018 Auto Bild 20": Dry braking 5/8 (+4.7% from best) despite excellent dry handling
• Some tests highlight handling strength over pure braking metrics

Performance Over Time

Test History

of 8

2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test

2018
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Strong:
Dry Handling

Weak:
Straight Aqua

Menu