Menu
Nokian WR D3 View Gallery (1)
175/65 R15 1 sizes 2011 Winter rated

Nokian WR D3

The Nokian WR D3 is a High Performance Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.8
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
91%
Wet Grip
88%
Road Feedback
88%
Handling
87%
Wear
85%
Comfort
87%
Buy again
90%
Snow Grip
80%
Ice Grip
87%
42 Reviews
87% Average
360,243 miles driven
32 Tests (avg: 6th)
Nokian WR D3

Nokian WR D3

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
6.8 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 30
Publications: 8
Period: 2011 - 2015
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 42
Avg Rating: 87%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.51
History Points: 6
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2015 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test Auto Express 2015 225/45 R17 3/8 0 metrics
2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2015 185/60 R15 10/18 0 metrics
2015 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 ADAC 2015 205/55 R16 4/19 0 metrics
2015 Winter Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2015 185/60 R14 17/51 0 metrics
2014 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test Auto Express 2014 205/55 R16 2/10 0 metrics
2014 AZ Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2014 205/55 R16 3/11 0 metrics
2014 AMS Winter Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2014 205/55 R16 6/10 0 metrics
2014 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2014 225/50 R17 4/16 0 metrics
2014 50 Winter Tyre Braking Overview Auto Bild 2014 225/50 R17 7/48 0 metrics
2013 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2013 195/65 R15 2/8 0 metrics
2013 Auto Bild SUV / 4x4 Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2013 215/65 R16 7/10 0 metrics
2013 Auto Bild Top 15 Winter Tyre Shootout Auto Bild 2013 195/65 R15 5/15 0 metrics
2013 Auto Bild Sports Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2013 225/50 R17 6/9 0 metrics
2013 Winter Tyre Overview - Braking Auto Bild 2013 195/65 R15 12/50 0 metrics
2013 AMS Sports Winter Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2013 225/50 R17 4/8 0 metrics
2013 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/60 R15 ADAC 2013 185/60 R15 5/17 0 metrics
2013 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/45 R17 ADAC 2013 225/45 R17 6/15 0 metrics
2013 ACE Winter Tyre Test ACE 2013 185/60 R15 5/9 0 metrics
2012 EVO Winter Tyre Test EVO 2012 205/55 R16 6/9 0 metrics
2012 Auto Bild Top 15 Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2012 205/55 R16 9/15 0 metrics
2012 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test Auto Express 2012 205/55 R16 4/8 0 metrics
2012 European Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 ADAC 2012 205/55 R!6 5/16 0 metrics
2012 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2012 205/55 R16 2/8 0 metrics
2012 Auto Bild 42 Winter Tyre Braking Test Auto Bild 2012 205/55 R16 13/43 0 metrics
2011 AMS Winter Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2011 205/55 R16 4/14 0 metrics
2011 Sport Auto Performance Winter Tyre Test Sport Auto 2011 225/45 R17 1/5 0 metrics
2011 European Winter Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 2011 195/65 R15 7/14 0 metrics
2011 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2011 225/45 R17 8/12 0 metrics
2011 ACE Winter Tyre Test ACE 2011 205/55 r16 6/8 0 metrics
2011 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2011 205/55 r16 3/14 0 metrics
32
Tests
6th
Average
1st
Best
17th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
17th/51
10th/18
Finnish all-rounder with a balanced performance. Convincing winter qualities, safe handling and short braking distances on hard-packed snow. Good safety reserves with aquaplaning, good wear.
Moderate cornering and extended braking distances on wet roads, only average ride comfort.

Alternative Tyres

7.7/10
86% 9 reviews
7.4/10
86% 17 reviews
7.4/10
86% 5 reviews
7.0/10
86% 11 reviews
6.5/10
87% 17 reviews
5.5/10
92% 53 reviews
Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
175/65R15 84 T C C 71
175/65R15 84 T C C 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Nokian WR D3 >>

Questions and Answers for the Nokian WR D3

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nokian WR D3. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Nokian WR D3 Reviews

Given 44% while driving a Nissan Primera (190/60 R15) on mostly country roads for 1,150 spirited miles
The best winter tyre I have ever had on the dry tarmac, but that's all. The worst winter tyre I have ever had on the wett and snow (I had Michelin Alpin A2, GY UltraGrip 7+, Semperit Speed-Grip 2 before). Slipping on wett, almost no traction on snow, aquaplaining on slushy roads and made in CCCP. I threw away of my car after a week in winter conditions and meanwhile I received Dunlop Winter Response 2, I have to switch to my summer tyres GT Radial Champiro HPX, which was better on a snow and slush than this overpraised Nokian. Michelin Semperit and Dunlop were the best on slushy roads, due to two the wide grooves around and wide lateral grooves. GY was also good on slush, but little bit behinde. GY and Dunlop were best on the snow, but Semperit wasn´t far to them.
Ask a question | Helpful 945
December 3, 2019
Given 94% while driving a Fiat Panda (155/80 R13) on a combination of roads for 2,500 average miles
I replaced my old BF Goodrich tyres with nokians and o boy what a difference, these tyres are simply awsome in almost every way, best thing i would say is the progresivity i cant stress enough about this, they have very predictable edge of traction on dry, wet, snow or even ice compared to other winter tyres i tryied, grip is great on any surface although when its little bit warmer outside you realy feel the soft compound but that is expected from winter tyres, only downside is feedback but that is partly because i have size with very high side walls, but all and all its very good tyre more focused on safety and snow performance than sporty feeling, and i will definitely buy theese again
March 18, 2019
Given 80% while driving a SEAT Toledo (185/60 R15 T) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
I was trying to find WR D4s back in 2016, but as I needed the tyres quickly, I bought the D3s.
I'm relatively happy with the tyres. Almost no wear for 3 winters. This is their fourth season and they grip very well. I had issues with breaking on wet surfaces in the beginning, but never had problems with aquaplaning. I also had issues with higher speeds. The car feels a bit uncomfortable over 160km/h or over 140 in corners(a bit wobbly).
Noise is also a bit higher then I would like.

