Menu

Yokohama Geolandar A/T S

The Yokohama Geolandar AT S is a All Terrain and Off Road All Season tyre designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

6.9
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
81%
Wet Grip
74%
Road Feedback
76%
Handling
69%
Wear
78%
Comfort
78%
Buy again
80%
Snow Grip
80%
Ice Grip
60%
13 Reviews
75% Average
259,127 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 3rd)
Yokohama Geolandar AT S

Yokohama Geolandar AT S

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
6.9 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2017
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 13
Avg Rating: 75.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.78
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tyre Test Drive Out 2017 265/65 R17 3/7 0 metrics
1
Tests
3rd
Average
3rd
Best
3rd
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
3rd/7

Questions and Answers for the Yokohama Geolandar AT S

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Yokohama Geolandar AT S. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Yokohama Geolandar AT S Reviews

Given 21% while driving a Toyota 4runner (285/70 R17) on mostly country roads for 10,000 average miles
Extremely Disappointed with Yokohama Geolandar AT Tyres
I purchased Yokohama Geolandar AT off-road tyres in March, expecting high quality from a reputed brand. However, one month ago, one of the tyres developed large balloons and eventually burst. Despite this clear manufacturing defect, Yokohama refused to honor the warranty, stating that since the tyre had already burst, it wasn't covered.
To make matters worse, another tyre has now developed two balloons, again a clear sign of a defect, yet Yokohama continues to deny responsibility, claiming it’s not a manufacturing issue, even though the tyre is still under warranty.

This experience has been extremely disappointing. It’s not just about poor product quality but also a serious safety concern. Defective tyres like these are a major risk to life, and Yokohama’s refusal to address the issue under warranty is unacceptable. I strongly advise others to think twice before purchasing Yokohama tyres, as the company does not seem to stand behind their product or their warranty
September 16, 2024
Given 81% while driving a Jeep Renegade longitude4x4 (215/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 12 average miles
Appart from being mediocre on ice, this tyre has done everything i ever asked it to do. Being a geologist i have to drive to some remote and off road places for my fieldwork and the geolandars have never let me down. I used them on gravel, mud, snow, grass, sand, loose rocks, any material you can think to drive on, and they never let me down. I was especially impressed on steep loose rock based inclines, where the grip was phenomenal, as well as medium to deep mud, where i could easily drive off the track and get myself killed. The only "letdown" of these tyres are the ice grip, where they do seem to struggle, but for their budget and being an AT - all season tyre i couldn't ask anything more.
October 8, 2019
Given 84% while driving a Hyundai Santa Fe (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 0 average miles
Although I havent been driving the car for long with these tyres, I believe they will last long enough.
December 20, 2017

How would you rate the Yokohama Geolandar AT S?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Yokohama Geolandar AT S Reviews

(225/45 R17 R) on track for 100 average miles
I use these tyres on my mitsi shogun on really rough terrain (low ratio 4x4) in the mountains of northern Spain. The terrain is rocky tracks, dry gravel and when the weather kicks in deep mud and deep snow (0.5m).. Even towing half tonne loads up steep slopes these tyres don't lose grip.They only last about 12 months, 10000 miles but given the conditions I'm happy with that. On tarmac they are great, no road noise, handle well, feel good. I've only ever had one puncture in the rough ground and it was a slow one which is amazing.
HTH
March 6, 2017
Given 87% while driving a Subaru Outback 2009 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 43,000 average miles
Whilst I never really explored the dry and wet limits of these tyres what I can say is that in snow they are fantastic: levels of grip only expected from studded tyres. As for wear, we sold our car at 43,000 miles and there was still a little useable tread on the original fronts and rears!
February 4, 2017
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 89% while driving a Honda 2006 (215/65 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 33,000 easy going miles
Super tyres lasted 3yrs & 33000 miles,diagonal wheel change only once.Replaced General Grabbers which lasted 2yrs &23000 miles.Would I purchase again? Absoloutely 4 replacements ordered.
October 22, 2014
Given 100% while driving a Jeep Grand Cherokee 2.7 LTD (245/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Bought these for my Grand Cherokee 2.7 CRD. Found them to be excellent on and off road. Handling on the road is good. Off roading they were more then capable, (not talking extreme off roading). Had no worries whatsoever in mud, wet, uphill climbs etc etc. I will definitely be buying again.
August 13, 2014
Given 89% while driving a Holden Crewman Cross 8 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 15 average miles
great tyre
September 4, 2013
Given 45% while driving a Land Rover Discovery 3 (225/60 R18) on mostly town for 8,000 easy going miles
tyres cracked in tread centres and sides not yet 2yrs old 1pair done7500/8000 miles and almost down to wear marks rubbish tyreswould not buy again
April 20, 2012
Given 73% while driving a Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.7V8 Ltd (235/65 R17) on mostly town for 50,000 easy going miles
My review is of the Geolander AT-S, which is not listed in your list of tyres. It is fitted to my Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.7 V8 Ltd. These tyres are quiet and long lasting (I am going to replace it now with another set on 80 000km). The handling in dry and wet is very good, although I am not somebody to push a permanent all wheel drive SUV to its limits!
April 8, 2011
Rate the Yokohama Geolandar AT S