Menu
Silverstone Atlantis V7 View Gallery (1)

Silverstone Atlantis V7

Silverstone Tyres High Performance Summer

The Silverstone Atlantis V7 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.2
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
70%
Wet Grip
42%
Road Feedback
53%
Handling
50%
Wear
66%
Comfort
52%
Buy again
27%
6 Reviews
51% Average
78,100 miles driven
Silverstone Atlantis V7

Silverstone Atlantis V7

Summer Economy
BETA
6.2 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 51.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.13
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Silverstone Atlantis V7

Questions and Answers for the Silverstone Atlantis V7

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Silverstone Atlantis V7. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Silverstone Atlantis V7 Reviews

Given 53% while driving a Subaru Forester (225/55 R17) on mostly country roads for 40,000 average miles
The dry grip is decent and presents no problem at all. The wet grip is so dangerous. The braking on wet roads is long and the ABS cannot compensate. The handling on wet roads is precarious and leads you to not go more than 40 km/h on turns and down hills. Dangerous car on wet. On snow : 0 The wear rate was excellent. After more than 60'000 km they are good and little wear. Will not buy again surely.
Helpful 657
November 23, 2021
Given 41% while driving a Subaru Forester (225/55 R17) on a combination of roads for 20,000 easy going miles
Tires fitted for 20000 miles. Since I bought them they are very bad. Didn't change because of price and inflation rates. Average tire on dry surface. Very dangerous on wet. Worst handling on wet. Aquaplaning + I won't recommend to any.
Helpful 685
February 19, 2021
Given 47% while driving a Honda City (195/55 R15) on mostly town for 0 average miles
NOISY!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not recommended at all. I bought it cheap but it is super noisy and annoying, even it is new.
Other than that overall is an OK tyre, might good for spare.
Helpful 795
November 6, 2018

How would you rate the Silverstone Atlantis V7?

Click a star to start your review

211 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Silverstone Atlantis V7 Reviews

Given 50% while driving a Daihatsu Perodua Myvi (195/55 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
Been using these tyres for a year and clocked close to 25,000km. It's a disappointing tyre for the price i paid and could have gotten the CC6 by adding a few RM. I think the durability is good, but the grip in wet road is not there especially when going above 90km/h. The noise control claimed by them, i felt it's not true. It's noisy and i compared it to my previous CC5. II recently rotated the tyre and found out that the rear is not even and had to stick to current set. It's really frustrating to have these tyres and can't wait for next weeks tyre change.
Helpful 727
July 20, 2018
Given 58% while driving a Mazda 3 2014 (225/40 R18) on mostly motorways for 3,000 average miles
Comparison made with my previous tyre, toyo proxes t1 sport, and my place having raining almost everyday. Dry grip is good, no complaint about it. But the grip in wet is worse, can feel aquaplanning when speed above 90-100km/h. I had one episode of skidding at 90km/h while at midcorner, which i didnt have any similar episode with my previous tyre. Noise is better controlled compared with toyo. Unable to comment about wear. Pricewise is good, just that i usually drive above 150km/h, and i need better grip and feel in both dry and wet.
Helpful 524
September 22, 2017
Rate the Silverstone Atlantis V7