Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/50 R17
Tyres tested
20
Disciplines
11

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
37.9 m -5.80 m
43.7 m Best
44.5 m +0.80 m
44.5 m +0.80 m
44.5 m +0.80 m
44.6 m +0.90 m
44.8 m +1.10 m
44.9 m +1.20 m
44.9 m +1.20 m
45.1 m +1.40 m
45.2 m +1.50 m
45.4 m +1.70 m
45.4 m +1.70 m
45.5 m +1.80 m
45.6 m +1.90 m
45.6 m +1.90 m
45.6 m +1.90 m
45.7 m +2.00 m
46 m +2.30 m
46.3 m +2.60 m
46.7 m +3.00 m

The difference between best and worst was 23.2% (8.8 m ≈ 2 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
113.2 km/h +2.40 km/h
110.8 km/h Best
109.7 km/h -1.10 km/h
109.6 km/h -1.20 km/h
109.6 km/h -1.20 km/h
109.5 km/h -1.30 km/h
109.4 km/h -1.40 km/h
109.3 km/h -1.50 km/h
109.1 km/h -1.70 km/h
109.1 km/h -1.70 km/h
109 km/h -1.80 km/h
108.9 km/h -1.90 km/h
108.8 km/h -2.00 km/h
108.7 km/h -2.10 km/h
108.6 km/h -2.20 km/h
108.5 km/h -2.30 km/h
108.3 km/h -2.50 km/h
108.3 km/h -2.50 km/h
107.3 km/h -3.50 km/h
107.3 km/h -3.50 km/h
107 km/h -3.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (6.2 Km/H).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
31 m -1.20 m
32.2 m Best
32.5 m +0.30 m
33.3 m +1.10 m
33.4 m +1.20 m
33.5 m +1.30 m
33.6 m +1.40 m
34 m +1.80 m
34.4 m +2.20 m
34.7 m +2.50 m
34.8 m +2.60 m
35 m +2.80 m
35.1 m +2.90 m
35.5 m +3.30 m
35.7 m +3.50 m
35.8 m +3.60 m
35.9 m +3.70 m
36 m +3.80 m
36.3 m +4.10 m
36.4 m +4.20 m
36.5 m +4.30 m

The difference between best and worst was 17.7% (5.5 m ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
77.5 km/h +1.70 km/h
75.8 km/h Best
74.9 km/h -0.90 km/h
74.7 km/h -1.10 km/h
74.6 km/h -1.20 km/h
74.2 km/h -1.60 km/h
74.1 km/h -1.70 km/h
73.6 km/h -2.20 km/h
73.6 km/h -2.20 km/h
73.5 km/h -2.30 km/h
72.8 km/h -3.00 km/h
72.6 km/h -3.20 km/h
72.3 km/h -3.50 km/h
72.2 km/h -3.60 km/h
72.1 km/h -3.70 km/h
71.9 km/h -3.90 km/h
71.3 km/h -4.50 km/h
71.3 km/h -4.50 km/h
71.2 km/h -4.60 km/h
71.1 km/h -4.70 km/h
70.6 km/h -5.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (6.9 Km/H).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
93.3 km/h Best
90.9 km/h -2.40 km/h
90.7 km/h -2.60 km/h
RefReference Summer
90.5 km/h -2.80 km/h
90.5 km/h -2.80 km/h
88.9 km/h -4.40 km/h
88.7 km/h -4.60 km/h
88.3 km/h -5.00 km/h
88.1 km/h -5.20 km/h
87.8 km/h -5.50 km/h
87.5 km/h -5.80 km/h
87.5 km/h -5.80 km/h
87.5 km/h -5.80 km/h
86.8 km/h -6.50 km/h
86.5 km/h -6.80 km/h
86.1 km/h -7.20 km/h
85.5 km/h -7.80 km/h
85.4 km/h -7.90 km/h
85 km/h -8.30 km/h
84.8 km/h -8.50 km/h
84.6 km/h -8.70 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 9.3% (8.7 Km/H).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
25.9 m Best
26.7 m +0.80 m
27.2 m +1.30 m
27.4 m +1.50 m
27.5 m +1.60 m
27.6 m +1.70 m
27.6 m +1.70 m
27.7 m +1.80 m
27.7 m +1.80 m
27.9 m +2.00 m
28 m +2.10 m
28.1 m +2.20 m
28.1 m +2.20 m
28.3 m +2.40 m
28.3 m +2.40 m
28.6 m +2.70 m
28.7 m +2.80 m
28.7 m +2.80 m
29.2 m +3.30 m
29.8 m +3.90 m
RefReference Summer
60.7 m +34.80 m

