Test Charts / Auto Bild
2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 195/65 R15
- Tyres tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 9
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 34.5 m | Best | |
| 35.2 m | +0.70 m | |
| 35.6 m | +1.10 m | |
| 35.7 m | +1.20 m | |
| 36 m | +1.50 m | |
| 36.2 m | +1.70 m | |
| 36.4 m | +1.90 m | |
| 36.7 m | +2.20 m | |
| 37 m | +2.50 m | |
| 37 m | +2.50 m | |
| 37.5 m | +3.00 m | |
| 37.5 m | +3.00 m | |
| 37.5 m | +3.00 m | |
| 37.7 m | +3.20 m | |
| 37.9 m | +3.40 m | |
| 38.1 m | +3.60 m | |
17Avon ZV7 |
38.3 m | +3.80 m |
| 38.3 m | +3.80 m | |
| 38.7 m | +4.20 m | |
| 39.2 m | +4.70 m |
The difference between best and worst was 13.6% (4.7 m ≈ 1 Car Lengths).
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 115.1 km/h | Best | |
| 115 km/h | -0.10 km/h | |
| 113.5 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 113.4 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 113.3 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 113.2 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 113.1 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 113 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 112.9 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 112.7 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 112.7 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 112.6 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 112.3 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 112.3 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 112 km/h | -3.10 km/h | |
| 111.9 km/h | -3.20 km/h | |
| 111.6 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
18Avon ZV7 |
111.4 km/h | -3.70 km/h |
| 111.3 km/h | -3.80 km/h | |
| 111 km/h | -4.10 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 3.6% (4.1 Km/H).
Wet
3Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 34.3 m | Best | |
| 34.5 m | +0.20 m | |
| 35.2 m | +0.90 m | |
| 35.9 m | +1.60 m | |
| 36 m | +1.70 m | |
| 36 m | +1.70 m | |
| 36.5 m | +2.20 m | |
| 37 m | +2.70 m | |
| 37 m | +2.70 m | |
| 37.3 m | +3.00 m | |
| 37.5 m | +3.20 m | |
| 37.6 m | +3.30 m | |
| 37.7 m | +3.40 m | |
| 38 m | +3.70 m | |
| 38.1 m | +3.80 m | |
16Avon ZV7 |
38.2 m | +3.90 m |
| 38.7 m | +4.40 m | |
| 39.1 m | +4.80 m | |
| 39.2 m | +4.90 m | |
| 39.6 m | +5.30 m |
The difference between best and worst was 15.5% (5.3 m ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 77.6 km/h | Best | |
| 77 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 76.2 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 76.1 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 75.8 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 75.6 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 75.6 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 75.4 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 75.1 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 75.1 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 74.7 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
12Avon ZV7 |
74.5 km/h | -3.10 km/h |
| 74.4 km/h | -3.20 km/h | |
| 74.2 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
| 74.2 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
| 74 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 73.7 km/h | -3.90 km/h | |
| 73.6 km/h | -4.00 km/h | |
| 73.6 km/h | -4.00 km/h | |
| 73.3 km/h | -4.30 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (4.3 Km/H).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 90.1 km/h | Best | |
| 87.3 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 87.3 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 86.8 km/h | -3.30 km/h | |
| 86.7 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
| 86.4 km/h | -3.70 km/h | |
| 86.1 km/h | -4.00 km/h | |
| 85.6 km/h | -4.50 km/h | |
| 85.5 km/h | -4.60 km/h | |
| 85.4 km/h | -4.70 km/h | |
| 85.1 km/h | -5.00 km/h | |
| 84.7 km/h | -5.40 km/h | |
| 84.3 km/h | -5.80 km/h | |
| 83.8 km/h | -6.30 km/h | |
| 83.5 km/h | -6.60 km/h | |
| 83.2 km/h | -6.90 km/h | |
| 82.8 km/h | -7.30 km/h | |
| 82.3 km/h | -7.80 km/h | |
| 82.2 km/h | -7.90 km/h | |
| 81.2 km/h | -8.90 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 9.9% (8.9 Km/H).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 71.7 dB | Best | |
| 72 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 72.3 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 72.6 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 72.6 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 73 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 73.3 dB | +1.60 dB | |
13Avon ZV7 |
73.4 dB | +1.70 dB |
| 73.5 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 73.6 dB | +1.90 dB | |
| 73.7 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 73.8 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 73.9 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 74.1 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 76.1 dB | +4.40 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 6.1% (4.4 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 49,920 KM | Best | |
| 47,580 KM | -2,340 KM | |
| 45,240 KM | -4,680 KM | |
| 44,460 KM | -5,460 KM | |
| 42,510 KM | -7,410 KM | |
| 42,120 KM | -7,800 KM | |
| 41,340 KM | -8,580 KM | |
| 41,340 KM | -8,580 KM | |
| 39,000 KM | -10,920 KM | |
| 38,610 KM | -11,310 KM | |
| 38,220 KM | -11,700 KM | |
| 38,220 KM | -11,700 KM | |
| 37,440 KM | -12,480 KM | |
| 35,880 KM | -14,040 KM | |
| 35,100 KM | -14,820 KM | |
| 34,710 KM | -15,210 KM | |
| 34,710 KM | -15,210 KM | |
16Avon ZV7 |
34,710 KM | -15,210 KM |
| 31,980 KM | -17,940 KM | |
| 27,300 KM | -22,620 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 45.3% (22,620 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 km |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.91 Price/1000 | Best | €13.57 | |
| 4.84 Price/1000 | +0.93 Price/1000 | €11.04 | |
| 5.02 Price/1000 | +1.11 Price/1000 | €12.97 | |
| 5.19 Price/1000 | +1.28 Price/1000 | €12.79 | |
| 5.23 Price/1000 | +1.32 Price/1000 | €15.24 | |
| 5.29 Price/1000 | +1.38 Price/1000 | €13.20 | |
| 5.38 Price/1000 | +1.47 Price/1000 | €7.18 | |
| 5.4 Price/1000 | +1.49 Price/1000 | €16.51 | |
| 5.44 Price/1000 | +1.53 Price/1000 | €15.35 | |
| 5.57 Price/1000 | +1.66 Price/1000 | €14.15 | |
| 5.67 Price/1000 | +1.76 Price/1000 | €10.72 | |
| 5.74 Price/1000 | +1.83 Price/1000 | €14.30 | |
| 6.17 Price/1000 | +2.26 Price/1000 | €11.33 | |
| 6.19 Price/1000 | +2.28 Price/1000 | €21.41 | |
| 6.54 Price/1000 | +2.63 Price/1000 | €16.12 | |
| 6.72 Price/1000 | +2.81 Price/1000 | €14.49 | |
| 6.77 Price/1000 | +2.86 Price/1000 | €14.49 | |
18Avon ZV7 |
6.91 Price/1000 | +3.00 Price/1000 | €20.04 |
| 6.98 Price/1000 | +3.07 Price/1000 | €13.87 | |
| 7.14 Price/1000 | +3.23 Price/1000 | €15.46 |
The difference between best and worst was 82.6% (3.23 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Giti GitiSynergy E1) works out €569 cheaper than the most expensive (Cooper Zeon CS8).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2018 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.2 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.02 kg/t | +0.82 kg/t | £58 | |
| 7.04 kg/t | +0.84 kg/t | £60 | |
| 7.26 kg/t | +1.06 kg/t | £75 | |
| 7.35 kg/t | +1.15 kg/t | £82 | |
| 7.51 kg/t | +1.31 kg/t | £93 | |
| 7.54 kg/t | +1.34 kg/t | £95 | |
| 7.55 kg/t | +1.35 kg/t | £96 | |
| 7.61 kg/t | +1.41 kg/t | £100 | |
| 7.62 kg/t | +1.42 kg/t | £101 | |
| 7.67 kg/t | +1.47 kg/t | £105 | |
| 7.77 kg/t | +1.57 kg/t | £112 | |
| 7.79 kg/t | +1.59 kg/t | £113 | |
| 8.02 kg/t | +1.82 kg/t | £129 | |
| 8.12 kg/t | +1.92 kg/t | £137 | |
| 8.13 kg/t | +1.93 kg/t | £137 | |
| 8.14 kg/t | +1.94 kg/t | £138 | |
| 8.44 kg/t | +2.24 kg/t | £159 | |
19Avon ZV7 |
8.81 kg/t | +2.61 kg/t | £186 |
| 9.3 kg/t | +3.10 kg/t | £220 |
The difference between best and worst was 50% (3.1 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Cooper Zeon CS8 uses about 152 L (£220) more fuel than the Giti GitiSynergy E1.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview
195/65 R1547 tyres tested
19 of these 20 tyres tested again
2016 Market Overview - Braking Test
205/55 R1650 tyres tested
9 of these 20 tyres tested again
2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test
205/55 R1653 tyres tested
8 of these 20 tyres tested again

