Menu
Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo View Gallery (2)

Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo

Sailun Tyres Touring Winter

The Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo is a Touring Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

2.5
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
88%
Wet Grip
85%
Road Feedback
71%
Handling
77%
Wear
81%
Comfort
83%
Buy again
87%
Snow Grip
79%
Ice Grip
72%
11 Reviews
80% Average
28,350 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 44th)
Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo

Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo

Winter Economy
BETA
2.5 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Wet
55.3
1.93x / 1 test
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
55.3
1 test
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2019
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 11
Avg Rating: 80.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.51
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 44/47 1 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
1
Tests
44th
Average
44th
Best
44th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview
225/45 R17 • 2019
44th/47
View Test Results

Questions and Answers for the Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 10 user reviews

Drivers largely praise the Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo for outstanding value, confident wet grip, solid snow performance, comfortable ride, and decent efficiency/rolling resistance. Most reviews are highly positive, with several users comparing it favorably against pricier premium options. A minority note moderate road noise (especially at higher speeds) and slightly slow steering/feedback. Overall, it delivers strong winter performance for the price with only minor trade-offs.

Strengths
  • Value for money
  • Wet grip/handling
  • Snow traction
  • Ride comfort
  • Fuel efficiency/low rolling resistance
  • Overall grip
Areas for Improvement
  • Road noise at higher speeds
  • Slow steering response/limited feedback

Top 3 Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo Reviews

Given 73% while driving a Mercedes Benz E350 CDI Coupé 231hp (235/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
After few thousands kilometers and all kinds of weather i have the next impressions: dry handling is nothing special, not unsafe but could be better; dry braking is excellent; on wet weather its quite the opposite - wet handling is amazing (really strange) and wet braking is bad. On snowy conditions, it handles good but braking could be better. Comfort is good, road noise is also good. Rolling resistance (fuel efficiency) - good.
Helpful 715
March 5, 2024
Given 89% while driving a BMW 530D (225/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Amazing tyres, I changed them from weared out Michelin X-ice xi3(soft rubber) to these(harder rubber) and what I can say they are amazing, in average I would give Michelin 7 stars and 9 stars to Sailun. I drove my car with Michelin for 6 years, It was average for ice, but not very good for very snowy or wet roads. Sailun was amazing in rough rainy and very snowy roads when driving was very difficult, so they are much better. For ice i would say they are same. I would recommend to choose Sailun, they are very good at their price. I only drived 1 year with Sailuns, so I can't discuss about wearing as Michelins lasted 6 years in average snow/rain performance.. :) I would choose these tyres again 100%
Helpful 722
June 16, 2023
Given 54% while driving a Audi A6 S line (255/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 1,000 easy going miles
Grip snow bad
Helpful 810
January 11, 2023

How would you rate the Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo?

Click a star to start your review

182 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 90% while driving a BMW 520d (225/55 R17) on for 12,000 miles
Fited on Bmw F10, RWD. Best on snow. id buy them again over and over. best budget tyre
Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo image Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo additional image Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo additional image
Helpful 78
January 12, 2026
Given 71% while driving a Tesla Model S (245/45 R19) on mostly motorways for 2,000 easy going miles
Not bad for a low budget Chinese winter tire. There's a slight pitching notice at speeds above 90km/h, which is obviously more noticeable because I drive an electric car. But it's not that bad, and quite bearable. Rolling resistance is decent. Feedback not that good, and steering response is a bit slow. But for a set of 19" that costed 360e, you cannot really complain, no? If they can last for two seasons, I'd say it's absolutely best bang for the buck on the market right now.
Helpful 129
October 19, 2025
Given 90% while driving a Mercedes Benz (235/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 200 average miles
Really good tire, very comfortable, grip is great, road noise is low, efficiency is good. Handling, when compared to the wintercontact ts 850 p is slightly worse, but only marginally, and the comfort is so much better, which is more important to me. They are about three times less expensive than the continental and about 2,5 times less expensive than the ultragrip perfomance 3. They are really worth it, if they can last at least 40 000 km, i will be very pleased. The climate i live in does not get a lot of snow or ice, maybe few days in the year so i can't comment on snow/ice grip but for these colder dry conditions, everything has been almost perfect.
would recommend if you want quality for a fraction of premium
Helpful 586
December 22, 2023
Given 86% while driving a BMW 320d touring (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
Excellent tire for little money, I will buy the same tires again. Good handling and grip on dry and wet roads. Good driving in snow and ice.
Helpful 696
March 5, 2023
Given 91% while driving a Hyundai Tucson (225/55 R18 V) on a combination of roads for 1,150 easy going miles
Smooth ride with tyre, mid noisy, stable and very comfortable, low fuel consumption, money worth, not planing to buy premium tyre in future, go sailun...
Helpful 740
December 13, 2020
Given 91% while driving a Hyundai Tucson (225/55 R18 V) on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
Great tyres, premium tyres should lower the money value to their tyres (5 to 6 times exspensive) than this tyres. Great job Sailun, keep the good work...
Helpful 799
December 12, 2020
Given 87% while driving a Hyundai Grandeur (235/55 R17 V) on mostly town for 1,000 average miles
Very good tyres! They have amazing grip on cold wet roads, as well as very good braking. Some may find them a bit noisy, but who drives a car without music? To be honest they have exceeded my expectations. Extremely good value for money ratio. Good performance winter tyre! Chinese are advancing with their tyres.
Helpful 720
December 10, 2020
Rate the Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo