Menu

2017 Mid Range Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Wet Braking
  3. Wet Handling
  4. Dry Braking
  5. Dry Handling
  6. Noise / Comfort
  7. Result
  8. Bridgestone DriveGuard
  9. Uniroyal RainSport 3
  10. Debica Presto HP
  11. Fulda EcoControl HP
  12. Nokian Line
  13. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
  14. BFGoodrich gGrip
  15. Nexen N Blue HD+
  16. Toyo Proxes CF2
  17. Nankang Eco 2+

Test Summary
Wet Braking Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Dry Braking Bridgestone DriveGuard
Rolling Resistance Uniroyal RainSport 3
Noise Uniroyal RainSport 3
Snow Handling Bridgestone DriveGuard
Snow Handling Nankang Eco 2 Plus
Toyo Proxes CF2
Nexen N Blue HD Plus
BFGoodrich gGrip
Nokian Line
The first test featuring the new Bridgestone DriveGuard runflat tyre has been published!

Testing ten 205/55 R16 touring tyres on a VW Golf, Polish Motor magazine included the new generation Bridgestone DriveGuard runflat tyre against the traditional non-runflat competition. 

In the past runflat tyres have been criticised for low comfort, high noise and poor wet grip. During the launch of the Bridgestone DriveGuard last year, Bridgestone promised the latest generation runflat tyre had made these issues a thing of the past, and this is the first independent test confirming the new tyres abilities.

While Bridgestone were the only premium manufacturer included in the test, the very well regarded second tier brands from Continental (Uniroyal) and Goodyear (Fulda and Debica) were included to ensure Bridgestone didn't have an easy time of it.

Wet Braking

Uniroyal confirm their reputation as the wet masters, acing the wet braking test, and beating second placed Bridgestone by over a metre. Debica had a strong showing in third, with Nankang struggling in last place, a full 8.5 metres behind the winning Uniroyal.

Wet Braking

Spread: 8.50 M (17.5%)|Avg: 52.57 M
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre

Wet Handling

Bridgestone prove to be the fastest across a lap, with Nokian and Debica close behind in second and third place. Again, Nankang were totally off the pace and the slowest tyre on test

Wet Handling

Spread: 4.88 s (6.9%)|Avg: 73.94 s
Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Bridgestone DriveGuard
    71.15 s
  2. Nokian Line
    72.53 s
  3. Debica Presto HP
    73.00 s
  4. Uniroyal RainSport 3
    73.40 s
  5. Fulda EcoControl HP
    73.50 s
  6. Toyo Proxes CF2
    74.22 s
  7. BFGoodrich gGrip
    74.92 s
  8. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
    75.06 s
  9. Nexen N Blue HD Plus
    75.60 s
  10. Nankang Eco 2 Plus
    76.03 s

Bridgestone won both the lateral and longitudinal aquaplaning tests.

Dry Braking

Hankook proved its near-premium credentials, winning the dry braking tests, with Nexen and Bridgestone close behind. This time Toyo struggled, finishing last, but just 1.4 metres behind the winning Hankook.

Dry Braking

Spread: 1.40 M (3.6%)|Avg: 39.28 M
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre

Dry Handling

Hankook also won the closely contested dry handling test, setting the fastest lap. Bridgestone were 1/10th second behind, with Fulda another 3/10ths slower than Bridgestone.

Dry Handling

Spread: 1.97 s (2.1%)|Avg: 95.84 s
Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
    94.89 s
  2. Bridgestone DriveGuard
    95.00 s
  3. Fulda EcoControl HP
    95.30 s
  4. Nokian Line
    95.37 s
  5. BFGoodrich gGrip
    95.86 s
  6. Debica Presto HP
    95.91 s
  7. Toyo Proxes CF2
    96.26 s
  8. Uniroyal RainSport 3
    96.46 s
  9. Nexen N Blue HD Plus
    96.50 s
  10. Nankang Eco 2 Plus
    96.86 s

Noise / Comfort

The real challenge for runflat tyres are the comfort and noise tests.

While the Bridgestone came joint last in the comfort assessment scoring 5.5 points, it tied with two well respected tyres and was only 0.5 points away from five other patterns in joint third place with 6 points. Uniroyal had the clear comfort advantage scoring 7 points overall, and Fulda finished second with 6.1 points.

The magazine chose to noise test the tyres twice, once at 50 km/h and once at 80 km/h. At both speeds Nankang won the test with Toyo second, with Bridgestone scoring third place at the slower speed, but tenth place at the quicker speed.

Result

1st

Bridgestone DriveGuard

205/55 R16
Bridgestone DriveGuard
Total: 197.5
Dry 69.7
Wet 99.3
Subjective 15
Comfort 1.6
Rolling Resistance 4
Noise 7.9
2nd

Uniroyal RainSport 3

205/55 R16
Uniroyal RainSport 3
Total: 194.3
Dry 69.1
Wet 97.1
Subjective 13.3
Comfort 2
Rolling Resistance 5
Noise 7.8
3rd

Debica Presto HP

205/55 R16
Debica Presto HP
Total: 191.4
Dry 69.2
Wet 94.3
Subjective 13.9
Comfort 1.6
Rolling Resistance 4.6
Noise 7.8
4th

Fulda EcoControl HP

205/55 R16
Fulda EcoControl HP
Total: 191.1
Dry 69.4
Wet 92.5
Subjective 14.9
Comfort 1.8
Rolling Resistance 4.7
Noise 7.8
5th

Nokian Line

205/55 R16
Nokian Line
Total: 190.9
Dry 68.8
Wet 93.4
Subjective 14.5
Comfort 1.7
Rolling Resistance 4.5
Noise 8
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Total: 188.4
Dry 70
Wet 89.7
Subjective 14.5
Comfort 1.7
Rolling Resistance 4.6
Noise 7.9
7th

BFGoodrich gGrip

205/55 R16
BFGoodrich gGrip
Total: 186.4
Dry 69
Wet 88.9
Subjective 14.5
Comfort 1.6
Rolling Resistance 4.4
Noise 8
7th

Nexen N Blue HD+

205/55 R16
Nexen N Blue HD Plus
Total: 186.4
Dry 69.5
Wet 89.1
Subjective 13.9
Comfort 1.7
Rolling Resistance 4.2
Noise 8
9th

Toyo Proxes CF2

205/55 R16
Toyo Proxes CF2
Total: 185.1
Dry 68.2
Wet 89.1
Subjective 13.9
Comfort 1.7
Rolling Resistance 4.2
Noise 8
10th

Nankang Eco 2+

205/55 R16
Nankang Eco 2 Plus
Total: 181.1
Dry 68.7
Wet 86
Subjective 12.8
Comfort 1.7
Rolling Resistance 3.9
Noise 8

comments powered by Disqus