Menu

Test source Motor

2017 Mid Range Tyre Test

Overall test winnerBridgestone DriveGuard

The first test featuring the new Bridgestone DriveGuard runflat tyre has been published!

Tyres tested
10
Tested size
205/55 R16
Disciplines
4

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

10 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Bridgestone DriveGuard

+Very precise steering in wet and dry, good grip

−Noisy compared to the best in test (but good for a runflat!)

Read full verdict
2nd

Uniroyal RainSport 3

+Good wet grip, well balanced tyre

−Higher noise level compared to the best on test

Read full verdict
3rd

Debica Presto HP

+High grip in the wet, good braking in the dry

−An "unpleasant noise", slow steering in the wet

Read full verdict
4th

Fulda EcoControl HP

+Good in the wet and dry

−None mentioned

Read full verdict
5th

Nokian Line

+Very good handling in the wet

−None mentioned

Read full verdict
6th

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

+Good handling in the dry

−Difficult balance in the wet with oversteer and understeer

Read full verdict
Joint7th

BFGoodrich gGrip

+Good levels of comfort

−Slow steering in dry and wet

Read full verdict
Joint7th

Nexen N Blue HD Plus

+Good balance in the dry

−Understeer in the wet, relatively weak dry grip

Read full verdict
9th

Toyo Proxes CF2

+Good handling in the wet

−Relatively weak in the dry

Read full verdict
10th

Nankang Eco 2+

+Quiet

−Oversteer and understeer in the wet, relatively weak dry grip

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

2017 Mid Range Tyre Test · 205/55 R16

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

The first test featuring the new Bridgestone DriveGuard runflat tyre has been published!

Testing ten 205/55 R16 touring tyres on a VW Golf, Polish Motor magazine included the new generation Bridgestone DriveGuard runflat tyre against the traditional non-runflat competition. 

In the past runflat tyres have been criticised for low comfort, high noise and poor wet grip. During the launch of the Bridgestone DriveGuard last year, Bridgestone promised the latest generation runflat tyre had made these issues a thing of the past, and this is the first independent test confirming the new tyres abilities.

While Bridgestone were the only premium manufacturer included in the test, the very well regarded second tier brands from Continental (Uniroyal) and Goodyear (Fulda and Debica) were included to ensure Bridgestone didn't have an easy time of it.

Wet Braking

Uniroyal confirm their reputation as the wet masters, acing the wet braking test, and beating second placed Bridgestone by over a metre. Debica had a strong showing in third, with Nankang struggling in last place, a full 8.5 metres behind the winning Uniroyal.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
48.6 m Best
49.6 m +1.00 m
50.6 m +2.00 m
51.8 m +3.20 m
51.9 m +3.30 m
53.4 m +4.80 m
53.7 m +5.10 m
54.5 m +5.90 m
54.5 m +5.90 m
57.1 m +8.50 m

The difference between best and worst was 17.5% (8.5 m ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Bridgestone prove to be the fastest across a lap, with Nokian and Debica close behind in second and third place. Again, Nankang were totally off the pace and the slowest tyre on test

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
71.15 s Best
72.53 s +1.38 s
73 s +1.85 s
73.4 s +2.25 s
73.5 s +2.35 s
74.22 s +3.07 s
74.92 s +3.77 s
75.06 s +3.91 s
75.6 s +4.45 s
76.03 s +4.88 s

The difference between best and worst was 6.9% (4.88 s).

Bridgestone won both the lateral and longitudinal aquaplaning tests.

