Menu

Triangle SeasonX TA01

The Triangle SeasonX TA01 is a Touring All Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.8
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
87%
Wet Grip
73%
Road Feedback
87%
Handling
83%
Wear
83%
Comfort
83%
Buy again
90%
Snow Grip
90%
Ice Grip
90%
3 Reviews
85% Average
10,500 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 18th)
Triangle SeasonX TA01

Triangle SeasonX TA01

All Season Economy
BETA
6.8 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
100
0.32x / 1 test
Snow
84.1
1.38x / 4 tests
Dry
57.5
1.5x / 4 tests
Value
52.9
0.42x / 1 test
Wet
52.5
1.93x / 7 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
89.3
1 test
Braking
67.6
7 tests
Handling
47.3
3 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 1
Period: 2022 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 3
Avg Rating: 85.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.54
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Auto Bild All Season Camper Van Tyre Test Auto Bild 2025 245/45 R18 8/11 13 metrics
2024 All Season Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2024 225/50 R17 25/37 2 metrics
2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 195/55 R16 21/37 2 metrics
3
Tests
18th
Average
8th
Best
25th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
Triangle SeasonX TA01 achieves a "satisfactory" rating despite its low price point. The tyre offers only satisfactory performance on snow and dry surfaces but impresses with low pass-by noise levels. However, it suffers from limited grip levels on wet surfaces and shows weaknesses in snow traction and dry handling, making it suitable only for budget-conscious buyers with limited performance requirements.
25th/37
21st/37

Questions and Answers for the Triangle SeasonX TA01

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Triangle SeasonX TA01. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Triangle SeasonX TA01 Reviews

Given 86% while driving a Chevrolet Orlando (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 7,000 spirited miles
Very good all-round 4 season tires. Bought two of them initially and got fuel consumption down by about 1 l/100km. Only downside is during wet asphalt in the summer when leaving from the spot with a kick sometimes they slip. One tire got a bit chunked on the edge but I drive over the tram line with little care and engage going over the curb every time I park because the parking spot is of such nature. I hit on wheel on the curb and even if the die of the tire peeled because of the impact and the rim got distorted it still held air very well for a couple of months. I kept that tire for the spare wheel.
July 1, 2025
Given 79% while driving a Suzuki 2007 SX4 GYA (215/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
When I bought my Suzuki SX4 I also wanted some new rims with tires. Because I went for 18" rims I looked at an cheaper tire. I cam to the Triagle tires. This was two months ago.

But now I have them on my car for more than 2 months. They ride very well. Not so much noise and quit comfortable for 215/45 R18 tires. But maybe the SX4 is also more comfortable than my previous car.

As I see now when I bought the tires, they were around 75,- euro a tire in August. But now,3 months later they cost you 175,- euro each. Exactly the same tires with a fresh production date. That's the same price as Michelin or Continental tries will cost you. Very strange, but they can compete with those brands. They ride exellent.

But for so much money I would never buy them. Then I rather choose for Michelin, Continental of Vredestein.
November 2, 2024
Given 89% while driving a Opel Astra J 1.4 turbo (215/50 R17) on mostly country roads for 2,000 average miles
I've used these tires for about 3.000 kilometers. I've used them in hot summer(37+ C), cold weather (-15 C), on dry, wet roads, on snow and some ice. The grip was
verry good in all conditions. I have a normal style of driving and for that I can say that tyre respond very well at all demand. I paid around 60 euros per tire which was
verry good price. I recommend!
July 22, 2024

How would you rate the Triangle SeasonX TA01?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Triangle SeasonX TA01 Reviews

Rate the Triangle SeasonX TA01