Menu

Nokian Line Test Results

Tested 2013 to 2018 7 publications

Tested 19 times by independent publications, the Nokian Line averages a finish of 9th.

  • 19Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 1Podium finishes
  • 9thAverage finish
  • 57%Field beaten on average
  • 7Publications

19 tests, 2013 to 2018

Share of the field beaten in each test, oldest to newest. Hover or tap a point for the test.
  • Test win
  • Second
  • Third
  • Average 57%
The latest test

2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test P6 of 11

Conditionally recommended.

Weak: Dry Handling, Subj. Dry Handling Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Record by discipline

Where the Nokian Line finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 3 P7.7 of 13.7 46% -
Dry Handling 3 P9.3 of 13.7 35% -
Subj. Dry Handling 1 P11 of 11 0% -
Wet
Wet Braking 3 P7.3 of 13.7 56% -
Wet Handling 3 P6.3 of 13.7 65% -
Subj. Wet Handling 1 P4 of 11 70% -
Straight Aqua 2 P8 of 15.5 51% -
Comfort
Noise 2 P11 of 15.5 33% -
Value
Wear 1 P19 of 20 5% -
Value 1 P16 of 20 21% -
Rolling Resistance 2 P4.5 of 15.5 77% -

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Nokian Line. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Head-to-head record
Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Continental Premium Contact 5 15 shared: 2 ahead, 13 behind 15 2 13 - 13%
Dunlop Sport BluResponse 15 shared: 1 ahead, 14 behind 15 1 14 - 7%
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 15 shared: 0 ahead, 15 behind 15 0 15 - 0%
Vredestein Sportrac 5 14 shared: 4 ahead, 10 behind 14 4 10 - 29%
Fulda EcoControl HP 12 shared: 4 ahead, 8 behind 12 4 8 - 33%
Michelin Energy Saver+ 11 shared: 9 ahead, 2 behind 11 9 2 - 82%
Bridgestone Turanza T001 10 shared: 3 ahead, 7 behind 10 3 7 - 30%
Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco 9 shared: 4 ahead, 5 behind 9 4 5 - 44%
Kleber Dynaxer HP 3 8 shared: 7 ahead, 1 behind 8 7 1 - 88%
Semperit Comfort Life 2 7 shared: 6 ahead, 1 behind 7 6 1 - 86%
Nexen N Blue HD+ 7 shared: 4 ahead, 3 behind 7 4 3 - 57%
Pirelli Cinturato P1 Verde 7 shared: 2 ahead, 5 behind 7 2 5 - 29%
Apollo Alnac 4g 6 shared: 5 ahead, 1 behind 6 5 1 - 83%
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 6 shared: 5 ahead, 1 behind 6 5 1 - 83%
Sava intensa hp 6 shared: 5 ahead, 1 behind 6 5 1 - 83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 6 shared: 2 ahead, 4 behind 6 2 4 - 33%
Barum Brillantis 2 5 shared: 4 ahead, 1 behind 5 4 1 - 80%
BFGoodrich gGrip 5 shared: 4 ahead, 1 behind 5 4 1 - 80%
Firestone TZ300A 5 shared: 4 ahead, 1 behind 5 4 1 - 80%
Semperit Speed Life 4 shared: 3 ahead, 1 behind 4 3 1 - 75%

Against its own line

The same record for the tyre it replaced and the tyre that replaced it.

Against its own line
Tyre Tests Wins Avg finish Field beaten
Nokian Line This tyre 19 0 9th 57%
Nokian WetProof Successor 16 2 5th 70%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 19 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.

The Nokian Line often earns praise for dry and wet grip, but its 19-test record varies by comparison. Motor in 2017 placed wet handling second of ten, while AMS in 2018 found wet braking third of 11 and handling fourth, awarding Conditionally Recommended. ADAC's 2015 185/60 R14 test placed it third of 16 with good wet grip and low wear. The 2018 Auto Bild full test was much weaker overall at 19th of 20, with wet braking 14th and projected life 19th at 31,980 km. Dry-limit behaviour is a recurring concern: Auto Zeitung criticised stability in 2013, and AMS found substantial understeer in 2018, with dry handling last of 11.

