Menu

2020 Retread Summer Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
3 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Dry
  3. Wet
  4. Environment
  5. Results
  6. Continental Premium Contact 6
  7. Debica Presto HP
  8. King Meiler HPZ

Test Publication:
195/65 R16 3 tyres 4 categories
Test Size: 195/65 R16
Tyres Tested: 3 tyres
Test Categories:
4 categories (9 tests)
Similar Tests
Here at Tyre Reviews, we receive many different questions about tyres, but one question that comes up more than most asks if modern retreaded tyres, sometimes called "retread" or "remoulds", any good?

While we've not been able to test ourselves, tests from many years ago indicate that retreaded tyres don't perform as well as even a budget tyre. Car tyres typically aren't designed to be retreaded (commercial bus and lorry tyres are), so the retreading process can leave you with not only poor performance, but a product that could be classified as unsafe.

Naturally in the past few years there have been improvements in the car retreading process, and one brand in particular, King Meiler, has established a name for itself as "the" retreading brand.

To find out whether a modern retread can match a premium, or even a budget tyre, the Polish magazine "Motor" have tested the King Meiler HPZ against the premium Continental PremiumContact 6, and a much cheaper Debica Presto HP.

The results speak for themselves.

Dry

It's been a while since we've seen such huge differences in the dry between a premium tyre and a brand like Debica, which indicates that this version of the Presto HP certainly isn't the grippiest tyre on test, so for the retreaded tyre to be so far behind in both dry braking and dry handling, indicates a serious lack of grip!

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
  1. Continental Premium Contact 6
    35.50 M
  2. Debica Presto HP
    39.20 M
  3. King Meiler HPZ
    42.50 M

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Continental Premium Contact 6
    52.60 s
  2. Debica Presto HP
    53.30 s
  3. King Meiler HPZ
    55.00 s

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)
  1. Continental Premium Contact 6
    7.40 Points
  2. Debica Presto HP
    5.40 Points
  3. King Meiler HPZ
    4.50 Points

Wet

Wet was a similar story to dry, except with larger margins. While the Debica stopped the car a pretty sizable 6.3 meters after the premium Continental, the King Meiler took a HUGE extra 24.3 meters to stop the car, again from 100 km/h.  This means, where the car on the Debica stops, the car fitted with the King-Meiler tyres will still be doing more than 48 km/h!

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
  1. Continental Premium Contact 6
    51.80 M
  2. Debica Presto HP
    58.10 M
  3. King Meiler HPZ
    76.10 M

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Continental Premium Contact 6
    86.70 s
  2. Debica Presto HP
    92.00 s
  3. King Meiler HPZ
    100.50 s

The retread tyre also performed poorly in straight aquaplaning.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
  1. Debica Presto HP
    82.30 Km/H
  2. Continental Premium Contact 6
    82.10 Km/H
  3. King Meiler HPZ
    71.10 Km/H

Environment

With the retreaded tyre both noiser, and less comfortable than the premium and budget tyres, its only positive quality was price. However, with the longevity of the tyre untested, is a 100 euro saving really worth all the negative qualities?

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)
  1. Continental Premium Contact 6
    7.50 Points
  2. Debica Presto HP
    6.50 Points
  3. King Meiler HPZ
    6.00 Points

Noise

External noise in dB (Lower is better)
  1. Debica Presto HP
    63.30 dB
  2. Continental Premium Contact 6
    64.40 dB
  3. King Meiler HPZ
    64.70 dB

Price

Price in local currency (Lower is better)
  1. King Meiler HPZ
    129.72
  2. Debica Presto HP
    175.28
  3. Continental Premium Contact 6
    228.76

Results

Continental Premium Contact 6
  • 3PMSF: no
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 1st 35.5 M 100%
Dry Handling 1st 52.6 s 100%
Subj. Dry Handling 1st 7.4 Points 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 1st 51.8 M 100%
Wet Handling 1st 86.7 s 100%
Straight Aqua 2nd 82.1 Km/H 82.3 Km/H -0.2 Km/H 99.76%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 1st 7.5 Points 100%
Noise 2nd 64.4 dB 63.3 dB +1.1 dB 98.29%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Price 3rd 228.76 129.72 +99.04 56.71%
2nd

Debica Presto HP

195/65 R16
Debica Presto HP
  • 3PMSF: no
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 2nd 39.2 M 35.5 M +3.7 M 90.56%
Dry Handling 2nd 53.3 s 52.6 s +0.7 s 98.69%
Subj. Dry Handling 2nd 5.4 Points 7.4 Points -2 Points 72.97%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 2nd 58.1 M 51.8 M +6.3 M 89.16%
Wet Handling 2nd 92 s 86.7 s +5.3 s 94.24%
Straight Aqua 1st 82.3 Km/H 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 2nd 6.5 Points 7.5 Points -1 Points 86.67%
Noise 1st 63.3 dB 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Price 2nd 175.28 129.72 +45.56 74.01%
3rd

King Meiler HPZ

195/65 R16
King Meiler HPZ
  • 3PMSF: no
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 3rd 42.5 M 35.5 M +7 M 83.53%
Dry Handling 3rd 55 s 52.6 s +2.4 s 95.64%
Subj. Dry Handling 3rd 4.5 Points 7.4 Points -2.9 Points 60.81%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 3rd 76.1 M 51.8 M +24.3 M 68.07%
Wet Handling 3rd 100.5 s 86.7 s +13.8 s 86.27%
Straight Aqua 3rd 71.1 Km/H 82.3 Km/H -11.2 Km/H 86.39%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 3rd 6 Points 7.5 Points -1.5 Points 80%
Noise 3rd 64.7 dB 63.3 dB +1.4 dB 97.84%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Price 1st 129.72 100%

comments powered by Disqus