Menu

Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 Test Results

Tested 2018 to 2020 3 publications

Tested 7 times by independent publications, the Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 averages a finish of 16th. Its strongest discipline is Wet Braking, beating 54% of the field across 5 tests; its weakest is Snow Braking, at 17% across 5 tests.

  • 7Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 16thAverage finish
  • 41%Field beaten on average
  • 3Publications

Record by discipline

Where the Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 3 P6.7 of 17.7 66% -
Dry Handling 2 P5.5 of 21.5 78% -
Subj. Dry Handling 1 P3 of 10 78% -
Wet
Wet Braking Strong 5 P13.8 of 29.2 54% -
Wet Handling 2 P14.5 of 21.5 34% -
Subj. Wet Handling 1 P1 of 10 100% 1
Straight Aqua 3 P12.7 of 17.3 33% -
Snow
Snow Braking Weak 5 P18.6 of 22.6 17% -
Snow Traction 1 P2 of 10 89% -
Snow Handling 2 P18.5 of 21 12% -
Subj. Snow Handling 1 P7 of 10 33% -
Ice
Ice Braking 1 P10 of 10 0% -
Ice Traction 1 P9 of 10 11% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 1 P4 of 10 67% -
Noise 2 P14.5 of 21.5 34% -
Value
Wear 2 P13.5 of 20.5 36% -
Value 2 P13.5 of 20.5 36% -
Rolling Resistance 3 P9.3 of 17.7 41% -

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Head-to-head record
Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 7 shared: 0 ahead, 7 behind 7 0 7 - 0%
Kleber Krisalp HP3 6 shared: 1 ahead, 5 behind 6 1 5 - 17%
Uniroyal MS+ 77 6 shared: 1 ahead, 5 behind 6 1 5 - 17%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 6 shared: 1 ahead, 5 behind 6 1 5 - 17%
Continental WinterContact TS 860 6 shared: 0 ahead, 6 behind 6 0 6 - 0%
Gislaved Euro Frost 6 5 shared: 3 ahead, 2 behind 5 3 2 - 60%
Debica Frigo HP2 5 shared: 1 ahead, 4 behind 5 1 4 - 20%
Giti GitiWinterW1 4 shared: 3 ahead, 1 behind 4 3 1 - 75%
Firestone Winterhawk 3 4 shared: 3 ahead, 1 behind 4 3 1 - 75%
Falken Eurowinter HS01 4 shared: 2 ahead, 2 behind 4 2 2 - 50%
Semperit Speed Grip 3 4 shared: 1 ahead, 3 behind 4 1 3 - 25%
Hankook Winter i cept RS2 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Laufenn I FIT 3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind 3 3 0 - 100%
Duraturn Mozzo Winter 3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind 3 3 0 - 100%
Toyo Snowprox S954 3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind 3 3 0 - 100%
Matador MP 92 Sibir Snow 3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind 3 2 1 - 67%
Cooper Weather Master SA2+ 3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind 3 2 1 - 67%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind 3 1 2 - 33%
Sava Eskimo HP2 3 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind 3 1 2 - 33%
Barum Polaris 5 3 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind 3 1 2 - 33%

Against its own line

The same record for the tyre it replaced and the tyre that replaced it.

Against its own line
Tyre Tests Wins Avg finish Field beaten
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 This tyre 7 0 16th 41%
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 Successor 12 0 16th 46%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 7 tests. Updated September 21, 2025.

The Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 shows a mixed winter performance profile with notable competence in wet grip and dry dynamics, but persistent weaknesses on snow/ice and aquaplaning limit overall results. Across seven winter-focused tests it averages mid-to-lower table finishes (average position 15.7), with isolated strong showings in wet and dry handling/braking but consistently below-average snow and ice metrics.

Key strengths include wet handling/braking (multiple top-5 results and a category win) and respectable dry braking/handling in certain sizes. However, snow braking/handling and ice performance frequently rank near the back of the field, and aquaplaning resistance is also subpar. Rolling resistance and value are middle-of-the-pack to weak, contributing to no standout awards and few top-tier finishes.

