Test Charts / ADAC
2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/40 R18
- Tyres tested
- 31
- Disciplines
- 12
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41.4 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 42 m | +0.60 m | 16 km/h | |
| 42.2 m | +0.80 m | 18 km/h | |
| 42.3 m | +0.90 m | 19 km/h | |
| 42.5 m | +1.10 m | 21 km/h | |
| 42.6 m | +1.20 m | 22 km/h | |
| 43.1 m | +1.70 m | 26 km/h | |
| 43.3 m | +1.90 m | 27 km/h | |
| 43.7 m | +2.30 m | 30 km/h | |
| 43.8 m | +2.40 m | 30 km/h | |
| 43.8 m | +2.40 m | 30 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +2.50 m | 31 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +2.50 m | 31 km/h | |
| 44 m | +2.60 m | 32 km/h | |
| 44.1 m | +2.70 m | 32 km/h | |
| 44.2 m | +2.80 m | 33 km/h | |
| 44.3 m | +2.90 m | 33 km/h | |
| 44.4 m | +3.00 m | 34 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +3.10 m | 34 km/h | |
| 44.6 m | +3.20 m | 35 km/h | |
| 44.8 m | +3.40 m | 36 km/h | |
| 44.8 m | +3.40 m | 36 km/h | |
| 45 m | +3.60 m | 37 km/h | |
| 45 m | +3.60 m | 37 km/h | |
| 45.1 m | +3.70 m | 37 km/h | |
| 45.2 m | +3.80 m | 38 km/h | |
| 45.2 m | +3.80 m | 38 km/h | |
| 45.2 m | +3.80 m | 38 km/h | |
| 45.3 m | +3.90 m | 38 km/h | |
| 46 m | +4.60 m | 41 km/h | |
| 46.2 m | +4.80 m | 42 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 11.6% (4.8 m ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Evergreen Winter EW66 would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31.7 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 32.2 m | +0.50 m | 16 km/h | |
| 32.3 m | +0.60 m | 18 km/h | |
| 32.7 m | +1.00 m | 23 km/h | |
| 32.8 m | +1.10 m | 24 km/h | |
| 32.9 m | +1.20 m | 25 km/h | |
| 32.9 m | +1.20 m | 25 km/h | |
| 33 m | +1.30 m | 26 km/h | |
| 33 m | +1.30 m | 26 km/h | |
| 33.3 m | +1.60 m | 28 km/h | |
| 33.4 m | +1.70 m | 29 km/h | |
| 34.2 m | +2.50 m | 35 km/h | |
| 34.4 m | +2.70 m | 36 km/h | |
| 34.5 m | +2.80 m | 37 km/h | |
| 34.7 m | +3.00 m | 38 km/h | |
| 34.9 m | +3.20 m | 39 km/h | |
| 35 m | +3.30 m | 40 km/h | |
| 35 m | +3.30 m | 40 km/h | |
| 35.3 m | +3.60 m | 42 km/h | |
| 35.5 m | +3.80 m | 43 km/h | |
| 35.6 m | +3.90 m | 43 km/h | |
| 35.9 m | +4.20 m | 44 km/h | |
| 36.3 m | +4.60 m | 46 km/h | |
| 36.4 m | +4.70 m | 47 km/h | |
| 36.7 m | +5.00 m | 48 km/h | |
| 37.8 m | +6.10 m | 52 km/h | |
| 38.5 m | +6.80 m | 55 km/h | |
| 39.9 m | +8.20 m | 59 km/h | |
| 40.4 m | +8.70 m | 60 km/h | |
| 42.3 m | +10.60 m | 65 km/h | |
| 47.1 m | +15.40 m | 74 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 48.6% (15.4 m ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Syron Everest 2 would still be travelling at 74 km/h when the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Braking - Concrete
Wet braking on Concrete in meters (80 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36.5 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 36.6 m | +0.10 m | 7 km/h | |
| 36.6 m | +0.10 m | 7 km/h | |
| 36.9 m | +0.40 m | 14 km/h | |