The difference between best and worst was 134.4% (34.8 m ≈ 7.7 Car Lengths).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
52.6 km/h Best
52.3 km/h -0.30 km/h
52.2 km/h -0.40 km/h
52.2 km/h -0.40 km/h
52 km/h -0.60 km/h
51.9 km/h -0.70 km/h
51.7 km/h -0.90 km/h
51.6 km/h -1.00 km/h
51.4 km/h -1.20 km/h
51.2 km/h -1.40 km/h
51.1 km/h -1.50 km/h
50.9 km/h -1.70 km/h
50.9 km/h -1.70 km/h
50.9 km/h -1.70 km/h
50.7 km/h -1.90 km/h
50.6 km/h -2.00 km/h
50.4 km/h -2.20 km/h
50.2 km/h -2.40 km/h
50 km/h -2.60 km/h
49.7 km/h -2.90 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (2.9 Km/H).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70.9 dB Best
71.8 dB +0.90 dB
71.9 dB +1.00 dB
71.9 dB +1.00 dB
72.2 dB +1.30 dB
72.2 dB +1.30 dB
72.2 dB +1.30 dB
72.4 dB +1.50 dB
72.7 dB +1.80 dB
72.8 dB +1.90 dB
72.8 dB +1.90 dB
73 dB +2.10 dB
73 dB +2.10 dB
73.1 dB +2.20 dB
73.5 dB +2.60 dB
73.5 dB +2.60 dB
73.5 dB +2.60 dB
73.7 dB +2.80 dB
73.9 dB +3.00 dB
74 dB +3.10 dB
RefReference Summer
75.3 dB +4.40 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6.2% (4.4 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
48,375 KM Best
47,625 KM -750 KM
44,250 KM -4,125 KM
44,250 KM -4,125 KM
42,375 KM -6,000 KM
40,125 KM -8,250 KM
38,625 KM -9,750 KM
37,500 KM -10,875 KM
37,500 KM -10,875 KM
37,500 KM -10,875 KM
36,375 KM -12,000 KM
35,250 KM -13,125 KM
34,875 KM -13,500 KM
34,875 KM -13,500 KM
34,500 KM -13,875 KM
33,375 KM -15,000 KM
32,625 KM -15,750 KM
32,250 KM -16,125 KM
29,625 KM -18,750 KM
28,875 KM -19,500 KM

The difference between best and worst was 40.3% (19,500 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
7.55 Price/1000 Best €16.32
7.57 Price/1000 +0.02 Price/1000 €11.87
9.13 Price/1000 +1.58 Price/1000 €13.76
9.2 Price/1000 +1.65 Price/1000 €13.86
9.33 Price/1000 +1.78 Price/1000 €12.80
9.87 Price/1000 +2.32 Price/1000 €14.27
11.47 Price/1000 +3.92 Price/1000 €13.82
11.55 Price/1000 +4.00 Price/1000 €17.94
12.3 Price/1000 +4.75 Price/1000 €18.02
12.43 Price/1000 +4.88 Price/1000 €19.29
12.47 Price/1000 +4.92 Price/1000 €18.60
12.62 Price/1000 +5.07 Price/1000 €20.28
12.71 Price/1000 +5.16 Price/1000 €18.54
12.72 Price/1000 +5.17 Price/1000 €20.33
13.78 Price/1000 +6.23 Price/1000 €18.78
15.04 Price/1000 +7.49 Price/1000 €20.48
15.94 Price/1000 +8.39 Price/1000 €21.17
16.1 Price/1000 +8.55 Price/1000 €22.50
16.59 Price/1000 +9.04 Price/1000 €22.29
16.88 Price/1000 +9.33 Price/1000 €23.52

The difference between best and worst was 123.6% (9.33 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Sava Eskimo HP2) works out €466 cheaper than the most expensive (Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2017 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
RefReference Summer
7.1 kg/t -0.13 kg/t £0
7.23 kg/t Best £0
7.53 kg/t +0.30 kg/t £18
7.78 kg/t +0.55 kg/t £34
7.83 kg/t +0.60 kg/t £37
7.88 kg/t +0.65 kg/t £40
7.91 kg/t +0.68 kg/t £41
7.95 kg/t +0.72 kg/t £44
7.96 kg/t +0.73 kg/t £45
8.03 kg/t +0.80 kg/t £49
8.05 kg/t +0.82 kg/t £50
8.15 kg/t +0.92 kg/t £56
8.17 kg/t +0.94 kg/t £57
8.2 kg/t +0.97 kg/t £59
8.21 kg/t +0.98 kg/t £60
8.25 kg/t +1.02 kg/t £62
8.3 kg/t +1.07 kg/t £65
8.52 kg/t +1.29 kg/t £79
8.57 kg/t +1.34 kg/t £82
8.62 kg/t +1.39 kg/t £85
9.07 kg/t +1.84 kg/t £112

The difference between best and worst was 27.7% (1.97 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 uses about 77 L (£112) more fuel than the Uniroyal MS Plus 77.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.