Menu
Nexen Winguard Sport View Gallery (1)
185-275/35-65 R15-20 75 sizes 2008 Winter rated

Nexen Winguard Sport

The Nexen Winguard Sport is a Touring Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.0
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
82%
Wet Grip
79%
Road Feedback
78%
Handling
65%
Wear
85%
Comfort
81%
Buy again
85%
Snow Grip
90%
Ice Grip
50%
21 Reviews
77% Average
132,205 miles driven
6 Tests (avg: 23rd)
Nexen Winguard Sport

Nexen Winguard Sport

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
7 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
100
0.29x / 1 test
Snow
89.9
1.5x / 5 tests
Wet
72.6
2x / 7 tests
Value
61.8
0.38x / 4 tests
Dry
55.8
1.2x / 2 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
99.1
1 test
Braking
73.9
6 tests
Handling
70.9
3 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 6
Publications: 1
Period: 2011 - 2023
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 21
Avg Rating: 77.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.26
History Points: 6
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 48/54 1 metrics
2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 14/22 16 metrics
2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 15/57 2 metrics
2015 Winter Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2015 185/60 R14 31/51 0 metrics
2014 50 Winter Tyre Braking Overview Auto Bild 2014 225/50 R17 20/48 0 metrics
2011 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2011 225/45 R17 10/12 0 metrics
6
Tests
23rd
Average
10th
Best
48th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
15th/57
14th/22
Good traction and short braking distances on snow, stable wet and dry handling.
Understeering behavior on snow, limited mileage, high rolling resistance.
Good.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
185/65R15 88 H D C 69
195/65R15 91 H D C 69
195/65R15 91 T D C 69
16 inch
205/55R16 94 V XL D C 71
205/55R16 91 T D C 71
205/55R16 91 H D C 71
205/55R16 94 V XL D C 71
17 inch
225/45R17 94 V XL C C 71
205/50R17 93 V XL D C 71
215/45R17 91 V XL D C 70
225/50R17 98 V XL C C 70
215/55R17 98 V XL C C 71
215/55R17 98 V XL C C 71
225/45R17 94 V XL D D 72
225/45R17 94 V XL C C 71
205/50R17 93 V XL D C 71
215/45R17 91 V XL D C 70
225/50R17 98 V XL C C 70
215/55R17 98 V XL C C 71
225/45R17 94 V XL D D 72
18 inch
225/40R18 92 V XL D C 71
245/40R18 97 V XL D C 70
245/45R18 100 V XL D D 72
255/35R18 94 V XL C D 73
225/40R18 92 V XL D C 71
245/45R18 100 V XL D D 72
255/35R18 94 V XL C D 73
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Nexen Winguard Sport >>

Questions and Answers for the Nexen Winguard Sport

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nexen Winguard Sport. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 18 user reviews

Most drivers rate the Nexen Winguard Sport highly for winter value, with strong snow/slush traction, confident wet and acceptable dry grip in cold conditions, and notably low noise and good comfort. High-scoring reviews emphasize excellent winter transformation and stability, often comparing favorably to pricier brands. A minority report understeer and weaker wet/dry grip in milder temps, plus some tramlining, especially as tyres age. Overall, the Winguard Sport delivers strong cold-weather performance for the price with minor handling caveats.

Strengths
  • Strong snow and ice traction
  • Good wet performance (cold conditions)
  • Low noise and good comfort
  • Excellent value for money
  • Stable
  • Predictable handling in winter
  • Acceptable tread wear
Areas for Improvement
  • Understeer/average dry grip in milder temps
  • Tramlining or traction loss in 4-13°c wet/dry
  • Weaker pure-ice braking vs expectations

Top 3 Nexen Winguard Sport Reviews

Tesla (235/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 6,500 average miles
very good tire, in normal driving. If you drive hard in winter on cold dry road may be the best option. perfect value for money.
Ask a question | Helpful 804
March 23, 2021
Given 91% while driving a BMW 535xd (225/55 R17) on mostly country roads for 11,000 average miles
Fited these tires to my friends care a bmw e60 535xd ... no problems till now this is the second winter
January 6, 2016
Given 94% while driving a Honda Prelude 2.2vtec (205/60 R15 H) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
Winter 2017/2018 was my first experience with Nexen and in any case with Korean tires, so despite relatively good reviews there was certain skepticism about performance, especially in view of mixed test results (target was to find tires which are good on snow and ice like Scandinavian type tires, but also good on dry and wet like tires of continental Europe type, and not expensive). Returning home after tires were mounted I was chocked how they were silent - the best ever I have tried. Noise drop was as I would installed a noise insulation. Confort was also on the top, but partly it could be ensured by a little oversizing: 205/60 instead of 205/55.

Winter performance was fully satisfactory. In snow and on ice they were subjectively similar to Bridgestone Blizzak Revo GZ and Michelin X-Ice (I): good grip and braking in snow, but on pure ice they were all relatively weak, especially at temperatures slightly below 0C. All provide better handling than braking, so it's necessary to be careful though as with any tires. On dry and wet pavements Nexen looked far better than both with braking - at emergency braking they didn't slide first meters that was always slightly frightening me. Course-keeping ability on dry pavement may be a little bit worse than that with Michelin (quite similar to Bridgestone), but I could feel it just at speed over 120-130 km/h. Wear after 10K km looks typical. Thus, in overall they are really decent winter tires. Nexen, bravo !

