Menu

Test source Auto Bild

2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test

Overall test winnerMichelin Pilot Alpin 5

Moving on from the 51 set braking test, the full Auto Bild winter tyre test is once again, excellent.

Data analyzed and reviewed byJonathan Benson
15 min read
Tyre shortlist Read the test
2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test
225/40 R18 / 2025 View full image
2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test
Tyres tested
20
Tested size
225/40 R18
Test vehicle
BMW M135i
Disciplines
16

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

20 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

+The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is the most even-handed tyre in the test. It stops shortest on dry roads and second shortest in the wet, is second fastest through the dry handling course, is top three on both wet handling tracks and shares the quickest snow handling time. It is also joint quietest on the noise test.

−It is the most expensive tyre to buy and, with only average wear, one of the dearest per kilometre. Aquaplaning resistance, both straight and in bends, is in the lower half of the field, and it is behind the snow specialists for traction and in the slalom.

Read full verdict
33 owner reviews Test Results
2nd

Dunlop Winter

+The Dunlop Winter is one of the strongest tyres on snow, top four for braking, traction and the slalom, and it shares the third-shortest wet stop. It also shares the top comfort rating, is one of the quietest tyres measured and has the fifth-highest predicted mileage.

−Dry braking is only mid-field and it is in the bottom half for dry handling. Its lap times on both wet handling tracks are in the bottom half too, and straight-line aquaplaning resistance is one of the weaker results.

Read full verdict
2 owner reviews Test Results
Joint3rd

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

+The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 is the fastest tyre through the dry handling course, with the sporty, precise feel that high lateral grip brings, and it shares the highest predicted mileage in the test. It is also joint fifth for snow braking and in the top five for straight-line aquaplaning.

−Wet performance is only mid-field, with braking and both wet handling times around the middle of the order, and it is one of the louder tyres on the noise test. Snow traction is below average.

Read full verdict
9 owner reviews Test Results
Joint3rd

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

+The Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus shares third place at a much lower price than the tyres around it. It is in the top five for wet braking, fourth in both wet handling and snow handling, stays around mid-field or better in every grip test, and carries a high speed rating for a winter tyre.

−Ride comfort shares the lowest rating in the test and predicted wear is in the bottom five. It is also a little slow through the dry handling course.

6 owner reviews Test Results
5th

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

+The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 is the best tyre in the wet. It stops shortest, is fastest on the wet circle, second fastest round the wet handling track and second best for aquaplaning in bends. It also shares the highest predicted mileage in the test.

−It is weaker on dry roads, with braking in the bottom half, and only mid-field or below on snow, where its traction is among the lowest. Rolling resistance is the third highest in the test.

Read full verdict
15 owner reviews Test Results
6th

Hankook Winter i cept evo3

+The Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 is the best tyre for aquaplaning in bends and third best in a straight line. It is strong on snow, third fastest through the snow handling course and top six for traction and the slalom, and it wears well, which makes it one of the better-value tyres per kilometre.

−Wet braking is only mid-pack and its time on the wet circle is in the bottom five.

Read full verdict
23 owner reviews Test Results
7th

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

+The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P has the second-lowest rolling resistance in the test, is fourth for dry braking and third fastest through the dry handling course. It also shares the top comfort rating, is joint fifth for snow braking and third best for aquaplaning in bends.

−Wet braking and wet handling are both in the bottom half, which is where it loses ground to the leaders. It is also one of the more expensive tyres to run per kilometre.

Read full verdict
33 owner reviews Test Results
Joint8th

Barum Polaris 6

+The Barum Polaris 6 has the lowest rolling resistance in the test, is one of the quietest tyres and one of the cheapest to buy, which makes it third best per kilometre. Dry handling and snow braking are both around the middle of the field.

−It is weak against aquaplaning, second from last in a straight line and in the bottom five in bends, and its wet braking and handling are mid-field at best. Dry braking is in the bottom five.

Read full verdict
6 owner reviews Test Results
Joint8th

Uniroyal WinterExpert

+The Uniroyal WinterExpert has the third-lowest rolling resistance in the test, the sixth-shortest wet stop and the sixth-fastest time through the dry handling course. It is also good value per kilometre.

−Snow is its weaker side, with braking, traction, handling and the slalom all in the bottom half, and dry braking is below average too. Ride comfort shares the lowest rating and it is one of the noisier tyres.

Read full verdict
7 owner reviews Test Results
10th

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2

+The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 is the fastest tyre round the wet handling track and second fastest on the wet circle, and it is fifth for dry braking and snow handling. It also shares the top comfort rating.

−Dry handling is imprecise and third from last in the test, and snow traction and braking are both in the bottom half. It is one of the more expensive tyres to buy and to run, and Pirelli has since replaced it with the Cinturato Winter 3.

Read full verdict
3 owner reviews Test Results
11th

Semperit Speed Grip 5

+The Semperit Speed-Grip 5 is fifth fastest through the dry handling course, has the fourth-lowest rolling resistance and is solid on wet roads, with braking and handling in the top half and good aquaplaning resistance.

−Snow is its weak point, especially cornering, with braking and handling both third from last. It is the loudest tyre measured, shares the lowest comfort rating and its predicted wear is in the bottom four.

Read full verdict
3 owner reviews Test Results
12th

BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

+The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is one of the two best snow tyres in the test: it shares the quickest snow handling and slalom times, is second for snow braking and traction, and resists straight-line aquaplaning better than any other tyre.

−The snow focus costs it elsewhere. Wet braking and both wet handling times are in the bottom five, and it is slow through the dry handling course, with dry braking only mid-field.

Read full verdict
30 owner reviews Test Results
13th

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

+The Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus has good lateral grip in the wet, fifth fastest on the wet circle and sixth on the wet handling track.

−Dry braking is among the longest in the test and its predicted wear is the second lowest, which makes it one of the most expensive tyres per kilometre. Rolling resistance is the second highest, it is one of the louder tyres, and its snow results and wet braking are in the bottom half.

3 owner reviews Test Results
14th

Kleber Krisalp HP3

+The Kleber Krisalp HP3 stops shortest on snow, has the most traction there and shares the best slalom result. It is also second best for straight-line aquaplaning and sixth for aquaplaning in bends.

−It has the longest dry braking distance in the test and is second slowest through the dry handling course. Wet braking is the third longest, and ride comfort shares the lowest rating.

Read full verdict
36 owner reviews Test Results
15th

Ceat WinterDrive

+The Ceat WinterDrive is the cheapest tyre per kilometre in the test, combining a low price with the joint third-highest predicted mileage. It is third shortest for dry braking, sixth for snow traction and one of the quieter tyres.

−Wet roads are the weak point. It shares the longest wet stop, is slowest round the wet handling track, second slowest on the wet circle and in the bottom five for aquaplaning, both straight and in bends. Rolling resistance is on the high side too.

Read full verdict
Read owner reviews Test Results
Joint16th

Firestone Winterhawk 4

+The Firestone Winterhawk 4 has the third-highest snow traction in the test and the fifth-lowest rolling resistance. Its wet braking and wet handling are around the middle of the field, and it is reasonable value per kilometre.

−Dry handling feels spongy and is the slowest in the test, and its dry braking distance is the second longest.

Read full verdict
6 owner reviews Test Results
Joint16th

Toyo Observe EWS1

+The Toyo Observe EWS1 is strong on asphalt: second shortest for dry braking, joint third for wet braking, and in the top five on both wet handling tracks and for aquaplaning in bends. It also wears well and is good value per kilometre.

−Snow is a serious weakness. It is last for snow braking, snow handling and the slalom and third from last for traction, and it is the second loudest tyre measured.

Read full verdict
2 owner reviews Test Results
18th

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

+The Fulda Kristall Control HP2 is good on snow, with the third-best slalom result, joint fifth place for snow braking and seventh for traction. It also shares the top comfort rating and is fourth best for aquaplaning in bends.

−Wet roads are its weak point: it shares the longest wet stop, is slowest on the wet circle and second slowest round the wet handling track. Dry braking is also among the longest and predicted wear is in the bottom four.

Read full verdict
12 owner reviews Test Results
19th

Linglong Sport Master Winter

+The Linglong Sport Master Winter is the cheapest tyre in the test and second best per kilometre. On dry roads it is in the top seven for both braking and handling.

−It has the highest rolling resistance in the test, is second from last for snow traction and last for aquaplaning in bends. It is in the bottom four on both wet handling tracks, and its snow braking and handling are in the bottom half.

Read full verdict
4 owner reviews Test Results
20th

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

+The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro is fourth fastest through the dry handling course and sixth on the wet circle. It also shares the top comfort rating and is joint quietest on the noise test.

−It is near the bottom on snow, last for traction and second from last for braking, handling and the slalom, and it is last for straight-line aquaplaning. Its predicted wear is the lowest in the test by a wide margin, which makes it the most expensive tyre per kilometre.

Read full verdict
4 owner reviews Test Results

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18

TyreMichelin Pilot Alpin 5Dunlop WinterBridgestone Blizzak 6Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3Hankook Winter i cept evo3Continental WinterContact TS 870 PBarum Polaris 6Uniroyal WinterExpertPirelli Cinturato Winter 2Semperit Speed Grip 5BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2Vredestein Wintrac Pro+Kleber Krisalp HP3Ceat WinterDriveFirestone Winterhawk 4Toyo Observe EWS1Fulda Kristall Control HP2Linglong Sport Master WinterFalken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
Position1st2ndJoint 3rdJoint 3rd5th6th7thJoint 8thJoint 8th10th11th12th13th14th15thJoint 16thJoint 16th18th19th20th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry99.9%95.7%97.4%96.8%95.7%97.2%98.6%95.5%96%97.1%95.9%95.6%94.3%93.5%98%93.4%98.7%94.3%97.5%97.4%
Wet97.5%95.6%95.1%96.6%99.6%95.2%95%93.3%95.5%96.5%95.5%93.9%93.7%94.3%91.4%94.5%97.8%92.6%92.3%93.5%
Snow96.5%98.5%96.5%96.6%94.9%97.7%97.3%94.9%94%94.6%93.9%99.7%94.6%99.7%96.3%97%90.2%97.5%93.3%91.1%
Comfort95.6%99.8%94.3%91.3%95.2%94.6%99.3%95.5%90.6%99.5%90%94.6%90.5%90.7%95.2%94.6%94.1%98.7%94.9%100%
Value79.9%87.8%87.2%83.7%85.6%89.1%82.5%90.9%88.4%79.9%82.8%81.6%71.2%81.3%94.1%84.2%87.6%81.9%84.5%67.8%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Moving on from the 51 set braking test, the full Auto Bild winter tyre test is once again, excellent. Testing 225/40 R18 using an AWD BMW M135i (but also fitted to the Audi S3, VW Golf GTI and R, Mercedes-AMG A35, and Hyundai i30 N and more) Auto Bild have once again put all the tyres through snow, wet and dry testing, and tested wear, noise, comfort and rolling resistance.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h

The test revealed a clear dominance of established manufacturers and their secondary brands among top performers. Michelin secured first place with the Pilot Alpin 5, while its secondary brands BF Goodrich and Kleber achieved notable success in snow-specific disciplines, often outperforming the premium parent product in individual snow tests. Kumho emerged as a surprising success story, placing fourth overall and earning recognition as a price-performance winner.

The test identified a fundamental development challenge in winter tyre design: the inherent conflict between snow performance and wet/dry capabilities. BF Goodrich and Kleber exemplified this trade-off, achieving the shortest snow braking distances in the entire test (27.1 and 27.3 meters respectively) but struggling with extended wet braking distances (36.0 and 36.2 meters). Conversely, Goodyear established itself as the rain specialist with excellent wet performance across all disciplines but slightly compromised snow capability. This pattern highlights that truly balanced winter tyres require significant development resources and experience.

Unexpected Weaknesses in Premium Products

Several premium manufacturers delivered surprisingly inconsistent results. Continental's WinterContact TS 870 P, Hankook's Winter i*Cept evo3, and Vredestein's Wintrac Pro+ all showed extended wet braking distances despite their premium positioning and typically well-rounded product portfolios. Pirelli's Cinturato Winter 2 achieved strong wet performance but suffered notably imprecise dry handling, an unusual weakness for Pirelli.

Toyo's Observe Winter Sport 1 and Falken's Eurowinter HS02 Pro also performed below expectations, with extended braking distances across multiple conditions and, in Falken's case, the lowest projected mileage in the test. 

Consistent Performers

Michelin's Pilot Alpin 5 demonstrated the most balanced performance profile, achieving what testers described as the "golden middle" across all road conditions. It never claimed the absolute best result in any single discipline but maintained consistently strong performance in every test, justifying its premium pricing through reliability rather than singular excellence. Bridgestone's Blizzak 6 and Goodyear's UltraGrip Performance 3 both delivered consistent competence across their respective focuses—Bridgestone leaning toward dry handling and longevity, Goodyear dominating wet performance—while achieving the highest projected mileage of 53,000 kilometers.

Reference Summer Tyre Performance

AUTO BILD included a reference summer tyre in all testing disciplines to provide performance context. The results clearly illustrated the fundamental differences between tyre categories. On snow, the summer tyre was essentially non-functional, requiring 51.1 meters to stop from 50 km/h compared to 27-30 meters for winter tyres, and recording such poor handling performance that it was rated "not drivable" in the snow handling test. However, the summer tyre demonstrated its intended superiority in dry conditions, stopping from 100 km/h in just 37.8 meters—nearly 5 meters shorter than the best winter tyre (Michelin at 42.6 meters).

In wet conditions, the comparison proved more nuanced. The summer tyre achieved a 47.8-meter braking distance from 100 km/h, outperforming all winter tyres (best winter: Goodyear at 50.9 meters.) The summer tyre also completed the wet handling course at 83.8 km/h compared to the best winter tyre (Pirelli at 84.4 km/h), showing minimal difference in this discipline. This data reinforces why enthusiastic drivers of compact sports cars continue to maintain seasonal tyre changes despite the convenience of all-season alternatives—summer tyres provide measurably better performance and precision during warmer months.

Cost Analysis and Longevity

The test conducted wear simulation to project real-world mileage, revealing significant differences in long-term value. Bridgestone and Goodyear led with 53,000-kilometer projections, while Falken managed only 33,920 kilometers—a difference of nearly 20,000 kilometers that dramatically affects cost per kilometer. When purchase price was factored against projected mileage, Ceat emerged as the value leader at €7.32 per 1,000 kilometers despite modest purchase pricing, while Falken became the most expensive at €15.04 per 1,000 kilometers due to rapid wear. This proved that premium-priced tyres with high mileage can offer better value than cheap tyres that wear quickly.

Safety Implications of Budget Tyres

The deliberate inclusion of an anonymous budget tyre provided evidence of the safety risks associated with extremely low-priced products. While achieving acceptable snow braking (28.6 meters), this tyre became progressively dangerous in other conditions. Its 70.5-meter wet braking distance from 100 km/h represented a 13.2-meter disadvantage versus the best performer—equivalent to nearly three car lengths and potentially the difference between collision avoidance and impact. The dry braking distance of 46.5 meters and wet handling speed of just 72.1 km/h (versus 84.4 km/h for Pirelli) further demonstrated comprehensive performance deficiencies. The testers concluded explicitly that "cheap no-name tyres are a real danger in traffic," providing quantitative justification for this warning.

Dry

Michelin leads the dry braking results with the shortest stopping distance of 42.6 meters from 100 km/h, though even this best performer stands 4.8 meters behind the reference summer tyre, demonstrating the fundamental trade-off winter tyres make with their softer compounds and more aggressive tread patterns optimized for cold conditions.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
 37.8 m -4.80 m 0 km/h
1Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
 42.6 m Best 0 km/h
2Toyo Observe EWS1
 42.9 m +0.30 m 11 km/h
3Ceat WinterDrive
 43.5 m +0.90 m 19 km/h
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
 43.7 m +1.10 m 21 km/h
5Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
 44.1 m +1.50 m 24 km/h
6Linglong Sport Master Winter
 44.2 m +1.60 m 25 km/h
7Hankook Winter i cept evo3
 44.3 m +1.70 m 25 km/h
8Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
 44.5 m +1.90 m 27 km/h
9Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
 44.7 m +2.10 m 28 km/h
10Bridgestone Blizzak 6
 44.9 m +2.30 m 29 km/h
11Dunlop Winter
 45.5 m +2.90 m 33 km/h
12BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
 45.6 m +3.00 m 33 km/h
13Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
 45.7 m +3.10 m 34 km/h
14Uniroyal WinterExpert
 45.8 m +3.20 m 34 km/h
15Semperit Speed Grip 5
 45.9 m +3.30 m 35 km/h
16Barum Polaris 6
 46 m +3.40 m 35 km/h
RefReference Budget
 46.5 m +3.90 m 38 km/h
17Fulda Kristall Control HP2
 46.9 m +4.30 m 39 km/h
17Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
 46.9 m +4.30 m 39 km/h
19Firestone Winterhawk 4
 47.2 m +4.60 m 41 km/h
20Kleber Krisalp HP3
 47.3 m +4.70 m 41 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 25.1% (9.5 m ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 would still be travelling at 41 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Bridgestone claims top honors in dry handling with the most car-like precision and highest average speed through the test course, followed closely by Michelin and Continental, while the anonymous budget tyre trails significantly at 111.0 km/h compared to the leader's 116.9 km/h.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
 118 km/h +1.10 km/h
1Bridgestone Blizzak 6
 116.9 km/h Best
2Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
 116.7 km/h -0.20 km/h
3Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
 116.5 km/h -0.40 km/h
4Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
 116.4 km/h -0.50 km/h
5Semperit Speed Grip 5
 115.8 km/h -1.10 km/h
6Uniroyal WinterExpert
 115.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
7Linglong Sport Master Winter
 115.2 km/h -1.70 km/h
8Barum Polaris 6
 115.1 km/h -1.80 km/h
9Hankook Winter i cept evo3
 114.9 km/h -2.00 km/h
10Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
 114.8 km/h -2.10 km/h
11Toyo Observe EWS1
 114.7 km/h -2.20 km/h
11Ceat WinterDrive
 114.7 km/h -2.20 km/h
13Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
 114.5 km/h -2.40 km/h
14Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
 114.4 km/h -2.50 km/h
14Dunlop Winter
 114.4 km/h -2.50 km/h
14Fulda Kristall Control HP2
 114.4 km/h -2.50 km/h
17BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
 114.3 km/h -2.60 km/h
18Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
 114.1 km/h -2.80 km/h
19Kleber Krisalp HP3
 113.4 km/h -3.50 km/h
20Firestone Winterhawk 4
 112.8 km/h -4.10 km/h
RefReference Budget
 111 km/h -5.90 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.9% (7 Km/H).

