Test Charts / Auto Bild
2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 215/55 R17
- Tyres tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 15
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
39.1 m | -3.90 m | 0 km/h |
| 43 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 43.1 m | +0.10 m | 6 km/h | |
| 43.3 m | +0.30 m | 11 km/h | |
| 43.3 m | +0.30 m | 11 km/h | |
| 43.3 m | +0.30 m | 11 km/h | |
| 43.5 m | +0.50 m | 14 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +0.90 m | 19 km/h | |
| 44.2 m | +1.20 m | 21 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +1.50 m | 24 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +1.50 m | 24 km/h | |
| 44.7 m | +1.70 m | 25 km/h | |
| 44.9 m | +1.90 m | 27 km/h | |
| 45 m | +2.00 m | 27 km/h | |
| 45.1 m | +2.10 m | 28 km/h | |
| 45.5 m | +2.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 45.8 m | +2.80 m | 32 km/h | |
| 46.1 m | +3.10 m | 34 km/h | |
| 46.4 m | +3.40 m | 35 km/h | |
| 46.5 m | +3.50 m | 36 km/h | |
| 47.2 m | +4.20 m | 39 km/h | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
47.3 m | +4.30 m | 39 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 21% (8.2 m ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Uniroyal WinterExpert would still be travelling at 39 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
125.5 km/h | +2.00 km/h |
| 123.5 km/h | Best | |
| 123.3 km/h | -0.20 km/h | |
| 123.2 km/h | -0.30 km/h | |
| 123 km/h | -0.50 km/h | |
| 122.8 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 122.6 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 122.2 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 122.2 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
122.2 km/h | -1.30 km/h |
| 122.1 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 121.9 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 121.7 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 121.5 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 121.5 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 121.4 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 121.4 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 121.4 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 121.3 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 121.3 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 121.3 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 120.8 km/h | -2.70 km/h | |
| 120.7 km/h | -2.80 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 3.8% (4.8 Km/H).
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
48.4 m | -2.80 m | 0 km/h |
| 51.2 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 53.3 m | +2.10 m | 26 km/h | |
| 54 m | +2.80 m | 30 km/h | |
| 54 m | +2.80 m | 30 km/h | |
| 54.9 m | +3.70 m | 34 km/h | |
| 55.2 m | +4.00 m | 35 km/h | |
| 55.2 m | +4.00 m | 35 km/h | |
| 55.4 m | +4.20 m | 36 km/h | |
| 55.9 m | +4.70 m | 38 km/h | |
| 55.9 m | +4.70 m | 38 km/h | |
| 56.1 m | +4.90 m | 38 km/h | |
| 56.2 m | +5.00 m | 39 km/h | |
| 56.2 m | +5.00 m | 39 km/h | |
| 56.4 m | +5.20 m | 39 km/h | |
| 56.7 m | +5.50 m | 40 km/h | |
| 56.7 m | +5.50 m | 40 km/h | |
| 57.5 m | +6.30 m | 43 km/h | |
| 57.7 m | +6.50 m | 44 km/h | |
| 57.7 m | +6.50 m | 44 km/h | |
| 58.3 m | +7.10 m | 45 km/h | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
64.9 m | +13.70 m | 60 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 34.1% (16.5 m ≈ 3.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 would still be travelling at 45 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 72.7 km/h | Best | |
| 72.5 km/h | -0.20 km/h | |
| 72.1 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 72.1 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 72 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 71.9 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 71.7 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
71.5 km/h | -1.20 km/h |
| 71.3 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 71.2 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 71.2 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 71.1 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 70.8 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 70.8 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 70.6 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 70.3 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 70.1 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
| 69.8 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 69.8 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 69.1 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 68.7 km/h | -4.00 km/h | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
61.9 km/h | -10.80 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (10.8 Km/H).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 12.02 s | Best | |
| 12.21 s | +0.19 s | |
| 12.21 s | +0.19 s | |
| 12.33 s | +0.31 s | |
| 12.34 s | +0.32 s | |
| 12.39 s | +0.37 s | |
| 12.41 s | +0.39 s | |
| 12.41 s | +0.39 s | |
| 12.41 s | +0.39 s | |
| 12.42 s | +0.40 s | |
| 12.43 s | +0.41 s | |
| 12.47 s | +0.45 s | |
RefReference Summer |
12.47 s | +0.45 s |
| 12.48 s | +0.46 s | |
| 12.59 s | +0.57 s | |
| 12.62 s | +0.60 s | |
| 12.63 s | +0.61 s | |
| 12.65 s | +0.63 s | |
| 12.66 s | +0.64 s | |
| 12.69 s | +0.67 s | |
| 12.77 s | +0.75 s | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
14.28 s | +2.26 s |
The difference between best and worst was 18.8% (2.26 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 81.3 km/h | Best | |
| 80.7 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 80.5 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 79.8 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 79.6 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 79.3 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 78.9 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 78.9 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 78.8 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 78.7 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
| 78.7 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
78.6 km/h | -2.70 km/h |
| 78.4 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 77.1 km/h | -4.20 km/h | |
| 76.6 km/h | -4.70 km/h | |
| 75.8 km/h | -5.50 km/h | |
| 75.2 km/h | -6.10 km/h | |
| 75.1 km/h | -6.20 km/h | |
| 74.7 km/h | -6.60 km/h | |
| 74.3 km/h | -7.00 km/h | |
| 71.5 km/h | -9.80 km/h | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
67.1 km/h | -14.20 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 17.5% (14.2 Km/H).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 2.94 m/sec2 | Best | |
RefReference Summer |
2.9 m/sec2 | -0.04 m/sec2 |
| 2.82 m/sec2 | -0.12 m/sec2 | |
| 2.78 m/sec2 | -0.16 m/sec2 | |
| 2.77 m/sec2 | -0.17 m/sec2 | |
| 2.75 m/sec2 | -0.19 m/sec2 | |
| 2.74 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 2.7 m/sec2 | -0.24 m/sec2 | |
| 2.65 m/sec2 | -0.29 m/sec2 | |
| 2.65 m/sec2 | -0.29 m/sec2 | |
| 2.61 m/sec2 | -0.33 m/sec2 | |
| 2.59 m/sec2 | -0.35 m/sec2 | |
| 2.59 m/sec2 | -0.35 m/sec2 | |
| 2.48 m/sec2 | -0.46 m/sec2 | |
| 2.46 m/sec2 | -0.48 m/sec2 | |
| 2.41 m/sec2 | -0.53 m/sec2 | |
| 2.39 m/sec2 | -0.55 m/sec2 | |
| 2.25 m/sec2 | -0.69 m/sec2 | |
| 2.15 m/sec2 | -0.79 m/sec2 | |
| 2.05 m/sec2 | -0.89 m/sec2 | |
| 1.81 m/sec2 | -1.13 m/sec2 | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
1.57 m/sec2 | -1.37 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 46.6% (1.37 m/sec2).
