Menu
BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS+ View Gallery (2)
Tested by Tyre Reviews View Test »

BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS+

BFGoodrich Tyres Ultra High Performance All Season

The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus is a Ultra High Performance All Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.7
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
87%
Wet Grip
80%
Road Feedback
70%
Handling
87%
Wear
70%
Comfort
80%
Buy again
77%
Snow Grip
65%
Ice Grip
60%
3 Reviews
75% Average
50,000 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 7th)
BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus

BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
7.7 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Ice
94.1
0.84x / 1 test
Snow
85.8
1.38x / 2 tests
Dry
71.8
1.5x / 6 tests
Wet
57.9
1.93x / 6 tests
Value
54.1
0.42x / 3 tests
Comfort
48.7
0.32x / 4 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
74.4
6 tests
Handling
66.7
9 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 2
Period: 2023
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 3
Avg Rating: 75%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.76
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2023 275/40 R20 7/7 11 metrics
2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test Tire Rack 225/45 R18 6/9 11 metrics

Videos

Best UHP All Season Tire? Continental vs Pirelli vs Falken vs BFGoodrich vs General vs Vredestein

Best UHP All Season Tire? Continental vs Pirelli vs Falken vs BFGoodrich vs General vs Vredestein

All Tests
View Test Results
2
Tests
7th
Average
6th
Best
7th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test
275/40 R20 • 2023
7th/7
Good dry handling and overall comfort, along with a decent warranty.
Falls behind in both dry and wet braking metrics. Higher price per mile.
2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test
225/45 R18 •
6th/9
The BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S PLUS provided a firm ride on the road that rounded over impacts well, though it didn't completely mask them. It produced a consistent tone over most surfaces, with some minor tread growl. Its steering was a standout feature, feeling nicely weighted, deliberate, and planted, communicating its performance DNA. On the wet track, it was reliable and balanced, though the steering felt slightly slower than preferred, and the front end tended to push in tighter turns. The dry track experience was similar, with hefty, assured steering being a highlight, but a lack of absolute traction held it back to the middle of the pack. In winter testing, the tyre was noticeably lacking in traction, with weak rear axle grip that made the car eager to rotate and forced slower cornering speeds.

Questions and Answers for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

How would you rate the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus?

Click a star to start your review

188 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus Reviews

Given 61% while driving a Volvo S90 (255/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 38,000 spirited miles
Coming from a continental Conti pro TX before these tires failed to keep the same levels of comfort/road noise and provide a little more performance at the same time. I will say they did handle very well with plenty of grip when new especially but now worn down they are struggling to keep those same levels of traction. I probably have about 3-4K miles left on them and I fear thats being very generous, they wore down very uneven due to just how wide the shoulder section of the tread is. the tires still have plenty of tread left in the center but on each side they are almost bald, not really happy about that. I am very unhappy about the tread life. This tire also gets your car extremely dirt very easily due to the large shoulders and sipes on each tire which kick up rocks and almost anything it runs over. overall id say it deserves a 6.5/10.
Helpful 879
March 11, 2025
Given 84% while driving a Hyundai Veloster Turbo 1.6 TGDi (225/40 R18) on mostly town for 12,000 spirited miles
In dry conditions, with traction control off, a spirited launch results in very little wheel spin. In wet conditions there is a minimal amount of wheel spin with traction control on. Icy surface grip is above average, but this is not a dedicated winter tire. Snow grip depends a lot on the depth and type of snow that has fallen. In powdery conditions the tires will slip and lose grip at launch. In wetter snow conditions the tires do much better. My partner, overall, hates the ride of my car because it is a stiffer suspension than in her car, but noticed a marked improvement in ride quality over the previous tires fitted to the car (Nexen) Cornering grip in both dry and wet road conditions is very good. In snow the tires will slide and lose grip if you aren't careful with your speed.
Helpful 930
November 17, 2022
Rate the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus