Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/45 R18
Tyres tested
20
Disciplines
15

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
37.8 m -4.50 m 0 km/h
42.3 m Best 0 km/h
43.1 m +0.80 m 18 km/h
43.6 m +1.30 m 22 km/h
43.8 m +1.50 m 24 km/h
44.1 m +1.80 m 26 km/h
44.4 m +2.10 m 28 km/h
44.4 m +2.10 m 28 km/h
44.5 m +2.20 m 29 km/h
44.5 m +2.20 m 29 km/h
44.8 m +2.50 m 31 km/h
RefReference Budget
45.2 m +2.90 m 33 km/h
45.4 m +3.10 m 34 km/h
45.6 m +3.30 m 35 km/h
45.6 m +3.30 m 35 km/h
45.8 m +3.50 m 36 km/h
45.8 m +3.50 m 36 km/h
46.2 m +3.90 m 38 km/h
46.5 m +4.20 m 39 km/h
46.6 m +4.30 m 39 km/h
46.8 m +4.50 m 40 km/h
47.1 m +4.80 m 42 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 24.6% (9.3 m ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Uniroyal WinterExpert would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
115.8 km/h +2.90 km/h
112.9 km/h Best
112.6 km/h -0.30 km/h
112.2 km/h -0.70 km/h
112.1 km/h -0.80 km/h
112 km/h -0.90 km/h
111.8 km/h -1.10 km/h
111.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
111.5 km/h -1.40 km/h
111.4 km/h -1.50 km/h
111.3 km/h -1.60 km/h
110.9 km/h -2.00 km/h
110.9 km/h -2.00 km/h
110.7 km/h -2.20 km/h
110.4 km/h -2.50 km/h
110.4 km/h -2.50 km/h
110.4 km/h -2.50 km/h
110.2 km/h -2.70 km/h
110 km/h -2.90 km/h
109.4 km/h -3.50 km/h
108.9 km/h -4.00 km/h
RefReference Budget
107.5 km/h -5.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 7.2% (8.3 Km/H).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
49.1 m Best 0 km/h
RefReference Summer
52.8 m +3.70 m 34 km/h
53 m +3.90 m 35 km/h
53 m +3.90 m 35 km/h
53.6 m +4.50 m 38 km/h
54.6 m +5.50 m 41 km/h
54.6 m +5.50 m 41 km/h
54.7 m +5.60 m 42 km/h
54.9 m +5.80 m 42 km/h
54.9 m +5.80 m 42 km/h
55 m +5.90 m 43 km/h
55 m +5.90 m 43 km/h
55.6 m +6.50 m 44 km/h
55.8 m +6.70 m 45 km/h
55.9 m +6.80 m 45 km/h
56.1 m +7.00 m 46 km/h
56.2 m +7.10 m 46 km/h
56.2 m +7.10 m 46 km/h
56.4 m +7.30 m 47 km/h
56.9 m +7.80 m 48 km/h
57.7 m +8.60 m 50 km/h
RefReference Budget
66.4 m +17.30 m 66 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 35.2% (17.3 m ≈ 3.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Debica Frigo HP2 would still be travelling at 50 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
86.8 km/h Best
RefReference Summer
86.2 km/h -0.60 km/h
85.7 km/h -1.10 km/h
85.5 km/h -1.30 km/h
85.5 km/h -1.30 km/h
84.3 km/h -2.50 km/h
84 km/h -2.80 km/h
84 km/h -2.80 km/h
83.9 km/h -2.90 km/h
83.3 km/h -3.50 km/h
83 km/h -3.80 km/h
82.9 km/h -3.90 km/h
82.5 km/h -4.30 km/h
82.1 km/h -4.70 km/h
82.1 km/h -4.70 km/h
81.9 km/h -4.90 km/h
81.7 km/h -5.10 km/h
81.4 km/h -5.40 km/h
81.1 km/h -5.70 km/h
80.3 km/h -6.50 km/h
79.5 km/h -7.30 km/h
RefReference Budget
73.2 km/h -13.60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 15.7% (13.6 Km/H).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
11.69 s -0.65 s
12.34 s Best
12.41 s +0.07 s
12.47 s +0.13 s
12.47 s +0.13 s
12.5 s +0.16 s
12.56 s +0.22 s
12.57 s +0.23 s
12.63 s +0.29 s
12.63 s +0.29 s
12.71 s +0.37 s
12.72 s +0.38 s
12.8 s +0.46 s
12.82 s +0.48 s
12.83 s +0.49 s
12.86 s +0.52 s
12.86 s +0.52 s
12.88 s +0.54 s
12.94 s +0.60 s
12.95 s +0.61 s
12.97 s +0.63 s
RefReference Budget
13.66 s +1.32 s