Wet

Goodyear dominates wet braking with a 50.9-meter stopping distance, establishing itself as the rain specialist, while the anonymous budget tyre posts a catastrophic 70.5-meter result—a 19.6-meter disadvantage that could mean the difference between accident avoidance and collision.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
 47.8 m -3.10 m 0 km/h
1Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
 50.9 m Best 0 km/h
2Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
 51.9 m +1.00 m 18 km/h
3Toyo Observe EWS1
 52 m +1.10 m 19 km/h
3Dunlop Winter
 52 m +1.10 m 19 km/h
5Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
 52.3 m +1.40 m 21 km/h
6Uniroyal WinterExpert
 53.3 m +2.40 m 28 km/h
7Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
 53.9 m +3.00 m 31 km/h
8Firestone Winterhawk 4
 54.4 m +3.50 m 33 km/h
9Semperit Speed Grip 5
 54.5 m +3.60 m 33 km/h
10Bridgestone Blizzak 6
 54.7 m +3.80 m 34 km/h
11Barum Polaris 6
 54.8 m +3.90 m 35 km/h
12Hankook Winter i cept evo3
 55.6 m +4.70 m 38 km/h
12Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
 55.6 m +4.70 m 38 km/h
14Linglong Sport Master Winter
 55.8 m +4.90 m 39 km/h
15Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
 55.9 m +5.00 m 39 km/h
16Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
 56.3 m +5.40 m 40 km/h
16BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
 56.3 m +5.40 m 40 km/h
18Kleber Krisalp HP3
 56.6 m +5.70 m 41 km/h
19Ceat WinterDrive
 57.7 m +6.80 m 45 km/h
19Fulda Kristall Control HP2
 57.7 m +6.80 m 45 km/h
RefReference Budget
 70.5 m +19.60 m 69 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 47.5% (22.7 m ≈ 5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 would still be travelling at 45 km/h when the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Pirelli takes the wet handling victory with the highest average speed, marginally ahead of Goodyear which continues its wet-weather dominance, while the budget tyre again finishes last with handling speeds 12.3 km/h slower than the leader, demonstrating comprehensively compromised wet performance.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Position / TyreResultGap to best
1Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
 84.4 km/h Best
2Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
 83.9 km/h -0.50 km/h
RefReference Summer
 83.8 km/h -0.60 km/h
3Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
 83.4 km/h -1.00 km/h
4Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
 82.6 km/h -1.80 km/h
5Toyo Observe EWS1
 82.3 km/h -2.10 km/h
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
 82.2 km/h -2.20 km/h
7Semperit Speed Grip 5
 82.1 km/h -2.30 km/h
8Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
 81.6 km/h -2.80 km/h
8Hankook Winter i cept evo3
 81.6 km/h -2.80 km/h
10Firestone Winterhawk 4
 81.5 km/h -2.90 km/h
11Bridgestone Blizzak 6
 81.1 km/h -3.30 km/h
12Uniroyal WinterExpert
 81 km/h -3.40 km/h
13Kleber Krisalp HP3
 80.9 km/h -3.50 km/h
14Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
 80.8 km/h -3.60 km/h
14Barum Polaris 6
 80.8 km/h -3.60 km/h
16Dunlop Winter
 80.4 km/h -4.00 km/h
17BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
 80.3 km/h -4.10 km/h
18Linglong Sport Master Winter
 80.2 km/h -4.20 km/h
19Fulda Kristall Control HP2
 80.1 km/h -4.30 km/h
20Ceat WinterDrive
 79.8 km/h -4.60 km/h
RefReference Budget
 72.1 km/h -12.30 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 14.6% (12.3 Km/H).

The reference summer tyre demonstrates its superiority in lateral aquaplaning resistance, while among winter tyres Hankook leads with the highest lateral acceleration before losing grip, and the budget tyre again finishes last with less than half the performance of the leader.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Position / TyreResultGap to best
1BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
 77.3 km/h Best
RefReference Summer
 77 km/h -0.30 km/h
2Kleber Krisalp HP3
 76.9 km/h -0.40 km/h
3Hankook Winter i cept evo3
 76.5 km/h -0.80 km/h
4Bridgestone Blizzak 6
 76.4 km/h -0.90 km/h
4Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
 76.4 km/h -0.90 km/h
6Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
 76.3 km/h -1.00 km/h
6Semperit Speed Grip 5
 76.3 km/h -1.00 km/h
8Toyo Observe EWS1
 76 km/h -1.30 km/h
8Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
 76 km/h -1.30 km/h
10Firestone Winterhawk 4
 75.9 km/h -1.40 km/h
11Fulda Kristall Control HP2
 75.4 km/h -1.90 km/h
12Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
 75.2 km/h -2.10 km/h
13Uniroyal WinterExpert
 75 km/h -2.30 km/h
13Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
 75 km/h -2.30 km/h
15Dunlop Winter
 74.1 km/h -3.20 km/h
16Ceat WinterDrive
 71.9 km/h -5.40 km/h
17Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
 71.7 km/h -5.60 km/h
18Linglong Sport Master Winter
 71.6 km/h -5.70 km/h
19Barum Polaris 6
 71.4 km/h -5.90 km/h
20Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
 71.1 km/h -6.20 km/h
RefReference Budget
 64.5 km/h -12.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 16.6% (12.8 Km/H).

Snow

Kleber achieves the shortest snow braking distance at 27.1 meters, narrowly ahead of stablemate BF Goodrich at 27.3 meters—both Michelin secondary brands outperforming their premium parent—while the reference summer tyre requires 51.1 meters, nearly double the distance and effectively undrivable in winter conditions.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
1Kleber Krisalp HP3
 27.1 m Best 0 km/h
2BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
 27.3 m +0.20 m 11 km/h
3Dunlop Winter
 27.5 m +0.40 m 16 km/h
4Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
 27.8 m +0.70 m 21 km/h
5Fulda Kristall Control HP2
 28 m +0.90 m 23 km/h
5Bridgestone Blizzak 6
 28 m +0.90 m 23 km/h
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
 28 m +0.90 m 23 km/h
8Hankook Winter i cept evo3
 28.1 m +1.00 m 25 km/h
9Firestone Winterhawk 4
 28.2 m +1.10 m 26 km/h
9Barum Polaris 6
 28.2 m +1.10 m 26 km/h
9Ceat WinterDrive
 28.2 m +1.10 m 26 km/h
12Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
 28.3 m +1.20 m 27 km/h
13Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
 28.5 m +1.40 m 29 km/h
14Uniroyal WinterExpert
 28.6 m +1.50 m 30 km/h
RefReference Budget
 28.6 m +1.50 m 30 km/h
15Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
 28.7 m +1.60 m 31 km/h
15Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
 28.7 m +1.60 m 31 km/h
15Linglong Sport Master Winter
 28.7 m +1.60 m 31 km/h
18Semperit Speed Grip 5
 29 m +1.90 m 33 km/h
19Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
 29.5 m +2.40 m 37 km/h
20Toyo Observe EWS1
 29.7 m +2.60 m 38 km/h
RefReference Summer
 51.1 m +24.00 m 89 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 88.6% (24 m ≈ 5.3 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Toyo Observe EWS1 would still be travelling at 38 km/h when the Kleber Krisalp HP3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Kleber continues its snow dominance in the traction test with the highest measured force, again marginally ahead of BF Goodrich, demonstrating these two Michelin secondary brands' clear optimization for maximum snow grip, while the reference summer tyre produces only 248 Newtons compared to the leader's 2,619 Newtons.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Position / TyreResultGap to best
1Kleber Krisalp HP3
 2619 N Best
2BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
 2608 N -11.00 N
3Firestone Winterhawk 4
 2577 N -42.00 N
4Dunlop Winter
 2576 N -43.00 N
5Hankook Winter i cept evo3
 2560 N -59.00 N
6Ceat WinterDrive
 2547 N -72.00 N
7Fulda Kristall Control HP2
 2537 N -82.00 N
8Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
 2524 N -95.00 N
9Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
 2501 N -118.00 N
RefReference Budget
 2501 N -118.00 N
10Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
 2492 N -127.00 N
11Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
 2487 N -132.00 N
12Bridgestone Blizzak 6
 2483 N -136.00 N
13Barum Polaris 6
 2471 N -148.00 N
14Semperit Speed Grip 5
 2436 N -183.00 N
15Uniroyal WinterExpert
 2417 N -202.00 N
16Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
 2413 N -206.00 N
17Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
 2368 N -251.00 N
18Toyo Observe EWS1
 2354 N -265.00 N
19Linglong Sport Master Winter
 2341 N -278.00 N
20Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
 2314 N -305.00 N
RefReference Summer
 248 N -2,371.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 90.5% (2,371 N).

