Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
195/65 R15
Tyres tested
20
Disciplines
9

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
34.5 m Best
35.2 m +0.70 m
35.6 m +1.10 m
35.7 m +1.20 m
36 m +1.50 m
36.2 m +1.70 m
36.4 m +1.90 m
36.7 m +2.20 m
37 m +2.50 m
37 m +2.50 m
37.5 m +3.00 m
37.5 m +3.00 m
37.5 m +3.00 m
37.7 m +3.20 m
37.9 m +3.40 m
38.1 m +3.60 m
38.3 m +3.80 m
38.3 m +3.80 m
38.7 m +4.20 m
39.2 m +4.70 m

The difference between best and worst was 13.6% (4.7 m ≈ 1 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
115.1 km/h Best
115 km/h -0.10 km/h
113.5 km/h -1.60 km/h
113.4 km/h -1.70 km/h
113.3 km/h -1.80 km/h
113.2 km/h -1.90 km/h
113.1 km/h -2.00 km/h
113 km/h -2.10 km/h
112.9 km/h -2.20 km/h
112.7 km/h -2.40 km/h
112.7 km/h -2.40 km/h
112.6 km/h -2.50 km/h
112.3 km/h -2.80 km/h
112.3 km/h -2.80 km/h
112 km/h -3.10 km/h
111.9 km/h -3.20 km/h
111.6 km/h -3.50 km/h
111.4 km/h -3.70 km/h
111.3 km/h -3.80 km/h
111 km/h -4.10 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 3.6% (4.1 Km/H).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
34.3 m Best
34.5 m +0.20 m
35.2 m +0.90 m
35.9 m +1.60 m
36 m +1.70 m
36 m +1.70 m
36.5 m +2.20 m
37 m +2.70 m
37 m +2.70 m
37.3 m +3.00 m
37.5 m +3.20 m
37.6 m +3.30 m
37.7 m +3.40 m
38 m +3.70 m
38.1 m +3.80 m
38.2 m +3.90 m
38.7 m +4.40 m
39.1 m +4.80 m
39.2 m +4.90 m
39.6 m +5.30 m

The difference between best and worst was 15.5% (5.3 m ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
77.6 km/h Best
77 km/h -0.60 km/h
76.2 km/h -1.40 km/h
76.1 km/h -1.50 km/h
75.8 km/h -1.80 km/h
75.6 km/h -2.00 km/h
75.6 km/h -2.00 km/h
75.4 km/h -2.20 km/h
75.1 km/h -2.50 km/h
75.1 km/h -2.50 km/h
74.7 km/h -2.90 km/h
74.5 km/h -3.10 km/h
74.4 km/h -3.20 km/h
74.2 km/h -3.40 km/h
74.2 km/h -3.40 km/h
74 km/h -3.60 km/h
73.7 km/h -3.90 km/h
73.6 km/h -4.00 km/h
73.6 km/h -4.00 km/h
73.3 km/h -4.30 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (4.3 Km/H).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
90.1 km/h Best
87.3 km/h -2.80 km/h
87.3 km/h -2.80 km/h
86.8 km/h -3.30 km/h
86.7 km/h -3.40 km/h
86.4 km/h -3.70 km/h
86.1 km/h -4.00 km/h
85.6 km/h -4.50 km/h
85.5 km/h -4.60 km/h
85.4 km/h -4.70 km/h
85.1 km/h -5.00 km/h
84.7 km/h -5.40 km/h
84.3 km/h -5.80 km/h
83.8 km/h -6.30 km/h
83.5 km/h -6.60 km/h
83.2 km/h -6.90 km/h
82.8 km/h -7.30 km/h
82.3 km/h -7.80 km/h
82.2 km/h -7.90 km/h
81.2 km/h -8.90 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 9.9% (8.9 Km/H).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
71.7 dB Best
72 dB +0.30 dB
72.3 dB +0.60 dB
72.4 dB +0.70 dB
72.6 dB +0.90 dB
72.6 dB +0.90 dB
72.7 dB +1.00 dB
72.7 dB +1.00 dB
72.7 dB +1.00 dB
72.9 dB +1.20 dB
73 dB +1.30 dB
73.3 dB +1.60 dB
73.4 dB +1.70 dB
73.5 dB +1.80 dB
73.6 dB +1.90 dB
73.7 dB +2.00 dB
73.8 dB +2.10 dB
73.9 dB +2.20 dB
74.1 dB +2.40 dB
76.1 dB +4.40 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6.1% (4.4 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
49,920 KM Best
47,580 KM -2,340 KM
45,240 KM -4,680 KM
44,460 KM -5,460 KM
42,510 KM -7,410 KM
42,120 KM -7,800 KM
41,340 KM -8,580 KM
41,340 KM -8,580 KM
39,000 KM -10,920 KM
38,610 KM -11,310 KM
38,220 KM -11,700 KM
38,220 KM -11,700 KM
37,440 KM -12,480 KM
35,880 KM -14,040 KM
35,100 KM -14,820 KM
34,710 KM -15,210 KM
34,710 KM -15,210 KM
34,710 KM -15,210 KM
31,980 KM -17,940 KM
27,300 KM -22,620 KM

