Test Charts / Auto Bild
2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/50 R17
- Tyres tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 11
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
37.9 m | -5.80 m |
| 43.7 m | Best | |
| 44.5 m | +0.80 m | |
| 44.5 m | +0.80 m | |
| 44.5 m | +0.80 m | |
| 44.6 m | +0.90 m | |
| 44.8 m | +1.10 m | |
| 44.9 m | +1.20 m | |
| 44.9 m | +1.20 m | |
| 45.1 m | +1.40 m | |
| 45.2 m | +1.50 m | |
| 45.4 m | +1.70 m | |
| 45.4 m | +1.70 m | |
| 45.5 m | +1.80 m | |
| 45.6 m | +1.90 m | |
| 45.6 m | +1.90 m | |
| 45.6 m | +1.90 m | |
| 45.7 m | +2.00 m | |
| 46 m | +2.30 m | |
| 46.3 m | +2.60 m | |
| 46.7 m | +3.00 m |
The difference between best and worst was 23.2% (8.8 m ≈ 2 Car Lengths).
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
113.2 km/h | +2.40 km/h |
| 110.8 km/h | Best | |
| 109.7 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 109.6 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 109.6 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 109.5 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 109.4 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 109.3 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 109.1 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 109.1 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 109 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 108.9 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 108.8 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 108.7 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 108.6 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 108.5 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 108.3 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 108.3 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 107.3 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 107.3 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 107 km/h | -3.80 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (6.2 Km/H).
Wet
3Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
31 m | -1.20 m |
| 32.2 m | Best | |
| 32.5 m | +0.30 m | |
| 33.3 m | +1.10 m | |
| 33.4 m | +1.20 m | |
| 33.5 m | +1.30 m | |
| 33.6 m | +1.40 m | |
| 34 m | +1.80 m | |
| 34.4 m | +2.20 m | |
| 34.7 m | +2.50 m | |
| 34.8 m | +2.60 m | |
| 35 m | +2.80 m | |
| 35.1 m | +2.90 m | |
| 35.5 m | +3.30 m | |
| 35.7 m | +3.50 m | |
| 35.8 m | +3.60 m | |
| 35.9 m | +3.70 m | |
| 36 m | +3.80 m | |
| 36.3 m | +4.10 m | |
| 36.4 m | +4.20 m | |
| 36.5 m | +4.30 m |
The difference between best and worst was 17.7% (5.5 m ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
77.5 km/h | +1.70 km/h |
| 75.8 km/h | Best | |
| 74.9 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 74.7 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 74.6 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 74.2 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 74.1 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 73.6 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 73.6 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 73.5 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 72.8 km/h | -3.00 km/h | |
| 72.6 km/h | -3.20 km/h | |
| 72.3 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 72.2 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 72.1 km/h | -3.70 km/h | |
| 71.9 km/h | -3.90 km/h | |
| 71.3 km/h | -4.50 km/h | |
| 71.3 km/h | -4.50 km/h | |
| 71.2 km/h | -4.60 km/h | |
| 71.1 km/h | -4.70 km/h | |
| 70.6 km/h | -5.20 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (6.9 Km/H).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 93.3 km/h | Best | |
| 90.9 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 90.7 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
90.5 km/h | -2.80 km/h |
| 90.5 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 88.9 km/h | -4.40 km/h | |
| 88.7 km/h | -4.60 km/h | |
| 88.3 km/h | -5.00 km/h | |
| 88.1 km/h | -5.20 km/h | |
| 87.8 km/h | -5.50 km/h | |
| 87.5 km/h | -5.80 km/h | |
| 87.5 km/h | -5.80 km/h | |
| 87.5 km/h | -5.80 km/h | |
| 86.8 km/h | -6.50 km/h | |
| 86.5 km/h | -6.80 km/h | |
| 86.1 km/h | -7.20 km/h | |
| 85.5 km/h | -7.80 km/h | |
| 85.4 km/h | -7.90 km/h | |
| 85 km/h | -8.30 km/h | |
| 84.8 km/h | -8.50 km/h | |
| 84.6 km/h | -8.70 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 9.3% (8.7 Km/H).
