Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
245/45 R18
Tyres tested
20
Disciplines
9

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
32.1 m Best
32.9 m +0.80 m
33.2 m +1.10 m
33.2 m +1.10 m
33.2 m +1.10 m
33.4 m +1.30 m
33.5 m +1.40 m
34 m +1.90 m
34.1 m +2.00 m
34.2 m +2.10 m
34.3 m +2.20 m
34.3 m +2.20 m
34.7 m +2.60 m
34.7 m +2.60 m
34.8 m +2.70 m
34.9 m +2.80 m
35.4 m +3.30 m
35.7 m +3.60 m
36 m +3.90 m
36 m +3.90 m

The difference between best and worst was 12.1% (3.9 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
117 km/h Best
116.8 km/h -0.20 km/h
116.4 km/h -0.60 km/h
116.3 km/h -0.70 km/h
116.2 km/h -0.80 km/h
116.2 km/h -0.80 km/h
116.1 km/h -0.90 km/h
115.9 km/h -1.10 km/h
115.4 km/h -1.60 km/h
115.4 km/h -1.60 km/h
115.4 km/h -1.60 km/h
115.3 km/h -1.70 km/h
115 km/h -2.00 km/h
114.9 km/h -2.10 km/h
114.8 km/h -2.20 km/h
114.6 km/h -2.40 km/h
114.3 km/h -2.70 km/h
114.2 km/h -2.80 km/h
113.7 km/h -3.30 km/h
112.5 km/h -4.50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 3.8% (4.5 Km/H).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
44.9 m Best
45.3 m +0.40 m
45.4 m +0.50 m
46.5 m +1.60 m
47.2 m +2.30 m
47.3 m +2.40 m
47.3 m +2.40 m
48 m +3.10 m
48.1 m +3.20 m
48.1 m +3.20 m
48.3 m +3.40 m
48.9 m +4.00 m
49.2 m +4.30 m
49.5 m +4.60 m
49.7 m +4.80 m
50.5 m +5.60 m
50.6 m +5.70 m
51 m +6.10 m
51.6 m +6.70 m
52.2 m +7.30 m

The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (7.3 m ≈ 1.6 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
74.6 km/h Best
74.3 km/h -0.30 km/h
73.9 km/h -0.70 km/h
73.3 km/h -1.30 km/h
73.2 km/h -1.40 km/h
73 km/h -1.60 km/h
72.3 km/h -2.30 km/h
72.1 km/h -2.50 km/h
71.9 km/h -2.70 km/h
71.5 km/h -3.10 km/h
70.6 km/h -4.00 km/h
70.5 km/h -4.10 km/h
70 km/h -4.60 km/h
69.6 km/h -5.00 km/h
69.5 km/h -5.10 km/h
69.2 km/h -5.40 km/h
68.9 km/h -5.70 km/h
68.8 km/h -5.80 km/h
68.7 km/h -5.90 km/h
67.7 km/h -6.90 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 9.2% (6.9 Km/H).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
99.1 km/h Best
98.5 km/h -0.60 km/h
97.2 km/h -1.90 km/h
96.7 km/h -2.40 km/h
96.6 km/h -2.50 km/h
96.6 km/h -2.50 km/h
95.8 km/h -3.30 km/h
95.5 km/h -3.60 km/h
95.5 km/h -3.60 km/h
95.4 km/h -3.70 km/h
95.3 km/h -3.80 km/h
95.2 km/h -3.90 km/h
95 km/h -4.10 km/h
93.9 km/h -5.20 km/h
93.6 km/h -5.50 km/h
93.2 km/h -5.90 km/h
92.7 km/h -6.40 km/h
92.5 km/h -6.60 km/h
91.7 km/h -7.40 km/h
90.7 km/h -8.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 8.5% (8.4 Km/H).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
71 dB Best
71.2 dB +0.20 dB
71.3 dB +0.30 dB
71.3 dB +0.30 dB
71.5 dB +0.50 dB
71.7 dB +0.70 dB
71.8 dB +0.80 dB
72.1 dB +1.10 dB
72.1 dB +1.10 dB
72.1 dB +1.10 dB
72.2 dB +1.20 dB
72.2 dB +1.20 dB
72.4 dB +1.40 dB
72.5 dB +1.50 dB
72.8 dB +1.80 dB
72.8 dB +1.80 dB
73.2 dB +2.20 dB
73.2 dB +2.20 dB
73.5 dB +2.50 dB
73.6 dB +2.60 dB

