Menu

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

The Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS is a premium ultra high performance all-season tyre that stands out for its exceptional wet-weather confidence and security. Independent tests and real-world drivers consistently highlight class-leading wet grip, strong braking and a composed, predictable balance in the dry. It delivers an impressively refined everyday experience for the category, with dependable cold-weather traction and useful capability in light snow.

9.5
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
89%
Wet Grip
91%
Road Feedback
83%
Handling
87%
Wear
68%
Comfort
82%
Buy again
87%
Snow Grip
76%
Ice Grip
62%
30 Reviews
81% Average
409,898 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 2nd)
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

All Season Premium
BETA
9.5 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Ice
100
0.84x / 1 test
Wet
90.2
1.93x / 10 tests
Dry
86.8
1.5x / 9 tests
Snow
79
1.38x / 6 tests
Value
78.9
0.42x / 4 tests
Comfort
60.2
0.32x / 5 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
89.5
15 tests
Braking
85.6
9 tests
Traction
61.3
1 test
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 2
Period: 2022 - 2023
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 30
Avg Rating: 80.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.58
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2023 275/40 R20 1/7 11 metrics
2022/23 UHP All Season Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2022 245/40 R18 2/4 13 metrics
2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test Tire Rack 225/45 R18 2/9 11 metrics

Videos

Best UHP All Season Tire? Continental vs Pirelli vs Falken vs BFGoodrich vs General vs Vredestein

Best UHP All Season Tire? Continental vs Pirelli vs Falken vs BFGoodrich vs General vs Vredestein

Michelin vs Continental vs Bridgestone vs Pirelli - The BEST Ultra High Performance All Season Tires

Michelin vs Continental vs Bridgestone vs Pirelli - The BEST Ultra High Performance All Season Tires

3
Tests
2nd
Average
1st
Best
2nd
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
Excellent in both wet and dry conditions with good handling and a solid warranty.
Slightly higher price point.
2nd/4
Best wet handling, fastest wet circle, good in snow, good levels of comfort.
Average snow performance.
The Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus offered a generally comfortable road ride, softening larger hits and absorbing smaller imperfections with poise, though with a touch of residual motion. Noise was well-mitigated, and the steering feel was subdued and responsive but not particularly eager or lively. On the wet track, the steering continued to be unexciting and flat, but this was paired with strong traction and compliant, well-balanced behavior, resulting in a neutral and capable performance. The dry track experience was more refreshing, where the tyre felt intuitive and athletic, held back only by its somewhat flat steering. During winter testing, it showcased admirable performance, accelerating well and being easy to drive, but it was somewhat unbalanced, as its braking didn't feel matched to its acceleration, and cornering required managing both front and rear grip.

Questions and Answers for the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Ask a question
April 26, 2023

2022/23 UHP All Season Tyre Test Results Table lists the Rolling Resistance for this tire as .975kg / t. I believe this may be an error as it appears the decimal may be a place off. Can you please confirm one way or the other? Rolling resistance is a factor in my tire decision that can tip the scale one way or the other with regard to the otherwise nearly identically rated Michelin PSAS4. Thanks!

You are of course correct, that error has now been fixed. Thank you for sharing.
October 3, 2023

Is this a 3pmsf tire? I realize its all season but I’m living in Germany and we are required to have 3pmsf tires as our all season tires

No it's not a 3PMSF sadly, plus it's not sold in Europe!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 28 user reviews

Across 28 reviews, the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS is viewed very positively as a sporty, confidence-inspiring ultra-high-performance all-season tyre, especially praised for excellent wet traction and strong dry handling/steering response. Many drivers also highlight a refined daily-driving experience with good comfort and generally low noise, and several note it can handle light snow/cold conditions better than expected for the category. Minority concerns include faster-than-expected treadwear for some drivers, a slightly soft/squirmy sidewall feel at the limit, and that it still trails true winter tyres (and some winter-biased all-seasons) on ice/heavy snow.

Strengths
  • Excellent wet grip and hydroplaning resistance
  • Strong dry grip with responsive handling and good steering feel
  • Comfortable ride for a uhp all-season
  • Generally quiet/low noise for the category (surface dependent)
  • Confident all-around performance in cold temps and light snow for many drivers
Areas for Improvement
  • Treadwear can be shorter than expected for some drivers (especially with spirited driving)
  • Not a substitute for a dedicated winter tyre on ice/heavy snow
  • Sidewalls can feel a bit soft/squirmy at the limit or during hard cornering

Top 3 Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Reviews

Given 90% while driving a Hyundai Genesis Coupe V6 (245/40 R19) on mostly country roads for 100 spirited miles
Fronts are 225 tread, rears are 245 on my rwd v6 coupe. am basing the scores off my initial impressions compared to the cheap tires that came with the car.

