Test Charts / Auto Bild
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/45 R18
- Tyres tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 10
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33.2 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 33.3 m | +0.10 m | 7 km/h | |
| 33.5 m | +0.30 m | 12 km/h | |
| 33.7 m | +0.50 m | 16 km/h | |
| 33.7 m | +0.50 m | 16 km/h | |
| 34 m | +0.80 m | 20 km/h | |
| 34.1 m | +0.90 m | 21 km/h | |
| 34.1 m | +0.90 m | 21 km/h | |
| 34.1 m | +0.90 m | 21 km/h | |
| 34.3 m | +1.10 m | 23 km/h | |
| 34.4 m | +1.20 m | 24 km/h | |
| 34.6 m | +1.40 m | 26 km/h | |
| 34.8 m | +1.60 m | 28 km/h | |
| 34.9 m | +1.70 m | 29 km/h | |
| 35.1 m | +1.90 m | 30 km/h | |
| 35.7 m | +2.50 m | 34 km/h | |
| 35.8 m | +2.60 m | 35 km/h | |
| 35.9 m | +2.70 m | 36 km/h | |
| 35.9 m | +2.70 m | 36 km/h | |
| 37.3 m | +4.10 m | 43 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
40.1 m | +6.90 m | 54 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 20.8% (6.9 m ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Uniroyal RainSport 5 would still be travelling at 43 km/h when the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 121.3 km/h | Best | |
| 120.9 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 120.3 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 120.1 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 119.4 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 119.2 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 119.1 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 118.7 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
| 118.4 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 118.4 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 118.2 km/h | -3.10 km/h | |
| 118.1 km/h | -3.20 km/h | |
| 117.8 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 117.4 km/h | -3.90 km/h | |
| 117.2 km/h | -4.10 km/h | |
| 117.1 km/h | -4.20 km/h | |
| 116.8 km/h | -4.50 km/h | |
| 116.8 km/h | -4.50 km/h | |
| 116.7 km/h | -4.60 km/h | |
| 115.5 km/h | -5.80 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
113.4 km/h | -7.90 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 6.5% (7.9 Km/H).
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38.7 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 38.9 m | +0.20 m | 9 km/h | |
| 39.5 m | +0.80 m | 19 km/h | |
| 39.7 m | +1.00 m | 21 km/h | |
| 39.7 m | +1.00 m | 21 km/h | |
| 40.3 m | +1.60 m | 26 km/h | |
| 40.6 m | +1.90 m | 28 km/h | |
| 41.4 m | +2.70 m | 33 km/h | |
| 41.6 m | +2.90 m | 34 km/h | |
| 41.7 m | +3.00 m | 35 km/h | |
| 42 m | +3.30 m | 36 km/h | |
| 42.2 m | +3.50 m | 37 km/h | |
| 42.2 m | +3.50 m | 37 km/h | |
| 42.5 m | +3.80 m | 39 km/h | |
| 42.8 m | +4.10 m | 40 km/h | |
| 42.8 m | +4.10 m | 40 km/h | |
| 43.1 m | +4.40 m | 42 km/h | |
| 43.7 m | +5.00 m | 44 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +5.20 m | 45 km/h | |
| 45.3 m | +6.60 m | 50 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
62.3 m | +23.60 m | 80 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 61% (23.6 m ≈ 5.2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Fulda SportControl 2 would still be travelling at 50 km/h when the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 77.2 km/h | Best | |
| 76.7 km/h | -0.50 km/h | |
| 76.3 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 75.7 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 75.5 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 75.5 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 75 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 74.6 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
| 74.4 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 74.3 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 73.9 km/h | -3.30 km/h | |
| 73.9 km/h | -3.30 km/h | |
| 73.8 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
| 73.8 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
| 73.7 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 73.5 km/h | -3.70 km/h | |
| 73.5 km/h | -3.70 km/h | |
| 73.4 km/h | -3.80 km/h | |
| 73.1 km/h | -4.10 km/h | |
| 72.2 km/h | -5.00 km/h | |
| 65 km/h | -12.20 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
65 km/h | -12.20 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 15.8% (12.2 Km/H).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 111.1 km/h | Best | |
| 108.5 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
| 107.2 km/h | -3.90 km/h | |
| 106.3 km/h | -4.80 km/h | |
| 105.7 km/h | -5.40 km/h | |
| 105.7 km/h | -5.40 km/h | |
| 105.4 km/h | -5.70 km/h | |
| 104.5 km/h | -6.60 km/h | |
| 104.4 km/h | -6.70 km/h | |
| 104.3 km/h | -6.80 km/h | |
| 104.1 km/h | -7.00 km/h | |
| 104 km/h | -7.10 km/h | |
| 103.9 km/h | -7.20 km/h | |
| 103.9 km/h | -7.20 km/h | |
| 103.7 km/h | -7.40 km/h | |
| 103 km/h | -8.10 km/h | |
| 102.8 km/h | -8.30 km/h | |
| 102.4 km/h | -8.70 km/h | |
| 102.3 km/h | -8.80 km/h | |
| 101.2 km/h | -9.90 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