Snow
2Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 25.9 m | Best | |
| 26.7 m | +0.80 m | |
| 27.2 m | +1.30 m | |
| 27.4 m | +1.50 m | |
| 27.5 m | +1.60 m | |
| 27.6 m | +1.70 m | |
| 27.6 m | +1.70 m | |
| 27.7 m | +1.80 m | |
| 27.7 m | +1.80 m | |
| 27.9 m | +2.00 m | |
| 28 m | +2.10 m | |
| 28.1 m | +2.20 m | |
| 28.1 m | +2.20 m | |
| 28.3 m | +2.40 m | |
| 28.3 m | +2.40 m | |
| 28.6 m | +2.70 m | |
| 28.7 m | +2.80 m | |
| 28.7 m | +2.80 m | |
| 29.2 m | +3.30 m | |
| 29.8 m | +3.90 m | |
RefReference Summer |
60.7 m | +34.80 m |
The difference between best and worst was 134.4% (34.8 m ≈ 7.7 Car Lengths).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 52.6 km/h | Best | |
| 52.3 km/h | -0.30 km/h | |
| 52.2 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 52.2 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 52 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 51.9 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 51.7 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 51.6 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 51.4 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 51.2 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 51.1 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 50.9 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 50.9 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 50.9 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 50.7 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 50.6 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 50.4 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 50.2 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 50 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
| 49.7 km/h | -2.90 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (2.9 Km/H).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70.9 dB | Best | |
| 71.8 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 72.8 dB | +1.90 dB | |
| 72.8 dB | +1.90 dB | |
| 73 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 73 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 73.1 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 73.5 dB | +2.60 dB | |
| 73.5 dB | +2.60 dB | |
| 73.5 dB | +2.60 dB | |
| 73.7 dB | +2.80 dB | |
| 73.9 dB | +3.00 dB | |
| 74 dB | +3.10 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
75.3 dB | +4.40 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 6.2% (4.4 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48,375 KM | Best | |
| 47,625 KM | -750 KM | |
| 44,250 KM | -4,125 KM | |
| 44,250 KM | -4,125 KM | |
| 42,375 KM | -6,000 KM | |
| 40,125 KM | -8,250 KM | |
| 38,625 KM | -9,750 KM | |
| 37,500 KM | -10,875 KM | |
| 37,500 KM | -10,875 KM | |
| 37,500 KM | -10,875 KM | |
| 36,375 KM | -12,000 KM | |
| 35,250 KM | -13,125 KM | |
| 34,875 KM | -13,500 KM | |
| 34,875 KM | -13,500 KM | |
| 34,500 KM | -13,875 KM | |
| 33,375 KM | -15,000 KM | |
| 32,625 KM | -15,750 KM | |
| 32,250 KM | -16,125 KM | |
| 29,625 KM | -18,750 KM | |
| 28,875 KM | -19,500 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 40.3% (19,500 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 km |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.55 Price/1000 | Best | €16.32 | |
| 7.57 Price/1000 | +0.02 Price/1000 | €11.87 | |
| 9.13 Price/1000 | +1.58 Price/1000 | €13.76 | |
| 9.2 Price/1000 | +1.65 Price/1000 | €13.86 | |
| 9.33 Price/1000 | +1.78 Price/1000 | €12.80 | |
| 9.87 Price/1000 | +2.32 Price/1000 | €14.27 | |
| 11.47 Price/1000 | +3.92 Price/1000 | €13.82 | |
| 11.55 Price/1000 | +4.00 Price/1000 | €17.94 | |
| 12.3 Price/1000 | +4.75 Price/1000 | €18.02 | |
| 12.43 Price/1000 | +4.88 Price/1000 | €19.29 | |
| 12.47 Price/1000 | +4.92 Price/1000 | €18.60 | |
| 12.62 Price/1000 | +5.07 Price/1000 | €20.28 | |
| 12.71 Price/1000 | +5.16 Price/1000 | €18.54 | |
| 12.72 Price/1000 | +5.17 Price/1000 | €20.33 | |
| 13.78 Price/1000 | +6.23 Price/1000 | €18.78 | |
| 15.04 Price/1000 | +7.49 Price/1000 | €20.48 | |
| 15.94 Price/1000 | +8.39 Price/1000 | €21.17 | |
| 16.1 Price/1000 | +8.55 Price/1000 | €22.50 | |
| 16.59 Price/1000 | +9.04 Price/1000 | €22.29 | |
| 16.88 Price/1000 | +9.33 Price/1000 | €23.52 |
The difference between best and worst was 123.6% (9.33 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Sava Eskimo HP2) works out €466 cheaper than the most expensive (Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2017 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
7.1 kg/t | -0.13 kg/t | £0 |
| 7.23 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.53 kg/t | +0.30 kg/t | £18 | |
| 7.78 kg/t | +0.55 kg/t | £34 | |
| 7.83 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | £37 | |
| 7.88 kg/t | +0.65 kg/t | £40 | |
| 7.91 kg/t | +0.68 kg/t | £41 | |
| 7.95 kg/t | +0.72 kg/t | £44 | |
| 7.96 kg/t | +0.73 kg/t | £45 | |
| 8.03 kg/t | +0.80 kg/t | £49 | |
| 8.05 kg/t | +0.82 kg/t | £50 | |
| 8.15 kg/t | +0.92 kg/t | £56 | |
| 8.17 kg/t | +0.94 kg/t | £57 | |
| 8.2 kg/t | +0.97 kg/t | £59 | |
| 8.21 kg/t | +0.98 kg/t | £60 | |
| 8.25 kg/t | +1.02 kg/t | £62 | |
| 8.3 kg/t | +1.07 kg/t | £65 | |
| 8.52 kg/t | +1.29 kg/t | £79 | |
| 8.57 kg/t | +1.34 kg/t | £82 | |
| 8.62 kg/t | +1.39 kg/t | £85 | |
| 9.07 kg/t | +1.84 kg/t | £112 |
The difference between best and worst was 27.7% (1.97 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 uses about 77 L (£112) more fuel than the Uniroyal MS Plus 77.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2017 50 Winter Tyre Shoot Out
225/50 R1745 tyres tested
19 of these 20 tyres tested again
2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview
225/45 R1747 tyres tested
12 of these 20 tyres tested again
2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test
225/45 R1720 tyres tested
11 of these 20 tyres tested again

