Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/45 R18
Tyres tested
20
Disciplines
10

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
33.2 m Best 0 km/h
33.3 m +0.10 m 7 km/h
33.5 m +0.30 m 12 km/h
33.7 m +0.50 m 16 km/h
33.7 m +0.50 m 16 km/h
34 m +0.80 m 20 km/h
34.1 m +0.90 m 21 km/h
34.1 m +0.90 m 21 km/h
34.1 m +0.90 m 21 km/h
34.3 m +1.10 m 23 km/h
34.4 m +1.20 m 24 km/h
34.6 m +1.40 m 26 km/h
34.8 m +1.60 m 28 km/h
34.9 m +1.70 m 29 km/h
35.1 m +1.90 m 30 km/h
35.7 m +2.50 m 34 km/h
35.8 m +2.60 m 35 km/h
35.9 m +2.70 m 36 km/h
35.9 m +2.70 m 36 km/h
37.3 m +4.10 m 43 km/h
RefReference Budget
40.1 m +6.90 m 54 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 20.8% (6.9 m ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Uniroyal RainSport 5 would still be travelling at 43 km/h when the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
121.3 km/h Best
120.9 km/h -0.40 km/h
120.3 km/h -1.00 km/h
120.1 km/h -1.20 km/h
119.4 km/h -1.90 km/h
119.2 km/h -2.10 km/h
119.1 km/h -2.20 km/h
118.7 km/h -2.60 km/h
118.4 km/h -2.90 km/h
118.4 km/h -2.90 km/h
118.2 km/h -3.10 km/h
118.1 km/h -3.20 km/h
117.8 km/h -3.50 km/h
117.4 km/h -3.90 km/h
117.2 km/h -4.10 km/h
117.1 km/h -4.20 km/h
116.8 km/h -4.50 km/h
116.8 km/h -4.50 km/h
116.7 km/h -4.60 km/h
115.5 km/h -5.80 km/h
RefReference Budget
113.4 km/h -7.90 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 6.5% (7.9 Km/H).

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
38.7 m Best 0 km/h
38.9 m +0.20 m 9 km/h
39.5 m +0.80 m 19 km/h
39.7 m +1.00 m 21 km/h
39.7 m +1.00 m 21 km/h
40.3 m +1.60 m 26 km/h
40.6 m +1.90 m 28 km/h
41.4 m +2.70 m 33 km/h
41.6 m +2.90 m 34 km/h
41.7 m +3.00 m 35 km/h
42 m +3.30 m 36 km/h
42.2 m +3.50 m 37 km/h
42.2 m +3.50 m 37 km/h
42.5 m +3.80 m 39 km/h
42.8 m +4.10 m 40 km/h
42.8 m +4.10 m 40 km/h
43.1 m +4.40 m 42 km/h
43.7 m +5.00 m 44 km/h
43.9 m +5.20 m 45 km/h
45.3 m +6.60 m 50 km/h
RefReference Budget
62.3 m +23.60 m 80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 61% (23.6 m ≈ 5.2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Fulda SportControl 2 would still be travelling at 50 km/h when the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
77.2 km/h Best
76.7 km/h -0.50 km/h
76.3 km/h -0.90 km/h
75.7 km/h -1.50 km/h
75.5 km/h -1.70 km/h
75.5 km/h -1.70 km/h
75 km/h -2.20 km/h
74.6 km/h -2.60 km/h
74.4 km/h -2.80 km/h
74.3 km/h -2.90 km/h
73.9 km/h -3.30 km/h
73.9 km/h -3.30 km/h
73.8 km/h -3.40 km/h
73.8 km/h -3.40 km/h
73.7 km/h -3.50 km/h
73.5 km/h -3.70 km/h
73.5 km/h -3.70 km/h
73.4 km/h -3.80 km/h
73.1 km/h -4.10 km/h
72.2 km/h -5.00 km/h
21
65 km/h -12.20 km/h
RefReference Budget
65 km/h -12.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 15.8% (12.2 Km/H).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
111.1 km/h Best
108.5 km/h -2.60 km/h
107.2 km/h -3.90 km/h
106.3 km/h -4.80 km/h
105.7 km/h -5.40 km/h
105.7 km/h -5.40 km/h
105.4 km/h -5.70 km/h
104.5 km/h -6.60 km/h
104.4 km/h -6.70 km/h
104.3 km/h -6.80 km/h
104.1 km/h -7.00 km/h
104 km/h -7.10 km/h
103.9 km/h -7.20 km/h
103.9 km/h -7.20 km/h
103.7 km/h -7.40 km/h
103 km/h -8.10 km/h
102.8 km/h -8.30 km/h
102.4 km/h -8.70 km/h
102.3 km/h -8.80 km/h
101.2 km/h -9.90 km/h
RefReference Budget
100.4 km/h -10.70 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 9.6% (10.7 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
4.12 m/sec2 Best
3.97 m/sec2 -0.15 m/sec2
3.93 m/sec2 -0.19 m/sec2
3.88 m/sec2 -0.24 m/sec2
3.87 m/sec2 -0.25 m/sec2
3.83 m/sec2 -0.29 m/sec2
3.8 m/sec2 -0.32 m/sec2
3.77 m/sec2 -0.35 m/sec2
3.73 m/sec2 -0.39 m/sec2
3.68 m/sec2 -0.44 m/sec2
3.63 m/sec2 -0.49 m/sec2
3.63 m/sec2 -0.49 m/sec2
3.58 m/sec2 -0.54 m/sec2
3.54 m/sec2 -0.58 m/sec2
3.53 m/sec2 -0.59 m/sec2
3.51 m/sec2 -0.61 m/sec2
3.38 m/sec2 -0.74 m/sec2
3.33 m/sec2 -0.79 m/sec2
3.23 m/sec2 -0.89 m/sec2
3.19 m/sec2 -0.93 m/sec2
RefReference Budget
3.04 m/sec2 -1.08 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 26.2% (1.08 m/sec2).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
71.9 dB Best
72 dB +0.10 dB
72.1 dB +0.20 dB
72.2 dB +0.30 dB
72.3 dB +0.40 dB
72.4 dB +0.50 dB
72.9 dB +1.00 dB
72.9 dB +1.00 dB
73 dB +1.10 dB
73 dB +1.10 dB
73.1 dB +1.20 dB
73.2 dB +1.30 dB
73.2 dB +1.30 dB
73.2 dB +1.30 dB
73.6 dB +1.70 dB
73.6 dB +1.70 dB
73.7 dB +1.80 dB
73.8 dB +1.90 dB
RefReference Budget
73.9 dB +2.00 dB
74 dB +2.10 dB
75.3 dB +3.40 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.7% (3.4 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
63,200 KM Best
55,600 KM -7,600 KM
51,600 KM -11,600 KM
44,800 KM -18,400 KM
43,600 KM -19,600 KM
41,600 KM -21,600 KM
40,400 KM -22,800 KM
40,400 KM -22,800 KM
40,400 KM -22,800 KM
39,200 KM -24,000 KM
38,800 KM -24,400 KM
38,800 KM -24,400 KM
35,200 KM -28,000 KM
34,400 KM -28,800 KM
33,600 KM -29,600 KM
33,600 KM -29,600 KM
32,800 KM -30,400 KM
32,800 KM -30,400 KM
32,000 KM -31,200 KM
27,600 KM -35,600 KM