And how to trust all these tire tests ?! Today, in view of my own experience, I may say that there was only one test with Nexen Winguard Sport that looks objective and it was performed in Korea.
April 11, 2018
Have you driven on the Nexen Winguard Sport tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Nexen Winguard Sport? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Nexen Winguard Sport >

Latest Nexen Winguard Sport Reviews

Given 100% while driving a Opel astra j 1.6 turbo (225/60 R16) on track for 20,000 average miles
Super tyres for this price. Good quality!
October 26, 2017
Given 59% while driving a Fiat Stilo (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
tramlines and loses traction on degrees 4-13 C. Third winter and its worst than before, little bit of wear.
December 29, 2016
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Ford (205/55 R16) on mostly country roads for 205 spirited miles
Tiers are ok for the price, well my toughts are you cant get everything without the price...well the tires suits 50E each perfectly. Good grip on weat, 80% would i say from 160 ps mondeo short geard. No noise at all, very little road rezistence, feedback is very nice..what i like about them is low rezistence very nice and smooth accel, sporty feedback
December 14, 2016
Given 64% while driving a BMW 330d M Sport (205/50 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 12,000 spirited miles
Poor grip in wet conditions. On snow tyre respond better. Dry grip average. Quite comfortable ride, not very noisy.
November 8, 2016
Given 84% while driving a Ford Fiesta Zetec S (205/40 R17) on a combination of roads for 5,000 spirited miles
Bought these tyres as my first set of winter tyres. WOW what a difference winter tyres make in cooler weather; anything below about 8 degrees Celsius these seemed to perform better than all the good big brand summer tyres I have owned in the past. I have been running them since november and it is now march and due to living in Scotland I will leave them on until april.

I was a bit apprehensive about buying the Nexen as they were so cheap however I had read a lot of good reviews and I completely agree. These are fantastic tyres for the money, they offer:
increased dry and wet grip on cooler days, traction on snow and ice (I tested them on a snow covered car park and I had to really work hard to get my car to skid!!!!) so they do work!, unless you have snow tyres with spikes don't expect better grip on ice, they are quiet on all surfaces and provide good progression and great feedback. Will 100% buy again.
March 15, 2016
Given 83% while driving a Ford Mustang (255/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
Really good tyres. In wet and dry I deel very confident with my mustang rwd.
Previous tyres were dunlop wintersport 3D and I would certainly go for these Nexens. Very happy user.
January 15, 2016
Given 90% while driving a Audi (235/40 R18 V) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Used on my Audi A6 after being stuck in the snow everywhere I went one year with Summer tyres. Absolutely fantastic in the snow. Ploughed through deep areas of snow, slush and ice on un-gritted roads without problem. Totally transformed the car in winter weather. Excellent grip in the wet and dry as well. I ended up using the tyres all year round with a 'spirited' driving style. I wouldn't expect them to perform as well as Dunlop/Vredestein on a dry summer's day but they are more than capable as an all-round tyre for typical British weather.
January 14, 2016
Given 77% while driving a Audi A4 2.0 TDi 170 S Line (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
I use this tires on the front wheels only, on the back I have a pair of Hankook Winter ICept Evo W310 Xl, which I used previous winter on the front.

I'm not sure if my evaluation would be correct, given the fact that I don't have all 4 wheels with the same tires (2&2) but I can certainly compare depending on front wheels grip and I can say that the nexens understirs on semi-dry, on ice are awful, on snow they do fine (got out from pretty hard situations with them) on dry they don't wear that bad grip is semi-good - a lot of tire noise when accelerating.

I think they are ok for a low budget but next time I'll go for a premium brand. Safety has no price.
January 5, 2016
Given 56% while driving a Toyota (205/55 R16 V) on track for 14,000 easy going miles
Recommended very good in dry, wet, and silent
November 21, 2015
Given 78% while driving a Saab Automobile 9 3 Vector Sport TiD 150 Saloon (225/45 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
Good price at £62.00 each, plus fitting. Very good in the wet and current cold, icy morning drives. Can't complain for the money but preferred the previous Kleber Quadraxxer tyres but they are £110.00 each. Overall provides confident driving in normal driving style, but not a sports tyre by any means.
January 30, 2015
Given 81% while driving a Ford Fiesta Zetec S (205/40 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 3,000 average miles
These tyres were a bargain price, and one of the few available below the £100 mark per tyre for my wheel size. I spent a lot of time researching them as was nervous about buying an important piece of kit for driving on snowy roads at such a lower price point than the rest.

I live in the French ski resort of Courchevel so snowy roads are a regular occurrence.

Overall I have been impressed by the tyres, I have been able to maintain 30 to 40 mph speeds on roads with 2 cm of compacted snow with out any skidding or loss in breaking performance.(tested on an empty straight road) They have held up pretty well in the corners too, although as always with driving on snow everything needs to be planned and done in slow motion.

Would I recommend these tyres? In a word yes they are a good all round compromise. My biggest piece of advice for any one driving in the snow a lot is choose your car well.

The little 1 litre eco boost engine and turbo in my car make it very hard to get any low range torque but as soon as the turbo comes in you do get a lot of wheel spin.
January 27, 2015
Given 80% while driving a Audi (225/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Fitted to my 2012 A3 2.0 tsi s line. Transforms the car into almost 4 x4 capability. Without these tyres the 2 wheel drive A3 is an embarrassment at the slightest sniff of slush or snow. For the money i cannot complement them enough. Fit them in Nov remove them in March for last 3 yeArs with no appreciable wear at 4000 miles
December 29, 2014