BF Goodrich and Michelin tie for the highest average speed through the snow handling course, though notably the top snow brakers Kleber and BF Goodrich don't maintain this advantage in handling where steering precision and feedback become as important as pure grip.

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Position / TyreResultGap to best
1BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
 59.3 km/h Best
1Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
 59.3 km/h Best
3Hankook Winter i cept evo3
 59.2 km/h -0.10 km/h
4Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
 59.1 km/h -0.20 km/h
5Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
 59 km/h -0.30 km/h
6Kleber Krisalp HP3
 58.7 km/h -0.60 km/h
7Bridgestone Blizzak 6
 58.6 km/h -0.70 km/h
7Dunlop Winter
 58.6 km/h -0.70 km/h
9Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
 58.5 km/h -0.80 km/h
10Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
 58.4 km/h -0.90 km/h
11Firestone Winterhawk 4
 58.1 km/h -1.20 km/h
12Barum Polaris 6
 58 km/h -1.30 km/h
12Ceat WinterDrive
 58 km/h -1.30 km/h
14Fulda Kristall Control HP2
 57.9 km/h -1.40 km/h
15Uniroyal WinterExpert
 57.8 km/h -1.50 km/h
16Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
 57.6 km/h -1.70 km/h
16Linglong Sport Master Winter
 57.6 km/h -1.70 km/h
18Semperit Speed Grip 5
 57.2 km/h -2.10 km/h
RefReference Budget
 56.1 km/h -3.20 km/h
19Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
 55.7 km/h -3.60 km/h
20Toyo Observe EWS1
 55.3 km/h -4.00 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 6.7% (4 Km/H).

Comfort

Michelin receives the highest comfort rating for its combination of refined ride quality and low noise levels, while the anonymous budget tyre finishes last with noticeably harsher impact absorption and less controlled damping over road irregularities.

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Position / TyreResultGap to best
1Fulda Kristall Control HP2
 8 Points Best
1Dunlop Winter
 8 Points Best
1Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
 8 Points Best
1Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
 8 Points Best
1Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
 8 Points Best
6Toyo Observe EWS1
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
6Linglong Sport Master Winter
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
6Ceat WinterDrive
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
6Barum Polaris 6
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
6Bridgestone Blizzak 6
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
6Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
6Hankook Winter i cept evo3
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
6Firestone Winterhawk 4
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
6Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
6BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
16Uniroyal WinterExpert
 6.7 Points -1.30 Points
16Semperit Speed Grip 5
 6.7 Points -1.30 Points
16Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
 6.7 Points -1.30 Points
16Kleber Krisalp HP3
 6.7 Points -1.30 Points
16Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
 6.7 Points -1.30 Points

The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (1.3 Points).

Barum and Michelin emerge as the quietest tyres with the lowest exterior noise measurements, while Semperit records the highest noise levels—though all finalists remain within acceptable ranges, demonstrating that modern winter tyre design has largely solved historical noise concerns.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
 64.9 dB -0.10 dB
1Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
 65 dB Best
1Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
 65 dB Best
3Dunlop Winter
 65.2 dB +0.20 dB
3Barum Polaris 6
 65.2 dB +0.20 dB
5Ceat WinterDrive
 65.5 dB +0.50 dB
6Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
 65.6 dB +0.60 dB
6Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
 65.6 dB +0.60 dB
8Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
 65.7 dB +0.70 dB
9Linglong Sport Master Winter
 65.9 dB +0.90 dB
9Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
 65.9 dB +0.90 dB
RefReference Budget
 66.1 dB +1.10 dB
11BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
 66.3 dB +1.30 dB
11Hankook Winter i cept evo3
 66.3 dB +1.30 dB
11Firestone Winterhawk 4
 66.3 dB +1.30 dB
14Kleber Krisalp HP3
 66.5 dB +1.50 dB
15Uniroyal WinterExpert
 66.7 dB +1.70 dB
15Fulda Kristall Control HP2
 66.7 dB +1.70 dB
17Bridgestone Blizzak 6
 66.8 dB +1.80 dB
18Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
 66.9 dB +1.90 dB
19Toyo Observe EWS1
 67 dB +2.00 dB
20Semperit Speed Grip 5
 67.6 dB +2.60 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (2.7 dB).

Value

Bridgestone and Goodyear project the longest service life at 53,000 kilometers based on wear testing, while Falken suffers the most rapid wear with only 33,920 kilometers expected—a nearly 20,000-kilometer difference that dramatically impacts long-term value regardless of purchase price.

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Position / TyreResultGap to best
1Bridgestone Blizzak 6
 53,000 KM Best
1Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
 53,000 KM Best
3Hankook Winter i cept evo3
 51,940 KM -1,060 KM
3Ceat WinterDrive
 51,940 KM -1,060 KM
5Dunlop Winter
 50,880 KM -2,120 KM
6Toyo Observe EWS1
 49,820 KM -3,180 KM
7Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
 48,230 KM -4,770 KM
8Uniroyal WinterExpert
 47,700 KM -5,300 KM
9Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
 47,170 KM -5,830 KM
10Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
 46,640 KM -6,360 KM
11Linglong Sport Master Winter
 46,110 KM -6,890 KM
12BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
 45,580 KM -7,420 KM
13Barum Polaris 6
 45,050 KM -7,950 KM
13Firestone Winterhawk 4
 45,050 KM -7,950 KM
13Kleber Krisalp HP3
 45,050 KM -7,950 KM
16Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
 44,520 KM -8,480 KM
17Semperit Speed Grip 5
 43,990 KM -9,010 KM
17Fulda Kristall Control HP2
 43,990 KM -9,010 KM
19Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
 37,630 KM -15,370 KM
20Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
 33,920 KM -19,080 KM

The difference between best and worst was 36% (19,080 KM).

When purchase price is divided by projected mileage, Ceat delivers the best value at just €7.32 per 1,000 kilometers despite modest pricing, while Falken becomes the most expensive option at €15.04 per 1,000 kilometers due to its combination of mid-range pricing and rapid wear.

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
1Ceat WinterDrive
 7.32 Price/1000 Best €13.08
2Linglong Sport Master Winter
 7.81 Price/1000 +0.49 Price/1000 €18.16
3Barum Polaris 6
 8.44 Price/1000 +1.12 Price/1000 €9.99
4Hankook Winter i cept evo3
 9.24 Price/1000 +1.92 Price/1000 €14.43
5Toyo Observe EWS1
 9.63 Price/1000 +2.31 Price/1000 €14.03
6Uniroyal WinterExpert
 9.64 Price/1000 +2.32 Price/1000 €12.20
7Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
 9.66 Price/1000 +2.34 Price/1000 €14.39
8Firestone Winterhawk 4
 9.99 Price/1000 +2.67 Price/1000 €13.96
9Fulda Kristall Control HP2
 10 Price/1000 +2.68 Price/1000 €15.43
10Dunlop Winter
 10.02 Price/1000 +2.70 Price/1000 €14.15
11Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
 10.94 Price/1000 +3.62 Price/1000 €16.99
12Kleber Krisalp HP3
 11.1 Price/1000 +3.78 Price/1000 €15.88
13Semperit Speed Grip 5
 11.14 Price/1000 +3.82 Price/1000 €14.02
14BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
 11.19 Price/1000 +3.87 Price/1000 €15.95
15Bridgestone Blizzak 6
 11.32 Price/1000 +4.00 Price/1000 €15.26
16Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
 12.86 Price/1000 +5.54 Price/1000 €18.66
17Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
 13.08 Price/1000 +5.76 Price/1000 €15.43
18Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
 13.29 Price/1000 +5.97 Price/1000 €20.38
19Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
 13.36 Price/1000 +6.04 Price/1000 €18.00
20Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
 15.04 Price/1000 +7.72 Price/1000 €21.38

The difference between best and worst was 105.5% (7.72 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Barum Polaris 6) works out €456 cheaper than the most expensive (Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2025 test; financing costs are excluded.