Snow
4Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25.4 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 25.5 m | +0.10 m | 8 km/h | |
| 25.5 m | +0.10 m | 8 km/h | |
| 25.5 m | +0.10 m | 8 km/h | |
| 25.9 m | +0.50 m | 18 km/h | |
| 25.9 m | +0.50 m | 18 km/h | |
| 26.1 m | +0.70 m | 21 km/h | |
| 26.2 m | +0.80 m | 23 km/h | |
| 26.3 m | +0.90 m | 24 km/h | |
| 26.3 m | +0.90 m | 24 km/h | |
| 26.3 m | +0.90 m | 24 km/h | |
| 26.3 m | +0.90 m | 24 km/h | |
| 26.3 m | +0.90 m | 24 km/h | |
| 26.4 m | +1.00 m | 25 km/h | |
| 26.4 m | +1.00 m | 25 km/h | |
| 26.4 m | +1.00 m | 25 km/h | |
| 26.4 m | +1.00 m | 25 km/h | |
| 26.5 m | +1.10 m | 26 km/h | |
| 26.6 m | +1.20 m | 28 km/h | |
| 27.3 m | +1.90 m | 34 km/h | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
27.6 m | +2.20 m | 37 km/h |
RefReference Summer |
40.9 m | +15.50 m | 80 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 61% (15.5 m ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 would still be travelling at 34 km/h when the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 2620 N | Best | |
| 2606 N | -14.00 N | |
| 2605 N | -15.00 N | |
| 2595 N | -25.00 N | |
| 2583 N | -37.00 N | |
| 2582 N | -38.00 N | |
| 2580 N | -40.00 N | |
| 2578 N | -42.00 N | |
| 2566 N | -54.00 N | |
| 2559 N | -61.00 N | |
| 2558 N | -62.00 N | |
| 2556 N | -64.00 N | |
| 2552 N | -68.00 N | |
| 2549 N | -71.00 N | |
| 2541 N | -79.00 N | |
| 2531 N | -89.00 N | |
| 2519 N | -101.00 N | |
| 2499 N | -121.00 N | |
| 2461 N | -159.00 N | |
| 2440 N | -180.00 N | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
2310 N | -310.00 N |
RefReference Summer |
864 N | -1,756.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 67% (1,756 N).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 55.5 km/h | Best | |
| 54.9 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 54.5 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 54.5 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 54.5 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 54.4 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 54.4 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 54.4 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 54.2 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 54.2 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 53.7 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 53.7 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 53.6 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 53.6 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 53.4 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 53.2 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 53.2 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 53.1 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 52.9 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
| 52.7 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
51.7 km/h | -3.80 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 6.8% (3.8 Km/H).
Snow Slalom
Lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.84 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.8 m/sec2 | -0.04 m/sec2 | |
| 3.79 m/sec2 | -0.05 m/sec2 | |
| 3.79 m/sec2 | -0.05 m/sec2 | |
| 3.79 m/sec2 | -0.05 m/sec2 | |
| 3.78 m/sec2 | -0.06 m/sec2 | |
| 3.78 m/sec2 | -0.06 m/sec2 | |
| 3.78 m/sec2 | -0.06 m/sec2 | |
| 3.77 m/sec2 | -0.07 m/sec2 | |
| 3.77 m/sec2 | -0.07 m/sec2 | |
| 3.76 m/sec2 | -0.08 m/sec2 | |
| 3.73 m/sec2 | -0.11 m/sec2 | |
| 3.73 m/sec2 | -0.11 m/sec2 | |
| 3.7 m/sec2 | -0.14 m/sec2 | |
| 3.7 m/sec2 | -0.14 m/sec2 | |
| 3.69 m/sec2 | -0.15 m/sec2 | |
| 3.67 m/sec2 | -0.17 m/sec2 | |
| 3.64 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3.64 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3.62 m/sec2 | -0.22 m/sec2 | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
3.47 m/sec2 | -0.37 m/sec2 |
RefReference Summer |
1.81 m/sec2 | -2.03 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 52.9% (2.03 m/sec2).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 69.7 dB | Best | |
| 69.7 dB | Best | |
