Menu
Matador Hectorra 5 View Gallery (1)
155-295/35-70 R14-21 132 sizes 2022

Matador Hectorra 5

Matador Tyres Touring Summer

The Matador Hectorra 5 is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

4.3
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
86%
Wet Grip
82%
Road Feedback
85%
Handling
82%
Wear
95%
Comfort
90%
Buy again
94%
5 Reviews
88% Average
38,200 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 40th)
Matador Hectorra 5

Matador Hectorra 5

Summer Economy
BETA
4.3 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Wet
72.7
2x / 3 tests
Dry
57.7
1.8x / 3 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
65.7
6 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 1
Period: 2024 - 2026
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 5
Avg Rating: 87.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.26
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? Auto Bild 2026 245/45 R19 41/50 2 metrics
2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 37/52 2 metrics
2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2024 205/55 R16 43/55 2 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
3
Tests
40th
Average
37th
Best
43rd
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?
245/45 R19 • 2026
41st/50
2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout
225/40 R18 • 2025
37th/52
2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview
205/55 R16 • 2024
43rd/55
View Test Results
Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
175/65 R 14 82 T D B 70
185/60 R 14 82 H D B 70
175/65 R 14 86 T XL C B 71
175/65 R 14 86 T XL C C 71
165/70 R 14 81 T C C 70
185/60 R 14 82 T D C 70
175/65R14 86 T XL C B 71
15 inch
195/55 R 15 85 V C B 71
185/65 R 15 88 H C B 70
195/55 R 15 85 H C B 71
195/65 R 15 95 H XL C B 72
195/65 R 15 91 H C B 71
195/65 R 15 91 V C B 71
195/65 R 15 91 T C B 71
185/65 R 15 92 T XL C B 71
16 inch
205/55 R 16 91 H C B 71
205/55 R 16 91 V C B 71
205/55 R 16 91 Y C B 71
205/60 R 16 92 H C B 71
205/60 R 16 92 V C B 71
205/60 R 16 96 W XL C B 72
215/60 R 16 99 H XL C B 72
205/55 R 16 94 V XL C B 72
17 inch
205/50 R 17 93 Y XL C B 72
215/55 R 17 98 Y XL C B 72
225/45 R 17 94 Y XL C B 72
225/50 R 17 98 V XL C B 72
225/50 R 17 98 Y XL C B 72
235/65 R 17 108 V XL C B 72
205/50 R 17 93 V XL C B 72
215/45 R 17 91 Y XL C B 72
225/45 R 17 91 Y C B 71
225/60 R 17 99 V C B 71
18 inch
245/40 R 18 97 Y XL C B 72
245/45 R 18 100 Y XL C B 72
225/40 R 18 92 Y XL C B 72
235/60 R 18 107 V XL B B 72
255/35 R 18 94 Y XL C B 73
235/60 R 18 107 W XL B B 72
19 inch
235/35 R 19 91 Y XL D B 72
20 inch
255/45 R 20 105 Y XL C B 73
245/35 R 20 95 Y XL C B 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Matador Hectorra 5 >>

Questions and Answers for the Matador Hectorra 5

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Matador Hectorra 5. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Matador Hectorra 5 Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Ford Kuga (235/45 R19) on a combination of roads for 200 spirited miles
Only been fitted for 2 weeks but so far very impressed. Previously had Continentals from new which did 22500 miles but double the price
Helpful 845
August 15, 2024
Given 91% while driving a Volkswagen Passat 2.0TDI (215/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
Amazing tires for 93€ per tire they don't slip hold well on dry and wet very good aquaplaning resistance they make little noise on some type of roads not all and catch stones between the treads very often overall best budget tire for now
Helpful 824
August 28, 2024
Given 90% while driving a Opel Astra k sports tourer 1,4 cng (215/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
The tires have done 110,000 in 1.5, they are used in a taxi Opel Astra K Sports Tourer and they did not slip and the wear is minimal, they will soon be replaced with the same ones.
Helpful 241
October 2, 2025

How would you rate the Matador Hectorra 5?

Click a star to start your review

206 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Matador Hectorra 5 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 71% while driving a Kia Motors Niro EV (215/55 R17) on for 6,000 miles
Car came from factory with Continental EcoContact 6Q, which were decent enough, but needed replacing at 14k on the front. The dealer I bought the car off fitted these Matadors, and I was honestly expecting them to be terrible. They really are quite good.

Only when really pushing on in the wet do they start to let go. They handle the cars 201hp no problem.

I would certainly consider buying them in the future if they weren't the price they are - for the same money you can get Falkens and only a tenner more for Goodyear.

Matador shares a lot of Continental knowledge, and really I can't tell the difference between them and the EcoContact 6Q. The Matador even have the Continental "wet grip" wear bars, same as the 6Q.

If you can get them cheap, then go for it.
Helpful 8
February 22, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 99% while driving a SEAT LEON 1.8TSI (225/40 R18) on for 30,000 miles
We are on our third set of Matadors used on a 1.8 Seat Leon tsi FR. The car is driven sensibly and always within the road conditions primarily in 50 mph twity poor country roads and motorways in the UK and France. We do not do drag strip dashes as seems prevalent with a lot of people these days.
These Matadors are fantastic and last incredibly well. At 30 k miles fronts were still legal but near the 1.6 mm marker. The rears were totally legal but had began to go slightly out of round. Ive put these tyres on my other car too (e class Mercedes).
SIMPLY FANTASTIC. The price has sadly increased over the years. People used to refer to them as budget but now the tyre snobs call them mid range. We're in the UK and have driven at 110 kph in France in heavy rain . No sign of aqua planning and superb handling and feedback. Why anyone would choose to spend two or three times as much beats me.
Helpful 19
February 13, 2026
Rate the Matador Hectorra 5