Menu
Kenda Emera A1 View Gallery (1)
195-265/35-55 R15-20 112 sizes 2018

Kenda Emera A1

The Kenda Emera A1 is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.4
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
79%
Wet Grip
73%
Road Feedback
75%
Handling
74%
Wear
66%
Comfort
85%
Buy again
78%
8 Reviews
76% Average
73,200 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 13th)
Kenda Emera A1

Kenda Emera A1

Summer Economy
BETA
7.4 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Medium Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Wet
80.5
2x / 4 tests
Dry
76.9
1.8x / 3 tests
Comfort
75.6
0.29x / 2 tests
Value
52.5
0.38x / 4 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
86.5
4 tests
Handling
64.2
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 1
Period: 2019
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 8
Avg Rating: 75.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.42
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 19/20 11 metrics
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 7/45 2 metrics
2
Tests
13th
Average
7th
Best
19th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
7th/45
19th/20
Good aquaplaning resistance, short dry braking.
Understeer during dry handling, very poor wear.
Conditionally recommended.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
205/55R16 91 V D B 70
205/55R16 91 V D B 70
17 inch
215/55R17 98 W D B 70
215/55R17 98 W D B 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Kenda Emera A1 >>

Questions and Answers for the Kenda Emera A1

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Kenda Emera A1. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Kenda Emera A1 Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Suzuki SX4 Scross 1.4T Boosterjet (215/55 R17) on mostly country roads for 1,000 spirited miles
These are VERY good tyres, with supreme comfort and grip. As good for grip as my Continental EcoContact 6, but with more ride comfort. Quiet and quite a soft compound, with good handling. Because these prioritise comfort, road feedback is not quite as good as the Continentals, but it makes for a safe, relaxing drive. I will actively choose these for both my cars again. Excellent.
Ask a question | Helpful 770
February 15, 2025
Given 39% while driving a Tesla Model 3 standard plus (235/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 300 spirited miles
It is not easy to handle the brake when Speed over 130km/h.
June 21, 2024
Given 81% while driving a Toyota 2006 Avalon (245/40 R18) on mostly motorways for 39,000 average miles
Extremely happy with this Tyre in the dry will stick to the road through tight corners
In the wet they are still a good Tyre would like to say my car is Lowed with some camber I do 600+ kilometers a week and some heavy footed driving in there as well and have had just over 11 months of driving out of the rear tyres compared to the 4 months I was getting from other brands
July 2, 2024
Have you driven on the Kenda Emera A1 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Kenda Emera A1? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Kenda Emera A1 >

Latest Kenda Emera A1 Reviews

Given 96% while driving a BMW 320i (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 3,000 spirited miles
Very good tyre, probably the best value for the money. Works very good on the car, I do not see any real disadvantages to the dunlop sportmaxx rt2 which were fitted before. The tyres have a stronger sidewall and a bit better turn in feeling then the Dunlops, but lack a little bit in comfort when directly compared. Grip level and noise seems similar, with the difference that the Kenda-s work better on low temperature. The wear looks normal for the driven km-s. We will se how it will be over time, from the tests I have seem this should be the only disadvantage to more known brands amd models in the same class.
November 7, 2023
Given 20% while driving a Skoda (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
I was overall not surprised by the qualities of this tyre. As it has been said time and time again... you get what you pay for with tyres!
November 1, 2023
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 97% while driving a (215/55 R16) on mostly town for 9,000 average miles
Good grip specially on motorway.
August 17, 2023
Given 96% while driving a Subaru 2011 Impreza WRX STI (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 300 average miles
Very good tyres. Grips well. A lot more quiet and sharper cornering feedback than my old bridestone potenza.
April 21, 2019
Given 91% while driving a Jaguar xf premium luxury (245/45 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 600 spirited miles
Bought these tyres very recently to replace my badly worn Pirellis at the front of my Jaguar XF. I've had good results from other budget brands in the past so had no hesitation in buying tyres made by a relatively unheard of company (a quick search revealed that they've been in business for over 60 years and a Finnish tyre test last year rated these very highly) To buy 2 of these tyres cost significantly less than the cost of a single tyre from a well known brand. The day after fitment I needed to do a long run from London to Bolton and back, going north I came off the motorway to enjoy a more scenic route through the Derbyshire dales and peak district. At this point the weather was relatively dry and the grip was just fine through the hills and winding roads. I did detect a slight hint of under steer in some of the sharper bends, certainly not concerned by this it was easily compensated for. I did the return journey on motorway only as the weather was dreadful, torrential rain all the way home for over 200 miles. These tyres had no grip problems at all in the wet and not once did I suffer any aquaplaning (there was a lot of standing water on the M1, I stayed in the fast lane for well over 100 miles) The road noise from these tyres is better than the pirellis that I had before, and I have not noticed any significant drop in MPG over this trip. These cost me £55 each and I am very pleased with them, will definitely buy them again. Bear in mind that in this instance they were fitted to the front wheels of a rear wheel drive vehicle, they may behave differently if they are also used for propulsion.
March 9, 2019