Menu
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV View Gallery (1)
285-295/40-45 R19-22 3 sizes 2021

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

6.3
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
90%
Wet Grip
83%
Road Feedback
88%
Handling
84%
Wear
63%
Comfort
90%
Buy again
71%
10 Reviews
81% Average
75,150 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 4th)
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV

Summer Premium
BETA
6.3 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 1
Period: 2013 - 2015
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 10
Avg Rating: 81.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.91
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2015 Off Road SUV 4x4 Tyre Test Off Road 2015 255/55 R18 5/9 0 metrics
2013 Auto Review Sports SUV Summer Test 2013 255/55 R18 2/11 0 metrics
2
Tests
4th
Average
2nd
Best
5th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
5th/9
Highest resistance to aquaplaning, good comfort
Average handling on dry surfaces
Goodyear are traditionally strong in the wet, and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV is no exception, scoring the shortest stopping distance in wet braking. The Cayenne had a nice balance during wet handling, but started to aquaplane earlier than the other leading competitors. During dry handling the Goodyear feels a little numb compared to some of the other tyres. Recommended for those who are looking for a safe and comfortable tyre opposed to a sporty drive.

Alternative Tyres

9.2/10
81% 18 reviews
8.0/10
94% 10 reviews
7.9/10
83% 35 reviews
7.5/10
83% 7 reviews
7.1/10
89% 7 reviews
7.1/10
79% 6 reviews
6.5/10
91% 5 reviews
Size Fuel Wet Noise
19 inch
285/45R19 111 W XL C A 72
285/45R19 111 W XL C A 72
22 inch
295/40R22 112 W XL B C 73
295/40R22 112 W XL B C 73
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV >>

Questions and Answers for the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV

Ask a question
September 21, 2020

Can you used the Goodyear 235/60 R18 V (107) EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) SUV AT XL J LR in Winter/all year?

Yes you can, however the F1 Asymmetric SUV is a summer tyre, and as such will have very poor performance in snow when compared to an all season and winter tyre, and a drop in performance in the cold and wet.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
255/50 R19 £227.99 - £227.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
Available in 5 tyre sizes - View all.

Top 3 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Volkswagen TOUAREG V6 TDI (275/45 R20 W) on mostly town for 13,000 average miles
I've gone through various tyres on various cars and never written a review. I initially wanted to buy the LS2 all season tyre which was out of stock so rather than waiting I opted for the 2017 Eagle F1 Asymmetrical SUV XL tyre from Goodyear. I've been very pleased. Noticeably quieter than the continental sport contact 5 and various Hankook and Pirelli tyres. The wear is excellent. I've still got close to 5mm after 2 years use and newrly 13k miles. Very comfortable low noise and good grip. I'm driving a VW Touareg 2016 model so I'm not exactly throwing it about but it grips well when required
Ask a question | Helpful 720
November 13, 2018
Given 94% while driving a Mercedes Benz ML350 (255/60 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,500 spirited miles
I bought these to go on my ML to replace the average tyres it came with, my main aim was for wet grip. These deliver that is spades, simply a brilliant tyre in the wet and equally as good in the wet, they just hang on!
The ML is not a light car so I am not expecting a lot of kilometres out of them, but they are doing very well thus far.
A very good tyre that I will definitely buy again!
January 16, 2018
Volkswagen (275/45 R20) on mostly motorways for 7,000 average miles
Had brand new tyres on the back of my VW Touareg MkII . Reached legal limit (1.6mm) in only 3 months - 7,000 miles. Weare was even across the whole tyre - such a rip off for £175 tyre. Will never buy these again.
May 24, 2017
Have you driven on the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV >

Latest Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV Reviews

Given 83% while driving a Volkswagen Touareg (265/50 R19 W) on a combination of roads for 5,500 spirited miles
In March 2016, I bought four new F1 tires for my VW Touareg V8. I mainly drive medium speed highways (80-140 Km/h) and unpaved roads. Before I place my statement I have to say that the roads I use are very tortuous and I generally drive them fast. I am very much aware of tire pressure control and tire rotation (done at 5.000Km). My comments:
- Cornering is excellent, both on dry and wet conditions.
- Noise is surprisingly very good, even on higher speeds.
- Tire balance is perfect, no vibrations or shimming at all.
- The main issue of this product is wearing. I have less than 8.000 Km and I already have to consider changing tires before the next rain season in October (the outer borders are totally weared out and aquaplaning is scaring my wife to death while I drive through the usual heavy rains that fall during summer time in Brazil).
June 10, 2017
Given 90% while driving a BMW X5 e70 (255/50 R19 W) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Had to change my Pirelli P Zero run-flats on my BMW X5 4.8i. I wanted to change them with another set of Pirelli P Zero run flats, but unfortunately they are not making them anymore for the BMW X5. Instead they told me that Pirelli makes the Pirelli Scorpion Verde for the SUV's now. Going through the tests I found out that the best tires for the SUV's were the Continental ContiSportContact 5 and the Goodyear Eagle F1 AsymmetricSUV. It was very difficult to find the Continental or the Goodyear run flat, in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, but easy to find the Pirelli Scorpion Verde. I almost bought the Pirelli's but luckily I found the Goodyear in Saudi, they had only 4 tires left, and I got them cheaper that the Pirelli's. Really a big change on the car. I thought the Pirelli's P Zero's were good, but I changed my mind after I fitted the Goodyear's. More quit, more comfortable, better grip in dry and excellent in wet. The road feedback in dry is not the best, but they have a very good grip and this is what mostly matters. The road feedback in wet is excellent and the grip is like they are glued on the road. I just used them for 1,000+ miles and I can't comment on the wear. Will update after more miles done.
February 22, 2017
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 51% while driving a Volkswagen TOUAREG V6 TDI (275/45 R20) on mostly motorways for 12,500 average miles
the Goodyear Eagle F1 came as OE on m,y Touareg. After about 12500 miles I noticed the rubber was chipping off the tyre, especially the edges. The flat part of the tyre didn't experience the same flaking/chipping of the tyre and still has several . When shopping around for new tyres several tyre dealers told me that they see this regularly on the Goodyear Eagle F1. I complained to my VW dealer, who basically said it's a tyre issue, and I should take it VW South Africa. VW South Africa also blamed Goodyear and said it's got nothing to do with VW. Wheel alignment was not the problem. The rear tyres didn't experience the same problem. The tyre is average in its class, but there is a specific chipping problem with them. I wish I could upload the photos.
November 11, 2016
Given 97% while driving a Mercedes Benz ML350 (255/60 R17) on a combination of roads for 3,000 spirited miles
Replaced a set of Kumho's (awful tyre!). The Goodyear's handle the weight of the ML very well with good feedback and turn in. Very good wet and dry braking as well as cornering.
Only had for a few months and I would expect high wear, but grip is more important to me. Great tyre, unfortunately expensive.
October 26, 2016
Given 57% while driving a Mercedes Benz ML (225/50 R19 W) on mostly town for 17,150 easy going miles
27600 km need changing - absolutely no longevity at all!
July 26, 2015
Given 94% while driving a Volvo XC90 D5 185 HP (225/50 R19 W) on a combination of roads for 500 average miles
I was pushed towards vredstein by my local dealer when searching for replacements to the stock Pirelli tyres my car left the factory with. Thankfully, the supplier sent the wrong size so he did a good deal on these Goodyears which have transformed the car. Not sure about wear yet but initial feedback is very positive.
April 3, 2013