Menu

Uniroyal RainSport 3 - Test Results

Test Statistics

11

Tests Completed

10th

Average Position

2nd

Best Result

21st

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Uniroyal RainSport 3 - Official Image

Uniroyal RainSport 3 shows a clear wet-weather bias with multiple top-tier wet braking results and occasional podium finishes in full tests, but it struggles for consistency, particularly in dry performance and dynamic handling. Early and mid-cycle tests (2014-2017) highlight strong to excellent wet capability and some high overall placings, while later tests (2019-2020) expose pronounced deficits in both dry and wet handling plus dry braking, dragging the average finish to mid-to-lower pack.
Overall, the tyre excels in straight-line wet stopping and is competitive in aquaplaning, value, and wear in certain sizes, yet persistent weaknesses in dry braking/handling and wet handling stability limit its all-round standing. It's a specialist wet-stopper rather than a balanced summer performer.

Performance Strengths
  • Wet Weather Performance Strong
    • 1st place wet braking in 2017 Mid Range Test (48.6 m)
    • 2nd place wet braking in 2017 Auto Bild (34.7 m, +0.3% from best)
    • 4th overall in 2016 50-tyre braking shootout, cited for excellent wet performance
    • Article note 2015 AMS: second placed in wet braking
  • Aquaplaning/Water Evacuation Moderate
    • 11/20 straight aquaplaning in 2020 Auto Bild (+3.8% from best)
    • Articles across 2016-2017 note strong overall wet capability matching top tyres
  • Value and Operating Costs Moderate
    • Wear 4/20 in 2020 Auto Bild (+20% vs best)
    • Rolling resistance 6/20 in 2020 (+6% from best)
    • Value 6/20 in 2020 (+15.8% from best)
  • Overall Results Potential Moderate
    • 2/10 overall in 2017 Mid Range Test
    • 6/43 in 2017 Auto Bild shootout
    • 2/11 overall in 2014 AMS
Performance Weaknesses
  • Dry Performance (Braking and Handling) Strong
    • 18/20 dry braking in 2020 Auto Bild (+11.2%)
    • 19/20 dry handling in 2020 (+2.8%)
    • 16/20 dry braking in 2017 Auto Bild (+6.7%)
    • 34/45 dry braking in 2019 AB shootout (+9.4%)
  • Wet Handling Consistency Strong
    • 20/20 wet handling in 2020 Auto Bild (+9.2%)
    • 7/20 wet handling in 2017 Auto Bild (+1.3%)
    • Articles 2016 AutoBild: strong wet but last in dry handling indicating balance issues
  • Late-Cycle Competitiveness Moderate
    • 16/20 overall in 2020 Auto Bild
    • 21/45 in 2019 braking shootout
    • Average overall position 9.5 across 11 tests with decline in 2019-2020
  • Dry NVH/Subjective Dynamics Moderate
    • 2016 AutoBild note: finished last in dry handling despite wet strength
    • 2017 Mid Range Test: dry handling 8/10 (+1.7%) indicating mediocre steering/precision
Performance Over Time

Test History

16
of 20
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test

2020
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6

Satisfactory.
Weak:
Dry Handling, Wet Handling
19
of 49
2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test

2020
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

21
of 45
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout

2019
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

2
of 10
2017 Mid Range Tyre Test

2017
Winner: Bridgestone DriveGuard

Strong:
Wet Braking
10
of 20
2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test

2017
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6

Recommended
Strong:
Wet Braking
Weak:
Dry Handling
6
of 43
2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Shootout

2017
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6

11
of 15
2016 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test

2016
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

Satisfactory
4
of 50
2016 Market Overview - Braking Test

2016
Winner: Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue

9
of 16
2016 ADAC Tyre Test - 225/45 R17

2016
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5

5
of 9
2015 AMS Performance Tyre Test

2015
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5

2
of 11
2014 AMS Summer Tyre Test - 205/55 R16

2014
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 5