| 36.9 m | +0.40 m | 14 km/h | |
| 37.5 m | +1.00 m | 21 km/h | |
| 37.6 m | +1.10 m | 22 km/h | |
| 37.7 m | +1.20 m | 23 km/h | |
| 38 m | +1.50 m | 26 km/h | |
| 38.1 m | +1.60 m | 27 km/h | |
| 38.2 m | +1.70 m | 27 km/h | |
| 38.9 m | +2.40 m | 32 km/h | |
| 38.9 m | +2.40 m | 32 km/h | |
| 39.7 m | +3.20 m | 37 km/h | |
| 40 m | +3.50 m | 38 km/h | |
| 40 m | +3.50 m | 38 km/h | |
| 40.2 m | +3.70 m | 39 km/h | |
| 40.4 m | +3.90 m | 40 km/h | |
| 40.7 m | +4.20 m | 42 km/h | |
| 40.8 m | +4.30 m | 42 km/h | |
| 40.9 m | +4.40 m | 43 km/h | |
| 41 m | +4.50 m | 43 km/h | |
| 41 m | +4.50 m | 43 km/h | |
| 41.4 m | +4.90 m | 45 km/h | |
| 41.7 m | +5.20 m | 46 km/h | |
| 43.6 m | +7.10 m | 52 km/h | |
| 44.7 m | +8.20 m | 56 km/h | |
| 47.1 m | +10.60 m | 62 km/h | |
| 47.3 m | +10.80 m | 62 km/h | |
| 47.7 m | +11.20 m | 63 km/h | |
| 53 m | +16.50 m | 73 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 45.2% (16.5 m ≈ 3.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Syron Everest 2 would still be travelling at 73 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Circle
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.1 m/s | Best | |
| 3 m/s | -0.10 m/s | |
| 3 m/s | -0.10 m/s | |
| 2.9 m/s | -0.20 m/s | |
| 2.9 m/s | -0.20 m/s | |
| 2.9 m/s | -0.20 m/s | |
| 2.7 m/s | -0.40 m/s | |
| 2.7 m/s | -0.40 m/s | |
| 2.6 m/s | -0.50 m/s | |
| 2.6 m/s | -0.50 m/s | |
| 2.6 m/s | -0.50 m/s | |
| 2.5 m/s | -0.60 m/s | |
| 2.5 m/s | -0.60 m/s | |
| 2.5 m/s | -0.60 m/s | |
| 2.5 m/s | -0.60 m/s | |
| 2.5 m/s | -0.60 m/s | |
| 2.5 m/s | -0.60 m/s | |
| 2.5 m/s | -0.60 m/s | |
| 2.5 m/s | -0.60 m/s | |
| 2.4 m/s | -0.70 m/s | |
| 2.4 m/s | -0.70 m/s | |
| 2.4 m/s | -0.70 m/s | |
| 2.4 m/s | -0.70 m/s | |
| 2.3 m/s | -0.80 m/s | |
| 2.3 m/s | -0.80 m/s | |
| 2.2 m/s | -0.90 m/s | |
| 2 m/s | -1.10 m/s | |
| 2 m/s | -1.10 m/s | |
| 1.8 m/s | -1.30 m/s | |
| 1.3 m/s | -1.80 m/s |
The difference between best and worst was 58.1% (1.8 m/s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 78.9 km/h | Best | |
| 77.1 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 76.9 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 75.2 km/h | -3.70 km/h | |
| 75.2 km/h | -3.70 km/h | |
| 75.1 km/h | -3.80 km/h | |
| 74.9 km/h | -4.00 km/h | |
| 74.6 km/h | -4.30 km/h | |
| 74.2 km/h | -4.70 km/h | |
| 74 km/h | -4.90 km/h | |
| 74 km/h | -4.90 km/h | |
| 73.8 km/h | -5.10 km/h | |
| 73.5 km/h | -5.40 km/h | |
| 73.4 km/h | -5.50 km/h | |
| 73.2 km/h | -5.70 km/h | |
| 72.6 km/h | -6.30 km/h | |
| 72.3 km/h | -6.60 km/h | |
| 72.1 km/h | -6.80 km/h | |
| 72.1 km/h | -6.80 km/h | |
| 71.9 km/h | -7.00 km/h | |
| 71.5 km/h | -7.40 km/h | |
| 71.1 km/h | -7.80 km/h | |
| 71.1 km/h | -7.80 km/h | |
| 70.8 km/h | -8.10 km/h | |
| 68.7 km/h | -10.20 km/h | |
| 67.9 km/h | -11.00 km/h | |
| 67.8 km/h | -11.10 km/h | |
| 67.7 km/h | -11.20 km/h | |
| 66.8 km/h | -12.10 km/h | |
| 65.8 km/h | -13.10 km/h | |
| 61.6 km/h | -17.30 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 21.9% (17.3 Km/H).
