Menu

Test source Auto Bild Allrad

2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test

Overall test winnerGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

The 2019 Auto Bild AllRad SUV tyre test tested ten 225/55 R17 tyre patterns using BMW X3, covering dry, wet, gravel, mud and grass performance!

Tyres tested
10
Tested size
225/55 R17
Disciplines
11

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

10 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

+Excellent handling, precise steering response and very short stopping distances on dry and wet roads.

−None mentioned.

Read full verdict
Joint2nd

Continental Premium Contact 6

+Excellent dry handling, very short wet and dry braking.

−Poor grip in gravel and dirt.

Read full verdict
Joint2nd

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

+Good dry handling, good wet and dry braking, good off road, best price / performance ratio.

−None mentioned.

Read full verdict
Joint2nd

Nokian PowerProof

+Good performance on all types of surfaces, very good handling on gravel and wet asphalt.

−Increased noise.

Read full verdict
5th

Maxxis Premitra HP5

+Great aquaplaning resistance, good handling on dry and wet roads.

−Weak grip on grass and sand.

Read full verdict
6th

Bridgestone Turanza T005

+Good handling in almost any environment, high aquaplaning resistance, low rolling resistance.

−Weak grip on grass.

Read full verdict
7th

Toyo Proxes Sport

+Good handling on gravel and in the dry, high aquaplaning resistance.

−Poor wet handling.

Read full verdict
8th

Nexen N Fera RU1

+Acceptable handling on dry and wet roads, high grip on sand and gravel.

−Long wet braking, highest rolling resistance.

Read full verdict
9th

Cooper Zeon CS8

+Good dry grip.

−Poor wet handling, grip and long wet braking distances.

Read full verdict
10th

CST Medallion MD A1

+Low noise, excellent in the mud.

−Dangerously long wet braking distances, poor wet handling, high levels of understeer in the dry.

Read full verdict

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17

TyreGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5Continental Premium Contact 6Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125Nokian PowerProofMaxxis Premitra HP5Bridgestone Turanza T005Toyo Proxes SportNexen N Fera RU1Cooper Zeon CS8CST Medallion MD A1
Position1stJoint 2ndJoint 2ndJoint 2nd5th6th7th8th9th10th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry98.8%100%98.8%97.3%97.4%96.7%95.4%95.7%94.2%93.9%
Wet99.4%98.4%96.9%96.4%96.3%96.7%94.5%93.8%92.7%88.5%
Off road96.6%89.6%96.1%93.8%93.3%90.1%92.7%93.4%93.9%93.9%
Comfort98.8%95.7%99.1%95.3%97.1%95.3%98%97.1%98.5%100%
Rolling Resistance87%90.1%82.4%88.1%80.6%100%82.4%73.8%86%86.5%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

The 2019 Auto Bild AllRad SUV tyre test tested ten 225/55 R17 tyre patterns using BMW X3, covering dry, wet, gravel, mud and grass performance! 

As with other tests in 2019, the gap between the best and worst tyres on test is getting ever smaller, and while the new Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 took another win, three tyres were awarded the second place slot!

The Continental PremiumContact 6, Hankook Ventus Prime 3 and Nokian PowerProof all were deemed "exemplary" buy Auto Bild, with each tyre having a slightly different balance of performance overall, but all equally as recommended.

This is a data heavy test so full information can be found below, but it's worth noting nearly any of the top six placed tyres would be excellent purchases in 2019. Check the results from each test carefully, and decide which tyre best suits your own personal requirements.

 

Dry

The Continental PremiumContact 6 proved to be the best in the dry, placing top in the dry braking and dry handling tests. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 placed a close second, with the Hankook third overall.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
34 m Best
34.6 m +0.60 m
34.6 m +0.60 m
35.5 m +1.50 m
35.6 m +1.60 m
35.7 m +1.70 m
36.5 m +2.50 m
37.1 m +3.10 m
37.5 m +3.50 m
37.8 m +3.80 m

The difference between best and worst was 11.2% (3.8 m ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
104.7 km/h Best
104 km/h -0.70 km/h
103.9 km/h -0.80 km/h
103.9 km/h -0.80 km/h
103.8 km/h -0.90 km/h
103.4 km/h -1.30 km/h
102.9 km/h -1.80 km/h
102.8 km/h -1.90 km/h
102.5 km/h -2.20 km/h
102.3 km/h -2.40 km/h

