Menu

Maxxis HP M3

The Maxxis HP M3 is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

6.9
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
69%
Wet Grip
57%
Road Feedback
65%
Handling
67%
Wear
64%
Comfort
76%
Buy again
50%
10 Reviews
64% Average
126,137 miles driven
Maxxis HP M3

Maxxis HP M3

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
6.9 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 10
Avg Rating: 64%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.04
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Maxxis HP M3

Alternative Tyres

8.4/10
79% 9 reviews
8.2/10
92% 14 reviews
7.7/10
90% 7 reviews
7.2/10
76% 5 reviews
7.1/10
75% 21 reviews
6.9/10
77% 7 reviews
6.5/10
87% 5 reviews
77% 4 reviews

Questions and Answers for the Maxxis HP M3

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Maxxis HP M3. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Maxxis HP M3 Reviews

Given 63% while driving a Tesla Model S (245/45 R19) on mostly motorways for 16,937 easy going miles
Nice performing tire, and a good price too. Works well in the rain and dry conditions. Acceptable in the snow, but not as good as a true snow tire. These tires wore out quickly - I have had them for 15 months and 27,000 km (17,000 miles) and they are nearly down to the wear indicators.
July 28, 2025
Given 40% while driving a Audi A3 2.0T quattro (235/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 20,000 spirited miles
I purchased a used audi a3 and the dealership sold me the car with these installed brand new... and let me tell you they are among the worst I've ever had in any vehicle. They advertise 60,000 km treadlife but after 22k I've driven on these, they are down to 1mm and I have to replace after just 8 month. Save yourself the hassle and get a decent tire for $50 a tire more. The value and wear life alone will make up for it
September 20, 2024
Given 56% while driving a Honda Prelude 2.2vtec (215/45 R17) on mostly town for 0 spirited miles
At the time when I bought these tyres these were available in my area for my size. I went from AD08 to these and they were noticeably more comfortable and quieter. My car has no ABS but it never locked up with AD08 when they were warmed up. With these, they would lock up everytime. Braking is downright dangerous with these tyres. I know they arent sporty and meant for SUVs but SUVs need to brake too. I wony recommend these to anyone. The steering response is great and they are comfortable with good lateral grip. But braking performance is scary. With ABS it might be different. Ill be going back to Yokohama AD08
October 5, 2023

How would you rate the Maxxis HP M3?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Maxxis HP M3 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 37% while driving a MG ZS EV (215/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
Honestly, these tyres haven't impressed. My wife's ZS was fitted with these from new, and immediately their deficiencies jumped out. Very numb steering response, not much in the way of feedback and the biggest problem, they are so easy to spin or slide in damp to wet conditions; trying to pull out of junctions in the wet requires you to be very gentle, or you're going nowhere with the smell of rubber coming into the cabin, at least until the traction control kicks in. You can also spin them if you are too enthusiastic in the dry, but it's not as much of a issue. This is our second ZS so we knew it wasn't the car; the first one was supplied on Kumho from new and felt entirely different.

They recently finally wore out, 15,000 miles for the fronts to wear out; ironically the rear tyres (FWD model) only lasted about 1500 miles more than the driven wheels. They've been replaced with Pirelli Powergy front and rear, and the car no longer feels numb, there's communication through the wheel, and they don't spin if you look at them funny. Overall, they are cheap for a reason, their life wasn't great, and their performance was iffy.
January 1, 2026
Given 36% while driving a MG ZS EV (255/55 R17) on mostly country roads for 9,000 average miles
Have these tyres on MG ZSEV. Performance is adequate in the dry. Reasonable grip and handling is acceptable given the rather stodgy set up of the MG. The issue is in the wet. The grip is awful. The torque from the electric motor spins the wheels when pulling away in the wet with almost no acceleration. It is downright dangerous. Cornering in the wet is also poor. I've decided to change these tyres at only 9000 miles, not because they are worn out, but because I'm not prepared to let me daughter (18 and inexperienced) drive on such scary tyres.
November 22, 2025
Given 85% while driving a Kia Motors Sorento III (UM) Diesel 2.2 CRDI (235/55 R18) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
A budget tyre that delivers sure footed handling. Wet and dry weather you feel safe. I am a driver who would represent most drivers on the road. I don't drive at excessive speeds. The tyres are very quite and comfortable. I live in Thailand and tyres are subject to changing road and weather conditions, they have never made me think of any reason to replace them. I would buy them again and I recommend them.
December 10, 2022
Given 86% while driving a Honda CRV (225/60 R18) on mostly motorways for 2,200 average miles
Good comfy tyres just done a return journey to the South of France very pleased withthem
May 19, 2022
Rate the Maxxis HP M3