Test Charts / Auto Bild
2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/45 R18
- Tyres tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 15
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
37.8 m | -4.50 m | 0 km/h |
| 42.3 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 43.1 m | +0.80 m | 18 km/h | |
| 43.6 m | +1.30 m | 22 km/h | |
| 43.8 m | +1.50 m | 24 km/h | |
| 44.1 m | +1.80 m | 26 km/h | |
| 44.4 m | +2.10 m | 28 km/h | |
| 44.4 m | +2.10 m | 28 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +2.20 m | 29 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +2.20 m | 29 km/h | |
| 44.8 m | +2.50 m | 31 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
45.2 m | +2.90 m | 33 km/h |
| 45.4 m | +3.10 m | 34 km/h | |
| 45.6 m | +3.30 m | 35 km/h | |
| 45.6 m | +3.30 m | 35 km/h | |
| 45.8 m | +3.50 m | 36 km/h | |
| 45.8 m | +3.50 m | 36 km/h | |
| 46.2 m | +3.90 m | 38 km/h | |
| 46.5 m | +4.20 m | 39 km/h | |
| 46.6 m | +4.30 m | 39 km/h | |
| 46.8 m | +4.50 m | 40 km/h | |
| 47.1 m | +4.80 m | 42 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 24.6% (9.3 m ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Uniroyal WinterExpert would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
115.8 km/h | +2.90 km/h |
| 112.9 km/h | Best | |
| 112.6 km/h | -0.30 km/h | |
| 112.2 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 112.1 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 112 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 111.8 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 111.6 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 111.5 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 111.4 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 111.3 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 110.9 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 110.9 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 110.7 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 110.4 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 110.4 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 110.4 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 110.2 km/h | -2.70 km/h | |
| 110 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 109.4 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 108.9 km/h | -4.00 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
107.5 km/h | -5.40 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 7.2% (8.3 Km/H).
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49.1 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
52.8 m | +3.70 m | 34 km/h |
| 53 m | +3.90 m | 35 km/h | |
| 53 m | +3.90 m | 35 km/h | |
| 53.6 m | +4.50 m | 38 km/h | |
| 54.6 m | +5.50 m | 41 km/h | |
| 54.6 m | +5.50 m | 41 km/h | |
| 54.7 m | +5.60 m | 42 km/h | |
| 54.9 m | +5.80 m | 42 km/h | |
| 54.9 m | +5.80 m | 42 km/h | |
| 55 m | +5.90 m | 43 km/h | |
| 55 m | +5.90 m | 43 km/h | |
| 55.6 m | +6.50 m | 44 km/h | |
| 55.8 m | +6.70 m | 45 km/h | |
| 55.9 m | +6.80 m | 45 km/h | |
| 56.1 m | +7.00 m | 46 km/h | |
| 56.2 m | +7.10 m | 46 km/h | |
| 56.2 m | +7.10 m | 46 km/h | |
| 56.4 m | +7.30 m | 47 km/h | |
| 56.9 m | +7.80 m | 48 km/h | |
| 57.7 m | +8.60 m | 50 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
66.4 m | +17.30 m | 66 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 35.2% (17.3 m ≈ 3.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Debica Frigo HP2 would still be travelling at 50 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 86.8 km/h | Best | |