100.4 km/h | -10.70 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 9.6% (10.7 Km/H).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 4.12 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.97 m/sec2 | -0.15 m/sec2 | |
| 3.93 m/sec2 | -0.19 m/sec2 | |
| 3.88 m/sec2 | -0.24 m/sec2 | |
| 3.87 m/sec2 | -0.25 m/sec2 | |
| 3.83 m/sec2 | -0.29 m/sec2 | |
| 3.8 m/sec2 | -0.32 m/sec2 | |
| 3.77 m/sec2 | -0.35 m/sec2 | |
| 3.73 m/sec2 | -0.39 m/sec2 | |
| 3.68 m/sec2 | -0.44 m/sec2 | |
| 3.63 m/sec2 | -0.49 m/sec2 | |
| 3.63 m/sec2 | -0.49 m/sec2 | |
| 3.58 m/sec2 | -0.54 m/sec2 | |
| 3.54 m/sec2 | -0.58 m/sec2 | |
| 3.53 m/sec2 | -0.59 m/sec2 | |
| 3.51 m/sec2 | -0.61 m/sec2 | |
| 3.38 m/sec2 | -0.74 m/sec2 | |
| 3.33 m/sec2 | -0.79 m/sec2 | |
| 3.23 m/sec2 | -0.89 m/sec2 | |
| 3.19 m/sec2 | -0.93 m/sec2 | |
RefReference Budget |
3.04 m/sec2 | -1.08 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 26.2% (1.08 m/sec2).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 71.9 dB | Best | |
| 72 dB | +0.10 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 72.3 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 73 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 73 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 73.1 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 73.2 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 73.2 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 73.2 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 73.6 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 73.6 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 73.7 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 73.8 dB | +1.90 dB | |
RefReference Budget |
73.9 dB | +2.00 dB |
| 74 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 75.3 dB | +3.40 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 4.7% (3.4 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 63,200 KM | Best | |
| 55,600 KM | -7,600 KM | |
| 51,600 KM | -11,600 KM | |
| 44,800 KM | -18,400 KM | |
| 43,600 KM | -19,600 KM | |
| 41,600 KM | -21,600 KM | |
| 40,400 KM | -22,800 KM | |
| 40,400 KM | -22,800 KM | |
| 40,400 KM | -22,800 KM | |
| 39,200 KM | -24,000 KM | |
| 38,800 KM | -24,400 KM | |
| 38,800 KM | -24,400 KM | |
| 35,200 KM | -28,000 KM | |
| 34,400 KM | -28,800 KM | |
| 33,600 KM | -29,600 KM | |
| 33,600 KM | -29,600 KM | |
| 32,800 KM | -30,400 KM | |
| 32,800 KM | -30,400 KM | |
| 32,000 KM | -31,200 KM | |
| 27,600 KM | -35,600 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 56.3% (35,600 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 km |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.7 Price/1000 | Best | €13.07 | |
| 10.97 Price/1000 | +2.27 Price/1000 | €16.01 | |
| 11.38 Price/1000 | +2.68 Price/1000 | €18.43 | |
| 11.47 Price/1000 | +2.77 Price/1000 | €17.68 | |
| 11.92 Price/1000 | +3.22 Price/1000 | €20.36 | |
| 11.93 Price/1000 | +3.23 Price/1000 | €15.46 | |
| 12.11 Price/1000 | +3.41 Price/1000 | €17.06 | |
| 12.37 Price/1000 | +3.67 Price/1000 | €17.62 | |
| 12.5 Price/1000 | +3.80 Price/1000 | €18.71 | |
| 12.5 Price/1000 | +3.80 Price/1000 | €17.31 | |
| 12.65 Price/1000 | +3.95 Price/1000 | €20.88 | |
| 12.75 Price/1000 | +4.05 Price/1000 | €18.33 | |
| 13.82 Price/1000 | +5.12 Price/1000 | €20.39 | |
| 14.49 Price/1000 | +5.79 Price/1000 | €21.95 | |
| 15.06 Price/1000 | +6.36 Price/1000 | €20.60 | |
| 15.47 Price/1000 | +6.77 Price/1000 | €17.20 | |
| 15.78 Price/1000 | +7.08 Price/1000 | €22.26 | |
| 16.07 Price/1000 | +7.37 Price/1000 | €28.74 | |
| 16.62 Price/1000 | +7.92 Price/1000 | €22.93 | |
| 19.51 Price/1000 | +10.81 Price/1000 | €26.09 |
The difference between best and worst was 124.3% (10.81 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6) works out €627 cheaper than the most expensive (Yokohama Advan Sport V107).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2023 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.13 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.65 kg/t | +0.52 kg/t | £32 | |
| 8.01 kg/t | +0.88 kg/t | £54 | |
| 8.01 kg/t | +0.88 kg/t | £54 | |
| 8.06 kg/t | +0.93 kg/t | £57 | |
| 8.09 kg/t | +0.96 kg/t | £59 | |
| 8.09 kg/t | +0.96 kg/t | £59 | |
| 8.1 kg/t | +0.97 kg/t | £60 | |
| 8.17 kg/t | +1.04 kg/t | £64 | |
| 8.26 kg/t | +1.13 kg/t | £70 | |
| 8.29 kg/t | +1.16 kg/t | £72 | |
| 8.32 kg/t | +1.19 kg/t | £74 | |
| 8.33 kg/t | +1.20 kg/t | £74 | |
| 8.34 kg/t | +1.21 kg/t | £75 | |
RefReference Budget |
8.41 kg/t | +1.28 kg/t | £79 |
| 8.41 kg/t | +1.28 kg/t | £79 | |
| 8.45 kg/t | +1.32 kg/t | £82 | |
| 8.46 kg/t | +1.33 kg/t | £82 | |
| 8.61 kg/t | +1.48 kg/t | £91 | |
| 8.79 kg/t | +1.66 kg/t | £103 | |
| 8.86 kg/t | +1.73 kg/t | £107 | |
| 9.99 kg/t | +2.86 kg/t | £177 |
The difference between best and worst was 40.1% (2.86 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 uses about 122 L (£177) more fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview
225/45 R1848 tyres tested
20 of these 20 tyres tested again
2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout
225/40 R1852 tyres tested
15 of these 20 tyres tested again
2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?
245/45 R1950 tyres tested
12 of these 20 tyres tested again