All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet

In the wet the Goodyear proved to be the best tyre, but the Nokian Powerproof was excellent during the wet handling test.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
46.9 m Best
47.5 m +0.60 m
48.5 m +1.60 m
49.9 m +3.00 m
50.9 m +4.00 m
51.2 m +4.30 m
52.3 m +5.40 m
52.6 m +5.70 m
54.7 m +7.80 m
60.2 m +13.30 m

The difference between best and worst was 28.4% (13.3 m ≈ 3 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
89.8 km/h Best
89.3 km/h -0.50 km/h
89.3 km/h -0.50 km/h
88.8 km/h -1.00 km/h
88.4 km/h -1.40 km/h
87.8 km/h -2.00 km/h
87.7 km/h -2.10 km/h
87.6 km/h -2.20 km/h
86.8 km/h -3.00 km/h
84.7 km/h -5.10 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.7% (5.1 Km/H).

All ten tyres were extremely close during the aquaplaning testing.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
82 km/h Best
81.5 km/h -0.50 km/h
81.5 km/h -0.50 km/h
81.4 km/h -0.60 km/h
81.1 km/h -0.90 km/h
81 km/h -1.00 km/h
80.2 km/h -1.80 km/h
78.2 km/h -3.80 km/h
78.2 km/h -3.80 km/h
77.8 km/h -4.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.1% (4.2 Km/H).

Off-road

Off-road testing is extremely difficult to conduct, and the results of these tests seemed to show no real trends.

The Nokian Powerproof was fastest during gravel handling, but only eighth overall for gravel traction, while the winning Hankook in the gravel traction test was slowest round the gravel handling lap!

Gravel Handling

Gravel Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Gravel Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
67.4 km/h Best
67.3 km/h -0.10 km/h
67.2 km/h -0.20 km/h
66.3 km/h -1.10 km/h
65.9 km/h -1.50 km/h
65.6 km/h -1.80 km/h
65.4 km/h -2.00 km/h
65.3 km/h -2.10 km/h
65.1 km/h -2.30 km/h
65 km/h -2.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 3.6% (2.4 Km/H).

Gravel Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Gravel Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
9902 N Best
9592 N -310.00 N
9526 N -376.00 N
9486 N -416.00 N
9242 N -660.00 N
9142 N -760.00 N
9061 N -841.00 N
8784 N -1,118.00 N
8579 N -1,323.00 N
8440 N -1,462.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 14.8% (1,462 N).

There doesn't seem to be any correlation between gravel, grass and mud traction results.

Grass Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Grass Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
9548 N Best
9462 N -86.00 N
9302 N -246.00 N
8879 N -669.00 N
8836 N -712.00 N
8766 N -782.00 N
8719 N -829.00 N
8524 N -1,024.00 N
8068 N -1,480.00 N
7987 N -1,561.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (1,561 N).

Mud Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Mud Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
2725 N Best
2571 N -154.00 N
2542 N -183.00 N
2514 N -211.00 N
2425 N -300.00 N
2420 N -305.00 N
2410 N -315.00 N
2407 N -318.00 N
2395 N -330.00 N
2230 N -495.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 18.2% (495 N).

Environment

As proven before, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 has extremely low rolling resistance.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.56 kg/t Best £0
8.39 kg/t +0.83 kg/t £48
8.58 kg/t +1.02 kg/t £59
8.69 kg/t +1.13 kg/t £66
8.74 kg/t +1.18 kg/t £69
8.79 kg/t +1.23 kg/t £72
9.18 kg/t +1.62 kg/t £94
9.18 kg/t +1.62 kg/t £94
9.38 kg/t +1.82 kg/t £106
10.24 kg/t +2.68 kg/t £156

The difference between best and worst was 35.4% (2.68 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Nexen N Fera RU1 uses about 108 L (£156) more fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza T005.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

The budget CST proved to be the quietest tyre on test, with the Hankook also scoring well.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
64.2 dB Best
64.8 dB +0.60 dB
65 dB +0.80 dB
65.2 dB +1.00 dB
65.5 dB +1.30 dB
66.1 dB +1.90 dB
66.1 dB +1.90 dB
67.1 dB +2.90 dB
67.4 dB +3.20 dB
67.4 dB +3.20 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5% (3.2 dB).

The Continental PremiumContact 6 was the most expensive tyre to buy.

