Firestone Winterhawk 3

The Firestone Winterhawk 3 is a Touring Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

This tyre replaced the Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO and this tyre has been replaced by the Firestone Winterhawk 4.

Tyre Reviews

Dry Grip 77%
Wet Grip 67%
Road Feedback 69%
Handling 69%
Wear 73%
Comfort 71%
Buy again 63%
Snow Grip 50%
Ice Grip 50%

Tyre review data from 7 tyre reviews averaging 65% over 59,000 miles driven.

The Winterhawk 3 is ranked 67th of 88 Winter Touring tyres.

Latest Tyre Test Results

2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test - 33rd of 49 tyres

View Full Test >>

2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview - 24th of 47 tyres

View Full Test >>

2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test - 19th of 22 tyres

  • Positive - Low price, ok in snow.
  • Negative - Low grip and slow steering in the wet, long wet and dry braking, low comfort.
View Full Test >>
Size Fuel Wet Noise Weight
155/80 R13 79T   E C 71 5.72kgs
155/65 R14 75T   E C 71 5.56kgs
165/65 R14 79T   E C 71 6.26kgs
175/65 R14 86T XL   E C 71 6.35kgs
175/65 R14 82T   E C 71 6.75kgs
165/70 R14 81T   E C 71 6.18kgs
185/70 R14 88T   E C 71 7.13kgs
195/50 R15 82H   E C 72 7.50kgs
195/50 R15 82T   E C 72 7.50kgs
195/55 R15 85H   E C 72 7.64kgs
195/60 R15 88T   E C 71 7.82kgs
165/65 R15 81T   E C 71 6.58kgs
185/65 R15 88T   E C 71 7.63kgs
195/65 R15 91T   E B 72 8.27kgs
195/65 R15 91T   E C 72 8.01kgs
195/65 R15 91H   E C 72 8.42kgs
195/55 R16 87H   E C 72 8.02kgs
205/55 R16 91T   E C 72 8.84kgs
205/55 R16 94H XL   E C 72 8.91kgs
205/55 R16 91H   E C 72 8.84kgs
215/55 R16 97H XL   E C 72 9.43kgs
225/55 R16 95H   E C 72 9.63kgs
205/60 R16 96H XL   C B 72 8.74kgs
205/60 R16 92H   E B 72 8.73kgs
205/45 R17 88V XL   E C 72 8.42kgs
225/45 R17 91H   E C 71 9.69kgs
225/45 R17 94V XL   E C 71 9.65kgs
235/45 R17 97V XL   E C 72 10.03kgs
205/50 R17 93V XL   E C 72 9.29kgs
215/50 R17 95V XL   C C 72 9.46kgs
225/50 R17 98H XL   C C 72 10.47kgs
225/50 R17 98V XL   C C 72 10.47kgs
205/55 R17 95V XL   E C 72 9.30kgs
215/55 R17 98V XL   E C 72 9.95kgs
225/55 R17 101V XL   E C 72 11.17kgs
225/40 R18 92V XL   E C 72 9.86kgs
245/40 R18 97V XL   E C 72 10.40kgs
225/45 R18 95V XL   E C 72 9.77kgs
235/45 R18 98V XL   C C 72 10.42kgs
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Firestone Winterhawk 3. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address


To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.

Winterhawk 3 Prices

Size Price Range  
155/65 R14 £40.91 - £40.91 (1 Prices) Compare Prices >>
185/65 R15 £46.97 - £90.80 (6 Prices) Compare Prices >>
195/65 R15 £46.48 - £89.60 (7 Prices) Compare Prices >>
205/55 R16 £59.91 - £157.10 (12 Prices) Compare Prices >>
225/50 R17 £96.90 - £115.40 (16 Prices) Compare Prices >>
Available in 28 tyre sizes - View all.

Top 3 Firestone Winterhawk 3 Reviews

Given 100% while driving a BMW 530d Auto SE LCI (225/50 R17 H) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
Excellent dry and wet grip, super quiet, super comfortable. I had previously Continental, and I must say that these tires are nozaj excellent and I dare say that even better.
93 - tyre reviewed on December 7, 2015   
Given 71% while driving a Peugeot 107 (155/65 R14) on mostly town for 9,000 average miles
In my opinion Firestone Winterhawk 3 is at most an average performance tyre. Maybe this should be correlated with my car tyre size (155/65 R14)...
In dry conditions it is a fair tyre, though it has a pronounced understeering tendency. The wet grip is acceptable if you don't need to brake suddenly :), and the snow/ice grip is poor.

- Comfortable tyres
- Low rolling resistance
- Low wear

- Wet grip.
- Poor snow and ice grip.
- Understeering behaviour.

Next time I will not buy these tyres again.
15 - tyre reviewed on January 12, 2017   
Given 74% while driving a Renault Megane 2 sedan (195/65 R15 T) on mostly town for 25,000 average miles
Been driving them around 40 000km (4 winters and 1 summer) on 2 wheel FWD car (1.6 atmo engine, no turbo so no torque). They are a pretty average tire. Handles everything well, master of none. Never got to the max of the tire (I drive 10-20kmh above limit and I'm a steady driver, no sharp turns, heavy braking or hard acceleration ), never had a scary situation, but never also had "wow this tire rocks" moment. It never stuck in the snow, never had problems with aquaplaning or on ice.

I even had it as a summer tyre this year and it still didn't wear (it is a better summer tire than Micheling Energy Saver). I'm currently on 5.5mm of thread which is outstanding. Not sure if its the tire or my suspension on the car, but bot tires (Energy Saver and WinterHawk 3) easily activated the ABS during braking. WinterHawk was little better in braking than the Energy Saver. For instance, on my other car (Skoda Fabia), you could brake harder and stop faster on less known tires (like the Barum Polaris or Bravuris 3HM). Skoda just digged in the asphalt or snow, while on my Megane ABS starts and the braking feeling is not so great. But this are two different cars, Megane is more comfortable than the Å koda but is also way more wallowy as the Å koda is much more direct in steering and grip.

I will replace them with premium All Season tires so will see if its the car or the tires.
6 - tyre reviewed on August 19, 2019   
Have you driven on the Firestone Winterhawk 3 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Firestone Winterhawk 3? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Firestone Winterhawk 3 >

Latest Firestone Winterhawk 3 Reviews

Given 48% while driving a Ford Focus MK3 (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 4,000 average miles
Got them as a used set of four. All same age - 2 years. The previous driver seemed to be an honest person. So nothing to say about that. I was used to having Uniroyals on my previous car. No comparison to them. In dry and wet conditions the tyres are quite all right, but last winter luckily gave us a bit of slush and snow. The car behaved not good. Steering wasn't put through to the road. I'll buy a pair of new ones soon. It'll not be the Winterhawk 3 again.
0 - tyre reviewed on August 12, 2021   
Given 23% while driving a Mercedes Benz E220Cdi (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Hello, I have Mercdes Benz. I have driven on lot of tyres, winter and summer. This is not my first snow or rain with this car. Firestone Winterhawk 3 is the worst tyre I had opportunity to drive on. On dry roads are relative ok, on wet roads it is better to stay home. On the snow also, like you don't have tyres. One season, around cca 10 000 km passed on these tyre and it will go to rubish... Very expensive tyres, and very bad tyres. I would never buy Firestone again.
3 - tyre reviewed on February 26, 2018   
Want the best all season tyre? Click here!
Given 69% while driving a Skoda Octavia (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 13,000 average miles
Nothing to impress. It is balanced and affordable tire. Performance on snow is Ok if you drive normally. Dry and wet handling are satisfactory.
4 - tyre reviewed on October 18, 2017