Snow
2Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (30 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.2 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 9.4 m | +0.20 m | 19 km/h | |
| 9.4 m | +0.20 m | 19 km/h | |
| 9.5 m | +0.30 m | 23 km/h | |
| 9.5 m | +0.30 m | 23 km/h | |
| 9.6 m | +0.40 m | 27 km/h | |
| 9.6 m | +0.40 m | 27 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 9.8 m | +0.60 m | 32 km/h | |
| 9.8 m | +0.60 m | 32 km/h | |
| 9.8 m | +0.60 m | 32 km/h | |
| 9.9 m | +0.70 m | 35 km/h | |
| 10 m | +0.80 m | 37 km/h | |
| 10 m | +0.80 m | 37 km/h | |
| 10 m | +0.80 m | 37 km/h | |
| 10.3 m | +1.10 m | 42 km/h | |
| 10.3 m | +1.10 m | 42 km/h | |
| 10.4 m | +1.20 m | 44 km/h | |
| 10.5 m | +1.30 m | 46 km/h | |
| 10.9 m | +1.70 m | 51 km/h | |
| 12.2 m | +3.00 m | 64 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 32.6% (3 m ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Landsail Winter Lander would still be travelling at 64 km/h when the Syron Everest 2 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 254 N | Best | |
| 249 N | -5.00 N | |
| 245 N | -9.00 N | |
| 245 N | -9.00 N | |
| 244 N | -10.00 N | |
| 243 N | -11.00 N | |
| 243 N | -11.00 N | |
| 242 N | -12.00 N | |
| 242 N | -12.00 N | |
| 241 N | -13.00 N | |
| 239 N | -15.00 N | |
| 239 N | -15.00 N | |
| 238 N | -16.00 N | |
| 238 N | -16.00 N | |
| 238 N | -16.00 N | |
| 237 N | -17.00 N | |
| 236 N | -18.00 N | |
| 236 N | -18.00 N | |
| 235 N | -19.00 N | |
| 235 N | -19.00 N | |
| 234 N | -20.00 N | |
| 233 N | -21.00 N | |
| 231 N | -23.00 N | |
| 230 N | -24.00 N | |
| 228 N | -26.00 N | |
| 227 N | -27.00 N | |
| 223 N | -31.00 N | |
| 222 N | -32.00 N | |
| 212 N | -42.00 N | |
| 198 N | -56.00 N | |
| 185 N | -69.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 27.2% (69 N).
Ice
1Ice Braking
Ice braking in meters (20 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15.2 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 15.5 m | +0.30 m | 18 km/h | |
| 15.8 m | +0.60 m | 25 km/h | |
| 15.9 m | +0.70 m | 27 km/h | |
| 16 m | +0.80 m | 29 km/h | |
| 16.1 m | +0.90 m | 31 km/h | |
| 16.2 m | +1.00 m | 32 km/h | |
| 16.3 m | +1.10 m | 34 km/h | |
| 16.6 m | +1.40 m | 38 km/h | |
| 16.7 m | +1.50 m | 39 km/h | |
| 16.7 m | +1.50 m | 39 km/h | |
| 16.7 m | +1.50 m | 39 km/h | |
| 16.7 m | +1.50 m | 39 km/h | |
| 16.8 m | +1.60 m | 40 km/h | |
| 16.8 m | +1.60 m | 40 km/h | |
| 16.8 m | +1.60 m | 40 km/h | |
| 16.9 m | +1.70 m | 41 km/h | |
| 17 m | +1.80 m | 42 km/h | |
| 17 m | +1.80 m | 42 km/h | |
| 17 m | +1.80 m | 42 km/h | |
| 17.4 m | +2.20 m | 46 km/h | |
| 17.4 m | +2.20 m | 46 km/h | |
| 17.4 m | +2.20 m | 46 km/h | |
| 17.4 m | +2.20 m | 46 km/h | |
| 17.5 m | +2.30 m | 47 km/h | |
| 17.8 m | +2.60 m | 50 km/h | |
| 18.1 m | +2.90 m | 52 km/h | |
| 18.2 m | +3.00 m | 53 km/h | |
| 19.1 m | +3.90 m | 59 km/h | |
| 19.3 m | +4.10 m | 60 km/h | |
| 21.1 m | +5.90 m | 69 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 38.8% (5.9 m ≈ 1.3 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Evergreen Winter EW66 would still be travelling at 69 km/h when the Syron Everest 2 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70.3 dB | Best | |
| 70.9 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 71.1 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 71.4 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 71.5 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 72 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 72.3 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 72.5 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 72.8 dB | +2.50 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +2.60 dB | |