Performance Strengths

  • Wet Weather Performance Moderate
    Details
    • 1st place subjective wet handling in 2019 Auto Center (205/55 R16)
    • 3rd place wet braking in 2019 Auto Center at +1.7% from best
    • Middle-group wet braking 2018 Auto Bild (36.6 m, 14/22, +6.7%)
  • Dry Braking and Handling Moderate
    Details
    • 3rd place dry braking in 2018 Auto Bild (43.8 m, 3/22, +10.9% from best)
    • 5th place dry handling in 2018 Auto Bild (106.5 km/h, +3.1%)
    • Top-4 dry braking and 3rd subjective dry handling in 2019 Auto Center
  • Value/Price Positioning Minor
    Details
    • Price 395 (9/20) and Value 9.93 price/1000 (10/20) in 2019 Auto Bild 17-inch
    • Price 260 (13/20) in 2018 Auto Bild 15-inch
  • Dry handling Strong in 3 of 3 tests
    Details
  • Wet braking Strong in 2 of 3 tests
    Details
  • Dry braking Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details

Performance Weaknesses

  • Snow Performance (Braking/Handling/Traction) Strong
    Details
    • Snow braking 19/22 in 2018 Auto Bild (+9.3%); snow handling 19/22 (+4.5%)
    • Snow braking 19/21 in 2019 Auto Bild (+8.3%); snow handling 18/20 (+3.6%)
    • Snow braking 24/30 in 2020 Auto Bild market overview (+7.4%); 22/30 in 2019 overview (+8.3%)
  • Ice Performance Strong
    Details
    • Ice braking 10/10 (+19.5%) and ice traction 9/10 (+20%) in 2019 Auto Center
  • Aquaplaning Resistance Moderate in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Straight aquaplaning 20/20 (+19.5%) in 2019 Auto Bild 17-inch
    • Straight aquaplaning 13/22 (+9.1%) in 2018 Auto Bild
    • Straight aquaplaning 5/10 (+6%) in 2019 Auto Center (only mid-pack despite weaker field)
  • Rolling Resistance/Efficiency Moderate
    Details
    • Rolling resistance 10/10 (+15.7%) in 2019 Auto Center
    • Rolling resistance 9/21 (+9.2%) in 2019 Auto Bild 17-inch; 9/22 (+19.5%) in 2018 Auto Bild
  • Overall Consistency/Awards Moderate
    Details
    • Average overall position 15.7 across 7 tests
    • Overall placements: 20/52 (2018 shootout), 15/22 (2018 Auto Bild full), 14/21 (2019 Auto Bild), 11/16 (2018 ADAC), 20/47 (2019 overview), 22/49 (2020 braking test), 8/10 (2019 Auto Center)
  • Wet handling Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
  • Ice grip Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details

Do owners agree with the tests?

Every tester write-up on the Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 (3 tests) and 14 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.

Where owners and testers agree

  • Snow traction strength in 1 of 3 tests 9 praise, 0 criticise of 14 reviews · Read those reviews

Raised by owners, not by any test of this tyre

  • Dry grip no test mentions it 7 praise, 1 criticise of 14 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Wet grip no test mentions it 6 praise, 0 criticise of 14 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Road noise no test mentions it 0 praise, 5 criticise of 14 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Snow braking no test mentions it 4 praise, 0 criticise of 14 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Warm-weather behaviour no test mentions it 0 praise, 3 criticise of 14 reviews · Read those reviews

Every test, newest first 7

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2020 1 test
2019 3 tests
P8 of 10 Beat 22% of the field

2019 Auto Center Winter Tyre Test

AutoCentrum 205/55 R16

StrongSubj. Wet HandlingSnow Traction WeakSnow BrakingIce BrakingIce TractionRolling Resistance WinnerNokian WR Snowproof

2018 3 tests

Back to the Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Yokohama tyres

Overview

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.