Menu

Michelin X Ice Snow

The Michelin X-Ice Snow is a premium touring winter tyre built with a clear Nordic-winter bias. It delivers very high confidence on ice and strong traction and braking on snow, with calm, predictable handling. Comfort, refinement and efficiency are standout traits, making it an easy tyre to live with through the colder months. Its main compromise is on wet and dry asphalt, where grip and stopping performance can lag behind more road-focused rivals.

0.3
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
78%
Wet Grip
79%
Road Feedback
75%
Handling
74%
Wear
90%
Comfort
88%
Buy again
91%
Snow Grip
94%
Ice Grip
85%
16 Reviews
84% Average
210,470 miles driven
13 Tests (avg: 4th)
Michelin X Ice Snow

Michelin X Ice Snow

Winter Premium
BETA
0.3 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
83
0.29x / 11 tests
Snow
81.7
1.5x / 34 tests
Value
80.3
0.38x / 9 tests
Ice
78.5
1.26x / 29 tests
Dry
58.5
1.2x / 18 tests
Wet
58.1
2x / 32 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
77.8
17 tests
Handling
71
48 tests
Braking
69.7
37 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 13
Publications: 6
Period: 2020 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 16
Avg Rating: 83.9%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.24
History Points: 6
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test Teknikens Varld 2025 235/45 R18 4/20 6 metrics
The Best Snow Tyres for 2025/26 Tyre Reviews 2025 205/55 R16 4/7 21 metrics
2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test Tekniikan Maailma 2025 205/55 R16 6/14 10 metrics
2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2024 225/45 R17 4/8 13 metrics
The Best Studded / Friction Winter Tyres for 2024 Teknikens Varld 2024 225/50 R17 5/17 0 metrics
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2023 225/45 R17 4/8 13 metrics
2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tyre Test TESTIRENKAAT 2023 205/55 R16 3/8 9 metrics
2022/23 Tyre Reviews Studless Winter Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2022 205/55 R16 1/9 20 metrics
Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 vs Michelin X-Ice Snow Tyre Reviews 2021 245/40 R18 1/3 3 metrics
2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test Teknikens Varld 2021 205/55 R16 4/16 11 metrics
2020 Vi Bilagare Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2020 205/60 R16 6/8 12 metrics
The Best Winter Tyres for 2020 Tyre Reviews 2020 205/55 R16 1/19 0 metrics
2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test Test World 2020 205/55 R16 8/20 15 metrics
13
Tests
4th
Average
1st
Best
8th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
4th/7
Very good snow braking, best ice braking and ice traction.
Weakest dry and wet performance with significantly extended wet braking distances, average rolling resistance.
The Michelin X-Ice Snow finishing fourth by a small margin was not on my bingo card at the start of this test, but data is data. It was strong overall in ice and not too far off the top 3 in the snow, but when you factor in a high rolling resistance and the weakest dry and wet performances overall, fourth is as good as it gets for the french tyre. It is now an aging product, hopefully there will be an update soon.

Satisfactory 2025/26 Best Snow Tyres Michelin X Ice Snow
The Michelin X-Ice Snow offers top-notch braking grip on ice, but its drivability is hindered by weaker lateral grip, causing the front tyres to lose traction quickly during fast maneuvers. It reacts slowly to steering inputs but behaves logically and predictably on snowy surfaces. On both wet and dry asphalt, its grip is weak and handling feels sluggish, making it difficult to navigate evasive maneuvers, although the rear tyres always maintain stability.
The Michelin X-Ice Snow continues to deliver mediocre ice performance, which simply isn't good enough for a tyre in this category. While the tyre made improvements this year compared to last year's test in dimension 225/50 R17, where it placed near the bottom, the change to a China-produced tyre (versus Canada previously) shows some progress. Stability stands out positively, being noticeably better than many competitors. Ice grip remains the weaker area, and snow grip is entirely acceptable but not exceptional. Where this tyre truly excels is in comfort - when switched to this tyre from the brutally loud Kumho, nearly all road noise disappears and the car suddenly becomes remarkably quiet. The ride quality and refinement are outstanding. Aquaplaning performance follows the typical Nordic friction pattern of being adequate but unexceptional. For drivers who rarely encounter genuinely icy conditions but want winter capability with excellent comfort, this could work, but the ice performance gap to the leaders remains too large for Nordic conditions.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
175/65R14 86 T XL D E 67
185/70R14 92 T XL C E 67
165/70R14 85 T XL D E 67
15 inch
195/65R15 95 T XL B E 69
185/65R15 92 T XL C E 67
16 inch
215/60R16 99 H XL C E 69
205/55R16 94 H XL C E 69
205/60R16 96 H XL C E 69
17 inch
225/60R17 103 T XL B E 69
225/50R17 98 H XL C E 69
215/55R17 98 H XL C E 69
215/45R17 91 H XL C E 69
205/50R17 93 H XL D E 69
225/45R17 94 H XL C E 69
18 inch
255/35R18 94 H XL C E 71
245/40R18 97 H XL C E 71
245/45R18 100 H XL C E 71
225/40R18 92 H XL C E 69
245/45R18 100 H XL C E 71
19 inch
235/35R19 91 H XL C E 69
20 inch
245/35R20 95 H XL C E 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Michelin X Ice Snow >>