Results

1st

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

225/55 R17
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Test winner.
Dry98.8%
Wet99.4%
Off road96.6%
Comfort98.8%
Rolling Resistance87%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 1034.6 m+0.60 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 10104 km/h-0.70 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 1046.9 mBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1089.3 km/h-0.50 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 1080.2 km/h-1.80 km/h
Gravel HandlingHigher is better5th / 1065.9 km/h-1.50 km/h
Gravel TractionHigher is better3rd / 109526 N-376.00 N
Grass TractionHigher is better1st / 109548 NBest in this discipline
Mud TractionHigher is better4th / 102514 N-211.00 N
NoiseLower is better3rd / 1065 dB+0.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 108.69 kg/t+1.13 kg/t
Price
490.00
Joint 2nd

Continental Premium Contact 6

225/55 R17
Continental Premium Contact 6
Exemplary.
Dry100%
Wet98.4%
Off road89.6%
Comfort95.7%
Rolling Resistance90.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 1034 mBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 10104.7 km/hBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 1047.5 m+0.60 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1089.3 km/h-0.50 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 1078.2 km/h-3.80 km/h
Gravel HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1067.2 km/h-0.20 km/h
Gravel TractionHigher is better10th / 108440 N-1,462.00 N
Grass TractionHigher is better6th / 108766 N-782.00 N
Mud TractionHigher is better10th / 102230 N-495.00 N
NoiseLower is better8th / 1067.1 dB+2.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 108.39 kg/t+0.83 kg/t
Price
550.00
Joint 2nd

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

225/55 R17
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Exemplary.
Dry98.8%
Wet96.9%
Off road96.1%
Comfort99.1%
Rolling Resistance82.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 1034.6 m+0.60 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 10103.9 km/h-0.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 1048.5 m+1.60 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 1087.8 km/h-2.00 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 1078.2 km/h-3.80 km/h
Gravel HandlingHigher is better10th / 1065 km/h-2.40 km/h
Gravel TractionHigher is better1st / 109902 NBest in this discipline
Grass TractionHigher is better2nd / 109462 N-86.00 N
Mud TractionHigher is better6th / 102420 N-305.00 N
NoiseLower is better2nd / 1064.8 dB+0.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 109.18 kg/t+1.62 kg/t
Price
435.00
Joint 2nd

Nokian PowerProof

225/55 R17
Nokian PowerProof
Exemplary.
Dry97.3%
Wet96.4%
Off road93.8%
Comfort95.3%
Rolling Resistance88.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 1035.5 m+1.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 10103.4 km/h-1.30 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 1051.2 m+4.30 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 1089.8 km/hBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 1081.1 km/h-0.90 km/h
Gravel HandlingHigher is better1st / 1067.4 km/hBest in this discipline
Gravel TractionHigher is better8th / 108784 N-1,118.00 N
Grass TractionHigher is better3rd / 109302 N-246.00 N
Mud TractionHigher is better5th / 102425 N-300.00 N
NoiseLower is better9th / 1067.4 dB+3.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 108.58 kg/t+1.02 kg/t
Price
475.00
5th

Maxxis Premitra HP5

225/55 R17
Maxxis Premitra HP5
Exemplary.
Dry97.4%
Wet96.3%
Off road93.3%
Comfort97.1%
Rolling Resistance80.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 1035.6 m+1.60 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 10103.9 km/h-0.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 1050.9 m+4.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 1088.8 km/h-1.00 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 1082 km/hBest in this discipline
Gravel HandlingHigher is better4th / 1066.3 km/h-1.10 km/h
Gravel TractionHigher is better4th / 109486 N-416.00 N
Grass TractionHigher is better9th / 108068 N-1,480.00 N
Mud TractionHigher is better2nd / 102571 N-154.00 N
NoiseLower is better6th / 1066.1 dB+1.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 109.38 kg/t+1.82 kg/t
Price
320.00
6th

Bridgestone Turanza T005

225/55 R17
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Exemplary.
Dry96.7%
Wet96.7%
Off road90.1%
Comfort95.3%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 1035.7 m+1.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better8th / 10102.8 km/h-1.90 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 1049.9 m+3.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 1088.4 km/h-1.40 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 1081 km/h-1.00 km/h
Gravel HandlingHigher is better6th / 1065.6 km/h-1.80 km/h
Gravel TractionHigher is better7th / 109061 N-841.00 N
Grass TractionHigher is better10th / 107987 N-1,561.00 N
Mud TractionHigher is better9th / 102395 N-330.00 N
NoiseLower is better9th / 1067.4 dB+3.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 107.56 kg/tBest in this discipline
Price
490.00
7th

