2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test
Conditionally recommended.
Where the Nokian Line finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 3 | P7.7 of 13.7 | 46% | - |
| Dry Handling | 3 | P9.3 of 13.7 | 35% | - |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 1 | P11 of 11 | 0% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 3 | P7.3 of 13.7 | 56% | - |
| Wet Handling | 3 | P6.3 of 13.7 | 65% | - |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 1 | P4 of 11 | 70% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 2 | P8 of 15.5 | 51% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Noise | 2 | P11 of 15.5 | 33% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 1 | P19 of 20 | 5% | - |
| Value | 1 | P16 of 20 | 21% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 2 | P4.5 of 15.5 | 77% | - |
Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Nokian Line. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 2 | 13 | - | 13% | |
| 15 | 1 | 14 | - | 7% | |
| 15 | 0 | 15 | - | 0% | |
| 14 | 4 | 10 | - | 29% | |
| 12 | 4 | 8 | - | 33% | |
| 11 | 9 | 2 | - | 82% | |
| 10 | 3 | 7 | - | 30% | |
| 9 | 4 | 5 | - | 44% | |
| 8 | 7 | 1 | - | 88% | |
| 7 | 6 | 1 | - | 86% | |
| 7 | 4 | 3 | - | 57% | |
| 7 | 2 | 5 | - | 29% | |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | - | 83% | |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | - | 83% | |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | - | 83% | |
| 6 | 2 | 4 | - | 33% | |
| 5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% | |
| 5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% | |
| 5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% |
The same record for the tyre it replaced and the tyre that replaced it.
| Tyre | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian Line This tyre | 19 | 0 | 9th | 57% |
| Nokian WetProof Successor | 16 | 2 | 5th | 70% |
Drawn from 19 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.
The Nokian Line often earns praise for dry and wet grip, but its 19-test record varies by comparison. Motor in 2017 placed wet handling second of ten, while AMS in 2018 found wet braking third of 11 and handling fourth, awarding Conditionally Recommended. ADAC's 2015 185/60 R14 test placed it third of 16 with good wet grip and low wear. The 2018 Auto Bild full test was much weaker overall at 19th of 20, with wet braking 14th and projected life 19th at 31,980 km. Dry-limit behaviour is a recurring concern: Auto Zeitung criticised stability in 2013, and AMS found substantial understeer in 2018, with dry handling last of 11.
Several unusual contrasts prevent a simple verdict. Dry braking was third of 11 at AMS in 2018 but ninth of ten at Motor in 2017, albeit only 2.8% behind the best there; Auto Bild criticised long dry stops in 2016 but praised them in 2018 despite 11th of 20 numerically. Wet praise contrasts with ADAC's weaker 2017 wet verdict. ADAC's two 2015 sizes gave opposite wear verdicts. Rolling resistance was low in several tests, including third of 11 at AMS, but high at Auto Bild in 2016. Aquaplaning praise in 2016 reversed to poor curved aquaplaning in 2018. Comfort also split the 2018 tests, praised by Auto Bild and criticised by AMS, which also criticised noise. Grip is often useful, but wear, efficiency and braking advantages are not consistent.
Good in the dry- 2017 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer Tyre Test (2017)
Very balanced tyre, good on wet and dry roads- 2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tyre Test (2014)
Good overall grip- 2013 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (2013)
Good in the wet- 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test (2018)
Very balanced tyre, good on wet and dry roads- 2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tyre Test (2014)
good in the wet- 2013 European Summer Touring Tyre Test (2013)
low rolling resistance- 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (2018)
low fuel consumption- 2016 ADAC Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (2016)
relatively low fuel consumption- 2013 European Summer Touring Tyre Test (2013)
High resistance to aquaplaning- 2016 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test (2016)
high wear- 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (2018)
High levels of understeer in the dry- 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test (2018)
let down by the tyres stability at the limit- 2013 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (2013)
relatively long stopping distance on dry surfaces- 2016 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test (2016)
high noise- 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test (2018)
Compared to the best, a little weak in the wet and noise tests- 2017 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer Tyre Test (2017)
Poor curved aquaplaning result- 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (2018)
Every tester write-up on the Nokian Line (8 tests) and 56 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
Conditionally recommended.
Satisfactory
Good overall grip for the Nokian Line but let down by the tyres stability at the limit
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Nokian tyres