Menu

Falken Azenis PT722

The Falken Azenis PT722 is a Ultra High Performance All Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.2
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
80%
Wet Grip
62%
Road Feedback
76%
Handling
78%
Wear
88%
Comfort
78%
Buy again
68%
10 Reviews
76% Average
136,852 miles driven
Falken Azenis PT722

Falken Azenis PT722

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
7.2 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 10
Avg Rating: 75.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 3.59
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Falken Azenis PT722

Questions and Answers for the Falken Azenis PT722

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Falken Azenis PT722. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Falken Azenis PT722 Reviews

Given 71% while driving a BMW X3 3.0dA (245/50 R18) on mostly town for 40,000 average miles
The most impressive of this falken tyre is the wear. They fitted on my X3 and run 60000+ km of town and city roads, still have 70% of tread. The 4 tyres wear are also even and not particular edge worn. I drive it mostly in the town and city, and a few time of long trips per year. The grip is fine in dry days, but you will be hesitated when you run on wet days. It is slippy when you turn at those round about. You can experience the drifting even climbing up the hill in the rain. Don't risk your life if you live in the hill districts. Lower the tyre preasure is my suggestion if you have to take it to the mountain or country roads. Its comfort and noise are at average level. Hence I will recommend this tyre for those drifting lover, rear wheel drive fans, but please do it in a safe and proper way. Otherwise, this distinctive tyre is an excellent choice for dry weather, long haul and heavy duty.
Ask a question | Helpful 708
May 21, 2025
Given 66% while driving a BMW X3 3.0dA (245/50 R18) on mostly town for 20,000 average miles
Very durable economic tyres. Comfortable but tough in dry days. Wet days can be dramma if you are not slowing down.
April 5, 2022
Given 94% while driving a Ford Fiesta (205/60 R14) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
I never thought these economical tyres could be such good in driving. My cay hugs the road in high speed and very quietly provide full information from road feedback. Cornering is a charm and traction is really manageable if one wants to spin in corners. Looks superb on car and very neat and clean design.

Tight budgeted should definitely give it a try..
September 18, 2017
Have you driven on the Falken Azenis PT722 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Falken Azenis PT722? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Falken Azenis PT722 >

Latest Falken Azenis PT722 Reviews

Given 80% while driving a Honda Accord (245/35 R20 W) on a combination of roads for 24,550 average miles
low noise and good comfort and good wear
after 15000 mile have alittle vibration but may come from damaged by attack to road pit
and wear pattern not smooth inside of rear wheel
compair with price is OK.
December 2, 2015
Given 64% while driving a Holden commodore (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 30,000 spirited miles
good road feel, acceptable dry grip but lacks progression.

grip in the wet uninspiring.

quiet and comfortable with exceptional life
December 4, 2014
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 61% while driving a Mitsubishi GTO Twin Turbo (275/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 4,000 spirited miles
Works well in the dry, though for track use, it does break traction quite suddenly.
Not recommended for fast driving in the wet or on damp roads, poor grip in the wet with zero warning of traction loss!
September 14, 2014
Given 44% while driving a Lexus IS250SE (255/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Have these tires on rear in Lexus IS250 Rear Wheel Drive
Extremely poor traction in DRY AND WET.
Tires spin in DRY, WITHOUT HEAVY ACCELERATION.
Tread fine, only 10,000km. Never again


July 24, 2014
Given 94% while driving a Acura 3.5 RL (245/50 R17 V) on mostly motorways for 2 average miles
this is a great tire im so impressed did not expect this level of performance at 80 90 100 mph there is no wobble just a smooth stable ride tires are very quiet, better than my michelin mx4 that came on the car and better than the toyo versados that i repleced the originals with i have never heared of a 30 day ride guarantee before but these will not be going back very very good in the raiin no hydroplaining this is the only tire i will buy now and the price much much cheaper than the michelins and versados. i was skeptical at first but im a true beleiver i waill put the falkens azenis pt722 up against anything out there regardless of price thanks faken this tire is a winner.
February 25, 2012
Given 99% while driving a Mercedes Benz E350 (245/45 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 300 average miles
500km with them. For now, first thoughts are that they're very stiff, silent and offer excellent grip in wet and dry.

Very satisfied for now. Will be back with more
April 14, 2011