Several unusual contrasts prevent a simple verdict. Dry braking was third of 11 at AMS in 2018 but ninth of ten at Motor in 2017, albeit only 2.8% behind the best there; Auto Bild criticised long dry stops in 2016 but praised them in 2018 despite 11th of 20 numerically. Wet praise contrasts with ADAC's weaker 2017 wet verdict. ADAC's two 2015 sizes gave opposite wear verdicts. Rolling resistance was low in several tests, including third of 11 at AMS, but high at Auto Bild in 2016. Aquaplaning praise in 2016 reversed to poor curved aquaplaning in 2018. Comfort also split the 2018 tests, praised by Auto Bild and criticised by AMS, which also criticised noise. Grip is often useful, but wear, efficiency and braking advantages are not consistent.

Performance Strengths

Performance Weaknesses

  • Tread life Minor in 1 of 8 tests
    Details
    • High wear, 2015 ADAC 205/55 R16 test; unusually low wear in its 185/60 R14 test that year
    • Projected 31,980 km, 19th of 20, 2018 Auto Bild test
  • Behaviour at the limit Strong in 2 of 8 tests
    Details
    • Stability at the limit criticised, 2013 Auto Zeitung test
    • Substantial dry understeer and dry handling last of 11, 2018 AMS test
  • Dry braking Minor in 1 of 8 tests
    Details
    • Long dry stops criticised, 2016 Auto Bild test
    • 9th of 10 but only 2.8% longer than best, 2017 Motor test; unusually stronger 3rd of 11 in 2018 AMS test
    • Praised as short despite 11th of 20 numerically, 2018 Auto Bild test
  • Road noise Strong in 2 of 8 tests
    Details
    • Criticised in 2017 ADAC and 2018 AMS tests
    • 15th of 20, 2018 Auto Bild test
  • Aquaplaning resistance Minor in 1 of 8 tests
    Details
    • Poor curved aquaplaning, 2018 Auto Bild test
    • Unusually favourable high aquaplaning resistance verdict, 2016 Auto Bild test

Do owners agree with the tests?

Every tester write-up on the Nokian Line (8 tests) and 56 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.

Where owners and testers agree

  • Wet grip strength in 3 of 8 tests 23 praise, 2 criticise of 56 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Dry grip strength in 3 of 8 tests 23 praise, 1 criticise of 56 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Dry handling strength in 1 of 8 tests 14 praise, 1 criticise of 56 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Wet braking strength in 1 of 8 tests 4 praise, 0 criticise of 56 reviews · Read those reviews

Where they disagree

  • Tread life weakness in 1 of 8 tests 29 praise, 9 criticise of 56 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Road noise weakness in 2 of 8 tests 12 praise, 5 criticise of 56 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Steering feel weakness in 1 of 8 tests 10 praise, 2 criticise of 56 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Behaviour at the limit weakness in 2 of 8 tests 3 praise, 0 criticise of 56 reviews · Read those reviews

Raised by owners, not by any test of this tyre

  • Value for money no test mentions it 8 praise, 0 criticise of 56 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Cold-weather grip no test mentions it 4 praise, 1 criticise of 56 reviews · Read those reviews

Every test, newest first 19

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2018 3 tests
P6 of 11 Beat 50% of the field

2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test

Auto Motor Und Sport 225/45 R17

Conditionally recommended.

WeakDry HandlingSubj. Dry Handling WinnerMichelin Pilot Sport 4

2017 2 tests
P5 of 10 Beat 56% of the field

2017 Mid Range Tyre Test

Motor 205/55 R16

StrongWet Handling WeakDry Braking WinnerBridgestone DriveGuard

2016 3 tests
2015 4 tests
2014 3 tests
2013 4 tests
P6 of 12 Beat 55% of the field

2013 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test

Auto Zeitung 215/55 R16

Good overall grip for the Nokian Line but let down by the tyres stability at the limit

WinnerDunlop Sport BluResponse

Back to the Nokian Line overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Nokian tyres

Overview

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.