RefReference Summer |
86.2 km/h | -0.60 km/h |
| 85.7 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 85.5 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 85.5 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 84.3 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 84 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 84 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 83.9 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 83.3 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 83 km/h | -3.80 km/h | |
| 82.9 km/h | -3.90 km/h | |
| 82.5 km/h | -4.30 km/h | |
| 82.1 km/h | -4.70 km/h | |
| 82.1 km/h | -4.70 km/h | |
| 81.9 km/h | -4.90 km/h | |
| 81.7 km/h | -5.10 km/h | |
| 81.4 km/h | -5.40 km/h | |
| 81.1 km/h | -5.70 km/h | |
| 80.3 km/h | -6.50 km/h | |
| 79.5 km/h | -7.30 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
73.2 km/h | -13.60 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 15.7% (13.6 Km/H).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
11.69 s | -0.65 s |
| 12.34 s | Best | |
| 12.41 s | +0.07 s | |
| 12.47 s | +0.13 s | |
| 12.47 s | +0.13 s | |
| 12.5 s | +0.16 s | |
| 12.56 s | +0.22 s | |
| 12.57 s | +0.23 s | |
| 12.63 s | +0.29 s | |
| 12.63 s | +0.29 s | |
| 12.71 s | +0.37 s | |
| 12.72 s | +0.38 s | |
| 12.8 s | +0.46 s | |
| 12.82 s | +0.48 s | |
| 12.83 s | +0.49 s | |
| 12.86 s | +0.52 s | |
| 12.86 s | +0.52 s | |
| 12.88 s | +0.54 s | |
| 12.94 s | +0.60 s | |
| 12.95 s | +0.61 s | |
| 12.97 s | +0.63 s | |
RefReference Budget |
13.66 s | +1.32 s |
The difference between best and worst was 16.9% (1.97 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 94.9 km/h | Best | |
| 94.7 km/h | -0.20 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
94.7 km/h | -0.20 km/h |
| 94.6 km/h | -0.30 km/h | |
| 94.5 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 93.2 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 93.1 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 92.4 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 92.1 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 91.7 km/h | -3.20 km/h | |
| 91.4 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 91.4 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 91.2 km/h | -3.70 km/h | |
| 91.1 km/h | -3.80 km/h | |
| 91 km/h | -3.90 km/h | |
| 90.9 km/h | -4.00 km/h | |
| 90.6 km/h | -4.30 km/h | |
| 90.5 km/h | -4.40 km/h | |
| 89 km/h | -5.90 km/h | |
| 88.7 km/h | -6.20 km/h | |
| 85.7 km/h | -9.20 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
80.6 km/h | -14.30 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 15.1% (14.3 Km/H).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 2.88 m/sec2 | Best | |
RefReference Summer |
2.59 m/sec2 | -0.29 m/sec2 |
| 2.55 m/sec2 | -0.33 m/sec2 | |
| 2.44 m/sec2 | -0.44 m/sec2 | |
| 2.42 m/sec2 | -0.46 m/sec2 | |
| 2.4 m/sec2 | -0.48 m/sec2 | |
| 2.34 m/sec2 | -0.54 m/sec2 | |
| 2.33 m/sec2 | -0.55 m/sec2 | |
| 2.29 m/sec2 | -0.59 m/sec2 | |
| 2.22 m/sec2 | -0.66 m/sec2 | |
| 2.21 m/sec2 | -0.67 m/sec2 | |
| 2.21 m/sec2 | -0.67 m/sec2 | |
| 2.18 m/sec2 | -0.70 m/sec2 | |
| 2.17 m/sec2 | -0.71 m/sec2 | |
| 2.16 m/sec2 | -0.72 m/sec2 | |
| 2.12 m/sec2 | -0.76 m/sec2 | |
| 2.11 m/sec2 | -0.77 m/sec2 | |
RefReference Budget |
2.08 m/sec2 | -0.80 m/sec2 |
| 2.03 m/sec2 | -0.85 m/sec2 | |
| 2 m/sec2 | -0.88 m/sec2 | |
| 1.8 m/sec2 | -1.08 m/sec2 | |
| 1.59 m/sec2 | -1.29 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 44.8% (1.29 m/sec2).