Dry Braking

Hankook proved its near-premium credentials, winning the dry braking tests, with Nexen and Bridgestone close behind. This time Toyo struggled, finishing last, but just 1.4 metres behind the winning Hankook.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
38.7 m Best
38.8 m +0.10 m
39 m +0.30 m
39.1 m +0.40 m
39.2 m +0.50 m
39.3 m +0.60 m
39.4 m +0.70 m
39.4 m +0.70 m
39.8 m +1.10 m
40.1 m +1.40 m

The difference between best and worst was 3.6% (1.4 m ≈ 0.3 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Hankook also won the closely contested dry handling test, setting the fastest lap. Bridgestone were 1/10th second behind, with Fulda another 3/10ths slower than Bridgestone.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
94.89 s Best
95 s +0.11 s
95.3 s +0.41 s
95.37 s +0.48 s
95.86 s +0.97 s
95.91 s +1.02 s
96.26 s +1.37 s
96.46 s +1.57 s
96.5 s +1.61 s
96.86 s +1.97 s

All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Noise / Comfort

The real challenge for runflat tyres are the comfort and noise tests.

While the Bridgestone came joint last in the comfort assessment scoring 5.5 points, it tied with two well respected tyres and was only 0.5 points away from five other patterns in joint third place with 6 points. Uniroyal had the clear comfort advantage scoring 7 points overall, and Fulda finished second with 6.1 points.

The magazine chose to noise test the tyres twice, once at 50 km/h and once at 80 km/h. At both speeds Nankang won the test with Toyo second, with Bridgestone scoring third place at the slower speed, but tenth place at the quicker speed.

Result

1st

Bridgestone DriveGuard

205/55 R16
Bridgestone DriveGuard
All discipline results (6)
TestResult
Dry69.7
Wet99.3
Subjective15
Comfort1.6
Rolling Resistance4
Noise7.9

Total: 197.5

2nd

Uniroyal RainSport 3

205/55 R16
Uniroyal RainSport 3
All discipline results (6)
TestResult
Dry69.1
Wet97.1
Subjective13.3
Comfort2
Rolling Resistance5
Noise7.8

Total: 194.3

3rd

Debica Presto HP

205/55 R16
Debica Presto HP
All discipline results (6)
TestResult
Dry69.2
Wet94.3
Subjective13.9
Comfort1.6
Rolling Resistance4.6
Noise7.8

Total: 191.4

4th

Fulda EcoControl HP

205/55 R16
Fulda EcoControl HP
All discipline results (6)
TestResult
Dry69.4
Wet92.5
Subjective14.9
Comfort1.8
Rolling Resistance4.7
Noise7.8

Total: 191.1

5th

Nokian Line

205/55 R16
Nokian Line
All discipline results (6)
TestResult
Dry68.8
Wet93.4
Subjective14.5
Comfort1.7
Rolling Resistance4.5
Noise8

Total: 190.9

6th

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

205/55 R16
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
All discipline results (6)
TestResult
Dry70
Wet89.7
Subjective14.5
Comfort1.7
Rolling Resistance4.6
Noise7.9

Total: 188.4

Joint 7th

BFGoodrich gGrip

205/55 R16
BFGoodrich gGrip
All discipline results (6)
TestResult
Dry69
Wet88.9
Subjective14.5
Comfort1.6
Rolling Resistance4.4
Noise8

Total: 186.4

Joint 7th

Nexen N Blue HD+

205/55 R16
Nexen N Blue HD Plus
All discipline results (6)
TestResult
Dry69.5
Wet89.1
Subjective13.9
Comfort1.7
Rolling Resistance4.2
Noise8

Total: 186.4

9th

Toyo Proxes CF2

205/55 R16
Toyo Proxes CF2
All discipline results (6)
TestResult
Dry68.2
Wet89.1
Subjective13.9
Comfort1.7
Rolling Resistance4.2
Noise8

Total: 185.1

10th

Nankang Eco 2+

205/55 R16
Nankang Eco 2+
All discipline results (6)
TestResult
Dry68.7
Wet86
Subjective12.8
Comfort1.7
Rolling Resistance3.9
Noise8

Total: 181.1

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.

Where to buy

Affiliate links: if you buy, we may earn a commission. It never changes our tests, scores or recommendations. How we stay independent