Menu
Wanli S1015 View Gallery (1)
175-185/80 R14 2 sizes 2015

Wanli S1015

Wanli Tyres Touring Summer

The Wanli S1015 is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.7
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
70%
Wet Grip
44%
Road Feedback
58%
Handling
56%
Wear
72%
Comfort
54%
Buy again
40%
7 Reviews
56% Average
110,010 miles driven
Wanli S1015

Wanli S1015

Summer Budget
BETA
5.7 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 56.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.76
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Wanli S1015

Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
185/80R14 91 T D C 70
175/80R14 88 T D C 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Wanli S1015 >>

Questions and Answers for the Wanli S1015

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Wanli S1015. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Wanli S1015 Reviews

Given 10% while driving a Nissan Micra (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 15,003 easy going miles
Had 4 wanli s1015 tyres fitted 20/04/2014 . Paid £20 pounds for Naional Tyre guarantee.
Had a flat tyre on 14/09/2017 my breakdown cover changed the wheel and said there was cracking in the tread.
Drove to garage where they were fitted asked them to check the other tyres and was told that all the other tyres had cracks. This after only 2 years and four months of driving. Mileage over this period 15003. Had to replace all 4 tyres.
The tyres are being returned to the maker but garage not hopeful of any recompense.
What was the guarantee charge for. Nightmare all round.
Ask a question | Helpful 545
September 22, 2017
Given 99% while driving a BMW E38 7 Series (205/70 R14) on a combination of roads for 25,000 spirited miles
I don't know where Wanli tires should be classified, because they are budget friendly tires, but they also perform really well. This tread design has very good grip on both dry and wet roads and makes a great comfortable ride. I can have both affordability and quality in Wanli tires. I will definitely buy again.
Ask a question | Helpful 541
September 23, 2017
Given 37% while driving a Hyundai Getz (175/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 50,000 easy going miles
Have had a pair of these tires on a Getz 1.5 CRDI, first at back (ca. 40000 miles), then at front (ca. 10000 miles). While wear was ok (a bit better than average), and the dry grip was acceptable, as another user said, they were shocking in the wet (tyres marked as M+S!, must be a joke!). A complete DANGER!
Have driven 9 or 10 cars for long distances during the last 18 years, with many kinds and brands of tyres, and these ones are the worst without any doubt. Driving in the wet, even with an easy going style, they lost grip easily on almost any sharp curve. Never had an unintentional spin till I met these tyres.
They where also quite noisy. As for fuel consumption, it was ok. I've made some of my best consumption records while these tyres where mounted, but I wouldn't say that they helped a lot. Instead I would say the didn't hurt the fuel consumption.
Ask a question | Helpful 523
December 9, 2017
Have you driven on the Wanli S1015 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Wanli S1015? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Wanli S1015 >

Latest Wanli S1015 Reviews

Given 97% while driving a Toyota Vios (175/65 R14) on mostly town for 10,000 spirited miles
Definitely a MUST-BUY tire brand!!! WANLI tires have been getting bad reviews online but I don't get why??? I have been using WANLI tires for quite some time now and all I can say is that I am so satisfied with them. They give me good value for my money!! I'm getting WANLI tires for all my cars now.
Ask a question | Helpful 511
September 11, 2017
Smart fortwo passion (175/55 R15 S) on a combination of roads for 2 average miles
dealer fitted pair of s1200 on rear of smart fortwo at 27k miles replacing orinignal conti's
bearing in mind the rear engine rear wheel drive and quirky handling of the motor (having taken in for test drive with original fitment) the Wanli' let me down dangerously on roundabout, entrance to supermarket in fact anywhere the road surface was not dry and perfect. Felt my new purchase and my life was at risk and continue to take the most care in all conditions. what i can save in underwear i am going to spend on proper tyres
Ask a question | Helpful 488
November 30, 2012
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 33% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (205/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 5 spirited miles
Shocking in the wet. Simply pulling off quick from a junction in the wet is impossible. You need a big space cos you have to pull off gently otherwise you sit there wheel spinning and your chance has gone. The tread has lasted but one keeps going down after about 3 days it's completely flat. Not sure if it a puncture or faulty valve though. You can only just tell if the grip has been lost on a wet roundabout, it's very difficult to notice. Dry grip is ok, could be better. A lot of road noise, have to almost shout when talking when on a 70mph limit road. I wouldn't buy this make again.
Ask a question | Helpful 516
October 10, 2012
Given 29% while driving a Mercedes Benz 250D (1991) (195/65 R15) on mostly motorways for 10,000 spirited miles
Very hard rubber made these tyres very noisy at speed, and gave them terrible grip in both the wet and the dry.

In the end, I lost the back end of the car coming around a corner on an A-road in the wet. This was whilst following a Ford Fiesta (on Michelin tyres) that took the corner with no problems. Car rolled over 1 and a half times. Thankfully it was an old Merc so I crawled out with no injuries.

I have learned my lesson - I will never buy cheap tyres again. DO NOT BUY THESE - your life isn't worth it.
Ask a question | Helpful 497
January 7, 2011