Questions and Answers for the Michelin X Ice Snow

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Michelin X Ice Snow. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

YouTube Review

Review Summary

Based on 14 user reviews

Most drivers rate the Michelin X Ice Snow highly for confident winter performance, especially strong traction and braking on snow and generally solid grip on ice, with predictable handling. Comfort and noise are typically praised, and several note slow wear. A minority report weaker performance on wet or smooth/black ice and average dry/wet road grip versus all-season or studded options. Overall sentiment is strongly positive with durability and winter grip leading the praise.

Strengths
  • Snow traction
  • Ice grip (overall)
  • Predictable handling
  • Low wear/longevity
  • Ride comfort
  • Low noise
Areas for Improvement
  • Reduced grip on smooth/black ice vs studded
  • Average dry/wet road grip for non-winter conditions
  • Some road noise

Top 3 Michelin X Ice Snow Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Lexus IS350 (235/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Very good tire for my 2023 Lexus is 350 . 19 inch tyres for my car is expensive, so I went with my favourite brand Michelin . Did 7000 km on them , in Quebec, Canadian winters . So far I am very satisfied with the handling, grip in heavy snow and icy roads. Very comfortable ride , very quiet to. Almost no wear noticeable. I highly recommend these tires .
Ask a question | Helpful 925
November 12, 2024
Given 93% while driving a Toyota Proace Verso (215/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 1,500 easy going miles
Michelin X-Ice Snow is an excellent winter tyre for northern Sweden. The road conditions are extreme, with deep snow, as well as slippery wet ice. Not a single time I have missed the studded tyres I used the previous two winters on this car.
December 29, 2024
Given 76% while driving a Alfa Romeo 159 (215/50 R18) on mostly country roads for 50 average miles
Fitted the x ice snow as they were one of few nordic winter tyres available in my size. The other one was Hakkapeliitta R5. I have had hakkas before with great success, but decided to go for michelin this time because of better longevity, since these alfas are known for eating front tires. The x ices was 1250 euros fitted on car.

Where i live there are either tarmac or ice. Rarely snow. And the snow get to slush, and then ice again. So that is the conditions these tyres are tested on.

Asphalt, dry or wet. Very reassuring, and calm feeling trough the tires. Good grip, with early signals when pushing the car too much. The general comfort and rolling is great....maybe a little bit more noise than i expected. More than pirellis fr's for example. But i think that is to blame for the knobby, tractor like tread pattern of the x-snows.

Ice.... terrible! I don't know if that is just me being used to studded nordic tyres, but even the studless hakka r3 i remember was better on ice than these. I suspect that has to to with harder compound. That is just not for michelin, but a trend that seems to be in almost all tyres nowadays. Maybe because of high torque cars. I miss the really soft rubbery tyres for like 10 years ago. I have a car with bf ko2' and they are just a little bit worse than x ice snow on the same hill.

I know x ice snow was best with r5 in ice grip, so don't take my opinion for granted, but at least on black ice of western norway, there was not much grip to be found.

But then the snow came, at least for 2 days. And wow! I understand the name x ice SNOW. The pattern just paks down the snow and grip. No need to explain. Other than a 4x4 volvo struggled where i drove straight up a snowy hill with fwd.

So these tyres are great at snow and overall driving on asphalt. Wet asphalt are my 80% driving so that is good. The only drawback are grip on ice. But maybe my only option for that should have been the x ice north 4 studded. But studless tyres is because i don't have to pay stud taxes in the cities.

After 300 miles the tyres settled more in i can feel. Will try on ice again.

Will report later on wear.
December 3, 2023
Have you driven on the Michelin X Ice Snow tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Michelin X Ice Snow? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Michelin X Ice Snow >

Latest Michelin X Ice Snow Reviews

Given 83% while driving a Toyota 2023 Toyota GR Corolla (215/50 R17) on mostly country roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Very good all around winter tire.
Strong grip on snow and ice.
Minimal wear after 2 full winters.
Dry grip is not the main feature of this tire.
December 1, 2025
Given 87% while driving a Honda Fit (Jazz) (175/65 R15) on mostly motorways for 100,000 spirited miles
This is my third set of Xice tires

Just bought a new set have had two sets previously

Have driven on many different studded tires from cheapest to premium, went to studless as I was doing a long highway commute and was sick of the noise, and legal limits on when to have the tires on and off.

I drive in the worst of Canadian weather in Newfoundland Canada. Snow slush freezing rain we see it all.

The original Xice was better in deep snow

The newest ones are great winter tires but twitchy at the limit of traction

I only miss studs on wet smooth ice

If you drive on a well serviced road these are great tires

Had blizzacks DMV 2 on our van. There better but wear extremely fast

If you get a lot of smooth ice or wet ice go with the studded version or a Hakka 10 studded

Third set debating between Xice studded or Hakkas for my wife’s Subaru as she makes a trip across Newfoundland Canada at least once a winter 1000 km drive.
November 17, 2025
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 79% while driving a Mazda mx 5 (185/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Positive point: excellent snow and ice. I took a road trip in a Mazda MX5 to the North Cape in Norway in winter, -25c° icy road and everything went very well. Wear. Price.
Negative point: very average dry and wet road but they are not made for that
Redemption? Maybe, I plan to do another road trip to Scandinavia in winter, they will be on my short list
April 19, 2024
Given 78% while driving a Subaru 04 baja (225/60 R17) on a combination of roads for 700 spirited miles
I've had these fitted to my 2013 Outback 3.6R for this snow season in northern Michigan. Unless the car is over bumper height in snow and at a dead stop, you can just keep driving. They are predictable on ice and will actually stop. Lateral behavior in the snow is extremely impressive and can carry frankly irresponsible speeds around corners. Steering feedback is decent. They're no summer tire but better than the General Altimax RT43s that they replaced on this set of wheels.
December 28, 2022
Given 100% while driving a Buick Lacrosse (245/45 R19) on mostly town for 200 easy going miles
I purchased these tires for my 2014 Buick LaCrosse (FWD) in November 2022 just before the first significant snowfall of the North Dakota Winter. Since then we have had and continue to have plenty of snow and icy roads. They have performed way beyond my expectations and easily navigate through 4-6 inches of fresh snow. Our streets quickly become icy with packed snow and the tires proved themselves with a sure grip. I don't try to go where it is obvious a 4 wheel drive is necessary, but if you respect Mother Nature and realize your limits, you will be very happy with these tires.
December 16, 2022
Given 87% while driving a Subaru Outback (225/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
Last year I replaced a set of Michelin x-ice xi2 with the x-ice snow. I have found the x-ice snows have more grip in the snow and ice and particularly more lateral grip than the xi2. While still a fairly quiet and comfortable winter tire, the x-ice snows are less so than the xi2. However, I am happy to make that trade in a winter tire. So far wear has been excellent.
October 10, 2022
Given 96% while driving a Audi 1.8T Quattro (205/60 R16) on a combination of roads for 3,000 easy going miles
Extremely comfortable and pretty quiet. Very good on snow. Breaking on ice still feels little bit worse than Michelin X-Ice Xi2 I used before.
March 18, 2022
Tesla Model S (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 6,000 spirited miles
Absolutely superb winter tire. As we near one of the snowiest winters in several years in northeast Ohio, I can say with confidence these are the best snow tires I’ve used. I was a Blizzak believer until these tires. And while the Blizzaks are still one of the best snow tires available, the Michelin X-Ice Snow outperforms them in every way. Road noise, while present, is is unobtrusive, especially for a vehicle as quiet as a Tesla. The ride was firm and confident, and slightly better than the OEM Goodyear Touring that came with the car. Range dropped slightly, but not excessively. Wet grip was better than the OEM Goodyears as well. As for wear, I expect to get 3-4 winter seasons (18,000-24,000 miles), which I think is good for a winter tire driven “spiritedly” on a car as heavy as a Tesla. I will absolutely buy again.
March 10, 2022
Tesla Model S (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 6,000 spirited miles
Absolutely superb winter tire. As we near one of the snowiest winters in several years in northeast Ohio, I can say with confidence these are the best snow tires I’ve used. I was a Blizzak believer until these tires. And while the Blizzaks are still one of the best snow tires available, the Michelin X-Ice Snow outperforms them in every way. Road noise, while present, is is unobtrusive, especially for a vehicle as quiet as a Tesla. The ride was firm and confident, and slightly better than the OEM Goodyear Touring that came with the car. Range dropped slightly, but not excessively. Wet grip was better than the OEM Goodyears as well. As for wear, I expect to get 3-4 winter seasons (18,000-24,000 miles), which I think is good for a winter tire driven “spiritedly” on a car as heavy as a Tesla. I will absolutely buy again.
March 6, 2022
Given 86% while driving a Chevrolet Avalanche (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 20 average miles
I continue to be impressed with these tires, they are the best winter tires I have ever owned.
December 29, 2021
Given 93% while driving a Fiat Panda 4 x4 (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Previously owned the Michelin alpin 4a on a volkswagen tiguan. Fantastic tyres, Decided to choose the new version for my Fiat Panda cross. The x ice snow is an amazing tyre. It has been raining and snowing for the last month, i leave for work every morning in -10c and come home at night in -3c. Fresh snow, sludge, rain and ice. The tyre is amazing. I feel confident while driving In all conditions. Recently went offroading in a few mountain trails. Parked the car up and iced road, jumped out with the kids, and we could not walk without falling over, Completely iced over. I did not even realise there was ice, the tyres did not brake traction once.. Amazing tyres on ice, amazing. I have always used michelin , on all my cars. weather summer or winter. Never let me down.
December 5, 2020