Menu
Debica Presto HP View Gallery (1)
165-205/50-65 R14-15 9 sizes 2021

Debica Presto HP

The Debica Presto HP is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

8.5
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
80%
Wet Grip
70%
Road Feedback
80%
Handling
35%
Wear
100%
Comfort
85%
Buy again
85%
2 Reviews
76% Average
30,500 miles driven
4 Tests (avg: 9th)
Debica Presto HP

Debica Presto HP

Summer Economy
BETA
8.5 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Medium Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
82.1
0.29x / 3 tests
Wet
79.5
2x / 9 tests
Dry
75.6
1.8x / 7 tests
Value
57.6
0.38x / 2 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
78.8
8 tests
Braking
77.7
6 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 4
Publications: 4
Period: 2017 - 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 2
Avg Rating: 76.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.87
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2020 Retread Summer Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2020 195/65 R16 2/3 9 metrics
2019 Mid Range Tyre Test Moottori 2019 205/55 R16 4/8 8 metrics
2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview Auto Bild 2018 195/65 R15 25/47 0 metrics
2017 Mid Range Tyre Test Motor 2017 205/55 R16 3/10 4 metrics
4
Tests
9th
Average
2nd
Best
25th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2nd/3
Good aquaplaning resistance with low noise.
Average braking performance.
2019 Mid Range Tyre Test
205/55 R16 • 2019
4th/8
Good handling on dry and wet surfaces, short braking distance on a dry surface.
High rolling resistance, low resistance to aquaplaning, long braking distance on wet surfaces.
25th/47
Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
165/60R14 75 H D C 70
15 inch
195/55R15 85 H D C 70
195/50R15 82 V D C 71
195/55R15 85 V D C 70
185/60R15 84 H C B 70
195/60R15 88 H C C 71
205/60R15 91 H D C 71
205/65R15 94 H D D 71
205/65R15 94 V D D 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Debica Presto HP >>

Questions and Answers for the Debica Presto HP

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Debica Presto HP. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Have you driven on the Debica Presto HP tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Debica Presto HP? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Debica Presto HP >

Latest Debica Presto HP Reviews

Given 77% while driving a Hyundai elantra (195/65 R15) on mostly town for 28,500 average miles
Good quality .. worked just 45k km in my car .. without a big problems ..good in handling on dry asphalt, weak in wet surfaces .. Overall good tire , can work in all conditions .
Ask a question | Helpful 696
May 22, 2022
Given 100% while driving a BMW Z4 3.0Si (255/35 R18 W) on mostly country roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Fitted thes to 3.0 BMW Z4 in place of the original Bridgestone RFT (Runflats) - as yet I have not driven the Debica tyres as hard as the Bridgestones (yet!) but I can definitely guarantee that if you make the swop you will be amazed at the difference in roadfeel and the precision that has appeared in the steering - the Z4 now feels nimble and far less scary on wet, cambered, roads. Previously I was having to fight the steering when anywhere near wet, white lines and a long journey was very tiring due to the concentration required. Now the car is a joy to use.

N.B. I also have Debica Frigo HP winter tyres fitted to my everyday car - Do not be put off by the unknown name - these tyres are world class.
September 19, 2018
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!