Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/55 R17
Tyres tested
20
Disciplines
15

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
39.1 m -3.90 m 0 km/h
43 m Best 0 km/h
43.1 m +0.10 m 6 km/h
43.3 m +0.30 m 11 km/h
43.3 m +0.30 m 11 km/h
43.3 m +0.30 m 11 km/h
43.5 m +0.50 m 14 km/h
43.9 m +0.90 m 19 km/h
44.2 m +1.20 m 21 km/h
44.5 m +1.50 m 24 km/h
44.5 m +1.50 m 24 km/h
44.7 m +1.70 m 25 km/h
44.9 m +1.90 m 27 km/h
45 m +2.00 m 27 km/h
45.1 m +2.10 m 28 km/h
45.5 m +2.50 m 30 km/h
45.8 m +2.80 m 32 km/h
46.1 m +3.10 m 34 km/h
46.4 m +3.40 m 35 km/h
46.5 m +3.50 m 36 km/h
47.2 m +4.20 m 39 km/h
RefReference Winter Budget
47.3 m +4.30 m 39 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 21% (8.2 m ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Uniroyal WinterExpert would still be travelling at 39 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
125.5 km/h +2.00 km/h
123.5 km/h Best
123.3 km/h -0.20 km/h
123.2 km/h -0.30 km/h
123 km/h -0.50 km/h
122.8 km/h -0.70 km/h
122.6 km/h -0.90 km/h
7
122.2 km/h -1.30 km/h
122.2 km/h -1.30 km/h
RefReference Winter Budget
122.2 km/h -1.30 km/h
122.1 km/h -1.40 km/h
121.9 km/h -1.60 km/h
121.7 km/h -1.80 km/h
121.5 km/h -2.00 km/h
121.5 km/h -2.00 km/h
121.4 km/h -2.10 km/h
121.4 km/h -2.10 km/h
121.4 km/h -2.10 km/h
121.3 km/h -2.20 km/h
121.3 km/h -2.20 km/h
121.3 km/h -2.20 km/h
120.8 km/h -2.70 km/h
120.7 km/h -2.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 3.8% (4.8 Km/H).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
48.4 m -2.80 m 0 km/h
51.2 m Best 0 km/h
53.3 m +2.10 m 26 km/h
54 m +2.80 m 30 km/h
54 m +2.80 m 30 km/h
54.9 m +3.70 m 34 km/h
55.2 m +4.00 m 35 km/h
55.2 m +4.00 m 35 km/h
55.4 m +4.20 m 36 km/h
55.9 m +4.70 m 38 km/h
55.9 m +4.70 m 38 km/h
56.1 m +4.90 m 38 km/h
56.2 m +5.00 m 39 km/h
56.2 m +5.00 m 39 km/h
56.4 m +5.20 m 39 km/h
56.7 m +5.50 m 40 km/h
56.7 m +5.50 m 40 km/h
57.5 m +6.30 m 43 km/h
57.7 m +6.50 m 44 km/h
57.7 m +6.50 m 44 km/h
58.3 m +7.10 m 45 km/h
RefReference Winter Budget
64.9 m +13.70 m 60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 34.1% (16.5 m ≈ 3.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 would still be travelling at 45 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
72.7 km/h Best
72.5 km/h -0.20 km/h
72.1 km/h -0.60 km/h
72.1 km/h -0.60 km/h
72 km/h -0.70 km/h
71.9 km/h -0.80 km/h
71.7 km/h -1.00 km/h
RefReference Summer
71.5 km/h -1.20 km/h
71.3 km/h -1.40 km/h
71.2 km/h -1.50 km/h
71.2 km/h -1.50 km/h
71.1 km/h -1.60 km/h
70.8 km/h -1.90 km/h
70.8 km/h -1.90 km/h
70.6 km/h -2.10 km/h
70.3 km/h -2.40 km/h
70.1 km/h -2.60 km/h
69.8 km/h -2.90 km/h
69.8 km/h -2.90 km/h
69.1 km/h -3.60 km/h
68.7 km/h -4.00 km/h
RefReference Winter Budget
61.9 km/h -10.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (10.8 Km/H).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TyreResultGap to best
12.02 s Best
12.21 s +0.19 s
12.21 s +0.19 s
12.33 s +0.31 s
12.34 s +0.32 s
12.39 s +0.37 s
12.41 s +0.39 s
12.41 s +0.39 s
12.41 s +0.39 s
12.42 s +0.40 s
12.43 s +0.41 s
12.47 s +0.45 s
RefReference Summer
12.47 s +0.45 s
12.48 s +0.46 s
12.59 s +0.57 s
12.62 s +0.60 s
12.63 s +0.61 s
12.65 s +0.63 s
12.66 s +0.64 s
12.69 s +0.67 s
12.77 s +0.75 s
RefReference Winter Budget
14.28 s +2.26 s