The Contis are significantly more responsive to steering input compared to the cheapos I were using before (habilead headking s2000 front, joyroad rx6 rear). way more comfortable. acceleration noticeably better at all speeds. i'm almost certain it will be much better in the wet, which i haven't tried yet. brakes work much better with the contis.

they were quite expensive but even after driving for only an hour, i can already tell these are genuinely good tires. im not that interested in the final few percentages in comparing with the pilot as4 or pzero as3. All i care about is that these tires work very well. Sidewalls seem a tad soft for my liking, but the initial turn in is so much better than my cheapos, that you can carry more speed into corner entry despite the tendency to feel the weight shift towards the outside of the outer tire.
June 9, 2025
Given 87% while driving a Saab Automobile 9 3 Aero 2.8T V6 (235/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 12,000 spirited miles
I came from a BFGoodrich G-Force Sport Comp-2 at 240 treadwear that lasted less than 38 000 kilometers (24,000 miles) so I wanted a sticky tire that could last a couple of years. The Continental Extreme Contact DWS 06 Plus had a great balance between treadwear and performance. Wet traction was also a concern on my last tire.

Considering the G-Force as the best tire I have tried yet
Higher is better

- BFGoodrich G-Force Sport Comp-2
(8/10 overall in satisfaction)
Comfort : 4
Grip : 10
Noise : 3
Steering weight : 10
Steering feel : 10
Steering sharpness (initial turn-in) : 10

- Continental EC DWS 06 Plus
(8/10 overall satisfaction) (equal)
Comfort : 9 (way better, not even close)
Grip : 10 (feels quite sticky)
Noise : 8 (you hear almost nothing)
Steering weight : 5
Steering feel : 8 (once you are in a stable corner, the steering feels good)
Steering sharpness (initial turn-in) : 7 (not on train tracks anymore, but compensated by the ease of turning / lack of steering weight)

They are excellent tires in the rain, virtually no difference in tire feel or grip between dry and wet condition during daily commute. Comfortable over rough roads and bumps too. Although it is a UHP A/S, its grip is comparable to a UHP summer tire.

In terms of feel, it is not comparable to a proper UHP summer tire. During high speed or high load curves, you can feel the sidewalls wobble a bit, which needs getting used to.

In the end, I'm being picky. They are really great tires.
November 14, 2024
Given 59% while driving a Acura 4 dr integra ls vtec (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
Very impressive for most of tire life. Surprisingly effective in snow when new even when s worn off
Quiet at first very noisy when worn ever with frequent tire rotation. Replaced tires early due to high noise after several seasons. Lots of tread left and still performed well. But sounded like bad wheel bearing, replaced only because of noise on Highway
May 21, 2025

How would you rate the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 78% while driving a Honda Civic SI Coupe (225/45 R18) on for 30,000 miles
These are great tires! The Bridgestone and Goodyear all seasons I had on my car previously felt like garbage compared to these, both in handling feedback and overall grip, but they lasted a bit longer. I can't notice much of any difference between these in the wet and the dry, although in colder temperatures (20F and below mainly) they do lose enough grip that I'm able to notice it. They're worthless in the snow which isn't surprising for a summer performance oriented all season but the Crossclimate 2's that are on my parents Subaru grip better around corners and feel better at the steering wheel also. Even a little bit of slush is enough to break these loose, but they don't ever make you feel out of control which is nice.

I have Hawk HPS pads on my car which bite very hard for a street pad, but I still haven't had ABS engage during hard emergency braking situations with these tires. They are great when cornering hard, and when they break loose its never a surprise, unlike a lot of other tires that feel perfectly fine in a corner until they lose grip out of nowhere. They also snap back into grip very easily with small corrections, so they are very fun to push the limits with when you get the chance. They do transmit small road imperfections very well which isn't the nicest thing on the street (for some reason even the stress relief breaks in concrete pavement really makes these vibrate at highway speeds but they're fine on asphalt at the same speeds) but ends up being very helpful other times. They are also pretty loud depending on the road surface. They only lasted me 25,000 miles but that's including some pretty hard driving and occasional track use.
February 21, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 90% while driving a BMW X3 (245/50 R19) on for 10,000 miles
Compared to the oem pirelli cinturato run flats, these are quieter, more comfortable, and have better grip in the dry and wet.
February 2, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 84% while driving a Mazda 6 (225/45 R19) on a combination of roads for 32,100 spirited miles
Before I had gotten these tires, I had the Yokohama Advan sport A/S (non plus version) and we had gotten them replaced at 4 and 5 32nds because they started to hydroplane in the Dallas rain storms. These Contis performed amazingly ever since I have gotten them. I wore down 2 of the tires to 2/32nds and the others to about 4/32nds before replacing them and they definitely could've lasted a lot longer had I not driven as spiritedly as I did when I got them. When it comes to grip, there is little to fault these tires for. In the 225/45/r19 size, they gripped in all conditions and had a really direct feel when it comes to steering in all conditions. We have encountered light bits of snow and Ice for a brief period and these powered through them with no issues. At the limit, they do tend to understeer a little bit but that was corrected by either reducing the steering input, or slowing down for the corner a little bit more. I will say that under some extreme cornering, the sidewalls did feel a little soft and squishy and felt as if I was rolling onto the very edges of the tread and that was not a great feeling as it was the only time I made my FWD Mazda oversteer, but it was easy to recover when that happened. In terms of comfort, it left a little to be desired in my opinion... but that also could be due to the fact that I had 126.1k miles on the car at the end and 94k when we got the contis installed. Noise on the tires depended on the surface. On smooth surfaces and parallel-cut concrete, they were really quiet for the type of tire they are and I was satisfied with them. On cross-cut concrete and rougher surfaces, they were either moderate or LOUD and sometimes it was really bad to a point where having a conversation in the car had to mean that you were speaking loudly. On the rougher roads at 65-80 MPH, my apple watch was recording anywhere from 74-78 decibels which is really loud. On the quieter roads at the same speed, it was reading closer to 68-73 decibels. In these conditions, I was running my music at 80 decibels (which is on the verge of hearing damage after a few hours). On city roads at city speeds of 30-55 mph, the tires were comfortable in terms of the noise. Ride quality on these tires is a mixed bag in terms of context (in general, my car is stiffer riding compared to Hondas [we own a 2017 accord] and Toyotas). When you look at it with a UHP state of mind, the ride on these is taut and composed. It is really hard to unsettle these tires and overall are really consistent. When you look at it in the sense that these are going to be touring tires, they are STIFF and can ride a bit hard. Overall though, you will be satisfied with the way that they ride in terms of ride quality. Rolling resistance/fuel use on these tires is pretty bad. I have noticed that these tires run a few mpg LOWER than the yokos that were previously on the car. Lastly, treadlife on these also leaves some to be desired as they quickly wore down to 5/32nds but they last a while after that point. Then again, that could also be because of my spirited driving to that will vary between driver to driver, but overall, I would definitely purchase these again.
January 6, 2026
Given 78% while driving a Mercedes Benz CLK500 Coupe (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
I put these tires on my 2006 Mercedes CLK500 and I live in Minnesota. This is my second winter with the car but these tires were installed this summer. I picked up a set of used Bridgestone Blizzaks last year when I purchased the car so I had some better winter tires for driving in the brutal MN winters. The tires have plenty of tread but are dated from 2022 so they are a few years old. They did ok last year but recently I swapped them back on for this winter season in the middle of a few days of snow, ice, & cold on the roads. So I was able to drive my car back to back the in the same conditions with the new Continental's (my "summer" tires) comparing to the used Blizzzaks. I was shocked to find the new Continentals (an ultra high performance all season tire) is actually better grip that my 3y/o Blizzaks. The Blizzaks are still ok so I'm just going to run them out for the rest of the winter season but color me impressed on how great these Conti's are. It's also great at all the nice weather stuff also (comfort/quiet, dry handling grip, wet handling). The car had an old worn out set of these DWS06+ on it when I picked up the car 2 years ago and when I needed to replace them earlier this year, I wasn't sure I wanted to spend the extra money on the same ones even though I was happy with even at the end of their life. So I tried a set of Falken Azenis FK460 A/S first as they were highly rated in the same category. WOW. They were horrible. Absolute junk. So bad I returned them under their free 30 day trial and bough a new set of the Conti's again instead. I know it's an older tire model at this point but damn it's still one of the best and I'm very happy.
December 19, 2025
Given 76% while driving a Subaru WRX Limited (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 25,000 miles
Have had these on my 2020 WRX for 25k miles and have been very pleased. Never had an issue in snow (Subaru’s AWD helps) but has been ole reliable in wet and snow. I don’t really push the car hard so dry grip seems standard but nothing crazy. Only downside was some minor sidewall or shoulder wear with fine cracks and dryness. Other than that a really good tire!
December 16, 2025
Given 81% while driving a Hyundai Elantra GT Sport (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 32,500 spirited miles
Not as good as the Michelin Cross climate 2 in snow, but an excellent all year tire that beats the Michelin in dry grip and handling. I live in central Pennsylvania and just bought my 2nd set of these in a row.
December 10, 2025
Given 85% while driving a Volkswagen Golf GTI Mk8 (235/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 7,150 spirited miles
Excellent all season tire for every season and a few occasional snow days. Wet weather it is exceptional.
December 1, 2025
Given 86% while driving a Honda HRV (215/55 R17) on mostly country roads for 40,000 average miles
Have used the tires on a first generation Honda HR-V, so have not used on a high performance vehicle. However, the tires have supported and enabled the Honda's nimble and responsive driving capabilities during everyday driving on curvy mountain roads (Blue Ridge Mtns). The tires have provided excellent service throughout their lifespan on the HR-V, delivering excellent wear, traction, noise levels, and comfortable ride throughout the life of the tires. Will not hesitate to buy again for the HR-V.
October 7, 2025
Given 60% while driving a Kia Motors K900 (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 13,000 average miles
I purchased a set of 'Continental Extreme Contact DWS06 Plus) tires for my 2015 KIA K900 from Discount Tire back in Jan, 2022. I think these are the same you're asking about. Yesterday, had a nail in a tire and took it there for them to fix. The store salesman informed me my tires were getting close to being considered for replacement due to wear (around 3-4/32" tread depth, mine were at 5-6/32"). Given these are 50,000 mile warrantied tires (based on 2/32" tread depth) and I've only driven them about 13K miles, I was in disbelief about how bad the treadwear life is on these. At about 26% of the 50,000 mile warranty, they've worn about 63% of the useful tread life (based on 10/32" new and 2/32" end of life tread depth). Everything else about these tires was good, but the tread wear is abysmal. Also, driving a tire to 2/32" tread depth is almost suicidal.
March 18, 2025
Given 91% while driving a Alfa Romeo Giulia QF (245/45 R19) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
Bought these after reading some reviews from other Quadrifoglio owners saying that these were some of the best all-seasons that retained the dartiness and precision of the stock Pirellis. So far I would have to agree. I think the Pirellis were definitely a more focused and exciting tire, but not really by too much. But they only last 10k miles, front axle would judder at low speeds at full steering lock, in cold temps they were so stiff it was like driving on hockey pucks and felt like they weren't always gripping as they should.