Barum achieves the lowest rolling resistance and highest fuel efficiency at 7.77 kg/tonne, closely followed by Continental and Uniroyal, while the budget tyre posts the worst result at 10.37 kg/tonne—meaning noticeably higher fuel consumption in addition to its safety deficiencies.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
1Barum Polaris 6
 7.77 kg/t Best £0
2Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
 8.02 kg/t +0.25 kg/t £14
3Uniroyal WinterExpert
 8.09 kg/t +0.32 kg/t £18
4Semperit Speed Grip 5
 8.15 kg/t +0.38 kg/t £22
5Firestone Winterhawk 4
 8.48 kg/t +0.71 kg/t £40
RefReference Summer
 8.54 kg/t +0.77 kg/t £44
6Bridgestone Blizzak 6
 8.54 kg/t +0.77 kg/t £44
7Dunlop Winter
 8.58 kg/t +0.81 kg/t £46
8Toyo Observe EWS1
 8.65 kg/t +0.88 kg/t £50
9Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
 8.7 kg/t +0.93 kg/t £53
9Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
 8.7 kg/t +0.93 kg/t £53
11BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
 8.72 kg/t +0.95 kg/t £54
11Kleber Krisalp HP3
 8.72 kg/t +0.95 kg/t £54
13Hankook Winter i cept evo3
 8.9 kg/t +1.13 kg/t £64
13Fulda Kristall Control HP2
 8.9 kg/t +1.13 kg/t £64
15Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
 9.03 kg/t +1.26 kg/t £71
16Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
 9.05 kg/t +1.28 kg/t £73
17Ceat WinterDrive
 9.07 kg/t +1.30 kg/t £74
18Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
 9.16 kg/t +1.39 kg/t £79
19Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
 9.31 kg/t +1.54 kg/t £87
RefReference Budget
 9.9 kg/t +2.13 kg/t £121
20Linglong Sport Master Winter
 10.37 kg/t +2.60 kg/t £148

The difference between best and worst was 33.5% (2.6 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Linglong Sport Master Winter uses about 102 L (£148) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 6.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

1st

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

225/40 R18 92V XL
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Auto Bild Test Winner / Exemplary Testsieger / vorbildlich
The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 emerges as the overall test winner, described as an allrounder that strikes the golden balance across all road conditions. Its standout quality is being extremely quiet, making it the most refined choice for daily driving. The tyre excels particularly in dry conditions with strong lateral grip and precise handling, though it requires a slightly longer braking distance on dry pavement compared to summer tyres. On snow, it delivers solid performance with good traction and braking, while on wet roads it maintains predictable handling and stable braking. The tyre's main weakness is its premium pricing, making it the most expensive option in the test at approximately €630 per set. Despite the high cost, its balanced performance across all conditions and exceptional comfort make it the top recommendation for drivers seeking the best overall winter tyre experience.
Dry99.9%
Wet97.5%
Snow96.5%
Comfort95.6%
Value79.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 2042.6 mBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 20116.7 km/h-0.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 2051.9 m+1.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 2083.4 km/h-1.00 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better3rd / 2012.12 s+0.08 s
Straight AquaHigher is better12th / 2075.2 km/h-2.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better13th / 202.23 m/sec2-0.49 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 2027.8 m+0.70 m
Snow TractionHigher is better9th / 202501 N-118.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 2059.3 km/hBest in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better13th / 202.81 m/sec2-0.22 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better1st / 2065 dBBest in this discipline
WearHigher is better9th / 2047170 KM-5,830.00 KM
ValueLower is better19th / 2013.36 Price/1000+6.04 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 208.7 kg/t+0.93 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/70
3PMSF
Yes
Price
630.00
2nd

Dunlop Winter

225/40 R18 92V XL
Dunlop Winter
Auto Bild Eco Champion / Exemplary Eco-Meister / vorbildlich
The Dunlop Winter proves itself as a snow specialist that combines excellent winter performance with strong value for money. It particularly shines on snow-covered roads with high traction and exceptional lateral grip, making it one of the most confident choices for severe winter conditions. The tyre also performs admirably on wet surfaces, delivering short braking distances and stable handling. Its main compromise comes in dry conditions, where it requires slightly longer braking distances than some competitors, though this is typical for winter tyres with aggressive snow-focused tread designs. The handling on dry pavement is still more than adequate for safe daily driving. At around €510 per set, it offers compelling value, especially for drivers in regions with regular snowfall who prioritize winter grip over ultimate dry road performance.
Dry95.7%
Wet95.6%
Snow98.5%
Comfort99.8%
Value87.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better11th / 2045.5 m+2.90 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better14th / 20114.4 km/h-2.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 2052 m+1.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better16th / 2080.4 km/h-4.00 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better14th / 2012.56 s+0.52 s
Straight AquaHigher is better15th / 2074.1 km/h-3.20 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better10th / 202.34 m/sec2-0.38 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 2027.5 m+0.40 m
Snow TractionHigher is better4th / 202576 N-43.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better7th / 2058.6 km/h-0.70 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better4th / 202.98 m/sec2-0.05 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 208 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better3rd / 2065.2 dB+0.20 dB
WearHigher is better5th / 2050880 KM-2,120.00 KM
ValueLower is better10th / 2010.02 Price/1000+2.70 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 208.58 kg/t+0.81 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Price
510.00
Joint 3rd

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

225/40 R18 92V XL
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Auto Bild Exemplary vorbildlich
The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 positions itself as a sporty choice with particularly high lateral grip in dry conditions, making it feel more responsive and agile than typical winter tyres. This performance-oriented character extends to impressive wear resistance, achieving the highest mileage potential in the test alongside Goodyear. The tyre handles predictably across all conditions with strong overall balance. However, it shows a slight weakness in wet cornering situations, where lateral grip isn't quite as strong as in other conditions. On snow, it delivers reliable performance with good braking and traction. The tyre's sporty nature and long lifespan make it an excellent choice for enthusiastic drivers of compact sports cars who don't want to sacrifice too much handling precision during winter months, though the approximately €600 price tag reflects its premium positioning.
Dry97.4%
Wet95.1%
Snow96.5%
Comfort94.3%
Value87.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 2044.9 m+2.30 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 20116.9 km/hBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 2054.7 m+3.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better11th / 2081.1 km/h-3.30 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better10th / 2012.46 s+0.42 s
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 2076.4 km/h-0.90 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better9th / 202.45 m/sec2-0.27 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 2028 m+0.90 m
Snow TractionHigher is better12th / 202483 N-136.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better7th / 2058.6 km/h-0.70 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better7th / 202.89 m/sec2-0.14 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better17th / 2066.8 dB+1.80 dB
WearHigher is better1st / 2053000 KMBest in this discipline
ValueLower is better15th / 2011.32 Price/1000+4.00 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 208.54 kg/t+0.77 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/70
3PMSF
Yes
Price
600.00
Joint 3rd

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

225/40 R18 92W XL
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Auto Bild Exemplary vorbildlich
The Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ delivers a remarkable combination of performance and value, earning its place as a price-performance winner. This Korean tyre impresses particularly on snow with strong grip and confident handling, while also performing admirably on wet roads. Its standout feature is the W-speed rating (270 km/h), making it suitable for high-performance compact sports cars that might occasionally be driven at higher speeds. The tyre maintains balanced characteristics across all conditions without any major weaknesses, though it's slightly less sharp in dry handling compared to the most sporty options. At approximately €430 per set, it represents exceptional value, offering near-premium performance at a mid-range price. This makes it an ideal choice for budget-conscious drivers who refuse to compromise significantly on safety and performance during winter.
Dry96.8%
Wet96.6%
Snow96.6%
Comfort91.3%
Value83.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 2044.5 m+1.90 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better13th / 20114.5 km/h-2.40 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 2052.3 m+1.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 2082.6 km/h-1.80 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better8th / 2012.43 s+0.39 s
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 2076 km/h-1.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better11th / 202.32 m/sec2-0.40 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better12th / 2028.3 m+1.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better10th / 202492 N-127.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better4th / 2059.1 km/h-0.20 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better7th / 202.89 m/sec2-0.14 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better16th / 206.7 Points-1.30 Points
NoiseLower is better8th / 2065.7 dB+0.70 dB
WearHigher is better16th / 2044520 KM-8,480.00 KM
ValueLower is better7th / 209.66 Price/1000+2.34 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 208.7 kg/t+0.93 kg/t
EU Label
D/A/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
430.00
5th

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

225/40 R18 92V XL
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
Auto Bild Exemplary vorbildlich
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 establishes itself as the rain specialist of the test, excelling particularly in wet conditions across all disciplines. It delivers the shortest wet braking distances and most confident wet handling, making it the safest choice for regions with frequent winter rainfall rather than consistent snow. The tyre also achieves the joint-highest mileage projection in the test, promising excellent long-term value through extended wear life. However, this wet-weather optimization comes with a tradeoff in dry performance, where handling and braking aren't quite as sharp as the most performance-focused competitors. On snow, it provides solid if not exceptional performance. At around €580, it's positioned in the premium segment but justifies the cost through its outstanding wet weather safety and longevity, making it ideal for drivers in milder, wetter winter climates.
Dry95.7%
Wet99.6%
Snow94.9%
Comfort95.2%
Value85.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better13th / 2045.7 m+3.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better10th / 20114.8 km/h-2.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 2050.9 mBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 2083.9 km/h-0.50 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better1st / 2012.04 sBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 2076.4 km/h-0.90 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 202.65 m/sec2-0.07 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better13th / 2028.5 m+1.40 m
Snow TractionHigher is better16th / 202413 N-206.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better9th / 2058.5 km/h-0.80 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better11th / 202.84 m/sec2-0.19 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better6th / 2065.6 dB+0.60 dB
WearHigher is better1st / 2053000 KMBest in this discipline
ValueLower is better11th / 2010.94 Price/1000+3.62 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better18th / 209.16 kg/t+1.39 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Price
580.00
6th

