The 2021 Auto Zeitung SUV winter tyre test has tested ten suv winter tyres in 235/55 R18 size using a VW Tiguan crossover SUV.
As this is a smaller test when compared to other winter tyre tests we'll keep the introduction short. All ten sets of tyres were placed through the usual blend of dry, wet and snow testing, plus rolling resistance and noise.
In this test the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 wins another test with the best wet performance of the group, and the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 placed second with the best snow performance, two things we've seen plenty of times in previous tests.
Tyre Updates
Like nearly all winter tests, Auto Zeitung bought and tested the tyres at the end of the winter before publication, IE January 2021 for publication for the winter of 2021, and since then several of the tyres on test have received updates:
Continental update from DOT 3320: new mix, improved wear. TS870P also now available.
Falken changed mixture DOT 0721 for updated Label values according to the new regulation:D/B/72.
The new Goodyear UltraGrip Performance + SUV was introduced in May 2021 replacing the tyre in this test.
Hankook update from DOT 1521: new tread compound for improved wet grip,more precise handling by changing the sidewall structure.
Bridgestone, Firestone,Michelin, Nokian,Pirelli, Vredestein - No changes
Dry
The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV led dry braking, with the Vredestein Wintrac Pro and Nokian WRSUV 4 in second and third places.
Dry Braking
Spread: 2.20 M (5.2%)|Avg: 43.78 M
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
42.50 M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
42.90 M
Nokian WR SUV 4
43.30 M
Pirelli Scorpion Winter
43.60 M
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV
43.60 M
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
44.00 M
Continental Winter Contact TS 850
44.30 M
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
44.30 M
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
44.60 M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
44.70 M
Strangely the best tyres in dry braking were midpack at best during the dry handling test, with the Pirelli Scorpion Winter jumping up the order to finish half a second ahead of the second placed Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Dry Handling
Spread: 1.70 s (2.7%)|Avg: 64.41 s
Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
Pirelli Scorpion Winter
63.40 s
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
63.90 s
Continental Winter Contact TS 850
64.30 s
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
64.40 s
Nokian WR SUV 4
64.40 s
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV
64.50 s
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
64.50 s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
64.70 s
Firestone Winterhawk 4
64.90 s
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
65.10 s
Wet
The Bridgestone performed well during wet braking, but the Vredestein Wintrac Pro was again close to the top and this time the aging Continental Wintercontact TSS850P finished in third.
Wet Braking
Spread: 9.90 M (19.5%)|Avg: 55.11 M
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
50.80 M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
51.30 M
Continental Winter Contact TS 850
52.00 M
Nokian WR SUV 4
54.00 M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
54.50 M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
54.60 M
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV
55.00 M
Pirelli Scorpion Winter
58.20 M
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
60.00 M
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
60.70 M
Vredestein and Michelin again performed well in wet handling, with Continental claiming third.
Wet Handling
Spread: 6.40 s (7.1%)|Avg: 92.06 s
Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
89.80 s
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
90.10 s
Continental Winter Contact TS 850
90.20 s
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
91.20 s
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV
91.90 s
Firestone Winterhawk 4
92.00 s
Nokian WR SUV 4
92.40 s
Pirelli Scorpion Winter
93.30 s
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
93.50 s
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
96.20 s
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had the highest aquaplaning resistance by quite a margin.
Straight Aqua
Spread: 12.00 Km/H (14.7%)|Avg: 75.14 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
81.60 Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 4
78.00 Km/H
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
77.90 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
75.60 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV
75.20 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
74.90 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
73.30 Km/H
Continental Winter Contact TS 850
73.10 Km/H
Pirelli Scorpion Winter
72.20 Km/H
Nokian WR SUV 4
69.60 Km/H
Snow
Vredestein once again stopped the test vehicle effectively, winning snow braking.
Snow Braking
Spread: 1.90 M (6.8%)|Avg: 28.81 M
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
27.90 M
Nokian WR SUV 4
28.10 M
Continental Winter Contact TS 850
28.20 M
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
28.30 M
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
28.90 M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
29.00 M
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
29.10 M
Pirelli Scorpion Winter
29.30 M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
29.50 M
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV
29.80 M
Hankook took their first test win during snow traction with the Hankook Winter I Cept EVO 3 SUV with Michelin in a very close second place.
Snow Traction
Spread: 261.00 N (8.5%)|Avg: 2974.00 N
Pulling Force in Newtons (Higher is better)
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
3084.00 N
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
3081.00 N
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
3035.00 N
Firestone Winterhawk 4
3017.00 N
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
2981.00 N
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV
2964.00 N
Nokian WR SUV 4
2955.00 N
Pirelli Scorpion Winter
2921.00 N
Continental Winter Contact TS 850
2879.00 N
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
2823.00 N
Snow handling was conducted on a short indoor track.
Snow Handling
Spread: 1.10 s (3.8%)|Avg: 29.69 s
Snow handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
29.00 s
Continental Winter Contact TS 850
29.20 s
Firestone Winterhawk 4
29.20 s
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
29.60 s
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV
29.90 s
Nokian WR SUV 4
29.90 s
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
29.90 s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
30.00 s
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
30.10 s
Pirelli Scorpion Winter
30.10 s
Environment
The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was significantly quieter than the next best tyre, the Firestone WinterHawk 4.
Noise
Spread: 3.00 dB (4.3%)|Avg: 72.10 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
70.00 dB
Firestone Winterhawk 4
71.00 dB
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV
72.00 dB
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
72.00 dB
Nokian WR SUV 4
72.00 dB
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
72.00 dB
Pirelli Scorpion Winter
73.00 dB
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
73.00 dB
Continental Winter Contact TS 850
73.00 dB
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
73.00 dB
Continental had the lowest fuel use of the group, with the Falken trailing the pack by a margin.
Rolling Resistance
Spread: 2.00 kg / t (27.4%)|Avg: 8.10 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
Continental Winter Contact TS 850
7.30 kg / t
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
7.70 kg / t
Nokian WR SUV 4
7.90 kg / t
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
7.90 kg / t
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV
8.00 kg / t
Firestone Winterhawk 4
8.00 kg / t
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
8.20 kg / t
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
8.20 kg / t
Pirelli Scorpion Winter
8.50 kg / t
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
9.30 kg / t
The Falken balanced out some of the fuel costs by being the cheapest tyre on test, with the Michelin the most expensive.