Menu
Zeetex HP2000 vfm View Gallery (1)
195-265/35-60 R15-19 46 sizes 2016

Zeetex HP2000 vfm

The Zeetex HP2000 vfm is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.0
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
90%
Wet Grip
83%
Road Feedback
88%
Handling
65%
Wear
68%
Comfort
80%
Buy again
85%
8 Reviews
80% Average
35,340 miles driven
4 Tests (avg: 30th)
Zeetex HP2000 vfm

Zeetex HP2000 vfm

Summer Economy
BETA
6 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Medium Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
83.8
0.29x / 1 test
Value
77.8
0.38x / 4 tests
Wet
61.3
2x / 6 tests
Dry
51.8
1.8x / 5 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
60.3
8 tests
Handling
48.4
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 4
Publications: 1
Period: 2019 - 2022
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 8
Avg Rating: 79.8%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.22
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 38/44 2 metrics
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 20/20 10 metrics
2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 18/49 2 metrics
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 45/45 2 metrics
4
Tests
30th
Average
18th
Best
45th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
38th/44
18th/49
20th/20
Short wet and dry braking distances, low price, low rolling resistance.
Understeer in the dry and wet, low aquaplaning resistance, high wear.
Conditionally Recommended.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
225/45R17 91 Y C B 70
205/50R17 93 W XL C B 69
215/45R17 91 W XL C B 69
215/55R17 98 W XL C B 69
225/45R17 94 Y XL C B 70
225/50R17 98 Y XL C B 70
18 inch
225/40R18 92 Y XL C A 69
245/40R18 97 Y XL C A 70
245/45R18 100 Y XL C A 70
255/35R18 94 Y XL C A 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Zeetex HP2000 vfm >>

Questions and Answers for the Zeetex HP2000 vfm

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Zeetex HP2000 vfm. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Zeetex HP2000 vfm Reviews

Given 40% while driving a Citroën C3 Aircross SUV (215/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 5,000 spirited miles
Rubbish on my Citroen c3 air cross. They were original on the front but they were noisy. Rumble that could be felt though the steering wheel. So I put them on the back. Now when I drive in a spirited manner the rear starts letting go. Even in the dry. This makes dual carriageway roundabouts hairy to say the least. Don't bother is my opinion
Ask a question | Helpful 304
September 21, 2025
Given 85% while driving a Vauxhall (/45 R18) on mostly town for 0 spirited miles
I replaced my Dunlop SportMax RT and have to say that Zeetex are comparable. They are not as great as Dunlops but I had an emergency stop one day and I was surprised that ABS had no chance to work. My 2tons car stopped very quickly. I am very happy to have Zeetex for 50%of my previous Dunlops and they are similar in 80% I would say. I recommend them as the price to quality rate is very high. -Tom
July 8, 2022
BMW 330 Ci Sport (235/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 200 average miles
Very silent, car feels les road imperfections compared to pirelli p7, but comfort comes at a price of handling, steering feedback. Feels like 1 inch smaller in diameter to be honest. Grip is there, tyres are safe, but not high performance. At this price they are unbeatable, but would consider them as touring tyres, not high performance ones. This is initial review, will update my thougts after a few more thousands miles
June 5, 2020
Have you driven on the Zeetex HP2000 vfm tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Zeetex HP2000 vfm? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Zeetex HP2000 vfm >

Latest Zeetex HP2000 vfm Reviews

Given 94% while driving a Alfa Romeo 156 JTD (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
Thanks for cheap and very good tyre
May 7, 2020
Given 10% while driving a Saab Automobile 9 5 2.2 TID Vector Estate (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 4,000 average miles

Had these fitted as I needed tyres in a hurry and on a tight budget.
They were cheap for a reason.
About 8 months fitted and they're worn out, down the the wear markers. My yearly average is 5000 miles, and that's steady old man motoring.

Back to Avon or Falken without a doubt.
May 11, 2019
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 95% while driving a MINI Cooper S (215/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 500 spirited miles
Put these zeetex on my r52 cooper S . 215 40 r17 And firstly . They are so quiet compared to the P8s if just took off . I took them on a spirited dry B road run really gave it some round the lanes . No squealing just grip good feed back through the steering . Even lifted a rear wheel whilst cornering fast and only felt a little flex .totally happy .comfy quiet grippy i havent had them long enough to see how they wear . But I've done a bout 500 miles on them so far on all road types . Motorway . A road . B road . Urban . Speed humps potholes etc . No complaints . 👍👍👍👍👍
June 21, 2018
Given 90% while driving a Citroën C Elysee (195/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Good tires in everything.
May 19, 2018
Given 91% while driving a Peugeot RCZ GT 156THP (235/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 640 average miles
purchased 4 new zeetex HP2000 vfm and have found them good at handling on wet and dry on a RCZ sports coupe and well priced

December 11, 2017