Toyo Proxes Sport

225/55 R17
Toyo Proxes Sport
Good.
Dry95.4%
Wet94.5%
Off road92.7%
Comfort98%
Rolling Resistance82.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 1037.1 m+3.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 10103.8 km/h-0.90 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 1052.6 m+5.70 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 1087.7 km/h-2.10 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 1081.4 km/h-0.60 km/h
Gravel HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1067.3 km/h-0.10 km/h
Gravel TractionHigher is better5th / 109242 N-660.00 N
Grass TractionHigher is better8th / 108524 N-1,024.00 N
Mud TractionHigher is better8th / 102407 N-318.00 N
NoiseLower is better5th / 1065.5 dB+1.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 109.18 kg/t+1.62 kg/t
Price
375.00
8th

Nexen N Fera RU1

225/55 R17
Nexen N Fera RU1
Good.
Dry95.7%
Wet93.8%
Off road93.4%
Comfort97.1%
Rolling Resistance73.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 1036.5 m+2.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 10102.9 km/h-1.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 1052.3 m+5.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better8th / 1087.6 km/h-2.20 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better10th / 1077.8 km/h-4.20 km/h
Gravel HandlingHigher is better8th / 1065.3 km/h-2.10 km/h
Gravel TractionHigher is better2nd / 109592 N-310.00 N
Grass TractionHigher is better7th / 108719 N-829.00 N
Mud TractionHigher is better7th / 102410 N-315.00 N
NoiseLower is better6th / 1066.1 dB+1.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better10th / 1010.24 kg/t+2.68 kg/t
Price
350.00
9th

Cooper Zeon CS8

225/55 R17
Cooper Zeon CS8
Conditionally Recommended.
Dry94.2%
Wet92.7%
Off road93.9%
Comfort98.5%
Rolling Resistance86%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 1037.5 m+3.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better10th / 10102.3 km/h-2.40 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better9th / 1054.7 m+7.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better9th / 1086.8 km/h-3.00 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 1081.5 km/h-0.50 km/h
Gravel HandlingHigher is better7th / 1065.4 km/h-2.00 km/h
Gravel TractionHigher is better6th / 109142 N-760.00 N
Grass TractionHigher is better4th / 108879 N-669.00 N
Mud TractionHigher is better3rd / 102542 N-183.00 N
NoiseLower is better4th / 1065.2 dB+1.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 108.79 kg/t+1.23 kg/t
Price
400.00
10th

CST Medallion MD A1

225/55 R17
CST Medallion MD A1
Not Recommended.
Dry93.9%
Wet88.5%
Off road93.9%
Comfort100%
Rolling Resistance86.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 1037.8 m+3.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better9th / 10102.5 km/h-2.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 1060.2 m+13.30 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better10th / 1084.7 km/h-5.10 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 1081.5 km/h-0.50 km/h
Gravel HandlingHigher is better9th / 1065.1 km/h-2.30 km/h
Gravel TractionHigher is better9th / 108579 N-1,323.00 N
Grass TractionHigher is better5th / 108836 N-712.00 N
Mud TractionHigher is better1st / 102725 NBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better1st / 1064.2 dBBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 108.74 kg/t+1.18 kg/t
Price
270.00

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

3 comments
  1. Saeed Piroozfard archived

    Hey guys, I wanna buy tyres for my crossover (255/45/R20) and have three options:

    Nexen nfera Supreme (N5000 Platinum) : $175 each,
    Nankang SP-9 Cross-Sport : $115,
    Giti Sport S2 SUV :$125
    \
    which will provide more comfort and smooth driving experience?

    #9264
  2. Anton Nankov archived

    Any opinion on the new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV? Considering that the normal pilot sport 4 wins every test (beating the normal Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3/5 and Continental Premium Contact 6) we can assume that the SUV variant is AT LEAST just as good as the First and Second place in this test? especially if one uses the car 99% of the time on the road

    #4489
    1. TyreReviews Anton Nankov archived

      I'm actually in portugal on the launch of the tyre now, not driven it yet but it will certainly be up there with the Asymmetric 5.

      #4492
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.