Menu

MRF ZVTV

The MRF ZVTV is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.8
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
77%
Wet Grip
73%
Road Feedback
61%
Handling
63%
Wear
80%
Comfort
52%
Buy again
44%
11 Reviews
64% Average
155,840 miles driven
MRF ZVTV

MRF ZVTV

Summer Economy
BETA
6.8 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 11
Avg Rating: 64.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.05
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the MRF ZVTV

Questions and Answers for the MRF ZVTV

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the MRF ZVTV. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 MRF ZVTV Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Audi 3.2 v6 Quattro (195/55 R16) on mostly town for 55 average miles
This is my first car (Tata altroz XZ 195/55 R16) and first four wheeler tyre experience. As per me MRF zvtv tyres are all to do tyres in budget. I never afraid of driving on bad roads, patholes, wet roads. Durability in kms is awesome. Only thing is that my run is 55k now and there are fine cracks on shoulders. But I think it is not that harmfull.
July 4, 2025
Given 86% while driving a Suzuki Baleno (185/65 R15) on mostly country roads for 0 average miles
Only drawback is braking control not good Tyre milage excellent 90k still tyre condition is good No puncture or any tyre issues
April 13, 2023
Given 49% while driving a Honda City (175/65 R15) on mostly motorways for 31,000 average miles
OEM tyres provided by Honda in India for the model CITY. Using since 4 years. Nearing end of tyre life. No punctures till date. Driving style - Easy going 80%, Spirited 20%. Excellent dry grip. Excellent wet grip. Pathetic feedback. Pathetic comfort. Wear Above average.
January 8, 2022

How would you rate the MRF ZVTV?

Click a star to start your review

Latest MRF ZVTV Reviews

Given 63% while driving a Suzuki Ciaz (185/65 R15) on mostly motorways for 185 average miles
The set of 4 MRF ZVTV tyres came with the Maruti Ciaz, I had purchased in August 2016. The tyres are definitely ok in both wet and dry conditions. I have clocked a little over 61,000 kms so far on my odometer. And almost 90% of my total kms clocked in my car has been on highway drives. Where the roads have been pretty good for most of the journeys. But when the roads were bad, they were pretty bad and riddled with potholes and ditches. But yes, the tyres did handle the potholes and ditches quite well too. Did not have any tyre puncture in the first 4 years. But post the 5th and nearly the 6th year now, I'm having a few punctures. But worse still are the air leaks from the tyre edges that fit around the alloy wheels. This means having to sandpaper the alloy rims so that the tyre edges fit more securely around the edges of the alloy wheels, thus not allowing the air to leak or escape anymore. Not driven on any other car tyres in India to compare with. But driven for over 18 years in the UAE on Bridgestone B290 tyres. And they were very good tyres for the highways and city roads too. Enjoyed good grip, handling and mileage with them. Unfortunately, as per UAE Vehicle passing rules they had to be changed every 3 years or so. But by then, I.used to clock over 70,000 kms using them.
July 3, 2022
Given 40% while driving a Suzuki 1999 Gsxr750 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
Dangerous tire on light vehicles. Loses grip on pavement and to a lesser extent on asphalt. It is noisy over 50km/h and loses grip when starting and braking.
May 4, 2022
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 49% while driving a Honda City (175/65 R15) on mostly motorways for 31,000 average miles
OEM tyres provided by Honda in India for the model CITY. Using since 4 years. Nearing end of tyre life. No punctures till date. Driving style - Easy going 80%, Spirited 20%. Excellent dry grip. Excellent wet grip. Pathetic feedback. Pathetic comfort. Wear Above average.
January 8, 2022
Given 74% while driving a Maruti Udyog Ciaz (185/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
Came as originals on my Ciaz Zdi in 2015. Not much of driving but after 60k KM's still have a good deal of tread left. However, owing to age, fatigue cracks can be seen in the tyres now. Total VFM with average performance.
July 27, 2021
Given 56% while driving a Honda Jazz (175/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 20,500 spirited miles
Bad tyres, mediocre grip levels in wet and dry. Steering feedback was decent. These tyres lasted me 33k kms.
March 28, 2021
Given 76% while driving a Toyota 2006 Avalon (175/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
Good performence with new car, running upto 55000 KM , but confused to repeat or not.
November 11, 2020
Given 76% while driving a Skoda SKODA NEW RAPID STYLE (195/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 3,100 average miles
The tyres are good and give good handling and stability to the car. However the tyre build quality is questionable as my tyre was cut on the side due to a stone and i had to replace the tyre with a new one as MRF does not cover it under warranty.
June 22, 2018
Rate the MRF ZVTV