Menu
Zeetex HP102 View Gallery (1)

Zeetex HP102

Zeetex Tyres Touring Summer

The Zeetex HP102 is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.4
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
56%
Wet Grip
47%
Road Feedback
56%
Handling
47%
Wear
57%
Comfort
48%
Buy again
44%
11 Reviews
51% Average
69,000 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 44th)
Zeetex HP102

Zeetex HP102

Summer Economy
BETA
5.4 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2012
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 11
Avg Rating: 50.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.22
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2012 Autobild 50 Tyre Braking Test Auto Bild 2012 225/45 R17 44/45 0 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
1
Tests
44th
Average
44th
Best
44th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2012 Autobild 50 Tyre Braking Test
225/45 R17 • 2012
44th/45

Questions and Answers for the Zeetex HP102

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Zeetex HP102. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Zeetex HP102 Reviews

Maruti Udyog (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 1,000 easy going miles
The most cheap quality Tyre.Donot buy.
Helpful 919
November 15, 2018
Given 40% while driving a Audi A3 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
I got these from a local garage as needed new tyres and they refused to let car go with grips then.

Tyres are worst I had on the Audi. Car often spins from standing start, roundabouts bends etc on dry as well slides. Got use to it but feel really unsafe. Do 40mile a day careful driving all the time. Other half drove my car who thought I was kidding and first bend at 10/15moh car slide on a 90deg turn of a normal driver!

Soon as I got some spare cash I'll be getting new proper tyres on
Helpful 577
March 20, 2016
Given 73% while driving a Honda Accord (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 7,000 average miles
Hi;

I'm selling lot of Zeetex brand tyres in Florida. They are very good mid range tyres. HP102 are high performance tires and have sold lot of these tires up till now. Honestly no complaints so far, instead got lot of appreciation from customers because they end up saving lot of money without compromising quality. You have to understand its not only tyres but what pattern are you purchasing and what car you are putting it on. What condition your car is (shocks, axle, etc).Zeetex is very much comparable to Nexen, Kumho, basically midrange tires.
Helpful 641
January 19, 2014

How would you rate the Zeetex HP102?

Click a star to start your review

195 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Zeetex HP102 Reviews

Given 17% while driving a Nissan (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 3,000 average miles
never buy this brand. One of the worst tyres I had. Had them when i bought my car. Then changed to Hankook.There's a vast dofference. It made me realolize how cheap Zeetex are built.Never risk your life by saving $100-$150 on these cheap tyres. If you want good tyres for good value for money go for "Hankook" or "GT Radial".
Helpful 511
November 12, 2015
Given 10% while driving a Subaru Forester (225/45 R17 W) on mostly town for 1,000 easy going miles
I paid €360.00 for a set of these tyres new from local garage.I had never heard of the brand & was reluctant to purchase.The guy in garage told me they where an excellent budget tyre & proceeded to show me he had them fitted to his car and they performed great in all conditions so I purchased them.What a BIG mistake that was.They have NO real cornering grip in any conditions wet or dry.After a couple days I rang garage & told them the tyres had no grip.I was advised to give them 500mls to bed in??Well there's 1000 miles on them now & they are still useless!Minimal grip at low speed cornering in dry,No grip in wet,on corners & roundabouts the steering wheel turns but the car keeps going straight.On the motorway in dry conditions driving in straight line they felt ok,in any wet conditions not good at all.I wouldn't recommend these tyres to anyone.Ive ordered a new set of tyres for my car so I've learned the hard way.buy cheap buy twice.
Helpful 548
October 22, 2013
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 10% while driving a Subaru Forester (225/45 R17 W) on mostly town for 1,000 easy going miles
I paid €360.00 for a set of these tyres new from local garage.I had never heard of the brand & was reluctant to purchase.The guy in garage told me they where an excellent budget tyre & proceeded to show me he had them fitted to his car and they performed great in all conditions so I purchased them.What a BIG mistake that was.They have NO real cornering grip in any conditions wet or dry.After a couple days I rang garage & told them the tyres had no grip.I was advised to give them 500mls to bed in??Well there's 1000 miles on them now & they are still useless!Minimal grip at low speed cornering in dry,No grip in wet,on corners & roundabouts the steering wheel turns but the car keeps going straight.On the motorway in dry conditions driving in straight line they felt ok,in any wet conditions not good at all.I wouldn't recommend these tyres to anyone.Ive ordered a new set of tyres for my car so I've learned the hard way.buy cheap buy twice.
Helpful 530
October 22, 2013
Given 40% while driving a Ford Falcon BA XR8 Ute (245/45 R18 W) on mostly country roads for 8,000 average miles
Needed tyres, was given these for free with 3500 kms on them. Cant argue with price (free). Comfort & feel average, neither good nor bad. Dry weather grip OK for cornering & braking, acceleration from standing start so-so, everything wet weather - the worst tyre I've ever had on any car, bar none! Lets go without warning on corners, even driven VERY carefully, & wont grip at all accelerating or braking. The virtually bald Dunlop SP3000S they replaced were better in the wet. Now that I've can afford new tyres I'll be replacing them ASAP!
Helpful 547
March 24, 2013
Given 40% while driving a Audi A4 Avant 1.9tdi Sport (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
On dry not bad, but when wet they're poor gently said. In comparison to Fed's SS595 they're loosing badly, both on dry and wet, specially on wet tarmac. I'm using 225/40/R18. Only good point they were cheap, but will not buy again*
Helpful 516
November 19, 2012
Given 89% while driving a Peugeot partner van (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 3,000 average miles
I gotta say, Very happy so far with these tyres. I have em on my van. The factory fitted tyres were Continetals. Though from very early on they were useless. They never gripped well if I accelerated to quick on wet hill. Felt unsteady in general on wet roads when taking corners. Never liked them. had Vredestein t Trac tyres. Didn't like em either and had bad grip on wet roads. I decided to reaqd reviews about tyres before buying this time as I was buying 4 brand new. Seen a couple of positive reviews and couldn't argue with the price. Excellent grip on the road. Feel confident with them on wet roads. 3,000 miles so far. Intend to rotate them to prolong wear. can't comment yet but so far, I'm very pleased with them Read the Zeetex's are modeled on the Dunlop Sportmax tyres. I don't buy the hype about the Big 6 tyre manufacturers. They seem to be pretty neutral reviews for all the top tyre brands. The price doesn't jusfify the reports or reviews. Zeetex's are economy tyres and not low budget which I don't think I'll go that far. Solid tyres. Road noise doesn't seem too bad but to be honest, my van is noisy anyway. Its not made to be refined anyways so I don't really notice.
Helpful 462
November 24, 2011
Given 100% while driving a Nissan Maxima GLE (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 0 easy going miles
one of best tire i have driven
Helpful 529
August 20, 2011
Given 84% while driving a Fiat Bravo (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
Good tyre. Were on the car when I bought it and are lasting well. Done over 20,000 miles and still have 2 - 3 mm tread left. A bit noisy at first but settled down once bedded in.
Helpful 433
May 30, 2011
Rate the Zeetex HP102