| 73 dB | +2.70 dB | |
| 73.2 dB | +2.90 dB | |
| 73.3 dB | +3.00 dB | |
| 73.4 dB | +3.10 dB | |
| 74 dB | +3.70 dB | |
| 74.1 dB | +3.80 dB | |
| 74.2 dB | +3.90 dB | |
| 74.3 dB | +4.00 dB | |
| 75.3 dB | +5.00 dB | |
| 75.5 dB | +5.20 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 7.4% (5.2 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 81,000 KM | Best | |
| 76,500 KM | -4,500 KM | |
| 72,400 KM | -8,600 KM | |
| 67,000 KM | -14,000 KM | |
| 66,500 KM | -14,500 KM | |
| 64,600 KM | -16,400 KM | |
| 62,400 KM | -18,600 KM | |
| 61,300 KM | -19,700 KM | |
| 61,200 KM | -19,800 KM | |
| 60,000 KM | -21,000 KM | |
| 59,300 KM | -21,700 KM | |
| 57,700 KM | -23,300 KM | |
| 56,900 KM | -24,100 KM | |
| 55,400 KM | -25,600 KM | |
| 53,100 KM | -27,900 KM | |
| 53,000 KM | -28,000 KM | |
| 53,000 KM | -28,000 KM | |
| 52,700 KM | -28,300 KM | |
| 51,900 KM | -29,100 KM | |
| 51,600 KM | -29,400 KM | |
| 51,000 KM | -30,000 KM | |
| 50,100 KM | -30,900 KM | |
| 48,800 KM | -32,200 KM | |
| 48,400 KM | -32,600 KM | |
| 47,900 KM | -33,100 KM | |
| 47,700 KM | -33,300 KM | |
| 46,300 KM | -34,700 KM | |
| 44,600 KM | -36,400 KM | |
| 43,700 KM | -37,300 KM | |
| 41,800 KM | -39,200 KM | |
| 34,200 KM | -46,800 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 57.8% (46,800 KM).
Fuel Consumption
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.6 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | £83 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | £83 | |
| 6 l/100km | +0.40 l/100km | £110 |
The difference between best and worst was 7.1% (0.4 l/100km). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Momo North Pole W 20 EUROPA uses about 76 L (£110) more fuel than the Star Performer Stratos UHP.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
Abrasion
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 50 mg/km/t | Best | |
| 50 mg/km/t | Best | |
| 53 mg/km/t | +3.00 mg/km/t | |
| 56 mg/km/t | +6.00 mg/km/t | |
| 57 mg/km/t | +7.00 mg/km/t | |
| 58 mg/km/t | +8.00 mg/km/t | |
| 59 mg/km/t | +9.00 mg/km/t | |
| 60 mg/km/t | +10.00 mg/km/t | |
| 61 mg/km/t | +11.00 mg/km/t | |
| 61 mg/km/t | +11.00 mg/km/t | |
| 62 mg/km/t | +12.00 mg/km/t | |
| 62 mg/km/t | +12.00 mg/km/t | |
| 64 mg/km/t | +14.00 mg/km/t | |
| 64 mg/km/t | +14.00 mg/km/t | |
| 66 mg/km/t | +16.00 mg/km/t | |
| 67 mg/km/t | +17.00 mg/km/t | |
| 68 mg/km/t | +18.00 mg/km/t | |
| 69 mg/km/t | +19.00 mg/km/t | |
| 69 mg/km/t | +19.00 mg/km/t | |
| 70 mg/km/t | +20.00 mg/km/t | |
| 71 mg/km/t | +21.00 mg/km/t | |
| 71 mg/km/t | +21.00 mg/km/t | |
| 72 mg/km/t | +22.00 mg/km/t | |
| 73 mg/km/t | +23.00 mg/km/t | |
| 75 mg/km/t | +25.00 mg/km/t | |
| 76 mg/km/t | +26.00 mg/km/t | |
| 77 mg/km/t | +27.00 mg/km/t | |
| 77 mg/km/t | +27.00 mg/km/t | |
| 85 mg/km/t | +35.00 mg/km/t | |
| 86 mg/km/t | +36.00 mg/km/t | |
| 88 mg/km/t | +38.00 mg/km/t |
The difference between best and worst was 76% (38 mg/km/t).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 80 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking - Concrete
- 80 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 30 → 0 km/h
- Ice Braking
- 20 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets!
225/40 R1851 tyres tested
20 of these 31 tyres tested again
2026 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 50 Sets
245/45 R1950 tyres tested
16 of these 31 tyres tested again
2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tyres tested
16 of these 31 tyres tested again

