Test Charts / ADAC
2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 215/55 R17
- Tyres tested
- 16
- Disciplines
- 10
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35.4 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 37.3 m | +1.90 m | 29 km/h | |
| 37.3 m | +1.90 m | 29 km/h | |
| 37.5 m | +2.10 m | 31 km/h | |
| 37.7 m | +2.30 m | 32 km/h | |
| 37.7 m | +2.30 m | 32 km/h | |
| 37.8 m | +2.40 m | 33 km/h | |
| 37.8 m | +2.40 m | 33 km/h | |
| 37.9 m | +2.50 m | 33 km/h | |
| 37.9 m | +2.50 m | 33 km/h | |
| 38 m | +2.60 m | 34 km/h | |
| 38.1 m | +2.70 m | 35 km/h | |
| 38.1 m | +2.70 m | 35 km/h | |
| 38.4 m | +3.00 m | 36 km/h | |
| 38.9 m | +3.50 m | 39 km/h | |
| 40.9 m | +5.50 m | 48 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 15.5% (5.5 m ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Semperit Speed Life 3 would still be travelling at 48 km/h when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28.5 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 31.1 m | +2.60 m | 38 km/h | |
| 32.6 m | +4.10 m | 46 km/h | |
| 32.7 m | +4.20 m | 47 km/h | |
| 32.8 m | +4.30 m | 47 km/h | |
| 32.8 m | +4.30 m | 47 km/h | |
| 33 m | +4.50 m | 48 km/h | |
| 33.2 m | +4.70 m | 49 km/h | |
| 33.3 m | +4.80 m | 49 km/h | |
| 33.6 m | +5.10 m | 51 km/h | |
| 34.1 m | +5.60 m | 53 km/h | |
| 34.4 m | +5.90 m | 54 km/h | |
| 34.6 m | +6.10 m | 55 km/h | |
| 34.6 m | +6.10 m | 55 km/h | |
| 34.9 m | +6.40 m | 56 km/h | |
| 35.1 m | +6.60 m | 56 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 23.2% (6.6 m ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Goodride Solmax 1 would still be travelling at 56 km/h when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Braking - Concrete
Wet braking on Concrete in meters (80 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 35.8 m | +3.80 m | 42 km/h | |
| 36.3 m | +4.30 m | 45 km/h | |
| 36.3 m | +4.30 m | 45 km/h | |
| 37.1 m | +5.10 m | 48 km/h | |
| 37.2 m | +5.20 m | 49 km/h | |
| 37.3 m | +5.30 m | 49 km/h | |
| 37.4 m | +5.40 m | 49 km/h | |
| 38.2 m | +6.20 m | 52 km/h | |
| 38.3 m | +6.30 m | 53 km/h | |
| 38.3 m | +6.30 m | 53 km/h | |
| 39.1 m | +7.10 m | 55 km/h | |
| 39.5 m | +7.50 m | 57 km/h | |
| 39.9 m | +7.90 m | 58 km/h | |
| 40 m | +8.00 m | 58 km/h | |
| 40.1 m | +8.10 m | 58 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 25.3% (8.1 m ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Goodride Solmax 1 would still be travelling at 58 km/h when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 78.5 km/h | Best | |
| 78.4 km/h | -0.10 km/h | |
| 77.8 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 77.7 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 77.4 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 77.3 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 76.8 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 76.7 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 76.4 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 75.3 km/h | -3.20 km/h | |
| 75.1 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
| 74.9 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 74.3 km/h | -4.20 km/h | |
| 74.2 km/h | -4.30 km/h | |
| 74 km/h | -4.50 km/h | |
| 73.8 km/h | -4.70 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 6% (4.7 Km/H).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.5 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.3 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3.3 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3.3 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3.3 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3.2 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 | |
| 3.2 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 | |
| 3.1 m/sec2 | -0.40 m/sec2 | |
| 3.1 m/sec2 | -0.40 m/sec2 | |
| 3.1 m/sec2 | -0.40 m/sec2 | |
| 3 m/sec2 | -0.50 m/sec2 | |
| 2.9 m/sec2 | -0.60 m/sec2 | |
| 2.8 m/sec2 | -0.70 m/sec2 | |
| 2.8 m/sec2 | -0.70 m/sec2 | |
| 2.7 m/sec2 | -0.80 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 22.9% (0.8 m/sec2).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70 dB | Best | |
| 70.6 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 70.7 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 71 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71.3 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 71.4 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 71.4 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 71.5 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 72.6 dB | +2.60 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 3.7% (2.6 dB).
