Menu
Maxtrek TREK M900 View Gallery (1)

Maxtrek TREK M900

Maxtrek Tyres High Performance Winter

The Maxtrek TREK M900 is a High Performance Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.7
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
57%
Wet Grip
64%
Road Feedback
52%
Handling
42%
Wear
75%
Comfort
43%
Buy again
52%
Snow Grip
64%
Ice Grip
52%
6 Reviews
56% Average
20,757 miles driven
Maxtrek TREK M900

Maxtrek TREK M900

Winter Economy
BETA
6.7 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 55.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.49
History Points: 6
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Maxtrek TREK M900

Alternative Tyres

Semperit Speed Grip 5
8.9/10
Michelin Alpin
7.7/10
86% 9 reviews
Semperit Speed Grip 2
7.4/10
86% 17 reviews
Continental WinterContact TS 800
7.2/10
89% 12 reviews
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3
7.0/10
86% 11 reviews
Nokian WR D3
6.8/10
87% 42 reviews
Continental WinterContact TS830
6.7/10
90% 30 reviews
Sava eskimo hp
6.5/10
87% 17 reviews
Michelin Alpin A4
5.5/10
92% 53 reviews
Show All Winter High Performance tyres

Questions and Answers for the Maxtrek TREK M900

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Maxtrek TREK M900. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Maxtrek TREK M900 Reviews

Given 73% while driving a Mercedes Benz GL 350 CDI (295/40 R21) on a combination of roads for 3,107 average miles
Installed on GL 350 , rugged looking tire , first time using this brand.

If the manufacturer improvise the road noise conditions on dry highway surfaces at both low and high speeds not exceeding 120km.

This tire would be a great selling point , cabin noise decibels are through the roof.

Especially for a MB GL 350 fitted with air ride suspension, it feels like we’re constantly driving through a construction zone.

Gonna sell these and buy something closer to Hankook, Continental, etc

Got them installed brand new , we drove a combined 40 + hrs and 3106.856 miles.

It’s noisy and appalling, sounds like my bearings are all bad, which is definitely not the situation.

Got me second guessing myself.
Ask a question | Helpful 697
March 11, 2025
Given 19% while driving a Toyota RAV4 (215/60 R17) on mostly country roads for 1,000 miles
Not very good.
Ask a question | Helpful 714
January 20, 2025
Given 70% while driving a Peugeot 308 (205/55 R16 T) on a combination of roads for 150 average miles
Bought tires January 2021. Drives mostly in mid and northern Sweden. My tires has rivets and has a good grip on hard snow and ice. Run in of tires is necessary plugging rivets firmly. Noise is humming at all speeds as expected. Winter roads not covered by ice or snow requires traditional winter driving style. Driving on snow is easier than ice and could be done forced with a relaxed driving style, more similar to warm weather driving on summer tires. In short these tires behave better than non-riveted winter tires. This far I've only driven these tires at temperatures below -7⁰C.
Ask a question | Helpful 868
February 1, 2021
Have you driven on the Maxtrek TREK M900 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Maxtrek TREK M900? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Maxtrek TREK M900 >

Latest Maxtrek TREK M900 Reviews

Given 64% while driving a (270/65 R18) on mostly town for 500 average miles
Installed on a f350 truck get great grip in snow not so good on ice but much better than the full summer tires I had on. Good from the price
I like these better than the joyroads I put on my other truck
Ask a question | Helpful 86
December 20, 2025
Given 33% while driving a Toyota Echo (175/65 R14) on mostly town for 6,000 average miles
Absolutely abysmal tire. Noisy, poor traction(snow or dry), poor road feel(especially when the temperature is a bit warmer). The vehicle wanders all over the road. Please spend a couple extra dollars and buy a more reputable tire if you have to drive in severe winter climates. I won't make this mistake again.
Ask a question | Helpful 862
November 3, 2020
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 89% while driving a Dodge Caravan (225/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Second year with those m900 ice (no studs on), I had yokohama IG52 before and I can't realy tell there's a difference. The only difference is more money in my pocket.
Ask a question | Helpful 647
November 11, 2014