Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/45 R17
Tyres tested
20
Disciplines
11

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
38.4 m -5.90 m
44.3 m Best
44.4 m +0.10 m
44.4 m +0.10 m
44.5 m +0.20 m
44.5 m +0.20 m
44.7 m +0.40 m
44.7 m +0.40 m
44.7 m +0.40 m
45.1 m +0.80 m
45.2 m +0.90 m
45.5 m +1.20 m
45.7 m +1.40 m
46 m +1.70 m
46 m +1.70 m
46.3 m +2.00 m
46.4 m +2.10 m
46.5 m +2.20 m
46.7 m +2.40 m
46.7 m +2.40 m
47.3 m +3.00 m

The difference between best and worst was 23.2% (8.9 m ≈ 2 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
84.6 km/h +1.70 km/h
82.9 km/h Best
82.6 km/h -0.30 km/h
82.5 km/h -0.40 km/h
82.3 km/h -0.60 km/h
81.9 km/h -1.00 km/h
81.9 km/h -1.00 km/h
81.8 km/h -1.10 km/h
81.8 km/h -1.10 km/h
81.8 km/h -1.10 km/h
81.7 km/h -1.20 km/h
81.7 km/h -1.20 km/h
81.7 km/h -1.20 km/h
81.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
81.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
81.5 km/h -1.40 km/h
81.3 km/h -1.60 km/h
81.2 km/h -1.70 km/h
80.7 km/h -2.20 km/h
80.4 km/h -2.50 km/h
80.1 km/h -2.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.3% (4.5 Km/H).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
29.2 m Best
RefReference Summer
30.4 m +1.20 m
30.4 m +1.20 m
30.6 m +1.40 m
30.8 m +1.60 m
31.2 m +2.00 m
31.3 m +2.10 m
31.5 m +2.30 m
31.5 m +2.30 m
31.6 m +2.40 m
32 m +2.80 m
32 m +2.80 m
32.2 m +3.00 m
32.2 m +3.00 m
32.5 m +3.30 m
32.8 m +3.60 m
32.9 m +3.70 m
33 m +3.80 m
33.5 m +4.30 m
33.6 m +4.40 m
34.2 m +5.00 m

The difference between best and worst was 17.1% (5 m ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
75.7 km/h +1.00 km/h
74.7 km/h Best
74.3 km/h -0.40 km/h
74.1 km/h -0.60 km/h
73.7 km/h -1.00 km/h
73.1 km/h -1.60 km/h
72.8 km/h -1.90 km/h
72.6 km/h -2.10 km/h
72.5 km/h -2.20 km/h
72.5 km/h -2.20 km/h
72.4 km/h -2.30 km/h
72.3 km/h -2.40 km/h
72.1 km/h -2.60 km/h
72 km/h -2.70 km/h
71.7 km/h -3.00 km/h
71.7 km/h -3.00 km/h
71.3 km/h -3.40 km/h
71.1 km/h -3.60 km/h
70.2 km/h -4.50 km/h
69.6 km/h -5.10 km/h
69.5 km/h -5.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 8.2% (6.2 Km/H).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
78 km/h Best
76.7 km/h -1.30 km/h
75.8 km/h -2.20 km/h
74.6 km/h -3.40 km/h
74.2 km/h -3.80 km/h
73.4 km/h -4.60 km/h
73.3 km/h -4.70 km/h
72.2 km/h -5.80 km/h
71.7 km/h -6.30 km/h
71.7 km/h -6.30 km/h
70.3 km/h -7.70 km/h
70.1 km/h -7.90 km/h
69.3 km/h -8.70 km/h
68.4 km/h -9.60 km/h
68.4 km/h -9.60 km/h
68.1 km/h -9.90 km/h
66.8 km/h -11.20 km/h
66.6 km/h -11.40 km/h
65.5 km/h -12.50 km/h
62.8 km/h -15.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 19.5% (15.2 Km/H).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
24 m Best
24.1 m +0.10 m
24.1 m +0.10 m
24.2 m +0.20 m
24.3 m +0.30 m
24.3 m +0.30 m
24.3 m +0.30 m
24.3 m +0.30 m
24.5 m +0.50 m
24.6 m +0.60 m
24.6 m +0.60 m
24.6 m +0.60 m
24.7 m +0.70 m
24.7 m +0.70 m
24.8 m +0.80 m
24.9 m +0.90 m
25.1 m +1.10 m
25.2 m +1.20 m
26 m +2.00 m
26.4 m +2.40 m
RefReference Summer
89.1 m +65.10 m

