2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test

The biggest interest in this test was the Chinese budget winter tyre from Pace. With the most expensive set of winter tyres costing 660 euros at time of test, the budget Pace tyres were a full 400 euros cheaper, at just 260 euros. Are the savings worth the performance drop? Read on below to find out.

Dry

In the dry, the summer tyre dominates braking, and wins the handling test. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is the best of the winter tyres, while the test-topping Goodyear and Continental tyres could only manage mid-pack. The budget Pace tyre is acceptable under dry braking conditions, but is by far the worst during the dry handling lap.

Wet

For the top five winter tyres, wet braking was closely contested with the summer tyre, with the Goodyear winter tyre finishing top. Wet handling puts the summer reference back on top, with the Goodyear winter being the best of the winter tyres on test. In both tests, the budget Pace tyre again performs the worst.

Snow

Surprisingly the Pace budget tyre wins the snow braking test, proving that it's easy for a budget tyre manufacturer to make a tyre which works well in one road condition, but not all three. Snow handling is also closely contested, with only the Maxxis and Vredestein noticeably behind the rest.

Environmental

Both the Continental and Bridgestone winter tyres have a lower rolling resistance than the summer tyre on test, and every winter tyre proves to be quieter than the summer.

Result

Auto Bild started the test asking whether the huge cost saving of a budget winter tyre was worth the risk? Their answer is a firm no, unless you only ever drive it on snow covered roads - the dry and wet penalty is too vast.

1^st

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1

225/55 R17

• 3PMSF: no

Very good results on snow, High resistance to aquaplaning, Very high grip on wet surfaces, High level of comfort, Precise steering on dry surfaces

Slightly high noise level, expensive

Test winner

Total: 53

Dry 8

Wet 11

Snow 8

Comfort 10

Rolling Resistance 8

Noise 8

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

2^nd

Continental WinterContact TS 850 P

225/55 R17

• 3PMSF: no

Good balance of performance, Very good results on snow, especially in terms of lateral stability, Low noise level

Average braking performance on dry surfaces, Average ride comfort, High price

Recommended

Total: 50

Dry 8

Wet 8

Snow 10

Comfort 8

Rolling Resistance 8

Noise 8

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

3^rd

Michelin Alpin 5

225/55 R17

• 3PMSF: no

Good results on snow, High resistance to aquaplaning, Short braking distance on wet roads

Average braking performance on dry surfaces, High price

Recommended

Total: 50

Dry 8

Wet 10

Snow 8

Comfort 8

Rolling Resistance 8

Noise 8

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

4^th

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

225/55 R17

• 3PMSF: no

Short braking distance on dry and wet surfaces, Good lateral stability on wet surfaces

Medium traction and lateral stability in snow, Increased noise level

Recommended

Total: 50

Dry 8

Wet 10

Snow 8

Comfort 8

Rolling Resistance 8

Noise 8

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

5^th

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001

225/55 R17

• 3PMSF: no

Close to a summer tyre in the dry, good snow traction, low rolling resistance

Average aquaplaning resistance, poor snow handling

Good

Total: 51

Dry 10

Wet 8

Snow 8

Comfort 8

Rolling Resistance 9

Noise 8

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

6^th

Hankook Winter i cept evo2

225/55 R17

• 3PMSF: no

Short braking distance and general well balanced snow performance, well priced

Long braking distances in the dry and wet, average comfort

Satisfactory

Total: 44

Dry 6

Wet 8

Snow 8

Comfort 6

Rolling Resistance 8

Noise 8

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

7^th

Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S

225/55 R17

• 3PMSF: no

Short braking distance and generally high wet grip, Low noise level

Poor snow grip, poor dry grip, high rolling resistance

Satisfactory

Total: 46

Dry 8

Wet 10

Snow 6

Comfort 8

Rolling Resistance 6

Noise 8

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

8^th

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

225/55 R17

• 3PMSF: no

Good snow handling, Low price

Average aquaplaning resistance, low wet grip, poor dry grip and handling

Satisfactory

Total: 46

Dry 8

Wet 8

Snow 8

Comfort 6

Rolling Resistance 8

Noise 8

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

9^th

Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05

225/55 R17

• 3PMSF: no

Good resistance to aquaplaning, Good grip on dry surfaces, Low noise level

Relatively weak grip and a long stopping distance on snow and wet surfaces, High rolling resistance

Not Recommended

Total: 44

Dry 8

Wet 6

Snow 8

Comfort 8

Rolling Resistance 6

Noise 8

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

10^th

Pace Antarctica 5 Pace

225/55 R17

• 3PMSF: no

Very good results on snow, Very low price, Very low noise level

Weak grip on dry and wet surfaces, Very long braking distances on wet surfaces, High rolling resistance

Not Recommended

Total: 39

Dry 6

Wet 4

Snow 8

Comfort 6

Rolling Resistance 6

Noise 9

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

11^th

Reference Summer

225/55 R17

• 3PMSF: no

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts