Menu

Maxxis Victra Sport VS01

The Maxxis Victra Sport VS01 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.9
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
84%
Wet Grip
73%
Road Feedback
79%
Handling
79%
Wear
71%
Comfort
63%
Buy again
73%
8 Reviews
74% Average
52,200 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 11th)
Maxxis Victra Sport VS01

Maxxis Victra Sport VS01

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
6.9 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 3
Period: 2015 - 2016
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 8
Avg Rating: 74.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.06
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2016 Test World Performance Tyre Test Test World 2016 225/40 R18 9/13 0 metrics
2016 ADAC Tyre Test - 225/45 R17 ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 16/16 0 metrics
2015 Auto Bild Performance Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2015 275/35 R19 7/7 0 metrics
3
Tests
11th
Average
7th
Best
16th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
16th/16
Good in the dry
Weak on wet roads
9th/13
Short braking distances on dry roads, low noise
Weak grip and not enough good handling on wet roads
7th/7
None mentioned
Poor handling and long braking distances on wet surfaces, poor resistance to aquaplaning
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
205/55R16 94 W C B 71
17 inch
225/45R17 94 Y D B 71
205/50R17 93 Y D B 71
215/45R17 91 Y D B 71
18 inch
245/40R18 97 Y C B 71
245/45R18 100 Y D B 71
225/40R18 92 Y D B 71
19 inch
235/35R19 91 Y D B 71
20 inch
245/35R20 95 Y D B 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Maxxis Victra Sport VS01 >>

Questions and Answers for the Maxxis Victra Sport VS01

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Maxxis Victra Sport VS01. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Maxxis Victra Sport VS01 Reviews

Given 76% while driving a Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 ZC33S (205/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
40.000km in my Swift turbo. Last 5000km 2mm and less. Good track im doy condition, good too on wet. Great tread wear
Ask a question | Helpful 754
December 15, 2022
Given 46% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 8,000 average miles
My civic type r came with these fitted, and they seemed ok at first, if not a tad noisy. Did find that as the fronts were down to near 2.5mm that road feedback was all over, and wheel spinning was present when accelerating out of junctions etc, and if pushed too far would induce understeer. Have also found that the rears have started feathering and deforming causing god awful rumbling noises. Have since replaced with Nexen tyres and I'm far happier with them than the Maxxis.
October 25, 2021
Given 66% while driving a BMW 335i (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 200 spirited miles
Very decent dry handling. The stiff sidewalls and the compound makes it good on dry asphalt. Also low enough noise. However, that's where the pros stop. This tyre's sidewall is hard therefore you will feel every bump in the road. If you live in country or places where the road conditions are less than ideal, then this tyre is not for you. I live in Jamaica, and I won't be buying this tyre again. It performs better than the khumo, but the road conditions here makes this tire unsuitable.
December 23, 2020
Have you driven on the Maxxis Victra Sport VS01 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Maxxis Victra Sport VS01? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Maxxis Victra Sport VS01 >

Latest Maxxis Victra Sport VS01 Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Subaru 2006 impreza wrx STI (225/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 4,000 spirited miles
Bought these tyres years ago as were fairly cheap n was really surprised at how well they performed, dry grip is brilliant and also wet grip is really good n I'm a very spirited driver, had a 550hp bmw n these were on the front, also a few other BMW's I've had, on a mk4 golf n these were awesome now about to try on my Impreza as love these tires
October 9, 2018
Given 90% while driving a Nissan R32 GTS25 Skyline (245/40 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
initial installation was really good tires and rims litterally didnt need weights to balance for my konig hypergrams freaked the tire shop guy out (i use hubcentric rings to make sure its perfect on car too)

tires weren't noisy but you could hear it slightly with the windows down but its way overpowered by the wind or radio
handled well and while my car is known to step out i could comfortably throttle steer it

traction was there for my car the harder i cornered the harder it gripped into corners id litterally have to really push it at high speeds to lose traction on corners

i could still easily break traction on my drive wheels which wore out really fast in my opinion but im doing lots of burnouts

when the tires got past 70% they became very unpredictable in rain as most of the thread was gone but this is pretty much every single tire ever and it was the most fun time for me anyway,

front tires held up very well

i live in Jamaica an island in the Caribbean so we have a combination of really hot roads in poor condition as well as lots of new highways to stretch out the car on, i regularly commute through rain so ive been able to drive these tires on various terrains, bumpy roads weren't bad and i didnt have to slow down horribly

my car is around 2850lbs so its not the heaviest and heavier cars would perform differently with these tires in my opinion
September 11, 2018
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 70% while driving a Audi A6 TDI Quotro 3.0 S Line (225/40 R19 W) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
I bought these tyres fitted to a 2012 A6 Avant Biturbo. Initially I felt the whole car had some vibration in the chassis but it was only in Germany that I discovered the wheels had not been balanced correctly as the vibration became intolerable at 85 -100mph. Back in the UK I had the wheels checked and they were a long way out. I have not been able to test drive the car at the speeds driven in Germany however the improvement and overall smoothness is much improved up to and around 70mph. I was surprised at just how much weight the tyres took to get them in balance and it is possible that the previous owner has driven the car with out of balance wheels causing uneven wear but there is in excess of 7.5mm tread on the tyres so ??? I have never experienced so much weigh on a car Iv owned before including my previous A6 which was on 17" wheels and Pirelli P7. Where the Maxxis VS 01 beet Pirelli is road noise the Pirelli's absolutely screamed on some of the M25 concrete sections. Too early to fully know these tyres but as a bit of a tyre snob Maxxis would not be top of my mind as a choice for my A6 ....but I live to be surprised.
January 8, 2018
Given 80% while driving a Citroën C4 Grand Picasso (215/45 R18 W) on track for 0 average miles
It is a tire that had my doubts at first, but it was recommended to me by a tire shop and for now I am very happy, as for the value for money. The dry grip is very good and the curving behavior is excellent.
January 1, 2017
Given 83% while driving a Vauxhall (225/45 R18) on mostly country roads for 10,000 average miles
So far these tyres are proving very good indeed. Considering the price, the performance ratings are up there with brands costing considerably more. Having changed all 4 tyres from Uniroyal rainsport 3's, I have to say I was apprehensive at first - but I needn't have been. These tyres are much better than the rainsport 3's in my opinion. For starters, the tyres seem quieter and more responsive. Grip-wise, they seem slightly better if anything yet wear far better and evenly. Even in the wet, the tyres perform admirably and consistently. The ones I have at 225 45 18 are reinforced, so plenty sturdy enough for my Astra TDCI SRi. Maxxis are well respected amongst mountain bikers, cyclists, ATVers, Clio cup racing etc etc - seemingly this knowledge is 100% transferable to road going tyres. Excellent ones at that! To sum up: Brilliant tyres for the money and no doubt people will cotton on to this very soon. Hopefully this won't result in a price hike, because as it stands, they really are a gem.
July 10, 2015