Test Charts / Auto Bild
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 245/45 R18
- Tyres tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 9
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 32.1 m | Best | |
| 32.9 m | +0.80 m | |
| 33.2 m | +1.10 m | |
| 33.2 m | +1.10 m | |
| 33.2 m | +1.10 m | |
| 33.4 m | +1.30 m | |
| 33.5 m | +1.40 m | |
| 34 m | +1.90 m | |
| 34.1 m | +2.00 m | |
| 34.2 m | +2.10 m | |
| 34.3 m | +2.20 m | |
| 34.3 m | +2.20 m | |
| 34.7 m | +2.60 m | |
| 34.7 m | +2.60 m | |
| 34.8 m | +2.70 m | |
| 34.9 m | +2.80 m | |
| 35.4 m | +3.30 m | |
| 35.7 m | +3.60 m | |
| 36 m | +3.90 m | |
| 36 m | +3.90 m |
The difference between best and worst was 12.1% (3.9 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths).
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 117 km/h | Best | |
| 116.8 km/h | -0.20 km/h | |
| 116.4 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 116.3 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 116.2 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 116.2 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 116.1 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 115.9 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 115.4 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 115.4 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 115.4 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 115.3 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 115 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 114.9 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 114.8 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 114.6 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 114.3 km/h | -2.70 km/h | |
| 114.2 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 113.7 km/h | -3.30 km/h | |
| 112.5 km/h | -4.50 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 3.8% (4.5 Km/H).
Wet
3Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 44.9 m | Best | |
| 45.3 m | +0.40 m | |
| 45.4 m | +0.50 m | |
| 46.5 m | +1.60 m | |
| 47.2 m | +2.30 m | |
| 47.3 m | +2.40 m | |
| 47.3 m | +2.40 m | |
| 48 m | +3.10 m | |
| 48.1 m | +3.20 m | |
| 48.1 m | +3.20 m | |
| 48.3 m | +3.40 m | |
| 48.9 m | +4.00 m | |
| 49.2 m | +4.30 m | |
| 49.5 m | +4.60 m | |
| 49.7 m | +4.80 m | |
| 50.5 m | +5.60 m | |
| 50.6 m | +5.70 m | |
| 51 m | +6.10 m | |
| 51.6 m | +6.70 m | |
| 52.2 m | +7.30 m |
The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (7.3 m ≈ 1.6 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 74.6 km/h | Best | |
| 74.3 km/h | -0.30 km/h | |
| 73.9 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 73.3 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 73.2 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 73 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 72.3 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 72.1 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 71.9 km/h | -2.70 km/h | |
| 71.5 km/h | -3.10 km/h | |
| 70.6 km/h | -4.00 km/h | |
| 70.5 km/h | -4.10 km/h | |
| 70 km/h | -4.60 km/h | |
| 69.6 km/h | -5.00 km/h | |
| 69.5 km/h | -5.10 km/h | |
| 69.2 km/h | -5.40 km/h | |
| 68.9 km/h | -5.70 km/h | |
| 68.8 km/h | -5.80 km/h | |
| 68.7 km/h | -5.90 km/h | |
| 67.7 km/h | -6.90 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 9.2% (6.9 Km/H).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 99.1 km/h | Best | |
| 98.5 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 97.2 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 96.7 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 96.6 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 96.6 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 95.8 km/h | -3.30 km/h | |
| 95.5 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 95.5 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 95.4 km/h | -3.70 km/h | |
| 95.3 km/h | -3.80 km/h | |
| 95.2 km/h | -3.90 km/h | |
| 95 km/h | -4.10 km/h | |
| 93.9 km/h | -5.20 km/h | |
| 93.6 km/h | -5.50 km/h | |
| 93.2 km/h | -5.90 km/h | |
| 92.7 km/h | -6.40 km/h | |
| 92.5 km/h | -6.60 km/h | |
