Menu

Yokohama ADVAN APEX V601

The Yokohama ADVAN APEX V601 is a Extreme Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.4
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
91%
Wet Grip
79%
Road Feedback
83%
Handling
82%
Wear
64%
Comfort
75%
Buy again
75%
19 Reviews
79% Average
134,322 miles driven
Yokohama ADVAN APEX V601

Yokohama ADVAN APEX V601

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
7.4 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 19
Avg Rating: 78.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.2
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Yokohama ADVAN APEX V601

Questions and Answers for the Yokohama ADVAN APEX V601

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Yokohama ADVAN APEX V601. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 16 user reviews

Most drivers find the Yokohama ADVAN APEX V601 delivers strong dry grip, predictable handling, and surprisingly low noise for a UHP tyre, with acceptable to good wet performance. A minority report muted steering feedback, longer braking, and quicker wear versus top-tier rivals, but overall sentiment is positive and value is praised.

Strengths
  • Dry grip
  • Handling/feedback
  • Low noise for uhp
  • Predictability/confidence
  • Value for money
Areas for Improvement
  • Wet grip/braking confidence
  • Faster tread wear
  • Ride/noise harshness for some

Top 3 Yokohama ADVAN APEX V601 Reviews

Given 94% while driving a Toyota Estima Aeras G (235/50 R18) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
I was using Yokohama set of 4 V105 & 4 RV2 on this MPV before. RV2 is silent & comfort type of tyre where V105 is comfort & light performance set of tyre.
MPV users usually prefer comfortable ride but I’m driving a 3.5L V6 MPV I need a set of tyre can have good grip in dry as well as wet.
Surprisingly V601 is much quieter than I thought, side wall firm & excellent road conditions transmitting.
Ask a question | Helpful 651
August 4, 2025
Given 83% while driving a Audi RS4 Quattro (255/35 R19) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Bought them due to a lack of alternatives. Previously used P Zero Assimetrico, Dunlop Sport Maxx GT, GT Radial Champiro and Goodyear Eagle F1 Assymmetric.

They give better feedback in an AWD car (wet and dry) than the Champiro and P Zero, plus outlast both by some margin. Rides far better than either, too; roughly on par in terms of NVH and comfort as the Eagle F1s.

The Dunlop Sport Maxx GT is however more comfy, has marginally better wet performance and shorter braking distances. But they wear out even quicker than the Advan Apex.

I'm a lively and brisk driver, in both wet and dry conditions, and enjoy employing what i bought the car (RS4 Avant, 3.0L) for, finding quiet b-roads whenever i can.

Recommended if no completing alternatives, or you're on a budget.
May 28, 2024
Given 50% while driving a Toyota Supra (275/35 R19) on mostly motorways for 500 spirited miles
I gave into the all the marketing Yokohama did for the V601 on the GR Supra, and I was ultimately underwhelmed. The grip on this tire is great(especially during launch control), however, this tire lacks feedback. For being a street / sports car-oriented tire, these don't do a great job at transmitting road feel to the steering wheel compared to the factory Michelin Pilot Super Sports. Another notable trait of the V601 is a considerable increase in stopping distance. Braking does not feel as confident as it used to and the tires tend to squeal under medium to hard braking. Initial bite when making sharper turns is quite reduced compared to the Michelin and overall, seems to have watered down a great sports car.

They tend to have a very muted on-center feel that results in less confidence and feel when taking a hard corner. I personally will not be running these again when it's time to replace tires. Decent option for a cheaper tire on a larger sized wheel, however I will be looking into other brands of tire from now on.
August 23, 2024
Have you driven on the Yokohama ADVAN APEX V601 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Yokohama ADVAN APEX V601? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Yokohama ADVAN APEX V601 >

Latest Yokohama ADVAN APEX V601 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 66% while driving a Mazda Mazda 3 BP 2.0 (225/45 R17) on for 3,700 miles
I would call the Yokohama Advan Apex V601 a good teacher that helps you get better at driving and a very talkative tyre, it has a very narrow optimal window not sure if it has a very small slip angle or what, it squeals early but not necessarily lost grip yet on the same corners with MaxContact 7 it feels like it takes less longitudinal G, Advan Apex V601 is sensitive to inputs, any bad input there will be feedback and it will understeer for me, i would say i feel MaxContact 7 is a much grippier tyre even when driving inputs are bad, imagine after improving your technique

noise level when new is equivalent to a worn out 1.7mm MaxContact 7

my apex v601 is 6000km in im down to 6.3-6.9mm of tread depth, did a 2 hour track day as well, it kind of help up, a lot of squeal thats for sure, but the feedback is great you can really feel when its almost loosing traction when its sliding, and if its really goin sideways, wear wise its quite ok for my slow pacing on the track, the flakes you see are rubber picked up on track, drive hard enough it will all fall away back to smooth tyre

i still dont know what mindset should i have right now, is having a narrow optimal grip window a good thing or a bad thing for a tyre, would i buy again? im really in a mixed feeling zone, MC7 is a top choice, more forgiving, more grip but not as direct, feedback is not much, i dont know where the limits of the MC7 is but V601 i can easily know how much i can push it, when to pull back, when to correct my steering

