Menu

Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV

The Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV is a Ultra High Performance Winter tyre designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

9.0
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
92%
Wet Grip
80%
Road Feedback
90%
Handling
86%
Wear
90%
Comfort
96%
Buy again
84%
Snow Grip
55%
Ice Grip
30%
5 Reviews
78% Average
45,000 miles driven
8 Tests (avg: 3rd)
Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV

Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV

Winter Premium
BETA
9 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Value
94.8
0.38x / 6 tests
Snow
85.5
1.5x / 8 tests
Wet
82.9
2x / 10 tests
Dry
57.5
1.2x / 6 tests
Comfort
55.5
0.29x / 3 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
81.9
9 tests
Handling
77.7
9 tests
Traction
68.1
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 8
Publications: 5
Period: 2015 - 2021
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 5
Avg Rating: 78.1%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.76
History Points: 6
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2021 235/55 R18 3/10 12 metrics
2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2018 235/60 R18 2/9 11 metrics
2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test Auto Bild Allrad 2018 235/60 R18 3/11 10 metrics
2017 235/55 R17 SUV Winter Tyre Test ACE 2017 235/55 R17 3/8 0 metrics
2017 ADAC SUV Winter Tyre Test - 215/65 R16 ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 7/16 0 metrics
2016 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2016 215/60 R17 1/10 0 metrics
2016 AutoBild 4x4 Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild Allrad 2016 255/55 R18 2/8 0 metrics
2015 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild Allrad 2015 215/65 R16 3/8 0 metrics
8
Tests
3rd
Average
1st
Best
7th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test
235/55 R18 • 2021
3rd/10
The TS870P SUV is an excellent allrounder, safe on every surface, with the lowest rolling resistance on test.
Winter specialist with excellent snow performance, dynamic sporty wet handling and low rolling resistance.
Slightly long dry braking.
2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test
235/60 R18 • 2018
2nd/9
A very well balanced performance for the TS850P SUV, strong in all categories.

Questions and Answers for the Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV Reviews

Given 79% while driving a Mercedes Benz GLS 500 bi turbo (265/55 R19) on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
I have had the Conti's for 4-5 years on all my cars (high powered SUVs) both 235/65/17 as well as 265/55/19 in XL. The only positive is that they are truly balanced across all dimensions and adequate performers for both dry, wet (although lousy aquaplaning) with worst performance (but still ok if you are careful) on snow and winter slush. On the other side would love to change them but have not found a better performer (in all categories) and especially better in aquaplaning and winter slush. I strongly differentiate between snow tires and winter tires. Snow tires are winter tires but not all winter tires are snow tires. When I go skiing I mount a totally different set of tires (from another manufacturer). The Conti's are outstanding in terms of their durability. Heavy driving in mixed conditions and with SUVs weighing between 2800 and 3500 kg. 25'000 km and only used 3 mm of tread (6.5 left) although I never run winter tires under 4mm. ,With no other alternative (although I am testing some tires selectively will probably also buy them next time.
Ask a question | Helpful 810
February 15, 2024
Given 96% while driving a Volvo XC60 D5 AWD Auto (235/60 R18 W) on mostly country roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Have had these tyres on since October 2014, covered around 2,000 miles, so have driven in pretty much all conditions. Excellent handling and grip on wet, muddy, roads. Was really impressed with their grip on snow, felt really safe and positive feedback when turning. When the snow really came down and most of my neighbours stayed at home, we headed off up to the mountains to try them out on Virgin snow and ice covered roads! Superb grip, nothing thrown at them fazed them, brilliant performance. Their performance on wet surfaces is stunning, throwing the car around sharp bends and roundabouts at speed, not one moment of slip, stuck like glue, I cannot praise them enough. Would definitely recommend them without hesitation!
March 10, 2015
Given 63% while driving a Kia Motors (235/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 3,000 average miles
Rather disappointed with these tyres, having driven to Scotland for Christmas. They have been used in snow, on ice and in heavy rain and overall grip I would rate as poor. They are of course, better than summer tyres but nowhere near the performance of my previous 2 sets of continental winter tyres. The rear wheels spin up easily in all but the driest of conditions, causing the torque on demand system to kick in prematurely. I would not recommend these tyres and look forward to changing back to summer tyres when practical.
January 16, 2015
Have you driven on the Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV >

Latest Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV Reviews

Given 96% while driving a Honda CR V III (225/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
I have driven through snow on estate roads, country roads and motorways with no slip or wheel-spin whatsoever. Cold weather tyres are a no-brainer. Buy a set, and enjoy being able to drive regardless of whether a gritting lorry has been down your road. Don't take my word for it, check https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfuE00qdhLA and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7l2cMlNRX_A
Car manufacturers don't give a to$$ if your tyres won't hold the road in winter, as long as they get better emissions results, by fitting hard compound summer tyres as standard.
January 7, 2015