| 70.3 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 70.3 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 70.5 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 70.5 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 70.6 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 70.7 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +1.50 dB | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
71.3 dB | +1.60 dB |
| 71.5 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +2.50 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +2.50 dB | |
| 72.6 dB | +2.90 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
72.7 dB | +3.00 dB |
| 72.8 dB | +3.10 dB | |
| 73.5 dB | +3.80 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (3.8 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 41,713 KM | Best | |
| 40,933 KM | -780 KM | |
| 39,848 KM | -1,865 KM | |
| 39,795 KM | -1,918 KM | |
| 39,764 KM | -1,949 KM | |
| 38,717 KM | -2,996 KM | |
| 37,975 KM | -3,738 KM | |
| 36,841 KM | -4,872 KM | |
| 36,593 KM | -5,120 KM | |
| 34,514 KM | -7,199 KM | |
| 33,688 KM | -8,025 KM | |
| 33,516 KM | -8,197 KM | |
| 33,502 KM | -8,211 KM | |
| 31,409 KM | -10,304 KM | |
| 30,937 KM | -10,776 KM | |
| 30,888 KM | -10,825 KM | |
| 30,590 KM | -11,123 KM | |
| 30,303 KM | -11,410 KM | |
| 29,978 KM | -11,735 KM | |
| 28,501 KM | -13,212 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 31.7% (13,212 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 km |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.03 Price/1000 | Best | €22.03 | |
| 12.67 Price/1000 | +1.64 Price/1000 | €20.91 | |
| 13.44 Price/1000 | +2.41 Price/1000 | €21.13 | |
| 14.85 Price/1000 | +3.82 Price/1000 | €27.95 | |
| 15.29 Price/1000 | +4.26 Price/1000 | €26.10 | |
| 15.44 Price/1000 | +4.41 Price/1000 | €29.16 | |
| 15.79 Price/1000 | +4.76 Price/1000 | €24.34 | |
| 16.09 Price/1000 | +5.06 Price/1000 | €26.00 | |
| 16.12 Price/1000 | +5.09 Price/1000 | €21.01 | |
| 16.33 Price/1000 | +5.30 Price/1000 | €31.05 | |
| 16.67 Price/1000 | +5.64 Price/1000 | €24.63 | |
| 17.31 Price/1000 | +6.28 Price/1000 | €24.57 | |
| 17.35 Price/1000 | +6.32 Price/1000 | €25.82 | |
| 17.64 Price/1000 | +6.61 Price/1000 | €28.57 | |
| 17.78 Price/1000 | +6.75 Price/1000 | €20.04 | |
| 17.91 Price/1000 | +6.88 Price/1000 | €26.49 | |
| 19.35 Price/1000 | +8.32 Price/1000 | €28.48 | |
| 19.74 Price/1000 | +8.71 Price/1000 | €28.45 | |
| 20.59 Price/1000 | +9.56 Price/1000 | €29.12 | |
| 23.7 Price/1000 | +12.67 Price/1000 | €28.44 |
The difference between best and worst was 114.9% (12.67 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Uniroyal WinterExpert) works out €441 cheaper than the most expensive (Falken Eurowinter HS01).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2022 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.68 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.3 kg/t | +0.62 kg/t | £41 | |
| 7.39 kg/t | +0.71 kg/t | £47 | |
| 8.06 kg/t | +1.38 kg/t | £91 | |
| 8.18 kg/t | +1.50 kg/t | £99 | |
| 8.21 kg/t | +1.53 kg/t | £101 | |
| 8.31 kg/t | +1.63 kg/t | £108 | |
| 8.32 kg/t | +1.64 kg/t | £108 | |
| 8.32 kg/t | +1.64 kg/t | £108 | |
| 8.33 kg/t | +1.65 kg/t | £109 | |
| 8.33 kg/t | +1.65 kg/t | £109 | |
| 8.37 kg/t | +1.69 kg/t | £112 | |
| 8.4 kg/t | +1.72 kg/t | £113 | |
| 8.74 kg/t | +2.06 kg/t | £136 | |
| 8.87 kg/t | +2.19 kg/t | £145 | |
RefReference Summer |
8.87 kg/t | +2.19 kg/t | £145 |
| 8.89 kg/t | +2.21 kg/t | £146 | |
| 9.04 kg/t | +2.36 kg/t | £156 | |
| 9.12 kg/t | +2.44 kg/t | £161 | |
| 9.41 kg/t | +2.73 kg/t | £180 | |
| 9.53 kg/t | +2.85 kg/t | £188 | |
| 9.94 kg/t | +3.26 kg/t | £215 |
The difference between best and worst was 48.8% (3.26 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 uses about 148 L (£215) more fuel than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 50 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview
215/55 R1756 tyres tested
19 of these 20 tyres tested again
2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tyres tested
14 of these 20 tyres tested again
2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test
205/55 R1655 tyres tested
12 of these 20 tyres tested again

