Test Charts / Auto Bild
2026 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 50 Sets
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 245/45 R19
- Tyres tested
- 50
- Disciplines
- 2
- Test vehicle
- BMW 5 Series
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Wet
1Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 33.9 m | +0.90 m | 21 km/h | |
| 35.9 m | +2.90 m | 37 km/h | |
| 36.3 m | +3.30 m | 39 km/h | |
| 37.4 m | +4.40 m | 45 km/h | |
| 37.5 m | +4.50 m | 45 km/h | |
| 37.9 m | +4.90 m | 47 km/h | |
| 38 m | +5.00 m | 47 km/h | |
| 38 m | +5.00 m | 47 km/h | |
| 38.3 m | +5.30 m | 48 km/h | |
| 38.3 m | +5.30 m | 48 km/h | |
| 38.3 m | +5.30 m | 48 km/h | |
| 38.3 m | +5.30 m | 48 km/h | |
| 38.9 m | +5.90 m | 51 km/h | |
| 39.2 m | +6.20 m | 52 km/h | |
| 39.2 m | +6.20 m | 52 km/h | |
| 39.4 m | +6.40 m | 52 km/h | |
| 39.7 m | +6.70 m | 53 km/h | |
| 40 m | +7.00 m | 54 km/h | |
| 40.4 m | +7.40 m | 56 km/h | |
| 40.5 m | +7.50 m | 56 km/h | |
| 40.6 m | +7.60 m | 56 km/h | |
| 40.8 m | +7.80 m | 57 km/h | |
| 40.8 m | +7.80 m | 57 km/h | |
| 41 m | +8.00 m | 57 km/h | |
| 41 m | +8.00 m | 57 km/h | |
| 42.4 m | +9.40 m | 61 km/h | |
| 42.5 m | +9.50 m | 61 km/h | |
| 42.6 m | +9.60 m | 62 km/h | |
| 42.7 m | +9.70 m | 62 km/h | |
| 43.1 m | +10.10 m | 63 km/h | |
| 43.5 m | +10.50 m | 64 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +10.90 m | 65 km/h | |
| 44.1 m | +11.10 m | 65 km/h | |
| 44.6 m | +11.60 m | 66 km/h | |
| 44.7 m | +11.70 m | 67 km/h | |
| 45.1 m | +12.10 m | 67 km/h | |
| 45.1 m | +12.10 m | 67 km/h | |
| 45.7 m | +12.70 m | 69 km/h | |
| 46 m | +13.00 m | 69 km/h | |
| 46.1 m | +13.10 m | 69 km/h | |
| 46.7 m | +13.70 m | 70 km/h | |
| 47.1 m | +14.10 m | 71 km/h | |
| 47.5 m | +14.50 m | 72 km/h | |
| 47.7 m | +14.70 m | 72 km/h | |
| 47.9 m | +14.90 m | 73 km/h | |
| 47.9 m | +14.90 m | 73 km/h | |
| 49.3 m | +16.30 m | 75 km/h | |
| 49.7 m | +16.70 m | 75 km/h | |
| 50.6 m | +17.60 m | 77 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 53.3% (17.6 m ≈ 3.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Triangle Snowlink PL02 would still be travelling at 77 km/h when the Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow
1Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28.9 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 29 m | +0.10 m | 8 km/h | |
| 29.1 m | +0.20 m | 11 km/h | |
| 29.1 m | +0.20 m | 11 km/h | |
| 29.1 m | +0.20 m | 11 km/h | |
| 29.1 m | +0.20 m | 11 km/h | |
| 29.2 m | +0.30 m | 13 km/h | |
| 29.2 m | +0.30 m | 13 km/h | |
| 29.2 m | +0.30 m | 13 km/h | |
| 29.3 m | +0.40 m | 15 km/h | |
| 29.3 m | +0.40 m | 15 km/h | |
| 29.4 m | +0.50 m | 17 km/h | |
| 29.4 m | +0.50 m | 17 km/h | |
| 29.5 m | +0.60 m | 19 km/h | |
| 29.5 m | +0.60 m | 19 km/h | |
| 29.5 m | +0.60 m | 19 km/h | |
| 29.6 m | +0.70 m | 20 km/h | |
| 29.6 m | +0.70 m | 20 km/h | |
| 29.6 m | +0.70 m | 20 km/h | |
| 29.8 m | +0.90 m | 23 km/h | |
| 29.8 m | +0.90 m | 23 km/h | |
| 29.8 m | +0.90 m | 23 km/h | |
| 29.8 m | +0.90 m | 23 km/h | |
| 29.8 m | +0.90 m | 23 km/h | |
| 29.9 m | +1.00 m | 24 km/h | |
| 29.9 m | +1.00 m | 24 km/h | |
| 30 m | +1.10 m | 25 km/h | |
| 30 m | +1.10 m | 25 km/h | |
| 30.1 m | +1.20 m | 26 km/h | |
| 31.1 m | +2.20 m | 35 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (2.2 m ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Landsail Winter Lander would still be travelling at 35 km/h when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Wet Braking
- 80 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 50 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets!
225/40 R1851 tyres tested
26 of these 50 tyres tested again
2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tyres tested
22 of these 50 tyres tested again
2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test
245/45 R1920 tyres tested
20 of these 50 tyres tested again
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P / Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
This test’s winner finished 3rd there