The difference between best and worst was 16.9% (1.97 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
94.9 km/h Best
94.7 km/h -0.20 km/h
RefReference Summer
94.7 km/h -0.20 km/h
94.6 km/h -0.30 km/h
94.5 km/h -0.40 km/h
93.2 km/h -1.70 km/h
93.1 km/h -1.80 km/h
92.4 km/h -2.50 km/h
92.1 km/h -2.80 km/h
91.7 km/h -3.20 km/h
91.4 km/h -3.50 km/h
91.4 km/h -3.50 km/h
91.2 km/h -3.70 km/h
91.1 km/h -3.80 km/h
91 km/h -3.90 km/h
90.9 km/h -4.00 km/h
90.6 km/h -4.30 km/h
90.5 km/h -4.40 km/h
89 km/h -5.90 km/h
88.7 km/h -6.20 km/h
85.7 km/h -9.20 km/h
RefReference Budget
80.6 km/h -14.30 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 15.1% (14.3 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
2.88 m/sec2 Best
RefReference Summer
2.59 m/sec2 -0.29 m/sec2
2.55 m/sec2 -0.33 m/sec2
2.44 m/sec2 -0.44 m/sec2
2.42 m/sec2 -0.46 m/sec2
2.4 m/sec2 -0.48 m/sec2
2.34 m/sec2 -0.54 m/sec2
2.33 m/sec2 -0.55 m/sec2
2.29 m/sec2 -0.59 m/sec2
2.22 m/sec2 -0.66 m/sec2
2.21 m/sec2 -0.67 m/sec2
2.21 m/sec2 -0.67 m/sec2
2.18 m/sec2 -0.70 m/sec2
2.17 m/sec2 -0.71 m/sec2
2.16 m/sec2 -0.72 m/sec2
2.12 m/sec2 -0.76 m/sec2
2.11 m/sec2 -0.77 m/sec2
RefReference Budget
2.08 m/sec2 -0.80 m/sec2
2.03 m/sec2 -0.85 m/sec2
2 m/sec2 -0.88 m/sec2
1.8 m/sec2 -1.08 m/sec2
1.59 m/sec2 -1.29 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 44.8% (1.29 m/sec2).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
29.2 m Best 0 km/h
29.3 m +0.10 m 8 km/h
29.3 m +0.10 m 8 km/h
30.1 m +0.90 m 22 km/h
30.1 m +0.90 m 22 km/h
30.3 m +1.10 m 25 km/h
30.4 m +1.20 m 26 km/h
30.5 m +1.30 m 27 km/h
30.6 m +1.40 m 28 km/h
30.6 m +1.40 m 28 km/h
30.7 m +1.50 m 29 km/h
30.7 m +1.50 m 29 km/h
30.7 m +1.50 m 29 km/h
30.8 m +1.60 m 30 km/h
30.9 m +1.70 m 30 km/h
31 m +1.80 m 31 km/h
31 m +1.80 m 31 km/h
31 m +1.80 m 31 km/h
31.3 m +2.10 m 34 km/h
31.3 m +2.10 m 34 km/h
RefReference Budget
32.5 m +3.30 m 41 km/h
RefReference Summer
46.6 m +17.40 m 79 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 59.6% (17.4 m ≈ 3.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro would still be travelling at 34 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
2944 N Best
2883 N -61.00 N
2861 N -83.00 N
2858 N -86.00 N
2848 N -96.00 N
2830 N -114.00 N
2830 N -114.00 N
2785 N -159.00 N
2782 N -162.00 N
2780 N -164.00 N
2769 N -175.00 N
2768 N -176.00 N
2765 N -179.00 N
2763 N -181.00 N
2759 N -185.00 N
2756 N -188.00 N
2755 N -189.00 N
2737 N -207.00 N
2646 N -298.00 N
2571 N -373.00 N
RefReference Budget
2464 N -480.00 N
RefReference Summer
748 N -2,196.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 74.6% (2,196 N).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
60.6 km/h Best
60 km/h -0.60 km/h
59.9 km/h -0.70 km/h
59.8 km/h -0.80 km/h
59.8 km/h -0.80 km/h
59.7 km/h -0.90 km/h
59.5 km/h -1.10 km/h
59.3 km/h -1.30 km/h
59.2 km/h -1.40 km/h
59.1 km/h -1.50 km/h
59 km/h -1.60 km/h
59 km/h -1.60 km/h
58.8 km/h -1.80 km/h
58.7 km/h -1.90 km/h
58.1 km/h -2.50 km/h
57.7 km/h -2.90 km/h
57.5 km/h -3.10 km/h
57.4 km/h -3.20 km/h
RefReference Budget
57.3 km/h -3.30 km/h
57 km/h -3.60 km/h
56.9 km/h -3.70 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 6.1% (3.7 Km/H).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.38 m/sec2 Best
3.34 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
3.34 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
3.3 m/sec2 -0.08 m/sec2
3.27 m/sec2 -0.11 m/sec2
3.25 m/sec2 -0.13 m/sec2
3.25 m/sec2 -0.13 m/sec2
3.24 m/sec2 -0.14 m/sec2
3.23 m/sec2 -0.15 m/sec2
3.19 m/sec2 -0.19 m/sec2
3.18 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.16 m/sec2 -0.22 m/sec2
3.15 m/sec2 -0.23 m/sec2
RefReference Budget
3.13 m/sec2 -0.25 m/sec2
14
3.13 m/sec2 -0.25 m/sec2
3.11 m/sec2 -0.27 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.28 m/sec2
3.09 m/sec2 -0.29 m/sec2
3.03 m/sec2 -0.35 m/sec2
3.02 m/sec2 -0.36 m/sec2
2.97 m/sec2 -0.41 m/sec2
2.9 m/sec2 -0.48 m/sec2
RefReference Summer
1.46 m/sec2 -1.92 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 56.8% (1.92 m/sec2).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70.6 dB Best
70.8 dB +0.20 dB
71.4 dB +0.80 dB
71.7 dB +1.10 dB
71.7 dB +1.10 dB
71.7 dB +1.10 dB
71.9 dB +1.30 dB
72 dB +1.40 dB
72 dB +1.40 dB
72 dB +1.40 dB
72.2 dB +1.60 dB
RefReference Budget
72.2 dB +1.60 dB
RefReference Summer
72.4 dB +1.80 dB
72.6 dB +2.00 dB
72.7 dB +2.10 dB
72.8 dB +2.20 dB
73 dB +2.40 dB
73 dB +2.40 dB
73.6 dB +3.00 dB
73.8 dB +3.20 dB
74.1 dB +3.50 dB
75.3 dB +4.70 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6.7% (4.7 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
45,500 KM Best
44,476 KM -1,024 KM
44,312 KM -1,188 KM
42,401 KM -3,099 KM
41,387 KM -4,113 KM
40,504 KM -4,996 KM
39,348 KM -6,152 KM
39,130 KM -6,370 KM
38,266 KM -7,234 KM
37,820 KM -7,680 KM
36,846 KM -8,654 KM
36,609 KM -8,891 KM
36,514 KM -8,986 KM
35,549 KM -9,951 KM
34,421 KM -11,079 KM
34,407 KM -11,093 KM
34,139 KM -11,361 KM
33,916 KM -11,584 KM
31,400 KM -14,100 KM
29,534 KM -15,966 KM

The difference between best and worst was 35.1% (15,966 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
10.5 Price/1000 Best €12.15
10.95 Price/1000 +0.45 Price/1000 €14.79
10.97 Price/1000 +0.47 Price/1000 €17.11
11.81 Price/1000 +1.31 Price/1000 €16.39
11.88 Price/1000 +1.38 Price/1000 €18.46
12.03 Price/1000 +1.53 Price/1000 €17.17
12.84 Price/1000 +2.34 Price/1000 €17.29
13.33 Price/1000 +2.83 Price/1000 €17.43
14.54 Price/1000 +4.04 Price/1000 €20.95
14.87 Price/1000 +4.37 Price/1000 €18.59
14.95 Price/1000 +4.45 Price/1000 €20.06
15.4 Price/1000 +4.90 Price/1000 €22.10
15.49 Price/1000 +4.99 Price/1000 €21.42
16.07 Price/1000 +5.57 Price/1000 €21.53
16.93 Price/1000 +6.43 Price/1000 €24.71
17.38 Price/1000 +6.88 Price/1000 €23.10
18.12 Price/1000 +7.62 Price/1000 €23.31
18.62 Price/1000 +8.12 Price/1000 €22.20
18.95 Price/1000 +8.45 Price/1000 €24.64
19.61 Price/1000 +9.11 Price/1000 €23.83

The difference between best and worst was 86.8% (9.11 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Barum Polaris 5) works out €502 cheaper than the most expensive (Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2023 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.47 kg/t Best £0
7.94 kg/t +0.47 kg/t £28
8.02 kg/t +0.55 kg/t £32
8.05 kg/t +0.58 kg/t £34
8.09 kg/t +0.62 kg/t £37
8.11 kg/t +0.64 kg/t £38
8.23 kg/t +0.76 kg/t £45
8.24 kg/t +0.77 kg/t £45
8.41 kg/t +0.94 kg/t £55
8.43 kg/t +0.96 kg/t £57
8.45 kg/t +0.98 kg/t £58
8.46 kg/t +0.99 kg/t £58
8.48 kg/t +1.01 kg/t £60
RefReference Summer
8.55 kg/t +1.08 kg/t £64
8.57 kg/t +1.10 kg/t £65
8.65 kg/t +1.18 kg/t £70
8.71 kg/t +1.24 kg/t £73
8.76 kg/t +1.29 kg/t £76
8.79 kg/t +1.32 kg/t £78
8.79 kg/t +1.32 kg/t £78
9 kg/t +1.53 kg/t £90
RefReference Budget
9.43 kg/t +1.96 kg/t £116

The difference between best and worst was 26.2% (1.96 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro uses about 62 L (£90) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 5.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.