on the aesthetic side the outer shoulder tread design looks good thou hahhaha no idea why
January 28, 2026
Given 67% while driving a Volkswagen Mk7 Golf R (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 7,000 average miles
Dry Grip is good. Wet Grip is acceptable but not really great. Highspeed cornering gives me less confident on how the tyre behave. It sometime gives tyre noise on corner as if its trying to grip the road.
May 12, 2024
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 67% while driving a Volkswagen Mk7 Golf R (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 7,000 average miles
Dry Grip is good. Wet Grip is acceptable but not really great. Highspeed cornering gives me less confident on how the tyre behave. It sometime gives tyre noise on corner as if its trying to grip the road.
May 11, 2024
Given 67% while driving a Volkswagen Mk7 Golf R (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 7,000 average miles
Dry Grip is good. Wet Grip is acceptable but not really great. Highspeed cornering gives me less confident on how the tyre behave. It sometime gives tyre noise on corner as if its trying to grip the road.
May 11, 2024
Given 84% while driving a Honda Civic FK7 Sport (235/40 R18) on mostly motorways for 18,000 spirited miles
Started using a set of this Yokohama Advan APEX since late last year.
Dry Grip and the handling feedback is just great and sticky! Taking out of the corner is easy, gripped and gives you so much confidence. I like the road feedback, superb on dry surface (at a speed of 165 km/h) and also good on a wet surface (at a speed 120 km/h). Sometimes a bit struggle with traction (slightly on a higher-side of speed) but manageable. Basically the wet grip is just better than other normal UHP tires but a bit lower than those Michelin PS4 / Continental CSC7.
On a comfort side, I guess due to a stiff sidewall, it makes the road feedback better but like me, I prefer feedback over comfort.
Tire wear, I've been running close to 30,000KM on my Honda Civic FK7 Sport and the tread left approximately 35% left.
Overall, I love this tires, a bit cheaper than a set of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (which is the set that I am using before I change it to this Advan APEX) and also I would buy again. Love the grip and also love the sidewall design too ;-)
October 12, 2023
Given 77% while driving a Audi S4 (255/35 R19) on a combination of roads for 900 miles
Bought these for a B8 Audi S4 Avant (mildly tuned, ECU; 404PS) as a replacement for the no-longer-in-stock Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport, and they've been a pleasant surprise.

They're not the quietest (Michelin, Pirelli and Dunlop UHPs have better NVH) but easily superior to Toyo Proxes, Nankangs and GT Radials for highway rides. They are comfy, however; and predictable. Wear could be a concern for the spirited driver.

Precise feedback (for an audi), excellent grip and a completely predictable performance profile. Just great for hot hatches and sub 400bhp cars. Reason being they're a bit too lively in slick and wet conditions due to it's racy design.

Still, one of the better tyres in it's price range
September 30, 2023
Given 79% while driving a BMW 330e (265/40 R18) on mostly motorways for 12,500 spirited miles
Recently switched from the trusty PS4 after a solid 5-year run to the V601s. Performance wise it’s been impressive, delivering fantastic handling in both wet and dry conditions. However the only drawback I’ve encountered is the quicker wear and tear. With just around 20.000kms on the odometer, the tread is nearly worn out, warranting a replacement after roughly 9 months of use. Overall, while the performance is on point, the lifespan might be something to keep in mind.
August 26, 2023
Given 96% while driving a Honda Civic Si Sedan (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
Have been running on these tires for about a week and I must say it is fantastic. Dry grip is superb, handling is so precise and very predictable in the wet. Noise levels in the cabin is acceptable for such an extreme UHP tire, at least there's a difference in quietness compared to my previous tire. For those who are looking for a sporty tire with a sporty look I would definitely recommend this tire. Thumbs up!
June 17, 2023
Given 77% while driving a Mazda New Mazda 6 Estate Diesel (225/45 R19) on mostly motorways for 20,000 easy going miles
Dry grip is better than PS4 and F1A5, wet grip is same level to PS4 and F1A5, but handling/feeling to the car made me no confident in the corner.
It is a noisy tyre and not comfort but the grip is outstanding.
May 18, 2023
Given 79% while driving a Subaru 2018 WRX STi (265/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
I was able to use it on a some track session with friends during summer and I never had any problems with the grip especially on corners. On the city and highway, Its more comfortable than what I expected especially for its tire classification. The road noise is minimal. Haven't had the chance to really try it on wet roads yet though. Also started to see noticeable tire wear in almost a year of use but its to be expected. I 'd be happy to get about 3 years out of this tire. Overall, I'm very happy with its performance and I'd buy this tire again when the time comes.
May 8, 2023
Given 81% while driving a Peugeot 208 GTi (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 3,500 spirited miles
Mixed road use for 4500km. Dry hot roads, country long travel on rough surfaces and sprint sport racing every 4 weeks. Dropped noise levels was a factor over the Nankang and surprisingly better grip. Improved cornering was a selling point and that did not disappoint.
February 14, 2023
Given 83% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (275/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,600 spirited miles
Drive for some 1,600 miles, daily driven and spirit. Very good grip in dry, responsive in hard curves. In wet the performance is precise and some aquaplane but manageable, it's a 275 wide. The sound road is normal for performance tire with this trade ware. Still testing
September 16, 2022