Menu

Falken Azenis FK460 AS

The AZENIS FK460 A/S is Falken's Ultra High Performance All-Season tyre, which blends the versatility you demand of an all-season tire with the excitement you expect from an Azenis product.

8.0
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
93%
Wet Grip
67%
Road Feedback
90%
Handling
90%
Wear
55%
Comfort
80%
Buy again
40%
Snow Grip
10%
Ice Grip
10%
3 Reviews
59% Average
31,200 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 4th)
Falken Azenis FK460 AS

Falken Azenis FK460 AS

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
8 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Medium Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Wet
84.6
2x / 8 tests
Dry
78.1
1.5x / 8 tests
Value
68.4
0.38x / 4 tests
Snow
64.4
1.38x / 5 tests
Comfort
58.9
0.29x / 6 tests
Ice
40
1.2x / 1 test

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
81.6
1 test
Braking
77.9
9 tests
Handling
70.8
12 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 2
Period: 2023
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 3
Avg Rating: 59.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.64
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
Goodyear Eagle F1 vs Falken Azenis FK460 vs Wildpeak AT Trail Tyre Reviews 2023 255/40 R20 1/3 10 metrics
2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2023 275/40 R20 3/7 11 metrics
2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test Tire Rack 225/45 R18 7/9 11 metrics
3
Tests
4th
Average
1st
Best
7th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
Balanced performance across categories and less expensive on a per-mile basis. Good in wet conditions.
Subjective dry handling is slightly lower than its competitors.
The Falken Azenis FK460 A/S provided a promising ride on the road, balancing comfort and compliance without being too stiff and keeping road noise to a low volume. The steering feel was direct and natural but lacked a certain spark, needing a bit more heft and precision to be truly satisfying. On the wet track, the steering remained light and lively, but the tyre lacked lateral traction, requiring earlier braking to manage mid-corner speed and prevent sliding. This was reflected in its slower lap times. The dry track performance was not much of an improvement, with the same smeary, excessive movement and a tendency to push when driven hard. Winter conditions were not kind to the tyre; its traction was among the weakest in the test, and it required driving within a very narrow window to maintain control, as any misstep resulted in either understeer or abrupt rotation.

Questions and Answers for the Falken Azenis FK460 AS

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Falken Azenis FK460 AS. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

YouTube Review

Top 3 Falken Azenis FK460 AS Reviews

Given 99% while driving a Toyota 2022 GR86 (215/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 5,000 spirited miles
I'm very happy with these tires.
Looking at the performance specs compared to others, and from my own experience with them, I believe these tires have been underrated by consumer reviews.
Ask a question | Helpful 693
September 23, 2024
Given 64% while driving a Mazda 6 (225/45 R19) on mostly motorways for 26,000 average miles
Extreme grip but were completely worn down at 26,000 miles. Very disappointed in this purchase. Additionally, Falkan requires tire rotations every 5,000-7,000 miles to satisfy their "Warranty" requirements. I will never buy this brand again.
October 21, 2023
Given 46% while driving a Jeep Grand Cherokee (285/40 R20) on mostly country roads for 200 easy going miles
hydroplaning is a big problem
October 26, 2025
Have you driven on the Falken Azenis FK460 AS tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Falken Azenis FK460 AS? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Falken Azenis FK460 AS >

Latest Falken Azenis FK460 AS Reviews