Hankook Winter i cept evo3

225/40 R18 92V XL
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Auto Bild Good gut
The Hankook Winter i*Cept evo3 proves itself as a snow expert delivering excellent value for money. It shines particularly on snow-covered roads with strong performance across all winter disciplines, providing confident grip and handling when temperatures drop. The tyre maintains respectable performance on wet roads, though it doesn't quite match the wet-weather specialists in this category. Its main weakness appears in damp conditions where braking distances are slightly extended compared to the best performers. The tyre offers a compelling package for drivers prioritizing snow capability, with solid all-around performance that doesn't embarrass itself in any condition. At approximately €480 per set, it represents strong value in the premium mid-range segment, making it an intelligent choice for drivers who experience regular snowfall but don't want to pay top-tier prices.
Dry97.2%
Wet95.2%
Snow97.7%
Comfort94.6%
Value89.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 2044.3 m+1.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better9th / 20114.9 km/h-2.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better12th / 2055.6 m+4.70 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better8th / 2081.6 km/h-2.80 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better16th / 2012.63 s+0.59 s
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 2076.5 km/h-0.80 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 202.72 m/sec2Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 2028.1 m+1.00 m
Snow TractionHigher is better5th / 202560 N-59.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 2059.2 km/h-0.10 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better6th / 202.92 m/sec2-0.11 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better11th / 2066.3 dB+1.30 dB
WearHigher is better3rd / 2051940 KM-1,060.00 KM
ValueLower is better4th / 209.24 Price/1000+1.92 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better13th / 208.9 kg/t+1.13 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
480.00
7th

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

225/40 R18 92V XL
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Auto Bild Good gut
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P demonstrates the German manufacturer's expertise with a tyre that emphasizes efficiency and balanced behavior across snow and dry conditions. It features low rolling resistance, making it one of the most fuel-efficient options in the test while maintaining strong environmental credentials. The handling characteristics are well-sorted and predictable across different road surfaces, with particularly good performance on snow. However, the tyre shows a weakness on wet roads with slightly extended braking distances compared to wet-weather specialists, which is unusual for Continental's typically well-rounded products. The dry performance is solid with good handling precision. At around €610, it's positioned at premium pricing, making it best suited for drivers who value brand heritage, efficiency, and balanced winter performance, particularly those who prioritize snow capability over ultimate wet braking performance.
Dry98.6%
Wet95%
Snow97.3%
Comfort99.3%
Value82.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 2043.7 m+1.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 20116.5 km/h-0.40 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better12th / 2055.6 m+4.70 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better14th / 2080.8 km/h-3.60 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better9th / 2012.45 s+0.41 s
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 2076.3 km/h-1.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 202.61 m/sec2-0.11 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 2028 m+0.90 m
Snow TractionHigher is better8th / 202524 N-95.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better10th / 2058.4 km/h-0.90 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better5th / 202.95 m/sec2-0.08 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 208 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better9th / 2065.9 dB+0.90 dB
WearHigher is better10th / 2046640 KM-6,360.00 KM
ValueLower is better17th / 2013.08 Price/1000+5.76 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 208.02 kg/t+0.25 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Price
610.00
Joint 8th

Uniroyal WinterExpert

225/40 R18 92V XL
Uniroyal WinterExpert
Auto Bild Good gut
The Uniroyal WinterExpert stands out as a well-rounded performer with particular emphasis on fuel efficiency. It achieves the highest fuel-saving potential in the test thanks to exceptionally low rolling resistance, making it an economical choice for high-mileage drivers concerned about operating costs. The tyre delivers balanced performance across all conditions without any severe weaknesses, showing competent behavior on snow, wet, and dry surfaces. However, it doesn't claim top honors in any single discipline, representing a jack-of-all-trades approach. Dry braking distances are slightly longer than the sportiest options, but still within acceptable limits for safe winter driving. At approximately €460 per set, it offers solid value, particularly when factoring in the fuel savings over its lifetime. This makes it an intelligent choice for practical drivers who want dependable winter performance combined with low running costs.
Dry96%
Wet95.5%
Snow94%
Comfort90.6%
Value88.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better14th / 2045.8 m+3.20 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 20115.6 km/h-1.30 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 2053.3 m+2.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better12th / 2081 km/h-3.40 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better7th / 2012.38 s+0.34 s
Straight AquaHigher is better13th / 2075 km/h-2.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better11th / 202.32 m/sec2-0.40 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better14th / 2028.6 m+1.50 m
Snow TractionHigher is better15th / 202417 N-202.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better15th / 2057.8 km/h-1.50 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better17th / 202.76 m/sec2-0.27 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better16th / 206.7 Points-1.30 Points
NoiseLower is better15th / 2066.7 dB+1.70 dB
WearHigher is better8th / 2047700 KM-5,300.00 KM
ValueLower is better6th / 209.64 Price/1000+2.32 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 208.09 kg/t+0.32 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
460.00
Joint 8th

Barum Polaris 6

225/40 R18 92V XL
Barum Polaris 6
Auto Bild Good gut
The Barum Polaris 6, as Continental's budget brand, delivers impressive value as a genuine bargain option with the highest fuel-saving potential in the test. Its exceptionally low rolling resistance translates directly to lower fuel consumption, making it economical to run over its lifetime. The tyre proves itself safe and reliable on both snow and dry roads, providing confidence-inspiring performance in typical winter conditions without breaking the bank. However, it shows its budget positioning more clearly on wet roads, where overall performance lags slightly behind premium competitors. Despite this, it never falls into the dangerous category, maintaining acceptable safety standards. At approximately €380 per set—the lowest price among quality brand tyres in the test—it represents outstanding value for budget-conscious drivers who need a reliable winter tyre but can't justify premium pricing. The tyre proves that low cost doesn't necessarily mean compromised safety.
Dry95.5%
Wet93.3%
Snow94.9%
Comfort95.5%
Value90.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better16th / 2046 m+3.40 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better8th / 20115.1 km/h-1.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better11th / 2054.8 m+3.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better14th / 2080.8 km/h-3.60 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better15th / 2012.62 s+0.58 s
Straight AquaHigher is better19th / 2071.4 km/h-5.90 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better16th / 202.11 m/sec2-0.61 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better9th / 2028.2 m+1.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better13th / 202471 N-148.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better12th / 2058 km/h-1.30 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better17th / 202.76 m/sec2-0.27 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better3rd / 2065.2 dB+0.20 dB
WearHigher is better13th / 2045050 KM-7,950.00 KM
ValueLower is better3rd / 208.44 Price/1000+1.12 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 207.77 kg/tBest in this discipline
EU Label
C/C/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
380.00
10th

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2

225/40 R18 92V XL
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
Auto Bild Good gut
The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 establishes itself as a wet-weather specialist with exceptional grip talent on damp and rainy roads. It delivers particularly strong performance in wet conditions, providing confident handling and reliable braking when rain falls. However, this wet-focused optimization creates an imbalanced character with notably imprecise and vague handling on dry pavement, which is disappointing for a premium Italian brand typically known for sporty characteristics. The tyre also carries a high price tag at approximately €620 per set, making it one of the most expensive options. An important note is that this tyre has since been succeeded by the Cinturato Winter 3, so availability may be limited. The Pirelli is best suited for drivers in regions with wet but relatively mild winters who rarely encounter snow and prioritize wet-weather safety above all else, though the handling compromises and high price may steer many toward more balanced alternatives.
Dry97.1%
Wet96.5%
Snow94.6%
Comfort99.5%
Value79.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 2044.1 m+1.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better18th / 20114.1 km/h-2.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 2053.9 m+3.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 2084.4 km/hBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better2nd / 2012.11 s+0.07 s
Straight AquaHigher is better13th / 2075 km/h-2.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better15th / 202.13 m/sec2-0.59 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better15th / 2028.7 m+1.60 m
Snow TractionHigher is better17th / 202368 N-251.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better5th / 2059 km/h-0.30 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better10th / 202.85 m/sec2-0.18 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 208 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better6th / 2065.6 dB+0.60 dB
WearHigher is better7th / 2048230 KM-4,770.00 KM
ValueLower is better16th / 2012.86 Price/1000+5.54 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better16th / 209.05 kg/t+1.28 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
620.00
11th

Semperit Speed Grip 5

225/40 R18 92V XL
Semperit Speed Grip 5
Auto Bild Good gut
The Semperit Speed-Grip 5 presents a somewhat mixed character with strengths and weaknesses across different conditions. On dry and wet roads, it delivers balanced and predictable performance that inspires confidence in typical autumn and early spring conditions. However, it reveals its main weakness on snow, where it struggles particularly with lateral grip and cornering stability, making it less suitable for regions with consistent winter snowfall. The tyre doesn't excel in any particular area but maintains acceptable performance across most disciplines. At around €490 per set, it sits in the mid-premium price range, though the compromised snow performance makes the value proposition questionable for drivers who regularly face winter conditions. It might be best suited for urban drivers in milder climates who occasionally encounter light snow but primarily drive on cleared roads, where its decent wet and dry characteristics can shine without exposing its winter weaknesses.
Dry95.9%
Wet95.5%
Snow93.9%
Comfort90%
Value82.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better15th / 2045.9 m+3.30 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 20115.8 km/h-1.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better9th / 2054.5 m+3.60 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 2082.1 km/h-2.30 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better11th / 2012.52 s+0.48 s
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 2076.3 km/h-1.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 202.48 m/sec2-0.24 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better18th / 2029 m+1.90 m
Snow TractionHigher is better14th / 202436 N-183.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better18th / 2057.2 km/h-2.10 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better14th / 202.8 m/sec2-0.23 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better16th / 206.7 Points-1.30 Points
NoiseLower is better20th / 2067.6 dB+2.60 dB
WearHigher is better17th / 2043990 KM-9,010.00 KM
ValueLower is better13th / 2011.14 Price/1000+3.82 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 208.15 kg/t+0.38 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
490.00
12th

BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

225/40 R18 92V XL
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
Auto Bild Good gut
The BF Goodrich g-Force Winter 2 establishes itself as an absolute snow king with outstanding performance on snow-covered surfaces across all disciplines. As one of Michelin's secondary brands, it achieves the shortest braking distance on snow in the entire test and delivers exceptional traction and grip when temperatures plunge. However, this intense focus on winter performance creates a notably unbalanced tyre. It struggles on both wet and dry roads, with the dry performance being particularly compromised—handling feels spongy and imprecise, while braking distances are extended. The tyre essentially sacrifices three-season capability for maximum winter competence. At approximately €510 per set, it's reasonably priced for a specialized product. This tyre is specifically suited for drivers in harsh winter climates with consistent snow cover who primarily drive during winter months and are willing to sacrifice dry and wet performance for ultimate snow confidence and safety.
Dry95.6%
Wet93.9%
Snow99.7%
Comfort94.6%
Value81.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better12th / 2045.6 m+3.00 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better17th / 20114.3 km/h-2.60 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better16th / 2056.3 m+5.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better17th / 2080.3 km/h-4.10 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better18th / 2012.67 s+0.63 s
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 2077.3 km/hBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 202.5 m/sec2-0.22 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 2027.3 m+0.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better2nd / 202608 N-11.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 2059.3 km/hBest in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better1st / 203.03 m/sec2Best in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better11th / 2066.3 dB+1.30 dB
WearHigher is better12th / 2045580 KM-7,420.00 KM
ValueLower is better14th / 2011.19 Price/1000+3.87 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better11th / 208.72 kg/t+0.95 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/69
3PMSF
Yes
Price
510.00
13th

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

225/40 R18 92W XL
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
The Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ demonstrates strong lateral grip and handling precision on wet roads, making it a confident performer when rain falls during the winter months. It also shows respectable performance on snow with reliable traction. However, the tyre reveals a significant weakness with extended braking distances in dry conditions, which is concerning for a tyre from a brand positioning itself in the premium segment. The handling on dry roads also feels less precise and communicative than competitors. This combination of compromised dry performance and premium pricing around €500 per set makes the value proposition questionable. The tyre might appeal to drivers in regions with very wet but mild winters who rarely encounter dry cold conditions, but for most drivers seeking balanced winter performance, there are better options that don't sacrifice dry safety for wet grip.
Dry94.3%
Wet93.7%
Snow94.6%
Comfort90.5%
Value71.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better17th / 2046.9 m+4.30 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better14th / 20114.4 km/h-2.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better16th / 2056.3 m+5.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 2082.2 km/h-2.20 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better5th / 2012.3 s+0.26 s
Straight AquaHigher is better17th / 2071.7 km/h-5.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better17th / 202.09 m/sec2-0.63 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better15th / 2028.7 m+1.60 m
Snow TractionHigher is better11th / 202487 N-132.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better16th / 2057.6 km/h-1.70 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better16th / 202.77 m/sec2-0.26 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better16th / 206.7 Points-1.30 Points
NoiseLower is better18th / 2066.9 dB+1.90 dB
WearHigher is better19th / 2037630 KM-15,370.00 KM
ValueLower is better18th / 2013.29 Price/1000+5.97 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better19th / 209.31 kg/t+1.54 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Price
500.00
14th

Kleber Krisalp HP3

225/40 R18 92V XL
Kleber Krisalp HP3
The Kleber Krisalp HP3, as another Michelin secondary brand alongside BF Goodrich, proves itself as an exceptional snow specialist with absolute top-tier performance on snow-covered roads. It achieves the shortest braking distance on snow in the test and delivers outstanding traction, making it supremely confident in harsh winter conditions. However, like its BF Goodrich sibling, this snow focus creates significant compromises elsewhere. The tyre receives downgrades for extended dry braking distances, which raise safety concerns on clear winter days. Wet and dry handling also suffer from the soft compound and aggressive tread design optimized for snow. At approximately €500 per set, it's priced similarly to premium all-rounders that offer better balance. The Kleber is best reserved for drivers in mountainous or consistently snowy regions who prioritize maximum snow safety above all else and accept the compromises on other surfaces as a necessary trade-off.
Dry93.5%
Wet94.3%
Snow99.7%
Comfort90.7%
Value81.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better20th / 2047.3 m+4.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better19th / 20113.4 km/h-3.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better18th / 2056.6 m+5.70 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better13th / 2080.9 km/h-3.50 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better11th / 2012.52 s+0.48 s
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 2076.9 km/h-0.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better6th / 202.52 m/sec2-0.20 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 2027.1 mBest in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better1st / 202619 NBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better6th / 2058.7 km/h-0.60 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better1st / 203.03 m/sec2Best in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better16th / 206.7 Points-1.30 Points
NoiseLower is better14th / 2066.5 dB+1.50 dB
WearHigher is better13th / 2045050 KM-7,950.00 KM
ValueLower is better12th / 2011.1 Price/1000+3.78 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better11th / 208.72 kg/t+0.95 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/69
3PMSF
Yes
Price
500.00
15th

Ceat WinterDrive

225/40 R18 92V XL
Ceat WinterDrive
The Ceat WinterDrive from this Indian manufacturer manages to deliver the absolute best cost-per-kilometer ratio in the test while maintaining respectable snow and dry road performance. This achievement comes from combining a competitive purchase price of approximately €380 per set with good projected mileage, making it extremely economical for high-mileage drivers on tight budgets. The tyre performs adequately on snow with acceptable grip and braking, while dry road behavior remains within safe parameters. However, it shows its budget positioning most clearly on wet roads, where overall performance is weaker across handling, braking, and aquaplaning resistance. Despite these wet-weather limitations, it never enters truly dangerous territory. The Ceat represents a pragmatic choice for cost-conscious drivers who need winter capability but experience limited severe weather, making it suitable for urban environments where roads are typically cleared and wet performance is less critical than absolute bargain pricing.
Dry98%
Wet91.4%
Snow96.3%
Comfort95.2%
Value94.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 2043.5 m+0.90 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better11th / 20114.7 km/h-2.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better19th / 2057.7 m+6.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better20th / 2079.8 km/h-4.60 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better19th / 2012.69 s+0.65 s
Straight AquaHigher is better16th / 2071.9 km/h-5.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better18th / 202.06 m/sec2-0.66 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better9th / 2028.2 m+1.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better6th / 202547 N-72.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better12th / 2058 km/h-1.30 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better11th / 202.84 m/sec2-0.19 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better5th / 2065.5 dB+0.50 dB
WearHigher is better3rd / 2051940 KM-1,060.00 KM
ValueLower is better1st / 207.32 Price/1000Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better17th / 209.07 kg/t+1.30 kg/t
EU Label
D/C/70
3PMSF
Yes
Price
380.00
Joint 16th

Firestone Winterhawk 4

225/40 R18 92V XL
Firestone Winterhawk 4
The Firestone Winterhawk 4, as Bridgestone's budget brand, positions itself as a snow specialist with very high traction on snow-covered surfaces, making it confident and reassuring when winter conditions are at their worst. It also delivers respectable performance on wet roads, maintaining acceptable safety margins. However, the tyre shows its budget orientation and snow-focused design through spongy, imprecise handling on dry pavement, where the soft compound and flexible tread blocks compromise steering response and cornering stability. Extended dry braking distances also raise some safety concerns. At approximately €450 per set, it's positioned in the mid-range price bracket, though the handling compromises make competitors at similar prices more appealing for balanced performance. The Firestone is best suited for drivers in consistently snowy climates who prioritize winter grip and can tolerate vague dry handling, particularly those who drive conservatively and value the Bridgestone connection for quality assurance.
Dry93.4%
Wet94.5%
Snow97%
Comfort94.6%
Value84.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better19th / 2047.2 m+4.60 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better20th / 20112.8 km/h-4.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 2054.4 m+3.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better10th / 2081.5 km/h-2.90 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better13th / 2012.55 s+0.51 s
Straight AquaHigher is better10th / 2075.9 km/h-1.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better14th / 202.18 m/sec2-0.54 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better9th / 2028.2 m+1.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better3rd / 202577 N-42.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better11th / 2058.1 km/h-1.20 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better9th / 202.88 m/sec2-0.15 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better11th / 2066.3 dB+1.30 dB
WearHigher is better13th / 2045050 KM-7,950.00 KM
ValueLower is better8th / 209.99 Price/1000+2.67 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 208.48 kg/t+0.71 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Price
450.00
Joint 16th

Toyo Observe EWS1

225/40 R18 92W XL
Toyo Observe EWS1
The Toyo Observe Winter Sport 1 delivers surprisingly strong performance on wet and dry roads but suffers from significant weaknesses on snow that undermine its credibility as a winter tyre. On dry pavement, the tyre achieves an impressive second-place finish in braking, while wet braking is also competitive at fourth place. However, the snow performance is deeply concerning—the Toyo finishes dead last among all finalists in snow slalom, braking, handling, and near the bottom in traction. For a tyre marketed as a winter sport tyre, this failure to deliver adequate snow capability is disqualifying for many buyers. The tyre might work for drivers in regions with very mild winters who face mostly wet conditions, but anyone expecting real snow should look elsewhere. The imbalanced performance profile suggests Toyo prioritized dry and wet capability at the expense of winter-specific characteristics, resulting in a tyre that fails to meet the core requirements of its category.
Dry98.7%
Wet97.8%
Snow90.2%
Comfort94.1%
Value87.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 2042.9 m+0.30 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better11th / 20114.7 km/h-2.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 2052 m+1.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 2082.3 km/h-2.10 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better4th / 2012.17 s+0.13 s
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 2076 km/h-1.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better5th / 202.53 m/sec2-0.19 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better20th / 2029.7 m+2.60 m
Snow TractionHigher is better18th / 202354 N-265.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better20th / 2055.3 km/h-4.00 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better20th / 202.61 m/sec2-0.42 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better19th / 2067 dB+2.00 dB
WearHigher is better6th / 2049820 KM-3,180.00 KM
ValueLower is better5th / 209.63 Price/1000+2.31 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 208.65 kg/t+0.88 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
480.00
18th

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

225/40 R18 92V XL
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
The Fulda Kristall Control HP 2, as another Continental budget brand alongside Barum, demonstrates respectable dry road performance with decent handling characteristics that feel more car-like than many winter tyres. However, this dry-biased behavior creates an unbalanced package with particular weaknesses on wet roads, where performance across handling, braking, and aquaplaning resistance falls short of acceptable standards for safe winter driving. The snow performance is adequate but unremarkable. At approximately €440 per set, it sits in a challenging price position—more expensive than the better-balanced Barum sibling but lacking the performance to justify the premium over that proven budget option. The tyre struggles to find a clear identity or target customer, as drivers seeking dry performance would choose sportier options while those prioritizing winter safety would select better wet and snow performers. It represents a compromise that doesn't particularly excel at anything.
Dry94.3%
Wet92.6%
Snow97.5%
Comfort98.7%
Value81.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better17th / 2046.9 m+4.30 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better14th / 20114.4 km/h-2.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better19th / 2057.7 m+6.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better19th / 2080.1 km/h-4.30 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better20th / 2012.93 s+0.89 s
Straight AquaHigher is better11th / 2075.4 km/h-1.90 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 202.55 m/sec2-0.17 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 2028 m+0.90 m
Snow TractionHigher is better7th / 202537 N-82.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better14th / 2057.9 km/h-1.40 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better3rd / 202.99 m/sec2-0.04 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 208 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better15th / 2066.7 dB+1.70 dB
WearHigher is better17th / 2043990 KM-9,010.00 KM
ValueLower is better9th / 2010 Price/1000+2.68 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better13th / 208.9 kg/t+1.13 kg/t
EU Label
D/C/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
440.00
19th

Linglong Sport Master Winter

225/40 R18 92W XL
Linglong Sport Master Winter
The Linglong Sport Master Winter from the Chinese manufacturer manages to deliver respectable driving characteristics on both dry and snow-covered roads, showing that emerging brands are improving their winter tyre development capabilities. High lateral grip on wet surfaces is another positive attribute. However, the tyre is severely let down by extended braking distances on snow—ironic given its winter designation—which create serious safety concerns in the most critical winter driving situation. Overall snow performance beyond straight-line braking is also weaker than established competitors. At approximately €360 per set, it's among the cheapest options from recognized brands, but the snow braking weakness is too significant to overlook, even at this bargain price. The tyre might be acceptable for mild-winter regions where snow is rare and quickly cleared, but for actual winter driving conditions, the compromised emergency braking capability makes it impossible to recommend over similarly priced but safer alternatives from established budget brands.
Dry97.5%
Wet92.3%
Snow93.3%
Comfort94.9%
Value84.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 2044.2 m+1.60 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 20115.2 km/h-1.70 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better14th / 2055.8 m+4.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better18th / 2080.2 km/h-4.20 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better17th / 2012.66 s+0.62 s
Straight AquaHigher is better18th / 2071.6 km/h-5.70 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better20th / 202 m/sec2-0.72 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better15th / 2028.7 m+1.60 m
Snow TractionHigher is better19th / 202341 N-278.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better16th / 2057.6 km/h-1.70 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better14th / 202.8 m/sec2-0.23 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better9th / 2065.9 dB+0.90 dB
WearHigher is better11th / 2046110 KM-6,890.00 KM
ValueLower is better2nd / 207.81 Price/1000+0.49 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better20th / 2010.37 kg/t+2.60 kg/t
EU Label
D/A/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
360.00
20th

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

225/40 R18 92V XL
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro demonstrates respectable driving performance on dry pavement, maintaining decent handling characteristics and acceptable behavior in clear conditions. However, this Japanese-branded tyre (developed by Sumitomo) reveals significant weaknesses where they matter most for winter safety. It shows weaker overall performance on snow with compromised grip and handling, while extended braking distances in both wet and dry conditions raise serious safety concerns. The tyre also suffers from particularly rapid wear, resulting in the lowest projected mileage in the entire test—nearly 20,000 kilometers less than the longest-lasting competitors. This accelerated wear makes it extremely expensive over its shortened lifetime despite a mid-range purchase price around €510. The combination of safety compromises and poor durability makes the Falken impossible to recommend, as drivers would face both increased risk and the inconvenience and cost of premature replacement.
Dry97.4%
Wet93.5%
Snow91.1%
Comfort100%
Value67.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 2044.7 m+2.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 20116.4 km/h-0.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better15th / 2055.9 m+5.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better8th / 2081.6 km/h-2.80 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better6th / 2012.33 s+0.29 s
Straight AquaHigher is better20th / 2071.1 km/h-6.20 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better19th / 202.04 m/sec2-0.68 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better19th / 2029.5 m+2.40 m
Snow TractionHigher is better20th / 202314 N-305.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better19th / 2055.7 km/h-3.60 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better19th / 202.74 m/sec2-0.29 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 208 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better1st / 2065 dBBest in this discipline
WearHigher is better20th / 2033920 KM-19,080.00 KM
ValueLower is better20th / 2015.04 Price/1000+7.72 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better15th / 209.03 kg/t+1.26 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
510.00

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

More tyre tests2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tyre Test2026 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre TestThe BEST Winter Tyres for 2026/27All tests: Winter Tyres
Best tyresBest Winter TyresBest UHP Winter TyresBest Studless Winter Tyres

Discussion

10 comments
  1. Koen archived

    Why does the Toyo get this summary "extended braking distances on both wet and dry roads, which represent safety compromises that lead to downgrades in critical disciplines." while it's the 2nd best and 3rd best in dry and wet braking?

    #10414
    1. TyreReviews Koen archived

      Thanks for letting me know, I'll look into this now

      #10415
    2. TyreReviews Koen archived

      Thanks, I've updated that, it should go through the cache in the next few hours. It seems its results got combined with another tyre when generating the texts - not ideal!

      #10416
      1. Koen TyreReviews archived

        Thank You for the quick response and update 👍 as always, excellent work 👏

        #10417
  2. Thomas archived

    Kumho again with very strong result. let's see if other tests can confirm this

    #10362
  3. Driver archived

    Somebody seams very very scared from cheap Linglong competition. New models made in Europe are very good and almost matches performance of much more expensive premium tyres.

    #10357
    1. TB Driver archived

      source: trust me bro!

      Btw. it's the Kumho WP52+, not the regular WP52. The link is not correct.

      #10360
      1. TyreReviews TB archived

        Thanks, I'll get that updated

        #10361
  4. mark archived

    There is a mistake. It’s not the Dunlop “Winter Response 2”; it’s the new “Dunlop Winter” tyre. Please check the original AutoBild test.

    #10352
    1. TyreReviews mark archived

      Thank you, that should be fixed

      #10353
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.