The difference between best and worst was 45.3% (22,620 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
3.91 Price/1000 Best €13.57
4.84 Price/1000 +0.93 Price/1000 €11.04
5.02 Price/1000 +1.11 Price/1000 €12.97
5.19 Price/1000 +1.28 Price/1000 €12.79
5.23 Price/1000 +1.32 Price/1000 €15.24
5.29 Price/1000 +1.38 Price/1000 €13.20
5.38 Price/1000 +1.47 Price/1000 €7.18
5.4 Price/1000 +1.49 Price/1000 €16.51
5.44 Price/1000 +1.53 Price/1000 €15.35
5.57 Price/1000 +1.66 Price/1000 €14.15
5.67 Price/1000 +1.76 Price/1000 €10.72
5.74 Price/1000 +1.83 Price/1000 €14.30
6.17 Price/1000 +2.26 Price/1000 €11.33
6.19 Price/1000 +2.28 Price/1000 €21.41
6.54 Price/1000 +2.63 Price/1000 €16.12
6.72 Price/1000 +2.81 Price/1000 €14.49
6.77 Price/1000 +2.86 Price/1000 €14.49
6.91 Price/1000 +3.00 Price/1000 €20.04
6.98 Price/1000 +3.07 Price/1000 €13.87
7.14 Price/1000 +3.23 Price/1000 €15.46

The difference between best and worst was 82.6% (3.23 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Giti GitiSynergy E1) works out €569 cheaper than the most expensive (Cooper Zeon CS8).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2018 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.2 kg/t Best £0
7.02 kg/t +0.82 kg/t £58
7.04 kg/t +0.84 kg/t £60
7.26 kg/t +1.06 kg/t £75
7.35 kg/t +1.15 kg/t £82
7.51 kg/t +1.31 kg/t £93
7.54 kg/t +1.34 kg/t £95
7.55 kg/t +1.35 kg/t £96
7.61 kg/t +1.41 kg/t £100
7.62 kg/t +1.42 kg/t £101
7.67 kg/t +1.47 kg/t £105
7.77 kg/t +1.57 kg/t £112
7.79 kg/t +1.59 kg/t £113
8.02 kg/t +1.82 kg/t £129
8.12 kg/t +1.92 kg/t £137
8.13 kg/t +1.93 kg/t £137
8.14 kg/t +1.94 kg/t £138
8.44 kg/t +2.24 kg/t £159
8.81 kg/t +2.61 kg/t £186
9.3 kg/t +3.10 kg/t £220

The difference between best and worst was 50% (3.1 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Cooper Zeon CS8 uses about 152 L (£220) more fuel than the Giti GitiSynergy E1.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.