The difference between best and worst was 18.8% (2.26 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
81.3 km/h Best
80.7 km/h -0.60 km/h
80.5 km/h -0.80 km/h
79.8 km/h -1.50 km/h
79.6 km/h -1.70 km/h
79.3 km/h -2.00 km/h
78.9 km/h -2.40 km/h
78.9 km/h -2.40 km/h
78.8 km/h -2.50 km/h
78.7 km/h -2.60 km/h
78.7 km/h -2.60 km/h
RefReference Summer
78.6 km/h -2.70 km/h
78.4 km/h -2.90 km/h
77.1 km/h -4.20 km/h
76.6 km/h -4.70 km/h
75.8 km/h -5.50 km/h
75.2 km/h -6.10 km/h
75.1 km/h -6.20 km/h
74.7 km/h -6.60 km/h
74.3 km/h -7.00 km/h
71.5 km/h -9.80 km/h
RefReference Winter Budget
67.1 km/h -14.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 17.5% (14.2 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
2.94 m/sec2 Best
RefReference Summer
2.9 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
2.82 m/sec2 -0.12 m/sec2
2.78 m/sec2 -0.16 m/sec2
2.77 m/sec2 -0.17 m/sec2
2.75 m/sec2 -0.19 m/sec2
2.74 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
2.7 m/sec2 -0.24 m/sec2
2.65 m/sec2 -0.29 m/sec2
2.65 m/sec2 -0.29 m/sec2
2.61 m/sec2 -0.33 m/sec2
2.59 m/sec2 -0.35 m/sec2
2.59 m/sec2 -0.35 m/sec2
2.48 m/sec2 -0.46 m/sec2
2.46 m/sec2 -0.48 m/sec2
2.41 m/sec2 -0.53 m/sec2
2.39 m/sec2 -0.55 m/sec2
2.25 m/sec2 -0.69 m/sec2
2.15 m/sec2 -0.79 m/sec2
2.05 m/sec2 -0.89 m/sec2
1.81 m/sec2 -1.13 m/sec2
RefReference Winter Budget
1.57 m/sec2 -1.37 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 46.6% (1.37 m/sec2).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
25.4 m Best 0 km/h
25.5 m +0.10 m 8 km/h
25.5 m +0.10 m 8 km/h
25.5 m +0.10 m 8 km/h
25.9 m +0.50 m 18 km/h
25.9 m +0.50 m 18 km/h
26.1 m +0.70 m 21 km/h
26.2 m +0.80 m 23 km/h
26.3 m +0.90 m 24 km/h
26.3 m +0.90 m 24 km/h
26.3 m +0.90 m 24 km/h
26.3 m +0.90 m 24 km/h
26.3 m +0.90 m 24 km/h
26.4 m +1.00 m 25 km/h
26.4 m +1.00 m 25 km/h
26.4 m +1.00 m 25 km/h
26.4 m +1.00 m 25 km/h
26.5 m +1.10 m 26 km/h
26.6 m +1.20 m 28 km/h
27.3 m +1.90 m 34 km/h
RefReference Winter Budget
27.6 m +2.20 m 37 km/h
RefReference Summer
40.9 m +15.50 m 80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 61% (15.5 m ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 would still be travelling at 34 km/h when the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
2620 N Best
2606 N -14.00 N
2605 N -15.00 N
2595 N -25.00 N
2583 N -37.00 N
2582 N -38.00 N
2580 N -40.00 N
2578 N -42.00 N
2566 N -54.00 N
2559 N -61.00 N
2558 N -62.00 N
2556 N -64.00 N
2552 N -68.00 N
2549 N -71.00 N
2541 N -79.00 N
2531 N -89.00 N
2519 N -101.00 N
2499 N -121.00 N
2461 N -159.00 N
2440 N -180.00 N
RefReference Winter Budget
2310 N -310.00 N
RefReference Summer
864 N -1,756.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 67% (1,756 N).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
55.5 km/h Best
54.9 km/h -0.60 km/h
54.5 km/h -1.00 km/h
54.5 km/h -1.00 km/h
54.5 km/h -1.00 km/h
54.4 km/h -1.10 km/h
54.4 km/h -1.10 km/h
54.4 km/h -1.10 km/h
54.2 km/h -1.30 km/h
54.2 km/h -1.30 km/h
53.7 km/h -1.80 km/h
53.7 km/h -1.80 km/h
53.6 km/h -1.90 km/h
53.6 km/h -1.90 km/h
53.4 km/h -2.10 km/h
53.2 km/h -2.30 km/h
53.2 km/h -2.30 km/h
53.1 km/h -2.40 km/h
52.9 km/h -2.60 km/h
52.7 km/h -2.80 km/h
RefReference Winter Budget
51.7 km/h -3.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 6.8% (3.8 Km/H).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.84 m/sec2 Best
3.8 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
3.79 m/sec2 -0.05 m/sec2
3.79 m/sec2 -0.05 m/sec2
3.79 m/sec2 -0.05 m/sec2
3.78 m/sec2 -0.06 m/sec2
3.78 m/sec2 -0.06 m/sec2
3.78 m/sec2 -0.06 m/sec2
3.77 m/sec2 -0.07 m/sec2
3.77 m/sec2 -0.07 m/sec2
3.76 m/sec2 -0.08 m/sec2
3.73 m/sec2 -0.11 m/sec2
3.73 m/sec2 -0.11 m/sec2
3.7 m/sec2 -0.14 m/sec2
3.7 m/sec2 -0.14 m/sec2
3.69 m/sec2 -0.15 m/sec2
3.67 m/sec2 -0.17 m/sec2
3.64 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.64 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.62 m/sec2 -0.22 m/sec2
RefReference Winter Budget
3.47 m/sec2 -0.37 m/sec2
RefReference Summer
1.81 m/sec2 -2.03 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 52.9% (2.03 m/sec2).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
69.7 dB Best
69.7 dB Best
70.3 dB +0.60 dB
70.3 dB +0.60 dB
70.5 dB +0.80 dB
70.5 dB +0.80 dB
70.6 dB +0.90 dB
70.7 dB +1.00 dB
71.2 dB +1.50 dB
71.2 dB +1.50 dB
RefReference Winter Budget
71.3 dB +1.60 dB
71.5 dB +1.80 dB
71.7 dB +2.00 dB
71.8 dB +2.10 dB
71.9 dB +2.20 dB
72.1 dB +2.40 dB
72.2 dB +2.50 dB
72.2 dB +2.50 dB
72.6 dB +2.90 dB
RefReference Summer
72.7 dB +3.00 dB
72.8 dB +3.10 dB
73.5 dB +3.80 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (3.8 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
41,713 KM Best
40,933 KM -780 KM
39,848 KM -1,865 KM
39,795 KM -1,918 KM
39,764 KM -1,949 KM
38,717 KM -2,996 KM
37,975 KM -3,738 KM
36,841 KM -4,872 KM
36,593 KM -5,120 KM
34,514 KM -7,199 KM
33,688 KM -8,025 KM
33,516 KM -8,197 KM
33,502 KM -8,211 KM
31,409 KM -10,304 KM
30,937 KM -10,776 KM
30,888 KM -10,825 KM
30,590 KM -11,123 KM
30,303 KM -11,410 KM
29,978 KM -11,735 KM
28,501 KM -13,212 KM

The difference between best and worst was 31.7% (13,212 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
11.03 Price/1000 Best €22.03
12.67 Price/1000 +1.64 Price/1000 €20.91
13.44 Price/1000 +2.41 Price/1000 €21.13
14.85 Price/1000 +3.82 Price/1000 €27.95
15.29 Price/1000 +4.26 Price/1000 €26.10
15.44 Price/1000 +4.41 Price/1000 €29.16
15.79 Price/1000 +4.76 Price/1000 €24.34
16.09 Price/1000 +5.06 Price/1000 €26.00
16.12 Price/1000 +5.09 Price/1000 €21.01
16.33 Price/1000 +5.30 Price/1000 €31.05
16.67 Price/1000 +5.64 Price/1000 €24.63
17.31 Price/1000 +6.28 Price/1000 €24.57
17.35 Price/1000 +6.32 Price/1000 €25.82
17.64 Price/1000 +6.61 Price/1000 €28.57
17.78 Price/1000 +6.75 Price/1000 €20.04
17.91 Price/1000 +6.88 Price/1000 €26.49
19.35 Price/1000 +8.32 Price/1000 €28.48
19.74 Price/1000 +8.71 Price/1000 €28.45
20.59 Price/1000 +9.56 Price/1000 €29.12
23.7 Price/1000 +12.67 Price/1000 €28.44

The difference between best and worst was 114.9% (12.67 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Uniroyal WinterExpert) works out €441 cheaper than the most expensive (Falken Eurowinter HS01).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2022 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.68 kg/t Best £0
7.3 kg/t +0.62 kg/t £41
7.39 kg/t +0.71 kg/t £47
8.06 kg/t +1.38 kg/t £91
8.18 kg/t +1.50 kg/t £99
8.21 kg/t +1.53 kg/t £101
8.31 kg/t +1.63 kg/t £108
8.32 kg/t +1.64 kg/t £108
8.32 kg/t +1.64 kg/t £108
8.33 kg/t +1.65 kg/t £109
8.33 kg/t +1.65 kg/t £109
8.37 kg/t +1.69 kg/t £112
8.4 kg/t +1.72 kg/t £113
8.74 kg/t +2.06 kg/t £136
8.87 kg/t +2.19 kg/t £145
RefReference Summer
8.87 kg/t +2.19 kg/t £145
8.89 kg/t +2.21 kg/t £146
9.04 kg/t +2.36 kg/t £156
18
9.12 kg/t +2.44 kg/t £161
9.41 kg/t +2.73 kg/t £180
9.53 kg/t +2.85 kg/t £188
9.94 kg/t +3.26 kg/t £215

The difference between best and worst was 48.8% (3.26 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 uses about 148 L (£215) more fuel than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.