Menu

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

The Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 is a premium touring winter tyre built for drivers who prioritise maximum control in severe winter weather. It delivers exceptional grip and braking on ice and very strong performance on hard-packed and deep snow, making it a standout choice for harsh, Nordic-style conditions. On milder days, it is less convincing, with more road noise than many rivals and weaker wet-road security, particularly in aquaplaning situations.

8.8
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
76%
Wet Grip
73%
Road Feedback
66%
Handling
81%
Wear
74%
Comfort
64%
Buy again
69%
Snow Grip
91%
Ice Grip
86%
8 Reviews
76% Average
78,600 miles driven
8 Tests (avg: 2nd)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
8.8 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Ice
96.9
1.2x / 19 tests
Snow
83.6
1.5x / 20 tests
Value
66.2
0.42x / 6 tests
Dry
64
1.13x / 8 tests
Wet
60.8
1.93x / 15 tests
Comfort
58
0.32x / 7 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
87
12 tests
Handling
83.2
24 tests
Braking
76.9
22 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 9
Publications: 5
Period: 2021 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 8
Avg Rating: 75.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.43
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test Teknikens Varld 2025 235/45 R18 2/20 6 metrics
The Best Snow Tyres for 2025/26 Tyre Reviews 2025 205/55 R16 6/7 9 metrics
2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test Tekniikan Maailma 2025 205/55 R16 1/14 10 metrics
2024 Studded Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2024 225/45 R17 1/8 13 metrics
The Best Studded / Friction Winter Tyres for 2024 Teknikens Varld 2024 225/50 R17 2/17 0 metrics
2023 Studded Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2023 225/45 R17 1/8 15 metrics
2022/23 Tyre Reviews Studless Winter Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2022 205/55 R16 7/9 10 metrics
2021 Nordic Studded Winter Tyre Test Moottori 2021 205/55 R16 1/8 10 metrics
2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test Teknikens Varld 2021 205/55 R16 1/16 11 metrics

Videos

I Tested the BEST Snow Tires for 2025/26

I Tested the BEST Snow Tires for 2025/26

The BEST Tires for Snow & Ice Tested! Nokian vs Michelin vs Continental vs Yokohama vs Cooper + more

The BEST Tires for Snow & Ice Tested! Nokian vs Michelin vs Continental vs Yokohama vs Cooper + more

8
Tests
2nd
Average
1st
Best
7th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
The Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta 10 performs excellently on icy roads, where its behavior remains predictable in all situations and the steering feel is precise without being overly sharp. On asphalt, however, its performance is not on the same level, feeling imprecise and slow to react in situations requiring quick steering, though it remains controllable without surprises.
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 would have won this test if it were based solely on ice and snow performance, delivering an unbeatable 80 out of 80 possible points for winter road grip. The stud grip is extremely difficult to match, and on the ice track, it feels like the car tenses up when these tyres are fitted - grip increases dramatically, giving the driver greater opportunities to easily handle difficult situations in extreme slipperiness. However, this winter supremacy comes at a cost on dry pavement, where it delivers mediocre performance typical of studded tyres at their current development level. The comfort results are particularly disappointing, letting down an otherwise strong performer. While it brakes and handles superbly on winter surfaces, the aquaplaning performance is weak and the overall road manners lack the refinement of the top Nordic friction tyres. For those who drive exclusively on ice and snow roads, this remains the top choice, but its compromises on bare pavement are significant.
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10, a studded tyre, offered excellent ice and snow grip and improved wet performance compared to previous models. It showed strong stability and performed well in the moose test. However, its major drawback was very high rolling resistance, which significantly impacted its fuel efficiency and lowered its overall score. The tyre also produced more noise compared to non-studded options.

Questions and Answers for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 7 user reviews

Most drivers rate the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 highly for outstanding grip and control on ice, hard-packed snow, and deep snow, delivering strong winter confidence and safety. Several high-scoring reviews also note minimal wear over time. However, some users report intrusive road noise on pavement and average feel/feedback on dry/wet roads, and a couple of mid-scoring reviews cite notable performance decline after 2 seasons or ~20k miles. Overall sentiment is positive, with winter traction as the standout strength.

Strengths
  • Exceptional ice and hard-packed snow traction
  • Strong deep-snow performance
  • Confident winter handling and braking
  • Low wear/tread longevity (for many users)
Areas for Improvement
  • Noticeable road noise on pavement
  • Mediocre dry/wet road feel and feedback
  • Performance decline after a couple seasons or ~20k miles (some users)

Top 3 Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 Reviews

Given 66% while driving a Mazda 6 Wagon (225/55 R17) on mostly country roads for 10,000 average miles
TLDR: perfomance decline after just 2 seasons!

Driving in Finland, I bought a set of these based on the stellar reviews. For 2 seasons it was great. Especially in the snow and on white ice. Black ice performance was ok, but not great. Average in the dry and wet (to be expected).
During the 3rd season the performance declined significantly. I got stuck in downtown Helsinki on a snowy icy patch of tarmac while parking, other cars(regular 2wd) left the same spot even on studless tires without issues. Even the slightest icing / slush on the roads were too much. I lost confidence in the tire, I reported it to Nokian and they took the tires for inspection after the 3rd season. Without doing any tests they sent it back and said it was all ok. Never buying a Nokian again, it seems the lifetime of these tires is 2 seasons, even when there is plenty of tread remaining.
November 21, 2024
Given 96% while driving a Hyundai (205/60 R16) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
Absolutely the best snow and ice tires i have ever used.
I always want aggressive snow tires in the winter living in the mountains of western Washington no matter what vehicle I drive.
These hakkapeliitta 10 tires amaze me whenever we get snow. My Hyundai Elantra is fwd and sits pretty low to the ground. As long as my tires can touch the ground they really kick ass. Only problem I've ever had was trying to drive in 2 feet of fresh snow before anyone else was driving in it or being plowed. My car was to low for that much snow but i did make it out of driveway and around the block but i didn't dare stop until I got back in my driveway because i was on top of snow and my tires were spinning a bit to keep the momentum. Once some traffic had packed in down a bit i was great to go.
I love love love these tires.
I also bought a brand new set for our 2018 Mazda cx5 awd and Acura Mdx sh-awd. I'm excited and impatiently waiting for snow to put them to the test with our awd vehicle's.
December 23, 2023
Given 82% while driving a Jaguar XJ (X351) LWB 5.0L Supercharged (245/40 R20) on a combination of roads for 10,000 easy going miles
Nokian Hakka 10 is an exceptional tire in the worst winter conditions. Exceptional ice cornering, braking and acceleration. Quietest studded tire I have had to date. Tires still measure at 9/32nds after 10,000 kms of winter use. Only complaint is the tire gives you very little feedback on dry/wet conditions
October 9, 2022

How would you rate the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 56% while driving a Ford F 150 (265/70 R17) on for 8,000 miles
I bought these tires in early October 2025.
Since then, temperatures in the Laurentians region (St-Jerome) have gone through all ranges of good weather to the most extreme weather.
On dry roads and where to wet, nothing to complain about.
\r\nHowever, during snowstorms or ice storms I did not observe the much-touted and praised performance.
Not worth the price paid ($1600.00 CAD)
These are definitely the last set of Hakkapelica10 tires I'll ever get.
January 7, 2026
Given 64% while driving a Honda pilot (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 25,000 average miles
Tire performed great for about 20k miles in the Laurel Highlands. After that, still plenty of tread but suddenly handling on snow and Ice was BAD. If you can afford a tire that only goes 20k miles, then these are for you. After 20k, get rid of them or you will be slipping around and having handling issues on snow and Ice,
November 2, 2025
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 89% while driving a Hyundai I30N (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 11,000 average miles
Echoing other people’s reviews, these tyres are phenomenal in harsh winter conditions, to the point where it almost feels like driving in summer. If you’re in the market for winter tyres that will laugh at demanding conditions, keep you safe and handle as if there’s no ice or snow at all, buy these. Winter driving is a piece of cake with these tyres. My hot hatch is again fun to drive for the cold 6 months of the year up here in the north.

The only downsides are the road noise and wet braking. The noise, which, for a studded tyre, is not exceptionally worse than average, but it’s still hard to ignore the noise on asphalt. The wet braking on asphalt is not perfect and far from being “bad”; just something to keep in mind. Definitely buying these again, but I don’t know when that will be as the wear has been almost non-existent!
January 1, 2023
Given 76% while driving a Honda Civic 1.8 (/65 R15) on mostly country roads for 2,000 easy going miles
Here in the states, outlets like Consumer Reports would have us believe that premium studless winter tires have reached parity with studded Nordic winters. At least in the case of the Hakkapeliitta 10, this is absolutely not true. I've have the chance to directly compare these tires to lightly worn sets of the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 and the Continental Vikingcontact 7. In deep snow the difference is significant. But on hard packed snow and ice the Hakkas are massively better. I can't speak to the dry/wet traction or handling as my tires will spend 90% of their life on dirt roads and snow. Noise is still a significant problem with the Hakka 10. In my poorly insulated Honda Civic, the constant racket is intrusive at all speeds on pavement. For this reason, I would not recommend these tires in any case where the car spends most of its time on paved roads. They are an absolute godsend for anyone who drives a 2wd car through the remote northern parts of the American west. I will update this review regarding wear at a later date.
January 11, 2022
Rate the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10