These Continentals feel like they sacrifice maybe 15% of the sporty/direct feel of the Pirellis but make up for it in comfort, noise, and grip in colder temps. You can hustle around corners and mash the throttle and there's very little slip (if any) even in colder temps. And better yet, no more front axle judder. In general the car feels much smoother but can still play along with sporty driving pretty darn well. I'm still considering going for a more dedicated summer tire when the temps go up, but they are good enough to make me doubt whether that's worth it. Expect these will last much longer as well.
February 10, 2025
Given 84% while driving a Honda Accord (235/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
They're so refined, you don't know it's a performance tire until you push it or need it. Phenomenal in the wet vs hydroplaning.
December 22, 2024
Given 90% while driving a Honda Accord EX L V6 (225/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,500 spirited miles
I bit the bullet and made the jump from a life of budget and mid-range tires to a premium offering for the first time with these tires, and my initial impressions are great. Worth every cent, hands down.

When cruising around and taking it easy, the road noise of this tire is lower than I've experienced with any other tire I've run on two different cars. There certainly is some noise, but it's not loud and fades into the background. The tires also just ride quite smooth, I'm confident passengers would not know I have a performance oriented tire if I'm taking it easy.

Dry performance is impressive, especially with some very cold temperatures lately where I'm running these in Wisconsin. We had a day or two of -5F (-20C) temperatures, and these tires still grip well, launching well from a stop and inspiring confidence when being thrown through curves. Grip only goes up from here as temperatures rise, above freezing, I'm unable to kick in traction control when launching from a stop at all.

What really impressed me is that in wet conditions, and with light snow/slush on the road, the tires didn't seem to care. I hardly had to adjust my driving habits, and it was easy to tell if you started to approach the limit, but they still felt solid.

These tires did struggle a little bit with ice, but they were still significantly better than anything else I've run, and recovered from slides quickly. The slides were also very predictable.

Moving from some generic budget/mid-range tires to these, one thing I also noticed is that all my older ones started to feel less planted as you approach and exceed 100mph (160kph). These feel glued to the road even at these speeds, and I have even made an emergency swerve at this speed with zero hesitation, no loss of grip, and great precision. All in Mexico, and allegedly, of course.

If you make one modification to your car, and don't want to swap wheels for winter/summer, get yourself a set of tires like these. I don't feel like I'm making any compromises for any conditions, and the fact that Continental pulled that off amazes me.
December 13, 2024
Rate the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS