“Good looking tyre with reliable grip. I'm a sporty driver, although my car isn't sporty. The tyres give me a good grip, maybe not the best, but i've never felt losing grip while driving. Also in the snow it's very good...”
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Replaced by the Winterhawk 4 Replaces the Winterhawk 2 EVO
The Firestone Winterhawk 3 is a Central European winter tyre with generally favourable dry-grip feedback and repeated test praise for low noise and ice performance. Wet braking is a recurring weakness, while snow performance varies between tests and owners.
Dry grip is generally well liked by owners, and testers have repeatedly praised low noise and ice performance. However, ice feedback is divided among the seven owner reviews, and snow traction draws three favourable comments against two complaints. Comfort is praised by two owners but divides testers. Some mid-life accounts describe low wear, although there is also a wear complaint and no end-of-life or follow-up evidence establishing how performance changes with age.
Wet-road performance is the more persistent concern: owners raise more criticisms than praise, and wet braking was near the back in the 2017 Auto Bild test and last of 22 in 2018. Earlier ADAC wet-road praise is unusual against that later pattern. Third overall in the 2018 ADAC test also contrasts unusually with 19th of 20 in that year's Auto Bild test. Snow braking was more competitive in those Auto Bild tests, but snow handling varied.
The quick answer
Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tyre - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated January 2025.
- 8owner reviews
- 71,427miles driven
- 18professional tests
All Tests
View Test ResultsTested 18 times by independent publications, the Firestone Winterhawk 3 averages a finish of 14th.
Finishing position in each test
On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict
Alternative Tyres
View AllRunning Costs
View TestIn 195/65 R15, the Firestone Winterhawk 3 is projected to cost €13.11 per 1,000 km to buy and run - about €525 over 40,000 km - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test.
Dimensions & Label Scores
View AllSize Range42 sizes available
155-245Width40-80Profile13-18Rim75-101 T-VLoad/
EU LabelAcross 42 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.
Fuel
Wet
Noise
71-72dB B
3PMSF on every size
Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Firestone Winterhawk 3 in the wet?
How good is the Firestone Winterhawk 3 in the dry?
How good is the Firestone Winterhawk 3 in the snow?
How fuel efficient is the Firestone Winterhawk 3?
How many miles does the Firestone Winterhawk 3 last?
More questions about the Firestone Winterhawk 3 (9)
What do owners say about the Firestone Winterhawk 3?
How much does the Firestone Winterhawk 3 cost to run?
What is the Firestone Winterhawk 3's EU tyre label rating?
How comfortable and quiet are the Firestone Winterhawk 3?
How well do the Firestone Winterhawk 3 wear, according to owners?
Would owners buy the Firestone Winterhawk 3 again?
What does the Firestone Winterhawk 3 replace?
Has the Firestone Winterhawk 3 been replaced?
What sizes does the Firestone Winterhawk 3 come in?
Owner Questions
Ask a questionQuestions and Answers for the Firestone Winterhawk 3
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Owner Reviews
Review this tyreWhat owners say summarised from 7 reviews
Dry grip is the more consistently liked aspect of the Firestone Winterhawk 3, with three favourable mentions and no criticism, while two owners also praise comfort. Snow traction is more divided, with three positive comments against two complaints, so it is not a settled strength in this small group. Wet grip attracts two criticisms against one favourable account, and ice feedback is evenly split. Five of the seven reviews are mid-life reports, including useful remaining tread after substantial use, but there is also a wear complaint. There are no end-of-life or follow-up reviews to establish a shared ageing pattern. The 66.1% average reflects four positive reviews, two neutral and one below 40%, with marked disagreement about winter grip.
What owners mention most counted across 7 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 8 ratings
- Owner score 68%
- Dry Grip 78%
- Wear 75%
- Comfort 73%
- Wet Grip 69%
- Road Feedback 69%
- Handling 68%
- Snow Grip 60%
- Ice Grip 60%
Featured reviews
“Hello, I have Mercdes Benz. I have driven on lot of tyres, winter and summer. This is not my first snow or rain with this car. Firestone Winterhawk 3 is the worst tyre I had opportunity to drive on. On dry roads are...”
“Been driving them around 40 000km (4 winters and 1 summer) on 2 wheel FWD car (1.6 atmo engine, no turbo so no torque). They are a pretty average tire. Handles everything well, master of none. Never got to the max of...”
All 7 Firestone Winterhawk 3 reviews
- Volkswagen T Cross
- 225/45 R17
- 12,427 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Ford Focus MK3
- 205/55 R16
- 4,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Renault Megane 2 sedan
- 195/65 R15 T
- 25,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Average
I even had it as a summer tyre this year and it still didn't wear (it is a better summer tire than Micheling Energy Saver). I'm currently on 5.5mm of thread which is outstanding. Not sure if its the tire or my suspension on the car, but bot tires (Energy Saver and WinterHawk 3) easily activated the ABS during braking. WinterHawk was little better in braking than the Energy Saver. For instance, on my other car (Skoda Fabia), you could brake harder and stop faster on less known tires (like the Barum Polaris or Bravuris 3HM). Skoda just digged in the asphalt or snow, while on my Megane ABS starts and the braking feeling is not so great. But this are two different cars, Megane is more comfortable than the Å koda but is also way more wallowy as the Å koda is much more direct in steering and grip.
I will replace them with premium All Season tires so will see if its the car or the tires.
Which tyres do you drive?
Researching the Firestone Winterhawk 3? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Mercedes Benz E220Cdi
- 225/45 R17
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Skoda Octavia
- 225/45 R17
- 13,000 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Average
- Peugeot 107
- 155/65 R14
- 9,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Average
In dry conditions it is a fair tyre, though it has a pronounced understeering tendency. The wet grip is acceptable if you don't need to brake suddenly :), and the snow/ice grip is poor.
Positive:
- Comfortable tyres
- Low rolling resistance
- Low wear
Negative:
- Wet grip.
- Poor snow and ice grip.
- Understeering behaviour.
Next time I will not buy these tyres again.
- BMW 530d Auto SE LCI
- 225/50 R17 H
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tyre
All tyre testsThe latest Tyre Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tyres for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tyres Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tyres for 2026/27 →
Summer Tyres
All Season Tyres
Winter Tyres
SUV and All Terrain Tyres
Track Tyres
Which tyres do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tyres.