| 91.7 km/h | -7.40 km/h | |
| 90.7 km/h | -8.40 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 8.5% (8.4 Km/H).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 71 dB | Best | |
| 71.2 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 71.3 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 71.3 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 71.5 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 72.5 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 72.8 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 72.8 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 73.2 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 73.2 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 73.5 dB | +2.50 dB | |
| 73.6 dB | +2.60 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 3.7% (2.6 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 44,900 KM | Best | |
| 39,063 KM | -5,837 KM | |
| 39,063 KM | -5,837 KM | |
| 35,920 KM | -8,980 KM | |
| 33,226 KM | -11,674 KM | |
| 33,226 KM | -11,674 KM | |
| 32,328 KM | -12,572 KM | |
| 31,879 KM | -13,021 KM | |
| 30,083 KM | -14,817 KM | |
| 29,634 KM | -15,266 KM | |
| 27,838 KM | -17,062 KM | |
| 27,838 KM | -17,062 KM | |
| 27,389 KM | -17,511 KM | |
| 27,389 KM | -17,511 KM | |
| 27,389 KM | -17,511 KM | |
| 26,042 KM | -18,858 KM | |
| 23,797 KM | -21,103 KM | |
| 23,348 KM | -21,552 KM | |
| 23,348 KM | -21,552 KM | |
| 22,450 KM | -22,450 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 50% (22,450 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 km |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.9 Price/1000 | Best | €18.58 | |
| 12.29 Price/1000 | +0.39 Price/1000 | €15.63 | |
| 12.81 Price/1000 | +0.91 Price/1000 | €16.22 | |
| 12.85 Price/1000 | +0.95 Price/1000 | €16.62 | |
| 13.09 Price/1000 | +1.19 Price/1000 | €16.31 | |
| 13.78 Price/1000 | +1.88 Price/1000 | €17.32 | |
| 14.07 Price/1000 | +2.17 Price/1000 | €23.76 | |
| 15.12 Price/1000 | +3.22 Price/1000 | €24.30 | |
| 15.21 Price/1000 | +3.31 Price/1000 | €20.38 | |
| 15.99 Price/1000 | +4.09 Price/1000 | €20.43 | |
| 16.61 Price/1000 | +4.71 Price/1000 | €21.76 | |
| 16.87 Price/1000 | +4.97 Price/1000 | €20.23 | |
| 16.9 Price/1000 | +5.00 Price/1000 | €23.36 | |
| 17.53 Price/1000 | +5.63 Price/1000 | €22.45 | |
| 18.85 Price/1000 | +6.95 Price/1000 | €28.25 | |
| 19.15 Price/1000 | +7.25 Price/1000 | €29.38 | |
| 19.75 Price/1000 | +7.85 Price/1000 | €27.02 | |
| 19.9 Price/1000 | +8.00 Price/1000 | €22.45 | |
| 19.94 Price/1000 | +8.04 Price/1000 | €32.41 | |
| 20.01 Price/1000 | +8.11 Price/1000 | €25.68 |
The difference between best and worst was 68.2% (8.11 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5) works out €671 cheaper than the most expensive (Bridgestone Potenza S001).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2020 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.13 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.34 kg/t | +0.21 kg/t | £13 | |
| 7.4 kg/t | +0.27 kg/t | £17 | |
| 7.43 kg/t | +0.30 kg/t | £19 | |
| 7.55 kg/t | +0.42 kg/t | £26 | |
| 7.56 kg/t | +0.43 kg/t | £27 | |
| 7.63 kg/t | +0.50 kg/t | £31 | |
| 7.65 kg/t | +0.52 kg/t | £32 | |
| 7.77 kg/t | +0.64 kg/t | £40 | |
| 7.83 kg/t | +0.70 kg/t | £43 | |
| 7.94 kg/t | +0.81 kg/t | £50 | |
| 8.09 kg/t | +0.96 kg/t | £59 | |
| 8.15 kg/t | +1.02 kg/t | £63 | |
| 8.3 kg/t | +1.17 kg/t | £72 | |
| 8.45 kg/t | +1.32 kg/t | £82 | |
| 8.86 kg/t | +1.73 kg/t | £107 | |
| 8.98 kg/t | +1.85 kg/t | £114 | |
| 9.05 kg/t | +1.92 kg/t | £119 | |
| 9.16 kg/t | +2.03 kg/t | £126 | |
| 9.82 kg/t | +2.69 kg/t | £166 |
The difference between best and worst was 37.7% (2.69 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 uses about 115 L (£166) more fuel than the Fulda SportControl 2.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test
245/45 R1849 tyres tested
20 of these 20 tyres tested again
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout
225/45 R1745 tyres tested
15 of these 20 tyres tested again
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
225/45 R1720 tyres tested
13 of these 20 tyres tested again