The difference between best and worst was 271.3% (65.1 m ≈ 14.5 Car Lengths).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
78.4 km/h Best
78.4 km/h Best
78.3 km/h -0.10 km/h
77.8 km/h -0.60 km/h
77.6 km/h -0.80 km/h
77.4 km/h -1.00 km/h
77.3 km/h -1.10 km/h
77.3 km/h -1.10 km/h
77.3 km/h -1.10 km/h
77 km/h -1.40 km/h
77 km/h -1.40 km/h
77 km/h -1.40 km/h
76.9 km/h -1.50 km/h
76.6 km/h -1.80 km/h
76.5 km/h -1.90 km/h
76.4 km/h -2.00 km/h
76.3 km/h -2.10 km/h
75.6 km/h -2.80 km/h
75.3 km/h -3.10 km/h
75.3 km/h -3.10 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 4% (3.1 Km/H).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
68.7 dB Best
68.9 dB +0.20 dB
69.3 dB +0.60 dB
69.6 dB +0.90 dB
RefReference Summer
69.7 dB +1.00 dB
69.8 dB +1.10 dB
70 dB +1.30 dB
70.2 dB +1.50 dB
70.3 dB +1.60 dB
70.6 dB +1.90 dB
71 dB +2.30 dB
71.1 dB +2.40 dB
71.2 dB +2.50 dB
71.6 dB +2.90 dB
71.7 dB +3.00 dB
72.4 dB +3.70 dB
73.3 dB +4.60 dB
73.9 dB +5.20 dB
74.1 dB +5.40 dB
74.5 dB +5.80 dB
76.1 dB +7.40 dB

The difference between best and worst was 10.8% (7.4 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
51,250 KM Best
45,920 KM -5,330 KM
45,100 KM -6,150 KM
42,870 KM -8,380 KM
42,230 KM -9,020 KM
41,820 KM -9,430 KM
41,410 KM -9,840 KM
41,410 KM -9,840 KM
41,410 KM -9,840 KM
40,590 KM -10,660 KM
40,180 KM -11,070 KM
39,970 KM -11,280 KM
39,970 KM -11,280 KM
39,770 KM -11,480 KM
39,360 KM -11,890 KM
38,950 KM -12,300 KM
38,360 KM -12,890 KM
37,310 KM -13,940 KM
36,080 KM -15,170 KM
35,260 KM -15,990 KM

The difference between best and worst was 31.2% (15,990 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
7.62 Price/1000 Best €10.64
7.67 Price/1000 +0.05 Price/1000 €10.92
7.88 Price/1000 +0.26 Price/1000 €17.28
8.31 Price/1000 +0.69 Price/1000 €14.73
9.25 Price/1000 +1.63 Price/1000 €15.14
9.33 Price/1000 +1.71 Price/1000 €17.61
9.5 Price/1000 +1.88 Price/1000 €12.61
9.66 Price/1000 +2.04 Price/1000 €12.70
9.66 Price/1000 +2.04 Price/1000 €16.11
9.93 Price/1000 +2.31 Price/1000 €14.05
10.15 Price/1000 +2.53 Price/1000 €15.56
10.25 Price/1000 +2.63 Price/1000 €15.14
10.35 Price/1000 +2.73 Price/1000 €21.43
10.71 Price/1000 +3.09 Price/1000 €16.18
10.87 Price/1000 +3.25 Price/1000 €18.03
10.89 Price/1000 +3.27 Price/1000 €14.83
11.25 Price/1000 +3.63 Price/1000 €14.75
11.57 Price/1000 +3.95 Price/1000 €14.52
11.64 Price/1000 +4.02 Price/1000 €15.75
11.69 Price/1000 +4.07 Price/1000 €13.39

The difference between best and worst was 53.4% (4.07 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Sava Eskimo HP2) works out €432 cheaper than the most expensive (Kumho WinterCraft WP71).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2019 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.43 kg/t Best £0
7.77 kg/t +0.34 kg/t £20
7.78 kg/t +0.35 kg/t £21
7.8 kg/t +0.37 kg/t £22
7.81 kg/t +0.38 kg/t £23
7.85 kg/t +0.42 kg/t £25
7.95 kg/t +0.52 kg/t £31
8.04 kg/t +0.61 kg/t £36
8.11 kg/t +0.68 kg/t £40
8.11 kg/t +0.68 kg/t £40
8.28 kg/t +0.85 kg/t £50
8.44 kg/t +1.01 kg/t £60
8.56 kg/t +1.13 kg/t £67
8.57 kg/t +1.14 kg/t £68
8.77 kg/t +1.34 kg/t £79
8.8 kg/t +1.37 kg/t £81
8.97 kg/t +1.54 kg/t £91
9.29 kg/t +1.86 kg/t £110
RefReference Summer
9.3 kg/t +1.87 kg/t £111
9.59 kg/t +2.16 kg/t £128
9.99 kg/t +2.56 kg/t £152

The difference between best and worst was 34.5% (2.56 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 uses about 105 L (£152) more fuel than the Nokian WR Snowproof.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.