The difference between best and worst was 56.3% (35,600 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
8.7 Price/1000 Best €13.07
10.97 Price/1000 +2.27 Price/1000 €16.01
11.38 Price/1000 +2.68 Price/1000 €18.43
11.47 Price/1000 +2.77 Price/1000 €17.68
11.92 Price/1000 +3.22 Price/1000 €20.36
11.93 Price/1000 +3.23 Price/1000 €15.46
12.11 Price/1000 +3.41 Price/1000 €17.06
12.37 Price/1000 +3.67 Price/1000 €17.62
12.5 Price/1000 +3.80 Price/1000 €18.71
12.5 Price/1000 +3.80 Price/1000 €17.31
12.65 Price/1000 +3.95 Price/1000 €20.88
12.75 Price/1000 +4.05 Price/1000 €18.33
13.82 Price/1000 +5.12 Price/1000 €20.39
14.49 Price/1000 +5.79 Price/1000 €21.95
15.06 Price/1000 +6.36 Price/1000 €20.60
15.47 Price/1000 +6.77 Price/1000 €17.20
15.78 Price/1000 +7.08 Price/1000 €22.26
16.07 Price/1000 +7.37 Price/1000 €28.74
16.62 Price/1000 +7.92 Price/1000 €22.93
19.51 Price/1000 +10.81 Price/1000 €26.09

The difference between best and worst was 124.3% (10.81 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6) works out €627 cheaper than the most expensive (Yokohama Advan Sport V107).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2023 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.13 kg/t Best £0
7.65 kg/t +0.52 kg/t £32
8.01 kg/t +0.88 kg/t £54
8.01 kg/t +0.88 kg/t £54
8.06 kg/t +0.93 kg/t £57
8.09 kg/t +0.96 kg/t £59
8.09 kg/t +0.96 kg/t £59
8.1 kg/t +0.97 kg/t £60
8.17 kg/t +1.04 kg/t £64
8.26 kg/t +1.13 kg/t £70
8.29 kg/t +1.16 kg/t £72
8.32 kg/t +1.19 kg/t £74
8.33 kg/t +1.20 kg/t £74
8.34 kg/t +1.21 kg/t £75
RefReference Budget
8.41 kg/t +1.28 kg/t £79
15
8.41 kg/t +1.28 kg/t £79
8.45 kg/t +1.32 kg/t £82
8.46 kg/t +1.33 kg/t £82
8.61 kg/t +1.48 kg/t £91
8.79 kg/t +1.66 kg/t £103
8.86 kg/t +1.73 kg/t £107
9.99 kg/t +2.86 kg/t £177

The difference between best and worst was 40.1% (2.86 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 uses about 122 L (£177) more fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.