Falken Azenis PT722

The Falken Azenis PT722 is a Ultra High Performance All Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

Tyre Reviews

Dry Grip 81%
Wet Grip 68%
Road Feedback 79%
Handling 79%
Wear 88%
Comfort 80%
Buy again 69%

Tyre review data from 8 tyre reviews averaging 78% over 76,852 miles driven.

The Azenis PT722 is ranked 11th of 16 All Season Ultra High Performance tyres.

    Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Falken Azenis PT722
Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Falken Azenis PT722
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Falken Azenis PT722. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Top 3 Falken Azenis PT722 Reviews

Given 61% while driving a Mitsubishi GTO Twin Turbo (275/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 4,000 spirited miles
Works well in the dry, though for track use, it does break traction quite suddenly.
Not recommended for fast driving in the wet or on damp roads, poor grip in the wet with zero warning of traction loss!
20 - tyre reviewed on September 14, 2014   
Given 94% while driving a Ford Fiesta (205/60 R14) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
I never thought these economical tyres could be such good in driving. My cay hugs the road in high speed and very quietly provide full information from road feedback. Cornering is a charm and traction is really manageable if one wants to spin in corners. Looks superb on car and very neat and clean design.

Tight budgeted should definitely give it a try..
6 - tyre reviewed on September 18, 2017   
Given 64% while driving a Holden commodore (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 30,000 spirited miles
good road feel, acceptable dry grip but lacks progression.

grip in the wet uninspiring.

quiet and comfortable with exceptional life
2 - tyre reviewed on December 4, 2014   
Have you driven on the Falken Azenis PT722 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Falken Azenis PT722? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Falken Azenis PT722 >

Latest Falken Azenis PT722 Reviews

Given 80% while driving a Honda Accord (245/35 R20 W) on a combination of roads for 24,550 average miles
low noise and good comfort and good wear
after 15000 mile have alittle vibration but may come from damaged by attack to road pit
and wear pattern not smooth inside of rear wheel
compair with price is OK.
1 - tyre reviewed on December 2, 2015   
Given 44% while driving a Lexus IS250SE (255/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Have these tires on rear in Lexus IS250 Rear Wheel Drive
Extremely poor traction in DRY AND WET.
Tires spin in DRY, WITHOUT HEAVY ACCELERATION.
Tread fine, only 10,000km. Never again


0 - tyre reviewed on July 25, 2014   
Want the best all season tyre? Click here!
Given 94% while driving a Acura 3.5 RL (245/50 R17 V) on mostly motorways for 2 average miles
this is a great tire im so impressed did not expect this level of performance at 80 90 100 mph there is no wobble just a smooth stable ride tires are very quiet, better than my michelin mx4 that came on the car and better than the toyo versados that i repleced the originals with i have never heared of a 30 day ride guarantee before but these will not be going back very very good in the raiin no hydroplaining this is the only tire i will buy now and the price much much cheaper than the michelins and versados. i was skeptical at first but im a true beleiver i waill put the falkens azenis pt722 up against anything out there regardless of price thanks faken this tire is a winner.
0 - tyre reviewed on February 25, 2012   
Given 99% while driving a Mercedes Benz E350 (245/45 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 300 average miles
500km with them. For now, first thoughts are that they're very stiff, silent and offer excellent grip in wet and dry.

Very satisfied for now. Will be back with more
0 - tyre reviewed on April 14, 2011