Value
4Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 69,300 KM | Best | $8.23 | |
| 68,800 KM | -500 KM | $10.88 | |
| 60,300 KM | -9,000 KM | $13.41 | |
| 60,300 KM | -9,000 KM | $12.89 | |
| 55,200 KM | -14,100 KM | $11.53 | |
| 49,900 KM | -19,400 KM | $12.69 | |
| 47,900 KM | -21,400 KM | $15.79 | |
| 46,300 KM | -23,000 KM | $13.13 | |
| 43,700 KM | -25,600 KM | $16.11 | |
| 42,700 KM | -26,600 KM | $13.11 | |
| 40,800 KM | -28,500 KM | $14.40 | |
| 40,400 KM | -28,900 KM | $15.66 | |
| 38,000 KM | -31,300 KM | $13.39 | |
| 37,400 KM | -31,900 KM | $12.30 | |
| 35,600 KM | -33,700 KM | $15.73 | |
| 27,200 KM | -42,100 KM | $23.38 |
The difference between best and worst was 60.8% (42,100 KM). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tyre to own (Kumho Ecsta HS52) works out $379 cheaper than the most expensive (Vredestein Ultrac).
How this is calculated
Tyre life here is the manufacturer's treadwear warranty, NOT measured wear - treat it as the maker's promise, not a test result.
Tyre life is the manufacturer's treadwear warranty, not measured wear. Assumes $80 fitting per set of four. US prices are from the time of the 2024 test; financing costs are excluded.
Value
Dollars/1000 miles based on mileage warranty
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77 Price/1000 | Best | |
| 2.43 Price/1000 | +0.66 Price/1000 | |
| 2.52 Price/1000 | +0.75 Price/1000 | |
| 2.54 Price/1000 | +0.77 Price/1000 | |
| 2.77 Price/1000 | +1.00 Price/1000 | |
| 2.81 Price/1000 | +1.04 Price/1000 | |
| 2.82 Price/1000 | +1.05 Price/1000 | |
| 2.85 Price/1000 | +1.08 Price/1000 | |
| 2.89 Price/1000 | +1.12 Price/1000 | |
| 3.02 Price/1000 | +1.25 Price/1000 | |
| 3.11 Price/1000 | +1.34 Price/1000 | |
| 3.37 Price/1000 | +1.60 Price/1000 | |
| 3.42 Price/1000 | +1.65 Price/1000 | |
| 3.53 Price/1000 | +1.76 Price/1000 | |
| 3.57 Price/1000 | +1.80 Price/1000 | |
| 5.11 Price/1000 | +3.34 Price/1000 |
The difference between best and worst was 188.7% (3.34 Price/1000).
Fuel Consumption
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.7 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 6 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | £83 |
The difference between best and worst was 5.3% (0.3 l/100km). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun uses about 57 L (£83) more fuel than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
Abrasion
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48.1 mg/km/t | Best | |
| 51.9 mg/km/t | +3.80 mg/km/t | |
| 55 mg/km/t | +6.90 mg/km/t | |
| 58.7 mg/km/t | +10.60 mg/km/t | |
| 60.1 mg/km/t | +12.00 mg/km/t | |
| 67.4 mg/km/t | +19.30 mg/km/t | |
| 70.4 mg/km/t | +22.30 mg/km/t | |
| 72 mg/km/t | +23.90 mg/km/t | |
| 73 mg/km/t | +24.90 mg/km/t | |
| 73.5 mg/km/t | +25.40 mg/km/t | |
| 79.8 mg/km/t | +31.70 mg/km/t | |
| 80.8 mg/km/t | +32.70 mg/km/t | |
| 81.2 mg/km/t | +33.10 mg/km/t | |
| 82.5 mg/km/t | +34.40 mg/km/t | |
| 87.3 mg/km/t | +39.20 mg/km/t | |
| 102.7 mg/km/t | +54.60 mg/km/t |
The difference between best and worst was 113.5% (54.6 mg/km/t).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 80 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking - Concrete
- 80 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview
205/55 R1655 tyres tested
10 of these 16 tyres tested again
2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview
215/55 R1744 tyres tested
10 of these 16 tyres tested again
2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
205/55 R1620 tyres tested
9 of these 16 tyres tested again

