Menu

Test Charts / ADAC

2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/55 R17
Tyres tested
16
Disciplines
10

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
35.4 m Best 0 km/h
37.3 m +1.90 m 29 km/h
37.3 m +1.90 m 29 km/h
37.5 m +2.10 m 31 km/h
37.7 m +2.30 m 32 km/h
37.7 m +2.30 m 32 km/h
37.8 m +2.40 m 33 km/h
37.8 m +2.40 m 33 km/h
37.9 m +2.50 m 33 km/h
37.9 m +2.50 m 33 km/h
38 m +2.60 m 34 km/h
38.1 m +2.70 m 35 km/h
38.1 m +2.70 m 35 km/h
38.4 m +3.00 m 36 km/h
38.9 m +3.50 m 39 km/h
40.9 m +5.50 m 48 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 15.5% (5.5 m ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Semperit Speed Life 3 would still be travelling at 48 km/h when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
28.5 m Best 0 km/h
31.1 m +2.60 m 38 km/h
32.6 m +4.10 m 46 km/h
32.7 m +4.20 m 47 km/h
32.8 m +4.30 m 47 km/h
32.8 m +4.30 m 47 km/h
33 m +4.50 m 48 km/h
33.2 m +4.70 m 49 km/h
33.3 m +4.80 m 49 km/h
33.6 m +5.10 m 51 km/h
34.1 m +5.60 m 53 km/h
34.4 m +5.90 m 54 km/h
34.6 m +6.10 m 55 km/h
34.6 m +6.10 m 55 km/h
34.9 m +6.40 m 56 km/h
35.1 m +6.60 m 56 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 23.2% (6.6 m ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Goodride Solmax 1 would still be travelling at 56 km/h when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Braking - Concrete

Wet braking on Concrete in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking - Concrete
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
32 m Best 0 km/h
35.8 m +3.80 m 42 km/h
36.3 m +4.30 m 45 km/h
36.3 m +4.30 m 45 km/h
37.1 m +5.10 m 48 km/h
37.2 m +5.20 m 49 km/h
37.3 m +5.30 m 49 km/h
37.4 m +5.40 m 49 km/h
38.2 m +6.20 m 52 km/h
38.3 m +6.30 m 53 km/h
38.3 m +6.30 m 53 km/h
39.1 m +7.10 m 55 km/h
39.5 m +7.50 m 57 km/h
39.9 m +7.90 m 58 km/h
40 m +8.00 m 58 km/h
40.1 m +8.10 m 58 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 25.3% (8.1 m ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Goodride Solmax 1 would still be travelling at 58 km/h when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
78.5 km/h Best
78.4 km/h -0.10 km/h
77.8 km/h -0.70 km/h
77.7 km/h -0.80 km/h
77.4 km/h -1.10 km/h
77.3 km/h -1.20 km/h
76.8 km/h -1.70 km/h
76.7 km/h -1.80 km/h
76.4 km/h -2.10 km/h
75.3 km/h -3.20 km/h
75.1 km/h -3.40 km/h
74.9 km/h -3.60 km/h
74.3 km/h -4.20 km/h
74.2 km/h -4.30 km/h
74 km/h -4.50 km/h
73.8 km/h -4.70 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 6% (4.7 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.5 m/sec2 Best
3.5 m/sec2 Best
3.3 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.3 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.3 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.3 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.2 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
3.2 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
3 m/sec2 -0.50 m/sec2
2.9 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2
2.8 m/sec2 -0.70 m/sec2
2.8 m/sec2 -0.70 m/sec2
2.7 m/sec2 -0.80 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 22.9% (0.8 m/sec2).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70 dB Best
70.6 dB +0.60 dB
70.7 dB +0.70 dB
71 dB +1.00 dB
71.3 dB +1.30 dB
71.4 dB +1.40 dB
71.4 dB +1.40 dB
71.5 dB +1.50 dB
71.6 dB +1.60 dB
71.6 dB +1.60 dB
71.7 dB +1.70 dB
71.7 dB +1.70 dB
71.7 dB +1.70 dB
71.8 dB +1.80 dB
71.8 dB +1.80 dB
72.6 dB +2.60 dB

The difference between best and worst was 3.7% (2.6 dB).

Value

4

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 miles
69,300 KM Best $8.23
68,800 KM -500 KM $10.88
60,300 KM -9,000 KM $13.41
60,300 KM -9,000 KM $12.89
55,200 KM -14,100 KM $11.53
49,900 KM -19,400 KM $12.69
47,900 KM -21,400 KM $15.79
46,300 KM -23,000 KM $13.13
43,700 KM -25,600 KM $16.11
42,700 KM -26,600 KM $13.11
40,800 KM -28,500 KM $14.40
40,400 KM -28,900 KM $15.66
38,000 KM -31,300 KM $13.39
37,400 KM -31,900 KM $12.30
35,600 KM -33,700 KM $15.73
27,200 KM -42,100 KM $23.38

The difference between best and worst was 60.8% (42,100 KM). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tyre to own (Kumho Ecsta HS52) works out $379 cheaper than the most expensive (Vredestein Ultrac).

How this is calculated

Tyre life here is the manufacturer's treadwear warranty, NOT measured wear - treat it as the maker's promise, not a test result.

Tyre life is the manufacturer's treadwear warranty, not measured wear. Assumes $80 fitting per set of four. US prices are from the time of the 2024 test; financing costs are excluded.

Value

Dollars/1000 miles based on mileage warranty

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to best
1.77 Price/1000 Best
2.43 Price/1000 +0.66 Price/1000
2.52 Price/1000 +0.75 Price/1000
2.54 Price/1000 +0.77 Price/1000
2.77 Price/1000 +1.00 Price/1000
2.81 Price/1000 +1.04 Price/1000
2.82 Price/1000 +1.05 Price/1000
2.85 Price/1000 +1.08 Price/1000
2.89 Price/1000 +1.12 Price/1000
3.02 Price/1000 +1.25 Price/1000
3.11 Price/1000 +1.34 Price/1000
3.37 Price/1000 +1.60 Price/1000
3.42 Price/1000 +1.65 Price/1000
3.53 Price/1000 +1.76 Price/1000
3.57 Price/1000 +1.80 Price/1000
5.11 Price/1000 +3.34 Price/1000

The difference between best and worst was 188.7% (3.34 Price/1000).

Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km

Lower is better ↓
Fuel Consumption
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
5.7 l/100km Best £0
5.7 l/100km Best £0
5.7 l/100km Best £0
5.8 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.8 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.8 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
6 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83

The difference between best and worst was 5.3% (0.3 l/100km). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun uses about 57 L (£83) more fuel than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Abrasion

Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TyreResultGap to best
48.1 mg/km/t Best
51.9 mg/km/t +3.80 mg/km/t
55 mg/km/t +6.90 mg/km/t
58.7 mg/km/t +10.60 mg/km/t
60.1 mg/km/t +12.00 mg/km/t
67.4 mg/km/t +19.30 mg/km/t
70.4 mg/km/t +22.30 mg/km/t
72 mg/km/t +23.90 mg/km/t
73 mg/km/t +24.90 mg/km/t
73.5 mg/km/t +25.40 mg/km/t
79.8 mg/km/t +31.70 mg/km/t
80.8 mg/km/t +32.70 mg/km/t
81.2 mg/km/t +33.10 mg/km/t
82.5 mg/km/t +34.40 mg/km/t
87.3 mg/km/t +39.20 mg/km/t
102.7 mg/km/t +54.60 mg/km/t

The difference between best and worst was 113.5% (54.6 mg/km/t).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
80 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking - Concrete
80 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.