So, If you are a calm driver, this one is definitely a good choice.
January 8, 2020
Have you driven on the Nokian WR D3 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Nokian WR D3? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Nokian WR D3 >

Latest Nokian WR D3 Reviews

Given 90% while driving a Opel Astra G 1.6 (185/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
The best winter tyres I've ever driven. Perfect on snow, even on ice they have the needed grip to push you at the start. I have some concerns over the wet, but again perfect job, as we know - the winter tyres are not so good at only wet roads.
July 31, 2018
Given 80% while driving a Volkswagen 2.0 TDI 4Motion 16V (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 18,600 average miles
Rapport qualité prix quasi imbattable, je recommande.
May 15, 2018
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 63% while driving a BMW 320D (205/55 R16 H) on mostly town for 15,000 average miles
Extremely good on snow. Bad on warm days (10-15C) when braking. Very bad when braking on wet asphalt!! Car just can't stop quick enough - must be careful.
March 3, 2018
Given 89% while driving a (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 miles
Excellent tire!
Excellent on snow, great on wet and dry roads.
I did not drive in the summer so I do not know how to withstand high temperatures but winter tires do not run in the summer.
Nokian has made an excellent winter tire at a reasonable price.
November 11, 2017
Given 79% while driving a Honda 1.6 I DTEC (195/55 R15) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
the best snow tyre i ever had.
very good even on wet and dry road, not so far from the "main" of the brand (WRG2) but really much better on the snow:
great traction, brake power and steering control,
optimum feedback.
will buy again!
October 28, 2016
Given 87% while driving a Peugeot 308 1.6 e HDI (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 30,000 average miles
Initially purchased for winter 2013 as winter tires are an essential for driving in the north of Scotland. I drive approximately 150 miles a day on a combination of A roads (single and dual) B roads and some city driving. I'm very impressed with the wear on them, after around 30,000 miles they are now just below 2mm and in need to changing.
As a winter tires you would expect them to perform well in all low temperature situations, anything below around 10C these are brilliant. They give good grip in normal wet and dry conditions and perform great in snow and slush.
Where they fall down is when then temperature rises, above 10C they start to lose a little grip, in my car this meant occasional wheel spin and some under steer, if move beyond 20C (quite rare in Scotland I know) they pretty much turn to jelly and become quite a handful. I accept these conditions are not what they are designed to do so I'm not marking them down for that.

Overall great tyres, perfect for a range of conditions and ideal for most weather experienced in the UK and come it at a sensible price (
July 20, 2016
Given 93% while driving a (225/45 R17) on for 4,000 miles
wery good on dry and snow, low wear
May 26, 2016
Given 94% while driving a Fiat croma (205/55 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 30,000 spirited miles
By far the best winter tires I ever had
I drove them more than 30000 miles and 10000 miles during summer. Wear is their biggest downfall but in all other things they are amazing.
Highly recommended!
April 22, 2016
Given 86% while driving a Fiat 500L Living Lounge 1.6 jtdm 105hp (205/55 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Excellent winter tyres on dry, wet and particularly on snow.
I've used them both on my old alfa romeo Giulietta and now on my Fiat 500L Living 1.6 jtdm 105hp.
I think I'll buy Nokian again
February 23, 2016
Given 100% while driving a Suzuki Swift 1.3l 2007 (195/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 6,700 average miles
as a winter tire that wont cost you an arm or a leg and still can get you where you want .. this is a quiet soft comfortable tire , even when the temperature rises above 10c its still grips well , the wear is good to but i didnt drive them hard or pushed them to the limit .. for a suzuki swift 4x4 1.3L they put a smile on my face
November 29, 2015
Given 83% while driving a Volkswagen (195/65 R15 T) on mostly town for 0 average miles
I must say its was my first winter that i was drriving with theese tyres on dry i must say they are pretty noisy but the grip and cornering is good but on the wet and snow they are execellent
September 11, 2015
Given 91% while driving a Ford Galaxy (225/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 7,000 average miles
The best winter tyres I have ever driven. Absolutely stable, predictable and safe even in the worst conditions. They replaced Brigestone Blizzaks and I would never switch back. Perfect on just about every surface I have encountered this winter. And after 7000 miles they have almost no wear to show.
June 22, 2015