Menu
Roadhog RGHP01 View Gallery (1)
205-245/35-65 R17-19 31 sizes 2019

Roadhog RGHP01

The Roadhog RGHP01 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

4.5
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
85%
Wet Grip
60%
Road Feedback
75%
Handling
80%
Wear
60%
Comfort
85%
Buy again
55%
2 Reviews
71% Average
4,000 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 10th)
Roadhog RGHP01

Roadhog RGHP01

Summer Economy
BETA
4.5 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Value
78.4
0.38x / 1 test
Comfort
77.5
0.29x / 1 test
Dry
56.5
1.8x / 1 test
Wet
44.7
2x / 3 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
53
2 tests
Handling
42
1 test
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 2
Avg Rating: 71.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.52
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test al volante 2020 225/45 R17 10/10 6 metrics
1
Tests
10th
Average
10th
Best
10th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
10th/10
None mentioned.
Very low grip in the dry and wet. Poor handling leading to no confidence in the wet.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
225/60R17 99 H C B 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Roadhog RGHP01 >>

Questions and Answers for the Roadhog RGHP01

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Roadhog RGHP01. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Have you driven on the Roadhog RGHP01 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Roadhog RGHP01? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Roadhog RGHP01 >

Latest Roadhog RGHP01 Reviews

Given 56% while driving a Audi A4 Avant Quattro 252 bhp S Line Sport (8W/B9) (245/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 3,000 spirited miles
Good in dry conditions, good confort e low noise. In wet conditions is better to park and wait for sunny conditions before restart: they are dangerous.
Ask a question | Helpful 815
May 2, 2024
Given 92% while driving a Renault Scenic (215/60 R16) on mostly country roads for 1,000 average miles
These tyres replace a summer tyre, very comfortable ride. Very good in muddy and frosty conditions like field access
December 21, 2022
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!