Menu

Falken Wildpeak A/T Trail

The Falken Wildpeak AT Trail is a All Terrain and Off Road All Season tyre designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

8.1
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
80%
Wet Grip
82%
Road Feedback
75%
Handling
75%
Wear
88%
Comfort
73%
Buy again
90%
Snow Grip
75%
Ice Grip
60%
6 Reviews
78% Average
101,600 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 1st)
Falken Wildpeak AT Trail

Falken Wildpeak AT Trail

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
8.1 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Snow
100
1.38x / 3 tests
Value
71.9
0.42x / 1 test
Comfort
70
0.32x / 2 tests
Wet
40
1.93x / 2 tests
Dry
40
1.5x / 2 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
100
1 test
Braking
61.7
3 tests
Handling
59
3 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2023
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 77.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.13
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
Goodyear Eagle F1 vs Falken Azenis FK460 vs Wildpeak AT Trail Tyre Reviews 2023 255/40 R20 1/3 10 metrics
1
Tests
1st
Average
1st
Best
1st
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
215/65R16 102 H XL D D 72
17 inch
225/65R17 106 H XL D D 72
215/65R17 99 H D D 72
18 inch
255/55R18 109 V XL D D 73
235/60R18 107 H XL D D 71
235/55R18 100 V XL D D 72
19 inch
255/55R19 111 V XL D D 73
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Falken Wildpeak AT Trail >>

Questions and Answers for the Falken Wildpeak AT Trail

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Falken Wildpeak AT Trail. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Falken Wildpeak AT Trail Reviews

Given 68% while driving a Honda CRV (235/55 R19) on mostly motorways for 1,000 average miles
Great tires, would recommend.
December 18, 2024
Given 80% while driving a Toyota RAV4 (235/60 R18) on mostly town for 600 easy going miles
I bought these tyres +10mm in width than for the standard RAV4 hybrid for a bargain (235/60R18 where stock is 225/60R18). I've always wanted AT tyres for the looks and for the occasional offroading but honestly more for looks and durability. I've read and seen so many positive views so it was a no brainer.

Performance in the wet was as good as any regular tyre. I hadn't pushed it much but the car didn't feel skittish or unsettled even when the tyre store pumped in 42psi when I left the store.

Road noise is to be expected over a passenger style tyre. Being a RAV4 hybrid, with no engine running, you'll hear a bit of the tyre roar more than a passenger tyre. Don't believe anyone that says it's as quiet but at the same time, it's not noisy at all and you've got to be listening for the roar to notice it. Put it this way, the family travelling in it hasn't noticed.

What I was surprised by was the roughly 6.x mm of legal tread measured in multple areas (ranged from 6.1mm to 6.5mm). I was expecting a bit more tread any even with the 680 A A UTQG, I'm not sure how long this will last but hopefully it proves me wrong.

Also I was surprised by the weight of the tyre. Sure it's more but I did notice the acceleration performance dull slightly but it's an AT tyre and to be expected and I went up in size. Fuel consumption has so far taken me to 5.8L/100km on the freeway. Perhaps +0.2-0.3L/100km.

Would I do it again, at the AUD$205 each, yes every time when the G015 and Open Country AT3 was A$260-280 each.
October 12, 2024
Given 85% while driving a Ford Escape (235/50 R18) on a combination of roads for 25,000 easy going miles
The Falken AT Trail's offer a better ride and driving experience than the OEM Continentals. Only minimal loss of fuel economy and not discernible increase in road noise. They really come into their own on gravel roads, but also perform excellently on tarmac.
November 20, 2024

How would you rate the Falken Wildpeak AT Trail?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Falken Wildpeak AT Trail Reviews

Given 78% while driving a Subaru XV Crosstrek (235/60 R17) on a combination of roads for 35,000 average miles
The grip on these tires has over the past four years and 35k has been consistent and reassuring. They have never felt excessively loose in standing water, or made me lose confidence in the rain. They can follow grooves in the road more than I like, but I'm not sure it's not a character of the vehicle. For an all terrain they are reasonably quiet on the road with decent manners. They certainly don't hookup on asphalt like a quality highway tire, but they are so much more stable off road.
December 7, 2025
Given 83% while driving a Ford Kuga (235/50 R18) on mostly motorways for 20,000 average miles
A great SUV tyre for predominately on-road driving with the occasional off-road excursions. Handles well on gravel and rocky snow field access roads. Overall a quite and well composed ride across all types of terrain, so lives up to its AT name well.
April 3, 2024
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 79% while driving a Ford Escape (235/50 R18) on for 20,000 miles
A great crossover tyre at an affordable price. Mostly highway driving with some gravel back roads and a little beach/ sand driving. Only minimal wear after 23,000 km. No discernible difference in road noise and only slight drop in economy. Car performing much better than stock Continentals it came with.
January 25, 2024
Rate the Falken Wildpeak AT Trail