Menu

Mabor Sport Jet 3

The Mabor Sport Jet 3 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.8
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
83%
Wet Grip
77%
Road Feedback
79%
Handling
81%
Wear
87%
Comfort
77%
Buy again
89%
7 Reviews
82% Average
136,500 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 28th)
Mabor Sport Jet 3

Mabor Sport Jet 3

Summer Economy
BETA
5.8 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Wet
72.5
2x / 2 tests
Dry
71.4
1.8x / 2 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
72
4 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 1
Period: 2019 - 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 81.8%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.24
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 27/49 2 metrics
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 28/45 2 metrics
2
Tests
28th
Average
27th
Best
28th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
27th/49
28th/45

Questions and Answers for the Mabor Sport Jet 3

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Mabor Sport Jet 3. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Mabor Sport Jet 3 Reviews

Given 81% while driving a (225/45 R17) on for 0 miles
Very good for the price, cant go wrong with them and they last 50 to 70 Km
Ask a question | Helpful 790
October 15, 2023
Given 87% while driving a Rover 45 (205/45 R16) on mostly country roads for 50,000 average miles
Cannot find better Y tires for this range of price.
May 14, 2021
Given 76% while driving a Mitsubishi Colt (205/45 R16) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
Great valeu tires, i live on Portugal and it's mostly warm and dry but its doesn't compromisso on the wet. Very safe all around but you notice a lack off feedback on inicial braking on the wet. Other than that it's very safe on the wet and the wear os very good. Looks like new after around 10k km.
October 26, 2021
Have you driven on the Mabor Sport Jet 3 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Mabor Sport Jet 3? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Mabor Sport Jet 3 >

Latest Mabor Sport Jet 3 Reviews

Given 80% while driving a Fiat Punto GT turbo (195/50 R15) on mostly motorways for 6,000 average miles
This is a very good tire for all weather which allows for some spirited driving, I crossed the Alps on a Fiat Punto Gt with them and have no complains at all regarding the grip although there are much better tires ofc, these dont let you down and you can feel confident with them on dry. Wet grip is not this tire strong, allows you to drive ok in the rain on on very wet roads but sleeps more than recommendable and the braking distances increase hugely at least on a light boosted car like mine.
July 30, 2020
Given 81% while driving a SEAT Leon 1.9TDi (225/45 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 32,000 average miles
225/45/17 91Y
use time about 3 years
kms aprox 50.000 for 4 tyres (rotate)
nice use. nice dry drive. never flat tyre.
i have buy again.
March 4, 2018
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!