The difference between best and worst was 3.7% (2.6 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
44,900 KM Best
39,063 KM -5,837 KM
39,063 KM -5,837 KM
35,920 KM -8,980 KM
33,226 KM -11,674 KM
33,226 KM -11,674 KM
32,328 KM -12,572 KM
31,879 KM -13,021 KM
30,083 KM -14,817 KM
29,634 KM -15,266 KM
27,838 KM -17,062 KM
27,838 KM -17,062 KM
27,389 KM -17,511 KM
27,389 KM -17,511 KM
27,389 KM -17,511 KM
26,042 KM -18,858 KM
23,797 KM -21,103 KM
23,348 KM -21,552 KM
23,348 KM -21,552 KM
22,450 KM -22,450 KM

The difference between best and worst was 50% (22,450 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
11.9 Price/1000 Best €18.58
12.29 Price/1000 +0.39 Price/1000 €15.63
12.81 Price/1000 +0.91 Price/1000 €16.22
12.85 Price/1000 +0.95 Price/1000 €16.62
13.09 Price/1000 +1.19 Price/1000 €16.31
13.78 Price/1000 +1.88 Price/1000 €17.32
14.07 Price/1000 +2.17 Price/1000 €23.76
15.12 Price/1000 +3.22 Price/1000 €24.30
15.21 Price/1000 +3.31 Price/1000 €20.38
15.99 Price/1000 +4.09 Price/1000 €20.43
16.61 Price/1000 +4.71 Price/1000 €21.76
16.87 Price/1000 +4.97 Price/1000 €20.23
16.9 Price/1000 +5.00 Price/1000 €23.36
17.53 Price/1000 +5.63 Price/1000 €22.45
18.85 Price/1000 +6.95 Price/1000 €28.25
19.15 Price/1000 +7.25 Price/1000 €29.38
19.75 Price/1000 +7.85 Price/1000 €27.02
19.9 Price/1000 +8.00 Price/1000 €22.45
19.94 Price/1000 +8.04 Price/1000 €32.41
20.01 Price/1000 +8.11 Price/1000 €25.68

The difference between best and worst was 68.2% (8.11 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5) works out €671 cheaper than the most expensive (Bridgestone Potenza S001).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2020 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.13 kg/t Best £0
7.34 kg/t +0.21 kg/t £13
7.4 kg/t +0.27 kg/t £17
7.43 kg/t +0.30 kg/t £19
7.55 kg/t +0.42 kg/t £26
7.56 kg/t +0.43 kg/t £27
7.63 kg/t +0.50 kg/t £31
7.65 kg/t +0.52 kg/t £32
7.77 kg/t +0.64 kg/t £40
7.83 kg/t +0.70 kg/t £43
7.94 kg/t +0.81 kg/t £50
8.09 kg/t +0.96 kg/t £59
8.15 kg/t +1.02 kg/t £63
8.3 kg/t +1.17 kg/t £72
8.45 kg/t +1.32 kg/t £82
8.86 kg/t +1.73 kg/t £107
8.98 kg/t +1.85 kg/t £114
9.05 kg/t +1.92 kg/t £119
9.16 kg/t +2.03 kg/t £126
9.82 kg/t +2.69 kg/t £166

The difference between best and worst was 37.7% (2.69 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 uses about 115 L (£166) more fuel than the Fulda SportControl 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.