Snow
4Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29.2 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 29.3 m | +0.10 m | 8 km/h | |
| 29.3 m | +0.10 m | 8 km/h | |
| 30.1 m | +0.90 m | 22 km/h | |
| 30.1 m | +0.90 m | 22 km/h | |
| 30.3 m | +1.10 m | 25 km/h | |
| 30.4 m | +1.20 m | 26 km/h | |
| 30.5 m | +1.30 m | 27 km/h | |
| 30.6 m | +1.40 m | 28 km/h | |
| 30.6 m | +1.40 m | 28 km/h | |
| 30.7 m | +1.50 m | 29 km/h | |
| 30.7 m | +1.50 m | 29 km/h | |
| 30.7 m | +1.50 m | 29 km/h | |
| 30.8 m | +1.60 m | 30 km/h | |
| 30.9 m | +1.70 m | 30 km/h | |
| 31 m | +1.80 m | 31 km/h | |
| 31 m | +1.80 m | 31 km/h | |
| 31 m | +1.80 m | 31 km/h | |
| 31.3 m | +2.10 m | 34 km/h | |
| 31.3 m | +2.10 m | 34 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
32.5 m | +3.30 m | 41 km/h |
RefReference Summer |
46.6 m | +17.40 m | 79 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 59.6% (17.4 m ≈ 3.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro would still be travelling at 34 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 2944 N | Best | |
| 2883 N | -61.00 N | |
| 2861 N | -83.00 N | |
| 2858 N | -86.00 N | |
| 2848 N | -96.00 N | |
| 2830 N | -114.00 N | |
| 2830 N | -114.00 N | |
| 2785 N | -159.00 N | |
| 2782 N | -162.00 N | |
| 2780 N | -164.00 N | |
| 2769 N | -175.00 N | |
| 2768 N | -176.00 N | |
| 2765 N | -179.00 N | |
| 2763 N | -181.00 N | |
| 2759 N | -185.00 N | |
| 2756 N | -188.00 N | |
| 2755 N | -189.00 N | |
| 2737 N | -207.00 N | |
| 2646 N | -298.00 N | |
| 2571 N | -373.00 N | |
RefReference Budget |
2464 N | -480.00 N |
RefReference Summer |
748 N | -2,196.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 74.6% (2,196 N).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 60.6 km/h | Best | |
| 60 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 59.9 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 59.8 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 59.8 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 59.7 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 59.5 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 59.3 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 59.2 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 59.1 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 59 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 59 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 58.8 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 58.7 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 58.1 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 57.7 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 57.5 km/h | -3.10 km/h | |
| 57.4 km/h | -3.20 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
57.3 km/h | -3.30 km/h |
| 57 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 56.9 km/h | -3.70 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 6.1% (3.7 Km/H).
Snow Slalom
Lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.38 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.34 m/sec2 | -0.04 m/sec2 | |
| 3.34 m/sec2 | -0.04 m/sec2 | |
| 3.3 m/sec2 | -0.08 m/sec2 | |
| 3.27 m/sec2 | -0.11 m/sec2 | |
| 3.25 m/sec2 | -0.13 m/sec2 | |
| 3.25 m/sec2 | -0.13 m/sec2 | |
| 3.24 m/sec2 | -0.14 m/sec2 | |
| 3.23 m/sec2 | -0.15 m/sec2 | |
| 3.19 m/sec2 | -0.19 m/sec2 | |
| 3.18 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3.16 m/sec2 | -0.22 m/sec2 | |
| 3.15 m/sec2 | -0.23 m/sec2 | |
RefReference Budget |
3.13 m/sec2 | -0.25 m/sec2 |
| 3.13 m/sec2 | -0.25 m/sec2 | |
| 3.11 m/sec2 | -0.27 m/sec2 | |
| 3.1 m/sec2 | -0.28 m/sec2 | |
| 3.09 m/sec2 | -0.29 m/sec2 | |
| 3.03 m/sec2 | -0.35 m/sec2 | |
| 3.02 m/sec2 | -0.36 m/sec2 | |
| 2.97 m/sec2 | -0.41 m/sec2 | |
| 2.9 m/sec2 | -0.48 m/sec2 | |
RefReference Summer |
1.46 m/sec2 | -1.92 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 56.8% (1.92 m/sec2).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70.6 dB | Best | |
| 70.8 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 71.4 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 72 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 72 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 72 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +1.60 dB | |
RefReference Budget |
72.2 dB | +1.60 dB |
RefReference Summer |
72.4 dB | +1.80 dB |
| 72.6 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 72.8 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 73 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 73 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 73.6 dB | +3.00 dB | |
| 73.8 dB | +3.20 dB | |
| 74.1 dB | +3.50 dB | |
| 75.3 dB | +4.70 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 6.7% (4.7 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 45,500 KM | Best | |
| 44,476 KM | -1,024 KM | |
| 44,312 KM | -1,188 KM | |
| 42,401 KM | -3,099 KM | |
| 41,387 KM | -4,113 KM | |
| 40,504 KM | -4,996 KM | |
| 39,348 KM | -6,152 KM | |
| 39,130 KM | -6,370 KM | |
| 38,266 KM | -7,234 KM | |
| 37,820 KM | -7,680 KM | |
| 36,846 KM | -8,654 KM | |
| 36,609 KM | -8,891 KM | |
| 36,514 KM | -8,986 KM | |
| 35,549 KM | -9,951 KM | |
| 34,421 KM | -11,079 KM | |
| 34,407 KM | -11,093 KM | |
| 34,139 KM | -11,361 KM | |
| 33,916 KM | -11,584 KM | |
| 31,400 KM | -14,100 KM | |
| 29,534 KM | -15,966 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 35.1% (15,966 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 km |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.5 Price/1000 | Best | €12.15 | |
| 10.95 Price/1000 | +0.45 Price/1000 | €14.79 | |
| 10.97 Price/1000 | +0.47 Price/1000 | €17.11 | |
| 11.81 Price/1000 | +1.31 Price/1000 | €16.39 | |
| 11.88 Price/1000 | +1.38 Price/1000 | €18.46 | |
| 12.03 Price/1000 | +1.53 Price/1000 | €17.17 | |
| 12.84 Price/1000 | +2.34 Price/1000 | €17.29 | |
| 13.33 Price/1000 | +2.83 Price/1000 | €17.43 | |
| 14.54 Price/1000 | +4.04 Price/1000 | €20.95 | |
| 14.87 Price/1000 | +4.37 Price/1000 | €18.59 | |
| 14.95 Price/1000 | +4.45 Price/1000 | €20.06 | |
| 15.4 Price/1000 | +4.90 Price/1000 | €22.10 | |
| 15.49 Price/1000 | +4.99 Price/1000 | €21.42 | |
| 16.07 Price/1000 | +5.57 Price/1000 | €21.53 | |
| 16.93 Price/1000 | +6.43 Price/1000 | €24.71 | |
| 17.38 Price/1000 | +6.88 Price/1000 | €23.10 | |
| 18.12 Price/1000 | +7.62 Price/1000 | €23.31 | |
| 18.62 Price/1000 | +8.12 Price/1000 | €22.20 | |
| 18.95 Price/1000 | +8.45 Price/1000 | €24.64 | |
| 19.61 Price/1000 | +9.11 Price/1000 | €23.83 |
The difference between best and worst was 86.8% (9.11 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Barum Polaris 5) works out €502 cheaper than the most expensive (Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2023 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.47 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.94 kg/t | +0.47 kg/t | £28 | |
| 8.02 kg/t | +0.55 kg/t | £32 | |
| 8.05 kg/t | +0.58 kg/t | £34 | |
| 8.09 kg/t | +0.62 kg/t | £37 | |
| 8.11 kg/t | +0.64 kg/t | £38 | |
| 8.23 kg/t | +0.76 kg/t | £45 | |
| 8.24 kg/t | +0.77 kg/t | £45 | |
| 8.41 kg/t | +0.94 kg/t | £55 | |
| 8.43 kg/t | +0.96 kg/t | £57 | |
| 8.45 kg/t | +0.98 kg/t | £58 | |
| 8.46 kg/t | +0.99 kg/t | £58 | |
| 8.48 kg/t | +1.01 kg/t | £60 | |
RefReference Summer |
8.55 kg/t | +1.08 kg/t | £64 |
| 8.57 kg/t | +1.10 kg/t | £65 | |
| 8.65 kg/t | +1.18 kg/t | £70 | |
| 8.71 kg/t | +1.24 kg/t | £73 | |
| 8.76 kg/t | +1.29 kg/t | £76 | |
| 8.79 kg/t | +1.32 kg/t | £78 | |
| 8.79 kg/t | +1.32 kg/t | £78 | |
| 9 kg/t | +1.53 kg/t | £90 | |
RefReference Budget |
9.43 kg/t | +1.96 kg/t | £116 |
The difference between best and worst was 26.2% (1.96 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro uses about 62 L (£90) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 5.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 50 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tyres tested
20 of these 20 tyres tested again
2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview
215/55 R1756 tyres tested
15 of these 20 tyres tested again
2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets!
225/40 R1851 tyres tested
12 of these 20 tyres tested again

